The No Child Left Behind Act requires states to publish high school graduation rates for public schools; the U.S. Department of Education is currently considering a mandate to standardize high school graduation rate reporting. However, no consensus exists among researchers or policymakers about how to measure high school graduation rates. We use longitudinal data tracking a cohort of students at 82 Texas public high schools to assess the precision of three widely used high school graduation rate measures: Texas’s official graduation rates and two competing estimates based on publicly available enrollment data from the Common Core of Data. Our analyses show that these widely used approaches yield highly imprecise estimates of high school graduation and persistence rates. We propose several guidelines for using existing graduation and persistence rate data and argue that a national effort to track students as they progress through high school is essential to reconcile conflicting estimates.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/pubs/toolbocrevisit/index.html
BlackD.SandersS.TaylorL. (2003). Measurement of higher education in the census and Current Population Survey. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98(463), 545–554.
4.
CameronS. V.HeckmanJ. J. (1993). The non-equivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labor Economics, 11(1), 1–47.
5.
CollinsL. M.SchaferJ. L.KamC. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330–351.
6.
Commission on No Child Left Behind. (2007). Beyond NCLB: Fulfilling the promise to our nation’s children. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
7.
CrockerL.AlginaJ. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
FinnJ. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.
10.
FryR. (2005). The higher dropout rate of foreign-born teens: The role of schooling abroad. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/55.pdf
11.
Government Accountability Office. (2005). No Child Left Behind Act: Education could do more to help state better define graduation rates and improve knowledge about intervention strategies (GAO-05-879). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-05-879
12.
GreeneJ. P.ForsterG. (2003). Public high school graduation and college-readiness rates in the United States (Manhattan Institute: Education Working Paper 3). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/ewp_03.pdf
13.
GreeneJ. P.WintersM. (2005). Public high school graduation and college-readiness rates: 1991-2002. New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp_08.htm
14.
HaneyW.MadausG.AbramsL.WheelockA.MiaoJ.GruiaI. (2004). The education pipeline in the United States, 1970–2000. Boston: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy. Retrieved August 27, 2009, from http://www.bc.edu/research/nbetpp/statements/nbr3.pdf
15.
HeckmanJ. J.LaFontaineP. A. (2007). The American high school graduation rate: Trends and levels (IZA Discussion Paper No. 3216). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from ftp://repec.iza.org/RePEc/Discussionpaper/dp3216.pdf
LairdJ.KienzlG.DeBellM.ChapmanC. (2007). Dropout rates in the United States: 2005 compendium report. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007059.pdf
19.
LeeV. E.BurkhamD. T. (2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization. American Education Research Journal, 40(2), 353–393.
20.
Library of Congress, S. 1185 Graduation Promise Act of 2007. (2007).
21.
LosenD. (2005). Graduation rate accountability under the No Child Left Behind Act. In SundermanG.L.KimJ.S.OrfieldG. (Eds.), NCLB meets school realities: Lessons from the field (pp. 105–120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
22.
MiaoJ.HaneyW. (2004). High school graduation rates: Alternative methods and implications. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(55). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/v12n55/
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). National Institute of Statistics Sciences/Education Statistics Services Institute Task Force on Graduation, Completion, and Dropout Indicators: Final report (NCES 2005-105). Washington, DC: Author.
25.
NiuS. X.SullivanT.TiendaM. (2008). Minority talent loss and the Texas Top 10 Percent Law. Social Science Quarterly, 89(4), 831–845.
26.
RaghunathanT. E.LepkowskiJ. M.Van HoewykJ.SolenbergerP. (2001). A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology, 27(1), 85–95.
27.
RaghunathanT. E.SolenbergerP. W.Van HoewykJ. (2002). IVEware: Imputation and variance estimation software. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
28.
RoyJ.MishelL. (2008). Using administrative data to estimate graduation rates: Challenges, proposed solutions and their pitfalls. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 16(11). Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v16n11/
29.
RumbergerR. W. (2004). Why students drop out of school. In OrfieldG. (Ed.), Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis (pp. 131–156). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
30.
SchaferJ. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman and Hall.
31.
SchemoD. J. (2003, July). Questions on data cloud luster of Houston schools. New York Times, p. A1.
32.
SeastromM.HoffmanL.ChapmanC.StillwellR. (2007). The averaged freshman graduation rate for public high schools from the Common Core of Data: School years 2002–03 and 2003–04. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006606rev.pdf
33.
SwansonC. (2003a). Keeping count and losing count: Calculating graduation rates for all students under NCLB accountability. Washington, DC: Education Policy Center, The Urban Institute. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410843_keeping_count.pdf
34.
SwansonC. (2003b). NCLB implementation report: State approaches for calculating high school graduation rates. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Education Policy Center.
35.
SwansonC. (2004). Who graduates? Who doesn’t? A statistical portrait of public high school graduation, class of 2001. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410934_WhoGraduates.pdf
TylerJ. H. (2003). Economic benefits of the GED: Lessons from recent research. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 369–403.
39.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). The condition of education 2006 (NCES 2006-071). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006071.pdf
40.
WarrenJ. R. (2005). State-level high school completion rates: Concepts, measures, and trends. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(51). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n51
41.
WarrenJ. R.Halpern-MannersA. (2007). Is the glass emptying or filling up? Reconciling divergent trends in high school completion and dropout. Educational Researcher, 36(6), 335–343.
42.
WingleeM.MarkerD.HendersonA.YoungB. A.HoffmanL. (2000). A recommended approach to providing high school dropout and completion rates at the state level. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
