The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) is a policy change to the federally administered National School Lunch Program that allows schools serving low-income populations to classify all students as eligible for free meals, regardless of individual circumstances. This has implications for the use of free and reduced-price meal (FRM) data to proxy for student disadvantage in education research and policy applications, which is a common practice. We document empirically how the CEP has affected the value of FRM eligibility as a proxy for student disadvantage. At the individual student level, we show that there is essentially no effect of the CEP. However, the CEP does meaningfully change the information conveyed by the share of FRM-eligible students in a school. It is this latter measure that is most relevant for policy uses of FRM data.
AltindagD. T.BaekD.LeeH.MerkleJ. (in press). Free lunch for all? The impact of universal school lunch on student misbehavior. Economics of Education Review.
2.
BassD. N. (2010). Fraud in the lunchroom?Education Next, 10(1), 67–71.
ChingosM. M. (2016). No more free lunch for education policymakers and researchers. Evidence Speaks Reports, 1(20), 1–4.
6.
ChingosM. M. (2018). A promising alternative to subsidized lunch receipt as a measure of student poverty [Policy report]. Brookings Institute.
7.
DominaT.Pharris-CiurejN.PennerA. M.PennerA. K.BrummetQ.PorterS. R.SanabriaT. (2018). Is free and reduced-price lunch a valid measure of educational disadvantage?Educational Researcher, 47(9), 539–555.
GindlingT. H.MataC.KitchinJ.AvilaE. (2018). Some causes of undercount of low income students under the Community Eligibility Provision in Baltimore City Public Schools [Department of Economics Working Paper Series Paper No. 18-01]. University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
12.
GordonN. E.RuffiniK. J. (2018). School nutrition and student discipline: Effects of schoolwide free meals [National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 24986]. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24986
13.
GreenbergE. (2018). New measures of student poverty: Replacing free and reduced-price lunch status based on household forms with direct certification [Education policy program policy brief]. Urban Institute.
14.
GreenbergE.BlaggK.RainerM. (2019). Measuring student poverty [Policy report]. Urban Institute.
HarwellM.LeBeauB. (2010). Student eligibility for a free lunch as an SES measure in education research. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 120–131.
17.
HoffmanL. (2012). Free and reduced-price lunch eligibility data in EDFacts: A White paper on current status and potential changes [Unpublished manuscript]. United States Department of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556048.pdf
18.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2017). Low-income student calculation study [Policy report].
19.
MichelmoreK.DynarskiS. (2017). The gap within the gap: Using longitudinal data to understand income differences in educational outcomes. AERA Open, 3(1), 1–18.
20.
MooreQ.ConwayK.KlyerB.GothroA. (2016). Direct certification in the national school lunch program: State implementation progress, school year 2014-2015 [Report to Congress]. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
21.
NeubergerZ.SegalB.NchakoC.MastersonK. (2015). Take up of community eligibility this school year: More than 6 million children have better access to school meals [Policy report]. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
SchwartzA.E.RothbartM.W. (2020). Let them eat lunch: The impact of universal free meals on student performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(2), 376–410.
24.
SimpsonE. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13(2), 238–241.
25.
SnyderT. D.de BreyC.DillowS. A. (2019). Digest of education statistics 2017. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
ZedlewskiS. R.Martinez-SchiferlM. (2010). Low-income Hispanic children need both private and public food assistance (Policy Brief 2). Urban Institute.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
