Many policymakers suggest that school-based reading coaches can improve teachers’ practice, which consequently will improve students’ literacy skills. Although reading coaches are increasingly prevalent in schools nationwide, empirical evidence for their effects on student achievement is scarce. This article helps to address this gap by conducting an evaluation of a statewide reading coach program in Florida middle schools. Using achievement data from nearly 1,000 Florida middle schools from the 1997–1998 through 2005–2006 school years, we find that receiving a state-funded coach was associated with statistically significant improvements in average annual reading achievement gains for two of the four cohorts of schools analyzed. We examine implications for state and district policy and future research.
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2002). Every child a graduate: A framework for an excellent education for all middle and high school students. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BrownD.Reumann-MooreR.HughR.ChristmanJ. B.RifferR.PlessisP.. (2007). Making a difference: Year two report of the Pennsylvania high school coaching initiative. Philadelphia: Research for Action.
3.
BrownD.Reumann-MooreR.HughR.du PlessisP.ChristmanJ. B. (2006). Promising inroads: Year one of the Pennsylvania high school coaching initiative. Philadelphia: Research for Action.
4.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA.DugridP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
5.
ButlerD. L.NovakH. J.BeckinghamB.JarvisS.ElaschukC. (2000). Professional development and meaningful change: Towards sustaining an instructional innovation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
6.
Carnegie Corporation of New York. (2009). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York: Author.
7.
CarnevaleA. (2001). Help wanted . . . college required. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
8.
CatterallJ. S. (1995). Different ways of knowing: 1991–94 national longitudinal study, program effects on students and teachers (final report). Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies.
9.
Darling-HammondL.McLaughlinM. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597–604.
10.
ElmoreR. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
11.
Florida Department of Education. (2004a). Assessment and accountability briefing book. Tallahassee, FL: Author.
12.
Florida Department of Education. (2004b). Middle school reading coach grant request for application. Just read, Florida!Retrieved June 29, 2009, from http://www.justreadflorida.org/grants/MRC-RFP.asp
13.
GaretM. S.BirmanB. F.PorterA. C.DeSimoneL.HermanR.YoonK. S. (1999). Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
14.
GaretM. S.CronenS.EatonM.KurkiA.LudwigM.JonesW.. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
15.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DeSimoneL.BirmanB. F.YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
16.
GreeneW. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
GuinneyE. (2001). Coaching isn’t just for athletes: The role of teacher leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 740–743.
18.
HarrisD.SassT. (2007). Teacher training, teacher quality, and student achievement (Working Paper 3). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
19.
HasbrouckJ. E.DentonC. A. (2005). The reading coach: A how-to manual for success. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
20.
HawleyW.ValliL. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 151–180). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
JacobsV. A. (2008). Adolescent literacy: Putting the crisis in context. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 7–39.
22.
JohnsonS. M.BergJ. H.DonaldsonM. L. (2005). Who stays in teaching and why? A review of the literature on teacher retention. Boston: Harvard Graduate School of Education, Project on the Next Generation of Teachers.
23.
JoyceB.ShowersB. (1996). Staff development as a comprehensive service organization. Journal of Staff Development, 17, 2–6.
24.
JoyceB.ShowersB. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25.
KamilM. (2003). Reading for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
26.
KnightJ. (2006). Instructional coaching: Eight factors for realizing better classroom teaching through support, feedback and intensive, individualized professional learning. School Administrator, 63(4), 36–40.
27.
KohlerF. W.CrilleyK. M.ShearerD. D.GoodG. (1997). Effects of peer coaching on teacher and student outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 240–260.
28.
KohlerF. W.EzellH. K.PaluselliM. (1999). Promoting changes in teachers’ conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 154–165.
29.
KohlerF. W.McCulloughK.BuchanK. (1995). Using peer coaching to enhance preschool teachers’ development and refinement of classroom activities. Early Education and Development, 6, 215–239.
30.
KutnerM.GreenbergE.JinY.BoyleB.HsuY.DunleavyE. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved June 20, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007480
31.
LaveJ. (1988). Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MarshJ. A.McCombsJ. S.LockwoodJ. R.MartorellF.GershwinD.NaftelS.. (2008). Supporting literacy across the sunshine state: A study of Florida middle school reading coaches. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, MG-762-CC.
34.
MarshJ. A.McCombsJ. S.MartorellF. (in press). How instructional coaches support data-driven decision making: Policy implementation and effects in Florida middle schools. Educational Policy. Retrieved from http://epx.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/0895904809341467v1
35.
McCombsJ. S.KirbyS. N.BarneyH.DarilekH.MageeS. J. (2004). Achieving state and national literacy goals, a long uphill road: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
36.
NeufeldB.RoperD. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity. New York: The Annenberg Institute for School Reform and the Annenberg Institute Program on Education.
37.
PoglincoS. M.BachA. J.HovdeK.RosenbaumS.SaundersM.SupovitzJ. A. (2003). The heart of the matter: The coaching model in America’s choice schools. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education.
38.
RichardsA. (2003). “Making our own road”: The emergence of school-based staff developers in America’s public schools. New York: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.
39.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
RossJ. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17(1), 51–65.
41.
RossS. M.NunneryJ.SmithL. J. (1996). Evaluation of elementary school-wide programs: Clover Park school district year 1: 1996–97. Memphis: University of Memphis, Center for Research in Educational Policy.
ShowersB.JoyceB. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12–16.
44.
SlavinR. E.KarweitN. L.WasikB. A.MaddenN. A.DolanL. J. (1994). Success for all: A comprehensive approach to prevention and early intervention. In SlavinR. E.KarweitN. L.WasikB. A. (Eds.), Preventing early school failure: Research on effective strategies (pp. 175–205). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
45.
SturtevantE. G. (2003). The literacy coach: A key to improving teaching and learning in secondary schools. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
46.
TharpR. G.GallimoreR. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
TollC. A. (2007). Lenses on literacy coaching: Conceptualizations, functions, and outcomes. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
48.
VaughanD. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
WalpoleS.McKennaM. C. (2004). The literacy coach’s handbook: A guide to research-based practice. New York: Guilford.
WongK.NicoteraA. (2006). Peer coaching as a strategy to build instructional capacity in low performing schools. In WongK.RutledgeS. (Eds.), System-wide efforts to improve student achievement (pp. 271–302). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
52.
WooldridgeJ. (2001). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
