Using input and outcome data from a randomized study of dual-language immersion programs in an urban district, we examine the mediating relationships of dosage, expenditures, and classroom characteristics to students’ academic performance, and the moderating role of students’ race/ethnicity. Differential costs of immersion were concentrated at the district level and were modest, at about 2% to 4% of per-pupil spending annually. We estimate that an additional US$100 spent per immersion student in a given year was associated with an additional 8% of a standard deviation in language arts performance in English, which was just over one third of the causal point-in-time enrollment effect of 22% of a standard deviation. We find no generalizable evidence of differential effects by race/ethnicity.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
BarikH. C.SwainM. (1978). Evaluation of a French immersion program: The Ottawa study through Grade five. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 10, 192–201.
3.
BialystokE.CraikF. I. M. (2010). Cognitive and linguistic processing in the bilingual mind. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 12–23.
4.
BiblerA. (2017). Dual language education and student achievement (Working paper). Anchorage: University of Alaska Anchorage.
BurkhauserS.SteeleJ. L.LiJ.SlaterR. O.BaconM.MillerT. (2016). Partner-language learning trajectories in dual-language immersion: Evidence from an urban district. Foreign Language Annals, 49, 415–433.
7.
CaldasS. J.BoudreauxN. (1999). Poverty, race, and foreign language immersion: Predictors of math and English language arts performance. Learning Languages, 5, 4–15.
8.
CenozJ. (2003). The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7, 1–87.
9.
Center for Applied Linguistics. (2011a). Directory of foreign language immersion programs in U.S. schools. Retrieved from http://webapp.cal.org/Immersion/
10.
Center for Applied Linguistics. (2011b). Directory of two-way bilingual immersion programs in the U.S. Retrieved from www.cal.org/twi/directory/
11.
ChristianD.MontoneC. L.LindholmK. J.CarranzaI. (1997). Profiles in two-way immersion education. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
12.
ChristofidesL. N.SwidinskyR. (2010). The economic returns to a second official language: English in Quebec and French in the Rest-of-Canada. Nicosia, Cyprus: Institute for the Study of Labor.
13.
CollierV. P.ThomasW. P. (2004). The astounding effectiveness of dual language education for all. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 2(1), 1–20.
14.
Committee for Economic Development. (2006). Education for global leadership: The importance of international studies and foreign language education for U.S. economic and national security. Washington, DC: Committee for Economic Development. Retrieved from https://www.ced.org/pdf/Education-for-Global-Leadership.pdf
15.
FanS. P.LibermanZ.KeysarB.KinzlerK. D. (2016). The exposure advantage: Early exposure to a multilingual environment promotes effective communication. Psychological Science, 26, 1090–1097.
16.
FortuneT. W. (2012). What the research says about immersion. In Chinese language learning in the early grades: A handbook of resources and best practices for Mandarin immersion (pp. 9–14). New York, NY: Asia Society. Retrieved from https://asiasociety.org/files/chinese-earlylanguage.pdf
17.
GathercoleS. E.AllowayT. P.WillisC.AdamsA.-M. (2006). Working memory in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 265–281.
GreenbergA.BellanaB.BialystokE. (2013). Perspective-taking ability in bilingual children: Extending advantages in executive control to spatial reasoning. Cognitive Development, 28, 41–50.
20.
ImaiK.KeeleL.TingleyD.YamamotoT. (2011). Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review, 105, 765–789.
21.
KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2005). Using imperfect information to identify effective teachers. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
22.
KeshavarzM. H.AstanehH. (2004). The impact of bilinguality on the learning of English vocabulary as a foreign language (L3). Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7, 295–302.
23.
KleinE. C. (1995). Second versus third language acquisition: Is there a difference?Language Learning, 45, 419–465.
24.
LambertW. E.TuckerG. R.d’AnglejanA. (1973). Cognitive and attitudinal consequences of bilingual schooling: The St. Lambert Project through Grade five. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 141–159.
25.
LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62.
26.
Lara-AlecioR.GallowayM.MasonB.IrbyB. J.BrownG. (2004). Texas dual language program cost analysis. College Station: Texas A&M University.
27.
LevinH. M.BelfieldC.MuennigP.RouseC. (2007). The costs and benefits of an excellent education for all of America’s children. New York, NY: Teacher’s College, Columbia University.
28.
LevinH. M.McEwanP. J. (2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
Lindholm-LearyK. J. (2001). Dual language education. Avon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
30.
Lindholm-LearyK. J. (2005). Review of research and best practices on effective features of dual language education programs. San Jose, CA: San Jose State University.
31.
Lindholm-LearyK. J.BlockN. (2010). Achievement in predominantly low SES/Hispanic dual language schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 43–60.
32.
LukG.BialystokE. (2014). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 605–621.
33.
MarianV.ShookA.SchroederS. R. (2013). Bilingual two-way immersion programs benefit academic achievement. Bilingual Research Journal, 36, 167–186.
34.
MaxwellL. A. (2012, March28). “Dual” classes see growth in popularity. Education Week Spotlight, pp. 1–3.
35.
MostellerF. (1995). The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades. The Future of Children, 5, 113–127.
ParkesJ.RuthT.Anberg-EspinozaM.de JongE. (2009). Urgent research questions and issues in dual language education: Dual language researcher convocation report. Santa Fe: Dual Language Education of New Mexico, University of New Mexico.
39.
ParrishT. B. (1994). A cost analysis of alternative instructional models for limited English proficient students in California. Journal of Education Finance, 19, 256–278.
40.
RivkinS. G.HanushekE. A.KainJ. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458.
41.
RockoffJ. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94, 247–252.
42.
SaizA.ZoidoE. (2005). Listening to what the world says: Bilingualism and earnings in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 523–538.
43.
SantibañezL.ZárateM. E. (2014). Bilinguals in the U.S. and college enrollment. In CallahanR. M.GándaraP. C. (Eds.), The bilingual advantage: Language, literacy, and the U.S. labor market (pp. 211–233). Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
SchochetP. Z.PumaM.DekeJ. (2014). Understanding variation in treatment effects in education impact evaluations: An overview of quantitative methods (NCEE 2014-4017). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
46.
ShortD. J.EchevarriaJ.Richards-TutorC. (2011). Research on academic literacy development in sheltered instruction classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 15, 363–380. doi:10.1177/1362168811401155
47.
SteeleJ. L.PepperM. J.SpringerM. G.LockwoodJ. R. (2015). The distribution and mobility of effective teachers: Evidence from a large, urban school district. Economics of Education Review, 48, 86–101. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.05.009
48.
SteeleJ. L.SlaterR. O.ZamarroG.MillerT.LiJ.BurkhauserS.BaconM. (2017). Effects of dual-language immersion programs on student achievement: Evidence from lottery data. American Educational Research Journal, 54, 282S–306S.
49.
StockJ. H.WrightJ. H.YogoM. (2002). A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20, 518–529.
50.
StockJ. H.YogoM. (2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In AndrewsD. W. K. (Ed.). Identification and inference for econometric models (pp. 80–108). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
51.
ThomasW. P.CollierV. P. (2014). English learners in North Carolina dual language programs: Year 3 of this study: School year 2009–2010. Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.
52.
TurnbullM.HartD.LapkinS. (2003). Grade 6 French immersion students’ performance on large-scale reading, writing, and mathematics tests: Building explanations. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 49, 6–23.
53.
UmanskyI. M.ReardonS. F. (2014). Reclassification patterns among Latino English learner students in bilingual, dual immersion, and English immersion classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 879–912.
ValentinoR. A.ReardonS. F. (2015). Effectiveness of four instructional programs designed to serve English learners: Variations by ethnicity and initial English proficiency. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 612–637.
Watzinger-TharpJ.SwensonK.MayneZ. (2016). The academic achievement of Utah dual language immersion students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13670050.2016.1214675
58.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
