Policymakers are implementing reforms with the assumption that students do better when attending high-achieving schools. In this article, we use longitudinal data from Chicago Public Schools to test that assumption. We find that the effects of attending a higher performing school depend on the school’s performance level. At elite public schools with admission criteria, there are no academic benefits—test scores are not better, grades are lower—but students report better environments. In contrast, forgoing a very low-performing school for a nonselective school with high test scores and graduation rates improves a range of academic and nonacademic outcomes.
AbdulkadiroğluA.AngristJ. D.DynarskiS. M.KaneT. J.PathakP. A. (2011). Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from Boston’s charters and pilots. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 699–748.
2.
AbdulkadiroğluA.AngristJ. D.PathakP. A. (2014). The elite illusion: Achievement effects at Boston and New York exam schools. Econometrica, 82, 137–196.
3.
ACT Inc. (2007). The PLAN technical manual. Iowa City, IA: Author.
4.
AutorD. H.KatzL. F.KearneyM. S. (2008). Trends in US wage inequality: Revising the revisionists. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 300–323.
5.
BarrowL.ParkK.SchanzenbachD. W. (2011). Assessing the impacts on students of closing persistently failing schools. Unpublished paper.
6.
BifulcoR. (2012). Can non experimental estimates replicate estimates based on random assignment in evaluations of school choice? A within-study comparison. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, 729–751.
7.
BifulcoR.CobbC. D.BellC. (2009). Can interdistrict choice boost student achievement? The case of Connecticut’s interdistrict magnet school program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 323–345.
8.
BlackD. A.SmithJ. A. (2004). How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 99−124.
9.
BrummetQ. (2014). The effects of school closings on student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 119, 108–124.
10.
ClarkD. (2010). Selective schools and academic achievement. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 10(1), Article 9.
11.
CullenJ. B.JacobB. A.LevittS. D. (2005). The impact of school choice on student outcomes: An analysis of the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 729–760.
12.
D’AgostinoR.Jr.RubinD. B. (2000). Estimating and using propensity scores with partially missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 749–759.
13.
DayJ.NewburgerE. (2002). The big payoff: Educational attainment and synthetic estimates of work-life earnings (Current Population Report P23-210). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
14.
de la TorreM.GwynneJ. (2009).When schools close: Effects on displaced students in Chicago Public Schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
15.
DobbieW.FryerR. (2014). The impact of attending a school with high-achieving peers: Evidence from the New York City exam schools. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(3), 58–75.
16.
EngbergJ.GillB.ZamarroG.ZimmerR. (2012). Closing schools in a shrinking district: Do student outcomes depend on which schools are closed?Journal of Urban Economics, 71, 189–203.
17.
FortsonK.GleasonP.KopaE.Verbitsky-SavitzN. (2015). Horseshoes, hand grenades, and treatment effects: Reassessing bias in nonexperimental estimators. Economics of Education Review, 44, 100–113.
18.
FrankK. A.MaroulisS. J.DuongM. Q.KelceyB. M. (2013). What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin’s causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 437–460.
19.
GamoranA. (1996). Student achievement in public magnet, public comprehensive, and private city high schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 1–18.
20.
HarderV. S.StuartE. A.AnthonyJ. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 15, 234–249.
21.
HastingsJ. S.WeinsteinJ. M. (2008). Information, school choice, and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 1373–1414.
22.
HeckmanJ. J.LochnerL. J.ToddP. E. (2008). Earnings functions and rates of return (No. w13780). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
23.
JacksonK. C. (2010). Do students benefit from attending better schools? Evidence form rule-based student assignment in Trinidad and Tobago. The Economic Journal, 120, 1399–1429.
24.
JuhnC.MurphyK. M.PierceB. (1993). Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 410–442.
25.
LaLondeR. J. (1986). Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data. American Economic Review, 76, 604–620.
26.
LevinH. M. (2002). A comprehensive framework for evaluating educational vouchers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 159–174.
27.
MarshH. W.HauK. T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364–376.
28.
McEwanP. J. (2000). The potential impact of large-scale voucher programs. Review of Educational Research, 70, 103–149.
29.
MuennigF. (2005, October24–25). Health returns to education interventions. Paper prepared for the Columbia Teachers College Social Costs of Inadequate Education Symposium, New York, NY.
30.
NeildR. C. (2004). The effects of magnet schools on neighborhood high schools: An examination of achievement among entering freshmen. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 9(1), 1–21.
31.
NomiT.AllensworthE. A. (2013). Sorting and supporting: Why double-dose algebra led to better test scores but more course failures. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 756–788.
32.
Pop-ElechesC.UrquiolaM. (2013). Going to a better school: Effects and behavioral responses. American Economic Review, 103, 1289–1324.
33.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for casual effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
34.
SumA.KhatiwadaI.McLaughlinJ. (2009). The consequences of dropping out of high school: Joblessness and jailing for high school dropouts and the high cost for taxpayers. Boston, MA: Center for Labor Market Studies.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
