Evidence on optimal school size is mixed. We estimate the effect of transitory changes in school size on the academic achievement of fourth- and fifth-grade students in North Carolina using student-level longitudinal administrative data. Estimates of value-added models that condition on school-specific linear time trends and a variety of teacher-by-school, student, and school-by-year fixed effects suggest that, on average, there is no causal relationship between school size and academic performance. However, two subgroups of interest are significantly harmed by school size: socioeconomically disadvantaged students and students with learning disabilities. The largest effects are observed among students with learning disabilities: A 10-student increase in grade size is found to decrease their math and reading achievement by about 0.015 test-score standard deviations.
AbowdJ. M.KramarzF.MargolisD. N. (1999). High wage workers and high wage firms. Econometrica, 67, 251–333.
2.
AkerlofG. A.KrantonR. E. (2002). Identity and schooling: Some lessons for the economics of education. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 1167–1201.
3.
AlexanderK. L.EntwisleD. R.KabbaniN. (2001). The dropout process in life course perspective: Early risk factors at home and school. Teachers College Record, 103, 760–822.
4.
AltonjiJ. G.MansfieldR. (2011). The role of family, school, and community characteristics in inequality in education and labor-market outcomes. In DuncanG.MurnaneR. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 207–228). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
AndersonC. S. (1982). The search for school climate: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 52, 368–420.
6.
AndrewsM.DuncombeW.YingerJ. (2002). Revisiting economies of size in American education: Are we any closer to a consensus?Economics of Education Review, 21, 245–262.
7.
AngristJ. D.LangK. (2004). Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston’s Metco Program. The American Economic Review, 94, 1613–1634.
8.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricists’ companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BallouD. (2009). Test scaling and value-added measurement. Education Finance and Policy, 4, 351–383.
10.
BarrowL.ClaessensA.SchanzenbachD. W. (2013, March). The impact of Chicago’s small high school initiative (Working Paper No. 18889). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
11.
BaydarN.Brooks-GunnJ. (1991). Effects of maternal employment and child-care arrangements on preschoolers’ cognitive and behavioral outcomes: Evidence from the children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Developmental Psychology, 27, 932–945.
12.
BerryC. R. (2006). School consolidation and inequality. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 9, 49–75.
13.
BerryC. R.WestM. R. (2010). Growing pains: The school consolidation movement and student outcomes. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 26, 1–29.
14.
BloomH. S.Levy ThompsonS.UntermanR. (2010). Transforming the high school experience. New York, NY: MDRC.
15.
BloomH. S.UntermanR. (2014). Can small high schools of choice improve educational prospects for disadvantaged students?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33, 290–319.
16.
BoccardoJ.SchwartzA. E.StiefelL.WiswallM. (2013, November8–10). Beyond academics: Do small schools have better learning environments?Presentation at the APPAM 2012 Fall Conference, Baltimore, MD.
17.
BrummetQ. (2014). The effect of school closings on student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 119, 108–124.
18.
CarruthersC. K. (2012). New schools, new students, new teachers: Evaluating the effectiveness of charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 31, 280–292.
19.
ChenG. (2007). School disorder and student achievement: A study of New York City elementary schools. Journal of School Violence, 6, 27–43.
20.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26, 673–682.
21.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
22.
Common Core of Data. (2011). Numbers and types of public elementary and secondary schools from the common core of data: School year 2009-2010. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/pesschools09/tables/table_01.asp
23.
ConantJ. B. (1959). The American high school today: A first report to interested citizens. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Book.
24.
CottonK. (1996). School size, school climate and student performance. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
25.
CrispinL. (2012). School size and student achievement: Does one size fit all? Unpublished Manuscript, Ohio State University, Columbus.
26.
CurrieJ.ThomasD. (2001). Early test scores, socioeconomic status, school quality, and future outcomes. Research in Labor Economics, 20, 103–132.
27.
DeeT. S.HaW.JacobB. A. (2006). The effects of school size on parental involvement and social capital: Evidence from the ELS: 2002. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 9, 77–97.
28.
DuncombeW.YingerJ. (2007). Does school district consolidation cut costs?Economics of Education Review, 22, 193–201.
29.
EppleD.RomanoR. (2011). Peer effects in education: A survey of the theory and evidence. In BenhabibJ.BisinA.JacksonM. (Eds.), Handbook of social economics (Vol. 1B, pp. 1053–1163). Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier.
30.
GershensonS. (2013). Do summer time-use gaps vary by socioeconomic status?American Educational Research Journal, 50, 1219–1248.
31.
GoldhaberD.CowanJ.WalchJ. (2013). Is a good elementary teacher always good? Assessing teacher performance estimates across subjects. Economics of Education Review, 36, 216–228.
32.
GoldhaberD.HansenM. (2013). Is it just a bad class? Assessing the long-term stability of estimated teacher performance. Economica, 80, 589–612.
33.
GottfredsonD. C.DiPietroS. M. (2011). School size, social capacity, and student victimization. Sociology of Education, 84, 69–89.
34.
GuarinoC. M.ReckaseM. D.WooldridgeJ. M. (2015). Can value-added measures of teacher performance be trusted?Education Finance and Policy, 10, 117–156.
35.
GuryanJ.HurstE.KearneyM. (2008). Parental education and parental time with children. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 23–46.
36.
HallerE. J. (1992). High school size and student indiscipline: Another aspect of the school consolidation issue?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 145–156.
37.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2009). New evidence about Brown v. Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition on achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 349–383.
38.
HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100, 267–271.
39.
JacksonC. K.BruegmannE. (2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 85–108.
40.
JacobB. A.LefgrenL.SimsD. P. (2010). The persistence of teacher-induced learning. Journal of Human Resources, 45, 915–943.
41.
JohnstonS. L. (2009). Improving the school environment to reduce school violence: A review of the literature. Journal of School Health, 79, 451–465.
42.
KruegerA. B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 497–532.
43.
KuziemkoI. (2006). Using shocks to school enrollment to estimate the effect of school size on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 25, 63–75.
44.
LaddH. F.MuschkinC. G.DodgeK. A. (2014). From birth to school: Early childhood initiatives and third-grade outcomes in North Carolina. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33, 162–187.
45.
LamdinD. J. (1995). Testing for the effect of school size on student achievement within a school district. Education Economics, 3, 33–42.
46.
LauenD. L.GaddisS. M. (2012). Shining a light or fumbling in the dark? The effects of NCLB’s subgroup-specific accountability on student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 185–208.
47.
LeeV. E.LoebS. (2000). School size in Chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers’ attitudes and students’ achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 3–31.
48.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2009). A review of empirical evidence about school size effects: A policy perspective. Review of Educational Research, 79, 464–490.
49.
LeungA.FerrisJ. S. (2008). School size and youth violence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65, 318–333.
50.
ManskiC. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60, 531–542.
51.
McMillenB. J. (2004). School size, achievement, and achievement gaps. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(58), 1–24.
52.
Measures of Effective Teaching. (2010). Learning about teaching: Initial findings from the Measures of Effective Teaching project. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
53.
MittagN. (2012). New methods to estimate models with large sets of fixed effects with an application to matched employer-employee data from Germany (FDZ-Methodenreport). Nuremberg, Germany: Institute for Employment Research.
RavitchD. (2011). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
56.
ReadyD. D.LeeV. E. (2006). Optimal context size in elementary schools: Disentangling the effects of class size and school size. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 9, 99–135.
57.
RothsteinJ. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 175–214.
58.
SchoenebergerJ. A. (2012). Longitudinal attendance patterns: Developing high school dropouts. The Clearing House, 85, 7–14.
59.
SchwartzA. E.StiefelL.WiswallM. (2013). Do small schools improve performance in large, urban districts? Causal evidence from New York City. Journal of Urban Economics, 77, 27–40.
60.
ShearL.SmerdonB. (2003). Mapping the terrain: Year 1 of the evaluation of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s National School District and Network Grants Program. Retrieved from http://smallhs.sri.com/documents/Mapping_the_Terrain.pdf
61.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Smaller Learning Communities program. Washington, DC: Author.
62.
WelshW.StokesR.GreeneJ. R. (2000). A macro-level model of school disorder. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 37, 243–283.
63.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
WynneE.RyanK. (1997). Reclaiming our schools: Teaching character, academics, and discipline. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
