In the early 1990s, the Supreme Court established standards to facilitate the release of school districts from racial desegregation orders. Over the next two decades, federal courts declared almost half of all districts under court order in 1991 to be “unitary”—that is, to have met their obligations to eliminate dual systems of education. I leverage a comprehensive dataset of all districts that were under court order in 1991 to assess the national effects of the termination of desegregation orders on indices of residential-racial segregation and high-school dropout rates. I conclude that the release from court orders moderately increased the short-term rates of Hispanic–White residential segregation. Furthermore, the declaration of districts as unitary increased rates of 16- to 19-year-old school dropouts by around 1 percentage point for Blacks, particularly those residing outside the South, and 3 percentage points for Hispanics.
AizerA. (2008). Peer effects and human capital accumulation: The externalities of ADD (NBER Working Paper No. 14354). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
AllportG. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
3.
AnanatE. O. (2007). The wrong side(s) of the tracks: Estimating the causal effects of racial segregation on city outcomes (NBER Working Paper No. 13343). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
AngristJ. D.LangK. (2004). Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston’s METCO program. The American Economic Review, 94, 1613–1634.
5.
Baum-SnowN.LutzB. (2011). School desegregation, school choice and changes in residential location patterns by race. American Economic Review, 101, 3019–3046.
6.
BayerP.RossS.TopaG. (2008). Place of work and place of residence: Informal hiring networks and labor market outcomes. Journal of Political Economy, 116, 1150–1196.
7.
BillingsS.DemingD. J.RockoffJ. (2014). School resegregation, educational attainment and crime: Evidence from the end of busing in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 435–476.
8.
BorjasG. J. (1995). Ethnicity, neighborhoods, and human-capital externalities. American Economic Review, 85, 365–390.
9.
BoustanL. P. (2012). School desegregation and urban change: Evidence from city boundaries. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4, 85–108.
10.
CardD.RothsteinJ. (2007). Racial segregation and the Black–White test score gap. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 2158–2184.
11.
CarrellS.HoekstraM. (2010). Externalities in the classroom: How children exposed to domestic violence affect everyone’s kids. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 211–228.
12.
ChettyR.HendrenN.KatzL. (2016). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106, 855–902.
13.
ClotfelterC. H. (2004). After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
ClotfelterC. H.LaddH.VigdorJ. (2008). School segregation under color-blind jurisprudence: The case of North Carolina. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and Law, 16(1), 46–86.
15.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH.VigdorJ. (2006). Federal oversight, local control and specter of resegregation in Southern schools. American Law and Economics Review, 8(Summer), 1–43.
16.
CrainR. L.StraussJ. (1985). School desegregation and Black occupational attainments: Results from a long-term experiment (Report No. 359). Baltimore, MD: Center for the Social Organization of Schools.
17.
CutlerD. M.GlaeserE. L. (1997). Are ghettos good or bad?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 827–872.
18.
DardenJ.RahbarM.JezierskiL.LiM.VelieE. (2009). The measurement of neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and Black and White residential segregation in metropolitan Detroit: Implications for the study of social disparities in health. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, 137–158.
19.
GuryanJ. (2004). Desegregation and Black dropout rates. The American Economic Review, 94, 919–943.
20.
HanushekE.KainJ.RivkinS. (2009). New evidence about Brown V. Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition on achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 349–383.
21.
HoxbyC. M.WeingarthG. (2005). Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects. Unpublished manuscript.
22.
JacksonC. K. (2009). Student demographics, teacher sorting, and teacher quality: Evidence from the end of school desegregation. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 213–256.
23.
JohnsonR. C. (2015). Long-run impacts of school desegregation & school quality on adult attainments (NBER Working Paper No. 16664). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
LiebowitzD.PageL. (2014). Does school policy affect housing choices? Evidence from the end of desegregation in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 671–703.
25.
LindsethA. A. (2002). Legal issues relating to school funding/desegregation. In RossellC. H.ArmorD. J.WalbergH. J. (Eds.), School desegregation in the 21st century (pp. 41–66). Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
LutzB. F. (2011). The end of court-ordered desegregation. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3, 130–168.
27.
MasseyD.DentonN. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67, 281–315.
28.
MickelsonR. A.SmithS. S.SouthworthS. (2009). Resegregation, achievement, and the chimera of choice in post-unitary Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools. In SmrekarC. E.GoldringE. B. (Eds.), From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape of school desegregation (pp. 129–156). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
29.
MurnaneR. J. (2013). U.S. high school graduation rates: Patterns and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 370–422.
30.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
31.
ReardonS. F.BischoffK. (2011). Income inequality and income segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1092–1153.
32.
ReardonS. F.GrewalE.KalogridesD.GreenbergE. (2012). Brown fades: The end of court ordered school desegregation and the resegregation of American public schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, 876–904.
33.
ReberS. (2005). Court-ordered desegregation: Successes and failures in integrating American schools sinceBrown. Journal of Human Resources, 40, 559–590.
34.
SchwartzH. (2010). Housing policy is school policy: Economically integrative housing promotes academic success in Montgomery County, Maryland. Washington, DC: The Century Foundation.
35.
TieboutC. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.
36.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). 2010 census redistricting data (Public Law 94-171) summary file. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
VigdorJ. L. (2011). School desegregation and the black-white test score gap. In DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 443–464). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
38.
VigdorJ. L.LudwigJ. (2008). Segregation and the test score gap. In MagnusonK.WaldfogelJ. (Eds.), Steady gains and stalled progress: Inequality and the Black-White test score gap (pp. 181–211). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
WeinbergB. A. (2000). Black residential centralization and the spatial mismatch hypothesis. Journal of Urban Economics, 48, 1110–1134.
40.
WeinerD. A.LutzB. F.LudwigJ. (2011). The effects of school desegregation on crime (NBER Working Paper No. 15380). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
