Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Transfer Facilitation of Metalinguistic Awareness in Word Reading Among Dual Language Learners of English: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Study
This article reports the first meta-analytic Structural Equation Modeling study that examined the within- and cross-language relations of three metalinguistic awareness skills (orthographic, phonological, and morphological awareness, or OA, PA, and MA) with word reading among school-aged dual language learners (DLLs) of English. Based on 156 primary studies (N = 23,371), we found that (1) OA, PA, and MA each uniquely predicted word reading within first language (L1) and second language (L2); (2) L1 OA, PA, and MA predicted their corresponding skill in L2, showing a construct-level transfer facilitation effect; (3) for cross-over transfer, L1 PA, as opposed to L1 OA and MA, predicted L2 word reading, but their indirect effects on L2 word reading were all significant. Moderator analysis was conducted on L1 background (Chinese vs. non-Chinese); L2 learning context (ESL vs. EFL); and developmental stage (younger vs. older). We discuss the transfer facilitation effects of L1 metalinguistic awareness skills that can be leveraged for effective and differentiated instruction for DLLs.
Abu-RabiaS. (1997). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers. Reading and Writing, 9, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007962408827
2.
Abu-RabiaS. (2001). Testing the interdependence hypothesis among native adult bilingual Russian-English students. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010425825251
3.
Arco-TiradoJ. L.Fernández-MartínF. D.Hervás-TorresM.Jiménez-FernándezG.CaletN.DefiorS.NeitzelA. J.SlavinR. E. (2024). A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis on effective reading programs in Spanish. Review of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241297668
4.
BabayiğitS. (2014). The role of oral language skills in reading and listening comprehension of text: A comparison of monolingual (L1) and bilingual (L2) speakers of English language. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(S1), S22–S47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01538.x
5.
BaeH. S.JoshiR. M. (2018). A multiple-group comparison on the role of morphological awareness in reading: Within- and cross-linguistic evidence from Korean ESL and EFL learners. Reading and Writing, 31(8), 1821–1841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9795-4
6.
BialystokE.McBride-ChangC.LukG. (2005). Bilingualism, language proficiency, and learning to read in two writing systems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 580–590. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.580
7.
BorensteinM.HedgesL.RothsteinH. R. (2022). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 4) [Computer software]. Biostat.
8.
BowersP. N.KirbyJ. R.DeaconS. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309359353
9.
Branum-MartinL.TaoS.GarnaatS. (2015). Bilingual phonological awareness: Reexamining the evidence for relations within and across languages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037149
10.
Branum-MartinL.TaoS.GarnaatS.BuntaF.FrancisD. J. (2012). Meta-analysis of bilingual phonological awareness: Language, age, and psycholinguistic grain size. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 932–944. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027755
11.
CarlisleJ. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In FeldmanL. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–196). Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc.
12.
CassarM.TreimanR. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children’s knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.631
13.
CheungH.ChanM.ChongK. (2007). Use of orthographic knowledge in reading by Chinese-English bi-scriptal children. Language Learning, 57(3), 469–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00423.x
CheungM. W.-L. (2015b). metaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 120910. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521
ChoJ.-R.ChiuM. M.McBride-ChangC. (2011). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and literacy development in Korean and English: A 2-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(5), 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.487143
18.
ChungK.McBride-ChangC.CheungH.WongS. W. L. (2013). General auditory processing, speech perception and phonological awareness skills in Chinese–English biliteracy. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01500.x
19.
ChungS. C.ChenX.GevaE. (2019). Deconstructing and reconstructing cross-language transfer in bilingual reading development: An interactive framework. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.01.003
20.
CommissaireE.DuncanL.CasalisS. (2011). Cross-language transfer of orthographic processing skills: A study of French children who learn English at school. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01473.x
21.
CommissaireE.PasquarellaA.ChenB. X.DeaconS. H. (2014). The development of orthographic processing skills in children in early French immersion programs. Written Language & Literacy, 17(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.02com
22.
CumminsJ. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002222
23.
DeaconS. H.ChenX.LuoY.RamirezG. (2013). Beyond language borders: Orthographic processing and word reading in Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01490.x
24.
DeaconS. H.LevesqueK. (2024). Mechanisms in the relation between morphological awareness and the development of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(6), 1052–1069. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000871
25.
DeaconS. H.Wade-WoolleyL.KirbyJ. R. (2009). Flexibility in young second-language learners: Examining the language specificity of orthographic processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01392.x
26.
DichN.PedersenB. (2013). Native language effects on spelling in English as a foreign language: A time-course analysis. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 51–68.
27.
DurantK.JarmulowiczL.Harrel-WilliamsL. (2023). Spanish phonological awareness in kindergarten uniquely supports second-grade English morphological awareness in Spanish-English Dual Language Learners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 55(1), 85–104, https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_LSHSS-23-00027
28.
DurgunoğluA. Y. (2002). Cross-linguistic transfer in literacy development and implications for language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 52(1), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-002-0012-y
29.
GillonG. T. (2017). Phonological awareness: From research to practice (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
30.
GoodrichJ. M.FittonL.ThayerL. (2023). Relations between oral language skills and English reading achievement among Spanish–English bilingual children: A quantile regression analysis. Annals of Dyslexia, 73(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-022-00257-1
31.
GoodwinA. P.AhnS. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(4), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.689791
32.
GoodwinA. P.HugginsA. C.CarloM. S.AugustD.CalderonM. (2013). Minding morphology: How morphological awareness relates to reading for English language learners. Reading and Writing, 26, 1387–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9412-5
33.
Hipfner-BoucherK.ChenX. (2016). Cross-language transfer of metalinguistic and cognitive skills in second language learning. In ChenX.DronjicV.Helms-ParkR. (Eds.), Reading in a second language: Cognitive and psycholinguistic issues (pp. 99–132). Routledge.
34.
JakS.CheungM. W.-L. (2020). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters. Psychological Methods, 25(4), 430–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000245
35.
JeonE. H.YamashitaJ. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64(1), 160–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034
36.
KeS.MillerR. T.ZhangD.KodaK. (2021). Crosslinguistic sharing of morphological awareness in biliteracy development: A systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation coefficients. Language Learning, 71(1), 8–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12429
37.
KeS.ZhangD.KodaK. (2023). Metalinguistic awareness in second language reading development. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108979801
38.
KiefferM. J.LesauxN. K. (2012). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning, 62(4), 1170–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00722.x
39.
KirbyJ. R.BowersP. N. (2017). Morphological instruction and literacy. In CainK.ParrilaR.ComptonD. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 437–462). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.15.24kir
KodaK. (2008). Impacts of prior literacy experience on second language learning to read. In KodaK.ZehlerA. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages: Cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second-language literacy development (pp. 80–108). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935668-11
43.
KrencaK.GottardoA.GevaE.ChenX. (2020). English phonological specificity predicts early French reading difficulty in emerging bilingual children. Annals of Dyslexia, 70(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-019-00188-4
44.
LeeJ. W.WoltersA.KimG. Y.-S. (2023). The relations of morphological awareness with language and literacy skills vary depending on orthographic depth and nature of morphological awareness. Review of Educational Research, 93(4), 528–558. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221123816
45.
LeongC. K.HauK. T.ChengP. W.TanL. H. (2005). Exploring two-wave reciprocal structural relations among orthographic knowledge, phonological sensitivity, and reading and spelling of English words by Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.591
46.
LinM.-F. (2019). Developing EFL learners’ morphological awareness: Instructional effect, teachability of affixes, and learners’ perception. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 57(3), 289–325. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0081
47.
LiuY.GroenM. A.CainK. (2023). The association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 42, 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100571
48.
LuoY.ChenX.GevaE. (2014). Concurrent and longitudinal cross-linguistic transfer of phonological awareness and morphological awareness in Chinese-English bilingual children. Written Language and Literacy, 17(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.1.05luo
49.
Marinova-ToddS. H.MarshallD. B.SnowC. E. (2000). Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588095
50.
McBride-ChangC.HoC. (2005). Predictors of beginning reading in Chinese and English: A 2-year longitudinal study of Chinese kindergartners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_2
51.
McBride-ChangC.TongX.ShuH.WongA. M.-Y.LeungK.TardifT. (2008). Syllable, phoneme, and tone: Psycholinguistic units in early Chinese and English word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430801917290
52.
Melby-LervågM.LervågA. (2011). Cross-linguistic transfer of oral language, decoding, phonological awareness and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01477.x
53.
MirzaA.GottardoA. (2023). The role of context in learning to read languages that use different writing systems and scripts: Urdu and English. Languages, 8(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010086
NagyW. E.AndersonR. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English?Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 304–330. https://doi.org/10.2307/747823
56.
NagyW. E.AndersonR. C. (1995). Metalinguistic awareness and literacy acquisition in different languages (Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report, No. 618).
57.
NagyW. E.CarlisleJ. F.GoodwinA. P. (2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509967
OrwinR. G.VeveaJ. L. (2009). Evaluating coding decisions. In CooperH.HedgesL.ValentineJ. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 177–203). Russell Sage Foundation. https://doi.org/10.7758/9781610448864.13
60.
OuzzaniM.HammadyH.FedorowiczZ.ElmagarmidA. (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), Article 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
61.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
62.
PanJ.SongS.SuM.McBrideC.LiuH.ZhangY.LiH.ShuH. (2016). On the relationship between phonological awareness, morphological awareness and Chinese literacy skills: Evidence from an 8-year longitudinal study. Developmental Science, 19(6), 982–991. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12356
63.
ParkerC.ScottS.GeddesA. (2019). Snowball sampling. In AtkinsonP.DelamontS.CernatA.SakshaugJ. W.WilliamsR. (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036831710
64.
PengP.LeeK.LuoJ.LiS.JoshiR. M.TaoS. (2021). Simple view of reading in Chinese: A one-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Review of Educational Research, 91(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320964198
65.
PerfettiC. A.DunlapS. (2008). Learning to read: General principles and writing system variations. In KodaK.ZehlerA. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages: Cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second-language literacy development (pp. 25–50). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935668-9
66.
PrevooM. J. L.MaldaM.MesmanJ.Van IJzendoornM. H. (2016). Within- and cross-language relations between oral language proficiency and school outcomes in bilingual children with an immigrant background: A meta-analytical study. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 237–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315584685
67.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [R]. R.
68.
RafatY. (2016). Orthography-induced transfer in the production of English-speaking learners of Spanish. The Language Learning Journal, 44(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.784346
69.
ShareD. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
70.
Sun-AlperinM. K.WangM. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9221-7
71.
TongX.McBride-ChangC. (2010). Chinese-English biscriptal reading: Cognitive component skills across orthographies. Reading and Writing, 23, 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9211-9
72.
TongX.McBride-ChangC.WongA. M.-Y.ShuH.ReitsmaP.RispensJ. (2011). Longitudinal predictors of very early Chinese literacy acquisition. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01426.x
73.
WangM.KoI. Y.ChoiJ. (2009). The importance of morphological awareness in Korean–English biliteracy acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.002
74.
WangM.ParkY.LeeK. R. (2006). Korean-English biliteracy acquisition: Cross-language phonological and orthographic transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.148
75.
WangM.PerfettiC. A.LiuY. (2005). Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition: Cross-language and writing system transfer. Cognition, 97(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.001
76.
YangM.CoocN.ShengL. (2017). An investigation of cross-linguistic transfer between Chinese and English: A meta-analysis. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0036-9
77.
ZhangD. (2013). Linguistic distance effect on cross-linguistic transfer of morphological awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(5), 917–942. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000070
78.
ZhangD.KeS.MoY. (2023). Morphology in reading comprehension among school-aged readers of English: A synthesis and meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(5), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000797
79.
ZhangD.KodaK. (2013). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension in a foreign language: A study of young Chinese EFL learners. System, 41(4), 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.09.009
80.
ZhangH.KodaK. (2021). Cross-linguistic morphological awareness in Chinese heritage language reading acquisition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(2), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09722-7
81.
ZhangJ.McBride-ChangC. (2014). Auditory sensitivity, speech perception, L1 Chinese, and L2 English reading abilities in Hong Kong Chinese children. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035086
82.
ZhangK.SunX.Flores-GaonaZ.YuC.-L.EgglestonR. L.NickersonN.CarusoV. C.TardifT.KovelmanI. (2025). Cross-linguistic transfer in bilingual children’s phonological and morphological awareness skills: A longitudinal perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 28(2), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728924000439
83.
ZhangK.SunX.YuC.EgglestonR. L.MarksR. A.NickersonN.CarusoV. C.HuX.TardifT.ChouT.BoothJ. R.KovelmanI. (2023). Phonological and morphological literacy skills in English and Chinese: A cross-linguistic neuroimaging comparison of Chinese–English bilingual and monolingual English children. Human Brain Mapping, 44(13), 4812–4829. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26419
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
