Improving Preservice Teachers’ Feelings of Preparedness to Teach Through Recruitment of Instructionally Effective and Experienced Cooperating Teachers: A Randomized Experiment
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2020
Improving Preservice Teachers’ Feelings of Preparedness to Teach Through Recruitment of Instructionally Effective and Experienced Cooperating Teachers: A Randomized Experiment
New studies show that the instructional effectiveness of preservice candidates and their cooperating teachers are positively related. However, we neither know if these relationships are causal nor, assuming they are, if it is possible to significantly increase the instructional effectiveness of the cooperating teacher pool. In this study, we randomly assign districts to receive recommendation lists (generated using administrative data) for the recruitment of more promising cooperating teachers. Districts receiving lists recruited significantly more effective/experienced cooperating teachers, while candidates placed in these districts felt significantly better prepared to teach. As a result, this study offers an innovative, low-cost strategy for recruiting effective/experienced cooperating teachers and presents the first causal estimates that more effective/experienced cooperating teachers improve candidates’ preparedness to teach.
BastianK. C.PattersonK. M.PanY. (2018). Evaluating teacher preparation programs with teacher evaluation ratings: Implications for program accountability and improvement. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117718182
2.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley.
3.
GlennW. J. (2006). Model versus mentor: Defining the necessary qualities of the effective cooperating teacher. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(1), 85–95.
4.
GoldhaberD.KriegJ.TheobaldR. (2018a). The costs of mentorship? Exploring student teaching placements and their impact on student achievement (CEDR Working Paper No. 03132018-1-1). http://www.cedr.us/papers/working/CEDR%20WP%202018-1.pdf
GrossmanP.RonfeldtM.CohenJ. J. (2012). The power of setting: The role of field experience in learning to teach. In HarrisK. R.GrahamS.UrdanT.BusA. G.MajorS.SwansonH. L. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 3: Application to learning and teaching (pp. 311–334). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13275-023
KraftM. A.BlazarD.HoganD. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
12.
KriegJ. M.GoldhaberD.TheobaldR. (2020). Teacher candidate apprenticeships: Assessing the who and where of student teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(2), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119858983
13.
KriegJ. M.TheobaldR.GoldhaberD. (2016). A foot in the door: Exploring the role of student teaching assignments in teachers’ initial job placements. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 364–388.
14.
MaierA.YoungsP. (2009). Teacher preparation programs—And teacher labor markets: How social capital may help explain teachers’ career choices. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109341149
15.
MatskoK. K.RonfeldtM.Nolan GreeneH.KlugmanJ.ReiningerM.BrockmanS. L. (2020). Cooperating teacher as model and coach: What leads to student teachers’ perceptions of preparedness?Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118791992
MullmanH.RonfeldtM. (2019). Walking around the puddles: The landscape of clinical preparation in Tennessee. [Unpublished manuscript]. School of Education, University of Michigan.
18.
PapayJ. P.KraftM. A. (2015). Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: Methodological challenges and new evidence on long-term career improvement. Journal of Public Economics, 130, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.02.008
19.
RickenbrodeR.DrakeG.PomeranceL.WalshK. (2018). 2018 teacher prep review. National Council on Teacher Quality.
20.
RonfeldtM. (2012). Where should student teachers learn to teach?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711420865
21.
RonfeldtM.BardelliE.BrockmanS. L.MullmanH. (2020). Will mentoring a student teacher harm my evaluation scores? Effects of serving as a cooperating teacher on evaluation metrics. American Educational Research Journal, 57(3), 1392–1437. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219872952
22.
RonfeldtM.BrockmanS. L.CampbellS. L. (2018). Does cooperating teachers’ instructional effectiveness improve preservice teachers’ future performance?Educational Researcher, 47(7), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18782906
RonfeldtM.MatskoK. K.Greene NolanH.ReiningerM. (2020). Three different measures of graduates’ instructional readiness and the features of preservice preparation that predict them. Journal of Teacher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120919753
25.
RozelleJ. J.WilsonS. M. (2012). Opening the black box of field experiences: How cooperating teachers’ beliefs and practices shape student teachers’ beliefs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1196–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.008
SAS Institute. (2014). Preliminary report: The impact of candidates on teacher value-added reporting.
28.
SchwilleS. A. (2008). The professional practice of mentoring. American Journal of Education, 115(1), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1086/590678
29.
Yendol-HoppeyD. (2007). Mentor teachers’ work with prospective teachers in a newly formed professional development school: Two illustrations. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 669–698.
30.
ZeichnerK.GoreJ. (1990). Teacher socialization. In HoustonW. R. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 329–348). Macmillan.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
