Informal and institutional barriers may limit teacher movement between charter schools and traditional public schools (TPSs). However, we know little about how teachers choose schools in areas with a robust charter school sector. This study uses qualitative data from 123 teachers to examine teachers’ job decisions in three cities with varying charter densities: San Antonio, Detroit, and New Orleans. Our findings illuminate different types of segmentation and factors that facilitate and limit mobility between sectors. We find that structural policies within each sector can create barriers to mobility across charter schools and TPSs and that teachers’ ideological beliefs and values serve as informal, personal barriers that reinforce divides between sectors. This study offers implications for policy in districts with school choice.
AchinsteinB.OgawaR. T.SextonD.FreitasC. (2010). Retaining teachers of color: A pressing problem and a potential strategy for “hard-to-staff” schools. Review of Educational Research, 80, 71–107.
2.
AdamsonF.Darling-HammondL. (2012). Funding disparities and the inequitable distribution of teachers: Evaluating sources and solutions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(37), 1–46.
3.
BacolodM. (2007). Who teaches and where they choose to teach: College graduates of the 1990s. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 155–168.
4.
BallS. J.DaviesJ.DavidM.ReayD. (2002). “Classification” and “judgement”: Social class and the “cognitive structures” of choice of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23, 51–72. doi:10.1080/01425690120102854
5.
BehlingO.LabovitzG.GainerM. (1968). College recruiting: A theoretical base. Personnel Journal, 47, 13–19.
6.
BellC. A. (2009). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 191–208.
7.
BormanG. D.DowlingN. M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 367–409.
8.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2008). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 113–132.
9.
BrownK. D. (2014). Teaching in color: A critical race theory in education analysis of the literature on preservice teachers of color and teacher education in the U.S. Race Ethnicity and Education, 17, 326–345.
10.
BurasK. (2015). Charter schools, race, and urban space: Where the market meets grassroots resistance. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
Burian-FitzgeraldM.LuekensM. T.StrizekG. A. (2004). Less red tape or more green teachers: Charter school autonomy and teacher qualifications. In BulkleyK. E.WohlstetterP. (Eds.), Taking account of charter schools: What’s happened and what’s next (pp. 11–31). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
12.
CableD. M.JudgeT. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294–311.
13.
CannataM. A. (2010). Understanding the teacher job search process: Espoused preferences and preferences in use. Teachers College Record, 112, 2889–2934.
14.
CannataM. A. (2011). Charter schools and the teacher job search. Journal of School Choice, 5, 111–133.
15.
CannataM. A.PenalozaR. (2012). Who are charter school teachers? Comparing teacher characteristics, job choices, and job preferences. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(29), 1–21
16.
CarruthersC. K. (2012). The qualifications and classroom performance of teachers moving to charter schools. Education Finance and Policy, 7, 233–268.
17.
D’AmicoD.PawlewiczR. J.EarleyP. M.McGeehanA. P. (2017). Where are all the Black teachers? Discrimination in the teacher labor market. Harvard Educational Review, 87, 26–49.
EsbenshadeL. (2018, April17). A bifurcation in the labor force? Public and charter school teachers. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association (AERA) Conference, New York, NY.
20.
FengL.SassT. R. (2018). The impact of incentives to recruit and retain teachers in “hard-to-staff” subjects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37, 112–135.
21.
FiglioD. N.KennyL. W. (2007). Individual teacher incentives and student performance. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 901–914.
22.
FreedmanS. W.ApplemanD. (2009). “In it for the long haul”—How teacher education can contribute to teacher retention in high-poverty, urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 323–337.
23.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
24.
GulosinoC.NiY. (2018, January13). Newly hired teacher mobility in charter schools and traditional public schools: An application of segmented labor market theory. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association (AERA) Conference, New York, NY.
25.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2004). The revolving door: A path-breaking study of teachers in Texas reveals that working conditions matter more than salary. Education Next, 4, 76–82.
26.
HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2010). Constrained job matching: Does teacher job search harm disadvantaged urban schools? (No. w15816). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
HenryK. L.DixsonA. D. (2016). “Locking the door before we got the keys”: Racial realities of the charter school authorization process in post-Katrina New Orleans. Educational Policy, 30, 218–240.
29.
HorngE. L. (2009). Teacher tradeoffs: Disentangling teachers’ preferences for working conditions and student demographics. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 690–717.
30.
HoxbyC. M. (2000). Would school choice change the teaching profession?The Journal of Human Resources, 37, 846–891.
31.
HughesG. D. (2012). Teacher retention: Teacher characteristics, school characteristics, organizational characteristics, and teacher efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 105, 245–255.
32.
IngersollR. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499–534.
33.
IngersollR.MerillL. (2017). A quarter century of changes in the elementary and secondary teaching force: From 1987 to 2012. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017092
34.
JacksonC. K. (2012). School competition and teacher labor markets: Evidence from charter school entry in North Carolina. Journal of Public Economics, 96, 431–448.
35.
Jameson BrewerT.KretchmarK.SondelB.IshmaelS.McGlinn ManfraM. (2016). Teach for America’s preferential treatment: School district contracts, hiring decisions, and employment practices. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 24, 1–31.
36.
JohnsonS. M.KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39.
37.
KallebergA. L. (2018). Precarious lives: Job insecurity and well-being in rich democracies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
38.
KalogridesD.LoebS.BéteilleT. (2013). Systematic sorting teacher characteristics and class assignments. Sociology of Education, 86, 103–123.
39.
KolbeT.StrunkK. O. (2012). Economic incentives as a strategy for responding to teacher staffing problems: A typology of policies and practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 779–813.
40.
KretchmarK.SondelB.FerrareJ. J. (2014). Mapping the terrain: Teach for America, charter school reform, and corporate sponsorship. Journal of Education Policy, 29, 742–759. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.880812
41.
LankfordM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62.
42.
LinN.DuminM. (1986). Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8, 365–385.
43.
LincoveJ. A.BarrettN.StrunkK. O. (2018). Lessons from Hurricane Katrina: The employment effects of the mass dismissal of New Orleans teachers. Educational Researcher, 47, 191–203.
44.
LittleJ. W.BartlettL. (2010). The teacher workforce and problems of educational equity. Review of Research in Education, 34, 285–328.
45.
LoebS.KalogridesD.HorngE. L. (2010). Principal preferences and the uneven distribution of principals across schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 205–229.
46.
LoebS.ReiningerM. (2004). Public policy and teacher labor markets: What we know and why it matters. The Education Policy Center at Michigan State University. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED485592.pdf
47.
MalloyC. L.WohlstetterP. (2003). Working conditions in charter schools: What’s the appeal for teachers?Education and Urban Society, 35, 219–241.
48.
MatsudairaJ. D.PattersonR. W. (2017). Teachers’ unions and school performance: Evidence from California charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 61, 35–50.
49.
McGinnis JohnsonJ.NgE. S. (2016). Money talks or millennials walk: The effect of compensation on nonprofit millennial workers sector-switching intentions. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36, 283–305.
50.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
51.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
NiY. (2017). Teacher working conditions, teacher commitment, and charter schools. Teachers College Record, 119(6), 1–38.
54.
OberfieldZ. (2017). Are charters different? Public education, teachers, and the charter school debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
55.
OlbergA.PodgurskyM. J. (2011). Charting a new course to retirement: How charter schools handle teacher pensions. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
56.
OlsenB.AndersonL. (2007). Courses of action: A qualitative investigation into urban teacher retention and career development. Urban Education, 42, 5–29.
57.
PapayJ. P.Bacher-HicksA.PageL. C.MarinellW. H. (2017). The challenge of teacher retention in urban schools: Evidence of variation from a cross-site analysis. Educational Researcher, 46, 434–448.
58.
PattonM. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
PounderD. G.MerrillR. J. (2001). Job desirability of the high school principalship: A job choice theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 27–57.
62.
PrestonC.GoldringE.BerendsM.CannataM. (2012). School innovation in district context: Comparing traditional public schools and charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 31, 318–330.
63.
ReichM.GordonD. M.EdwardsR. C. (1973). A theory of labor market segmentation. The American Economic Review, 63, 359–365.
64.
RenzulliL. A.ParrottH. M.BeattieI. R. (2011). Racial mismatch and school type: Teacher satisfaction and retention in charter and traditional public schools. Sociology of Education, 84, 23–48.
65.
RochC. H.SaiN. (2017). Charter school teacher job satisfaction. Educational Policy, 31, 951–991.
66.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 4–36.
67.
SimonN. S.JohnsonS. M. (2015). Teacher turnover in high-poverty schools: What we know and can do. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1–36.
68.
StuitD. A.SmithT. M. (2012). Explaining the gap in charter and traditional public school teacher turnover rates. Economics of Education Review, 31, 268–279.
69.
SuperfineB. M.WooD. S. (2018). Teacher unions, charter schools, and the public/private distinction in education law and policy. Teachers College Record, 120(10), n10.
70.
TaylorL. L. (2008). Competition and teacher pay. Economic Inquiry, 48, 603–620.
TierneyM. L. (1983). Student college choice sets: Toward an empirical characterization. Research in Higher Education, 18, 271–284.
73.
TompkinsC. (2015). There’s no such thing as a bad teacher: Reconfiguring race and talent in post-Katrina charter schools. Souls, 17, 211–230.
74.
TorresA. C. (2014a). “Are we architects or construction workers?” Re-examining teacher autonomy and turnover in charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(124), 1–26.
75.
TorresA. C. (2016). Is this work sustainable? Teacher turnover and perceptions of workload in charter management organizations. Urban Education, 51, 891–914.
VedderR.HallJ. (2000). Private school competition and public school teacher salaries. Journal of Labor Research, 21, 161–168.
80.
VergariS. (2007). The politics of charter schools. Educational Policy, 21, 15–39.
81.
WalkerK. L. (2009). Excavating the millennial teacher mine. NASSP Bulletin, 93, 73–77.
82.
WelschD. M. (2011). Charter school competition and its impact on employment spending in Michigan’s public schools. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29, 323–336.
83.
WhiteT. C. (2016). Teach for America’s paradoxical diversity initiative: Race, policy, and Black teacher displacement in urban schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(16), 1–43.
84.
YoungI. P.RinehartJ. S.PlaceW. (1989). Theories for teacher selection: Objective, subjective and critical contact. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 329–336.
