This article examines the factors that determine a high school’s probability of offering Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) courses. The likelihood that a school offers advanced courses, and the number of sections that it offers, is largely driven by having a critical mass of students who enter high school with eighth-grade test scores that are far above average. The number and qualifications of the instructional staff, in contrast, play a very small role. The results suggest that the willingness of schools to offer advanced courses is driven by real, perceived, or created student demand and that there may be few resource constraints that prevent schools from supplying advanced courses.
Attewell P.,Domina T..Raising the bar: Curricular intensity and academic performance.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2008;30:51-71
2.
Burns R. B.,Mason D. A..Class formation and composition in elementary schools.American Educational Research Journal. 1998;35:793-772
3.
College Board. (1997). Summary report: 1997. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/student/testing/ap/sumrpts/1997/national_1997.pdf.
4.
College Board. (2002). What are the characteristics of AP teachers? An examination of survey research. Retrieved from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/pdf/200210_20717.pdf.
5.
College Board. (2009a). State policy. Retrieved from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/policy-advocacy/policy/state.
6.
College Board. (2009b). Summary report: 2009. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/ap/exgrd_sum/2009.html.
7.
Conger D.,Long M. C.,Iatarola P..Explaining race, poverty and gender differences in advanced course takings.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2009;28:555-576
8.
DoughertyC.MellorL.JianS. (2006). The relationship between advanced placement and college graduation: (2005 AP Studies Series, Report 1). Austin, TX: National Center for Educational Accountability. Retrieved from http://www.just4kids.org/en/files/Publication-The_Relationship_between_Advanced_Placement_and_College_Graudation-02–09–06.pdf.
9.
Duffett A.,Farkas S.Growing pains in the Advanced Placement program: Do tough trade-offs lie ahead?. Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Institute; 2009:
10.
Finley M. K..Teachers and tracking in a comprehensive high school.Sociology of Education. 1984;54:233-243
11.
Geiser S.,Santelices V.The role of advanced placement and honors courses in college admissions. Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California at Berkeley; 2004:
12.
GrubbN.OakesJ. (2007). Restoring value to the high school diploma: The rhetoric and practice of higher standards. Retrieved from http://epsl.asu.edu/epru/documents/EPSL-0710–242-EPRU.pdf.
13.
Haller E. J.,Monk D. H.,Bear A. S.,Griffith J.,Moss P..School size and program comprehensiveness: Evidence from “High School and Beyond.”.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1990;12:109-120
14.
Hu W..Powerhouse school district reaches beyond the elite.New York Times. 2009;:A20
15.
Iatarola P.,Schwartz A. E.,Stiefel L.,Chellman C..Small schools, large districts: Small school reform and New York City’s students.Teachers College Record. 2008;110:1837-1878
16.
Kelly S..The Black-White gap in mathematics course taking.Sociology of Education. 2009;82:47-69
17.
Klein A..Race to Top sets stage for ESEA reauthorization: Grant program’s priorities offer template for renewal.Education Week. 2010;:18
18.
Klopfenstein K..The advanced placement expansion of the 1990s: How did traditionally underserved students fare?.Education Policy Analysis Archives. 2004;12 (68): 1-13
19.
Lee V. E.,Smerdon B. A.,Alfeld-Liro C.,Brown S. L..Inside large and small high schools: Curriculum and social relations.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2000;22:147-171
20.
Losen D. J..Silent segregation in our nation’s schools.Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review. 1999;34:1-27
21.
Loveless T.The tracking wars: State reform meets school policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1999:
22.
Lucas Samuel R.,Berends M..Sociodemographic diversity, correlated achievement, and de facto tracking.Sociology of Education. 2002;75:328-348
23.
Monk D. H.,Haller E. J..Predictors of high school academic course offerings: The role of school size.American Educational Research Journal. 1993;30:3-21
24.
Oakes J.,Guiton G..Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school tracking decisions.American Educational Research Journal. 1995;32:3-33
25.
Acceleration programs provide benefits, but the costs are relatively expensive. Tallahassee, FL: Author; 2006:
26.
Porter A. C.,Polikoff M. S.21st century education: A reference handbook. Good T. L., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:434-442.
27.
Powell A. G.,Farrar E.,Cohen D. K.The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, Co; 1985:
28.
Resnick L. B..From aptitude to effort: A new foundation for our schools.Daedalus. 1995;124 (4): 55-63
29.
Resnick L. B..Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum.Educational Researcher. 2010;39:183-197
30.
Sawchuk S..AP teachers divided over push to open classes to all.Education Week. 2009;:8
31.
Spade J. Z.,Columba L.,Vanfossen B. E..Tracking in mathematics and science: Courses and course-selection procedures.Sociology of Education. 1997;70:108-127
32.
SpellingsM. (2007, May9). U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings delivers remarks at National Summit on America’s Silent Epidemic. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2007/05/05092007.html.
33.
Thomas B. Fordham Institute. (2009). Growing pains in the Advanced Placement program: Do tough trade-offs lie ahead?Retrieved from http://www.edexcellence.net/advanced_placement_report/Report.pdf.
34.
Tierney W. G.Urban high school students and the challenge of access: Many routes, difficult paths. Tierney W. G.Colyar J. E., ed. New York, NY: Peter Lang; 2006:1-6.
35.
Equal educational opportunity and nondiscrimination for minority students: Federal enforcement of title VI in ability grouping practices. Volume IV of the Equal Educational Opportunity Project Series. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1999:
36.
The condition of education 2006 (NCES 2006-071). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2006a:
37.
No Child Left Behind: Expanding the Advanced Placement incentive program. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2006b:
38.
The condition of education 2007 (NCES 2007-064). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2007:
39.
Welner K. G.Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity. New York: State University of New York Press; 2001:
40.
Welner K. G.,Oakes J..(Li)Ability grouping: The new susceptibility of school tracking systems to legal challenges.Harvard Educational Review. 1991;66:451-470
