In 2001, Texas became the first state to pass an in-state resident tuition policy that benefits undocumented immigrant students, a majority of whom are of Latino/a origin. This analysis estimates the effect of the Texas in-state resident tuition policy on students likely to be undocumented. Using a differences-in-differences strategy and two extensive data sets, results indicate that foreign-born non-citizen Latino/a students were more likely to attend college after the introduction of the Texas benefit. The results were strongest for older high school graduates, who were found to be 4.84 times more likely to have enrolled in college than not after the tuition policy than their counterparts in Southwestern states without a tuition policy. Multiple tests show that results are robust regardless of specification.
AdelmanC. (2005). Moving into town—and moving on: The community college in the lives of traditional-age students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
2.
AlfonsoM. (2004, April). What students of different racial/ethnic groups do after high school: An empirical analysis with focus on why students attend two-year colleges. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
3.
AltonjiJ. G. (1993). The demand for and return to education when education outcomes are uncertain. Journal of Labor Economics, 11(1), 48–83.
4.
BatalovaJ.FixM. (2006). New estimates of unauthorized youth eligible for legal status under the DREAM Act. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
5.
BeanF.LowellB. L. (2007). Unauthorized migration. In WatersM.UedaR.MarrowH. (Eds.), The new Americans: A guide to immigration since 1965 (pp. 78–92). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BeckerG. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
BergerE. (2001, May22). Undocumented students may get big tuition break. Houston Chronicle, p. 1A.
8.
BettsJ. R.LofstromM. (2000). The educational attainment of immigrants: Trends and implications. In BorjasG. (Ed.), Issues in the economics of immigration (pp. 51–115). Chicago: University of Chicago Press for National Bureau of Economic Research.
9.
BorjasG. J.FreemanR. B.LangK. (1991). Undocumented Mexican-born workers in the United States: How many, how permanent? In AbowdJ. M.FreemanR. B. (Eds.), Immigration, trade, and the labor market (pp. 77–100). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
CardD.LewisE. G. (2007). The diffusion of Mexican immigrants during the 1990s: Explanations and impacts. In BorjasG. J. (Ed.), Mexican immigration to the United States (pp. 193–223). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DominaT. (2007). Higher education policy as secondary school reform: Texas public high schools after Hopwood. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 200–217.
14.
DynarskiS. (2003). Does aid matter? Measuring the effect of student aid on college attendance and completion. American Economic Review, 93, 279–288.
15.
DynarskiS. (2004). The new merit aid. In HoxbyC. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 63–100). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
DynarskiS. (2008). Building the stock of college-educated labor. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 576–610.
17.
EllwoodD. T.KaneT. J. (2000). Who is getting a college education? Family background and the growing gaps in enrollment. In DanzigerS.WaldfogelJ. (Eds.), Securing the future (pp. 283–324). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
ErismanW.LooneyS. (2007, April). Opening the door to the American dream: Increasing higher education and success for immigrants. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
19.
FloresS. M. (2010). State “Dream Acts”: The effect of in-state resident tuition policies on the college enrollment of undocumented Latino students in the United States. The Review of Higher Education, 33, 239–283.
20.
FryR. (2005). The higher dropout rate of foreign-born teens: The role of schooling abroad. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. Retrieved December 17, 2009, from http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/55.pdf.
21.
GonzalesR. (2007). Wasted talent and broken dreams: The lost potential of undocumented students. In Focus, 5, 13.
22.
HagyA.StaniecJ.F.O. (2002). Immigrant status, race, and institutional choice in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 21, 381–392.
23.
HarrisD. (2007). Educational outcomes of disadvantaged students: From desegregation to accountability. In LaddH.FiskeE. (Eds.), AEFA handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 551–572). London: Taylor & Francis.
HellerD. E. (1997). Student price response in higher education: An update of Leslie and Brinkman. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 624–659.
26.
HoxbyC. M. (1998). Do immigrants crowd disadvantaged American natives out of higher education? In HamermeshD. S.BeanF. D. (Eds.), Help or hindrance? The economic implications of immigration for African-Americans (pp. 282–321). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. (1996). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved November 30, 2005, from http://www.visalaw.com/docs/IIIRA.html
28.
KaneT. J. (1994). College attendance by Blacks since 1970: The role of college cost, family background and the returns to education. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 878–911.
29.
KaneT. J. (1995). Rising public college tuition and college entry: How well do public subsidies promote access to college? (Working Paper No. 5164). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
30.
KaneT. J. (2003). A quasi-experimental estimate of the impact of financial aid on college-going (Working Paper No. 9703). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
31.
KaushalN. (2008). In-state tuition for the undocumented: Education effects on Mexican young adults. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 771–792.
32.
LeinbachT.BaileyT. (2006). Access and achievement of Hispanics and Hispanic immigrants in the colleges of the City University of New York. New Directions for Community Colleges, 133(2), 27–40.
33.
LongB. T. (2004a). Does the format of an aid program matter? The effect of in-kind tuition subsidies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 767–782.
34.
LongB. T. (2004b). How do financial aid policies affect colleges? The institutional impact of the Georgia HOPE Scholarship. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 1045–1066.
35.
LongM. (2004). Race and college admission: An alternative to affirmative action?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 1020–1033.
36.
LongM. C.TiendaM. (2008). Winners and losers: Changes in Texas university admissions post-Hopwood. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 255–280.
MartorellF. (2005). Does failing a high school graduation exam matter?Unpublished working paper: Author.
39.
MasseyD.CapoferroC. (2008). The geographic diversification of American immigration. In MasseyD. S. (Ed.), New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration (pp. 25–50). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
McGeeP. (2005, July24). More illegal immigrants in colleges: Enrollment has increased ninefold since the state allowed them to pay lower tuition. Fort Worth Star Telegram, p. B6.
41.
MoultonB. R. (1986). Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates. Journal of Econometrics, 32, 385–397.
42.
OlivasM. (2004). IIRIRA, the Dream Act, and undocumented college student residency. Journal of College and University Law, 30, 435–464.
43.
OlivasM. (2009). Undocumented college students, taxation, and financial aid: A technical note. Review of Higher Education, 32, 407–416.
44.
OrfieldG. (Ed.). (2004). Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
45.
OropesaR. S.LandaleN. S. (2008). Why do immigrant youths who never enroll in U.S. schools matter? School enrollment among Mexicans and non-Hispanic Whites. Sociology of Education, 82, 240–266.
46.
PasselJ. S. (2005a, March21). Estimates of the size and characteristics of the undocumented population. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. Retrieved September 1, 2005, from http://pewhispanic.org/reports/report/php?ReportID=44.
47.
PasselJ. S. (2005b, June14). Unauthorized migrants: Numbers and characteristics [Background briefing prepared for Task Force on Immigration and America’s Future]. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. Retrieved September 1, 2005, from http://pewhispanic.org/reports/.
48.
PasselJ. S.Van HookJ.BeanF. D. (2004). Estimates of legal and unauthorized foreign born population for the United States and selected states, based on Census 2000 (Report to the Census Bureau). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
49.
PernaL. W. (2000). Differences in the decision to attend college among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 117–141.
PostD. (1990). College-going decisions of Chicanos: The politics of misinformation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2, 174–187.
53.
RinconA. (2008). Undocumented immigrants and higher education. New York: LFB Scholarly.
54.
Sallie Mae Foundation. (2004). Caught in the financial aid information divide: A national survey of Latino perspectives on financial aid [PowerPoint presentation]. Retrieved March 20, 2006, from www.thesalliemaefund.org/news/TRPI%20Presentation.ppt.
55.
SmithJ. P. (2006). Immigrants and the labor market. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 203–233.
56.
St. JohnE. P.NoellJ. (1989). The effects of student financial aid on access to higher education: An analysis of progress with special consideration of minority enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 30, 563–581.
57.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2006, October). Current Population Survey—design and methodology (Technical Paper No. 66). Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2002, March). Current Population Survey—design and methodology (Technical Paper No. 63RV). Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
