Changing placement policy may help to improve developmental education student outcomes in community colleges, but there is little understanding of the impacts of these reforms. We take advantage of heterogeneous placement policy in a large urban community college district in California to compare the effects of math remediation under different policy contexts. District colleges either switched from using math diagnostics to using computer-adaptive tests, or raised placement cutoffs. We use quasi-experimental methods to identify the impact of remediation under each policy and the change in impact following placement policy experimentation. We find that switching to a computer-adaptive test exacerbated the penalty of remediation for marginal students and resulted in more placement errors. Modestly raising placement cutoffs had no significant effects.
ArmstrongW. B. (2000). The association among student success in courses, placement test scores, student background data, and instructor grading practices. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 24, 681–695.
2.
AseraR. (2011). Innovation at scale: How Virginia community colleges are collaborating to improve developmental education and increase student success. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.
3.
BaileyT.JeongD. W.ChoS. W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29, 255–270.
BurdmanP. (2012). Where to begin? The evolving role of placement exams for students starting college. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.
6.
BurdmanP. (2015). Degrees of freedom: Probing math placement policies at California colleges and universities (No. 3). Stanford: Policy Analysis for California Education.
7.
CameronA. C.GelbachJ. B.MillerD. L. (2011). Robust inference with multiway clustering. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 29(2), 238–249.
8.
ClarkB. (1960). The open door college. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
9.
CohenA. M.BrawerF. B. (2003). The American community college. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
10.
Deil-AmenR.TevisT. L. (2010). Circumscribed agency: The relevance of standardized college entrance exams for low SES high school students. The Review of Higher Education, 33, 141–175.
FieldsR.ParsadB. (2012). Tests and cut scores used for student placement in postsecondary education: Fall 2011. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.
13.
FongK.MelguizoT.PratherG. (2015). Increasing success rates in developmental math: The complementary role of individual and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9368-9
FultonM. (2012). Using state policies to ensure effective assessment and placement in remedial education. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
16.
HodaraM.JaggarsS. S.KarpM. M. (2012). Improving developmental education assessment and placement: Lessons from community colleges across the country (CCRC Working Paper No. 51). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
17.
HuangC.-W.SnipesJ.FinkelsteinN. (2014). Using assessment data to guide math course placement of California middle school students (REL 2014–040). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
18.
HughesK. L.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2011). Assessing developmental assessment in community colleges. Community College Review, 39, 327–351.
19.
ImbensG.KalyanaramanK. (2012). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 79, 933–959.
20.
JaggarsS. S.HodaraM. (2013). The opposing forces that shape developmental education. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 37, 575–579.
21.
JenkinsD.JaggarsS. S.RoksaJ. (2009). Promoting gatekeeper course success among community college students needing remediation: Findings and recommendations from a Virginia Study. New York, NY: Community College Research Center. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED507824
22.
LeeD. S.LemieuxT. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 281–355.
23.
MartorellP.McFarlinI.Jr. (2011). Help or hindrance? The effects of college remediation on academic and labor market outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 436–454.
24.
MartorellP.McFarlinI.Jr.XueY. (2015). Does failing a placement exam discourage underprepared students from enrolling college?Education Finance and Policy, 10, 46–80.
25.
MarwickJ. D. (2004). Charting a path to success: The association between institutional placement policies and the academic success of Latino students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28, 263–280.
26.
MatternK. D.PackmanS. (2009). Predictive validity of ACCUPLACER scores for course placement: A meta-analysis (Research Report No. 2009-2). New York, NY: College Board.
27.
MedhanieA. G.DupuisD. N.LeBeauB.HarwellM. R.PostT. R. (2012). The role of the ACCUPLACER mathematics placement test on a student’s first college mathematics course. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 332–351.
28.
MelguizoT. (2011). A review of the theories developed to describe the process of college persistence and attainment. In SmartJ. C.PaulsenM. B. (Eds.) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 395–424). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
29.
MelguizoT.BosH.NgoF.MillsN.PratherG. (in press). Using a regression discontinuity design to estimate the impact of placement decisions in developmental math. Research in Higher Education.
30.
MelguizoT.HagedornL. S.CypersS. (2008). Remedial/developmental education and the cost of community college transfer: A Los Angeles County sample. The Review of Higher Education, 31, 401–431.
31.
MelguizoT.KosiewiczH.PratherG.BosH. (2014). How are community college students assessed and placed in developmental math? Grounding our understanding in reality. Journal of Higher Education, 85, 691–722.
32.
MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2010). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education & Southern Regional Education Board. (2010). Beyond the rhetoric: Improving college readiness through coherent state policy. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. Retrieved from http://publications.sreb.org/2010/Beyond%20the%20Rhetoric.pdf
34.
NgoF.KwonW. (2015). Using multiple measures to make math placement decisions: Implications for access and success in community colleges. Research in Higher Education, 56, 442–470.
35.
PapayJ. P.MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2011). How performance information affects human-capital investment decisions: The impact of test-score labels on educational outcomes (No. w17120). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
36.
PerryM.BahrP. M.RosinM.WoodwardK. M. (2010). Course-taking patterns, policies, and practices in developmental education in the California Community Colleges. Mountain View, CA: EdSource.
37.
ReardonS. F.RobinsonJ. P. (2012). Regression discontinuity designs with multiple rating-score variables. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5, 83–104.
38.
RobinsonJ. P. (2011). Evaluating criteria for English learner reclassification: A causal-effects approach using a binding-score regression discontinuity design with instrumental variables. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 267–292.
RodríguezO.BowdenB.BelfieldC.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2014, September). Remedial placement testing in community colleges: What resources are required, and what does it cost? (CCRC Working Paper No. 73). New York, NY: Community College Research Center.
41.
Scott-ClaytonJ.CrostaP.BelfieldC. (2014). Improving the targeting of treatment: Evidence from college remediation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 371–393.
42.
Scott-ClaytonJ.RodriguezO. (2015). Development, discouragement, or diversion? New evidence on the effects of college remediation. Education Finance and Policy, 10, 4–45.
43.
StiglerJ. W.GivvinK. B.ThompsonB. J. (2010). What community college developmental mathematics students understand about mathematics. MathAMATYC Educator, 1(3), 4–16.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
