Teach For America (TFA) recruits high-achieving college graduates to teach for 2 years in the nation’s low-income schools. This study is the first to examine these teachers’ retention nationwide, asking whether, when, and why they voluntarily transfer from their low-income placement schools or leave teaching altogether. Based on a survey of three entire TFA cohorts (n = 2,029), this longitudinal, retrospective study uses discrete-time survival analysis. We found that teachers who have more challenging assignments—split grades, multiple subjects, or out-of-field classes—are at greater risk of leaving their schools or resigning from teaching than those with single-grade, single-subject, or in-field assignments. It is notable that in-field science teachers’ risk of resigning was higher than that of their out-of-field counterparts with nonscience degrees. This study informs policymakers and school officials seeking to retain TFA and other promising teachers.
AtwellP.LavinD.DominaT.LeveyT. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 886–924.
3.
AzimiN. (2007). Why Teach For America?New York Times Magazine. September30, 2007, p. 111.
4.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
5.
BirkelandS. E.CurtisR. (2006). Ensuring the support and development of new teachers in the Boston Public Schools: A proposal to improve teacher quality and retention. Boston: Boston Public Schools.
Education Trust. (2004). The real value of teachers: Using new information about teacher effectiveness to close the achievement gap. Washington, DC: Author.
11.
EhrenbergR. G.BrewerD. J. (1994). Do school and teacher characteristics matter? Evidence from high school and beyond. Economics of Education Review, 13(1), 1–17.
12.
EhrenbergR. G.BrewerD. J. (1995). Did teachers’ verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited. Economics of Education Review, 14(1), 1–21.
13.
ElfersA.PleckiM.KnappM. (2006). Teacher mobility: Looking more closely at “the movers” within a state system. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(3), 94–127.
14.
FinnJ. D. (2006). The adult lives of at-risk students: The roles of attainment and engagement in high school (NCES 2006-328). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
15.
FowlerF. (1998). Practical aspects of interview data collection and data management. In BickmanL.RogD. J. (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods, pp. 343–374. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
GritzM.TheobaldN. (1996). The effects of school district spending priorities on length of stay in teaching. The Journal of Human Resources, 31(3), 477–512.
18.
GuarinoC.SantibañezL.DaleyG.BrewerD. (2004). A review of the research literature on teacher recruitment and retention (No. TR-164-EDU). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326–354.
21.
HubermanM. (1993). The lives of teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
IngersollR. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26–37.
23.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
24.
IngersollR. (2002). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP Bulletin, 86(631), 16–31.
25.
JohnsonS. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books.
26.
JohnsonS. M.BergJ. H.DonaldsonM. L. (2005). Who stays in teaching and why: A review of the literature on teacher retention. Washington, DC: NRTA.
27.
JohnsonS. M.BirkelandS. (2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581–617.
28.
JohnsonS. M., The Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. (2004). Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
KardosS. M. (2004). Supporting and sustaining new teachers in schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
KellyS. (2004). An event history analysis of teacher attrition: Salary, teacher tracking, and socially disadvantaged schools. Journal of Experimental Education, 72(3), 195–220.
31.
KirbyS. N.BerendsM.NaftelS. (1999). Supply and demand of minority teachers in Texas: Problems and prospects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 47–66.
32.
LevyF.MurnaneR. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
LiuE. (2004). New teachers’ experiences of hiring in four states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
LiuE.JohnsonS. M. (2006). New teachers’ experiences of hiring: Late, rushed, and information-poor. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 324–360.
35.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
LuekensM. T.LyterD. M.FoxE. E.ChandlerK. (2004). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the teacher follow-up survey, 2000-01. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
37.
McCaffreyD. F.LockwoodJ. R.KoretzD. M.HamiltonL. S. (2003). Evaluating value-added models for teacher accountability. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
38.
Metropolitan Life. (2006). The MetLife Survey of the American Teacher, 2006: Expectations and Experiences.
39.
MontD.ReesD. I. (1996). The influence of classroom characteristics on high school teacher turnover. Economic Inquiry, 34(1), 152–167.
40.
MurnaneR. (2007). Improving the education of children living in poverty. The Future of Children: The Next Generation of Anti-Poverty Policies, 17(2).
41.
MurnaneR. J.PhillipsB. R. (1981). What do effective teachers of inner city children have in common?Social Science Research, 10(1), 83–100.
42.
MurnaneR. J.SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B.KempleJ. J.OlsenR. J. (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America’s children: Summary report. Washington, DC: Author.
44.
PattersonN.RoehrigG.LuffJ. (2003). Running the treadmill: Explorations of beginning high school science teacher turnover in Arizona. High School Journal, 86(4), 14-23.
45.
PayneS. L. (1951). The art of asking questions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
PeskeH. G.HaycockK. (2006). Teaching equality: How poor and minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.
47.
RaudenbushS.RowanB.CheongY. (1992). Contextual effects on the self-perceived efficacy of high school teachers. Sociology of Education, 65, 150–167.
48.
RockoffJ. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.
49.
RowanB. (1994). Comparing teacher’s work with work in other occupations: Notes on the professional status of teaching. Educational Researcher, 23(6), 4–17.
50.
SeastromM.GruberK.HenkeR.McGrathD.CohenB. (2004). Qualifications of the public school teacher workforce: Prevalence of out-of-field teaching, 1987–88 to 1999–2000 (NCES 2002–603). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
51.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (1993). It’s about time: Using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 155–195.
52.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
SkinnerC. (2005). Creating a force of leaders to eliminate educational inequity: Teach For America’s study of alumni career trajectories. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Montreal, Canada.
54.
SmithT.IngersollR. (2004). Reducing teacher turnover: What are the components of effective induction?American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714.
55.
StinebricknerT. R. (2001). A dynamic model of teacher labor supply. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(1), 196–230.
56.
SudmanS.BradburnN. M. (1982). Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57.
TarisT. W. (2000). A primer in longitudinal data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyA. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956.
59.
Tschannen-MoranM.Woolfolk HoyA.HoyW. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.
VeenmanS. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143–178.
62.
WillettJ. B.SingerJ. D. (1991). From whether to when: New methods for studying student dropout and teacher attrition. Review of Educational Research, 61, 407–450.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
