Flipped classrooms (FCs) in K–12 schools are growing in popularity. However, previous studies have reported inconsistent findings on the effects of FCs, and the conditions under which FCs are effective remain unclear. This three-level meta-analysis synthesized the effects of FCs versus traditional classrooms (TCs) on various learning domains among K–12 students based on 129 studies with 399 effect sizes (N = 12,727). The results revealed that FCs have a significant positive effect on K–12 students’ overall performance (without outliers: g = 0.53 [0.44,0.62], 95% prediction interval [–0.60, 1.66]) and on both the cognitive domain and the affective domain. Moderator analyses showed that region, measured outcome, outcome dilution, instructor equivalence, and publication type were significant predictors. In addition, the educational context and research methodology characteristics accounted for a significant proportion of the variability in overall effects. These findings provide valuable evidence-based recommendations for future research and practice.
*AbdelrahmanL. A. M.DewittD.AliasN.RahmanM. N. A. (2017). Flipped learning for ESL writing in a Sudanese school. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 60–70. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152605
2.
AbeysekeraL.DawsonP. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
3.
AlexanderP. A. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: The art and science of quality systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352
4.
AlgarniB. (2018). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of flipped classroom in mathematics education [Conference session]. 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 7970–7976.
5.
*AlgarniB.Lortie-ForguesH. (2022). An evaluation of the impact of flipped-classroom teaching on mathematics proficiency and self-efficacy in Saudi Arabia. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13250
6.
*AlmasseriM.AlHojailanM. I. (2019). How flipped learning based on the cognitive theory of multimedia learning affects students’ academic achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(6), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12386
7.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
BakerW. L.WhiteC. M.CappelleriJ. C.KlugerJ.ColemanC. I. (2009). Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: The role of meta-regression. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 63(10), 1426–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02168.x
10.
BergmannJ.SamsA. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
11.
BergmannJ.SamsA. (2016). Flipped learning for elementary instruction. International Society for Technology in Education.
12.
BeckerB. J. (2000). Multivariate meta-analysis. In BrownS. D.TinsleyH. E. A. (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 499–525). Academic Press.
13.
*BhagatK. K.ChangC. N.ChangC. Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 134–142. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.134
14.
BhutoriaA.AljabriN. (2022). Patterns of cognitive returns to information and communication technology (ICT) use of 15-year-olds: Global evidence from a hierarchical linear modeling approach using PISA 2018. Computers & Education, 181, 104447.
15.
BishopJ. L.VerlegerM. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research [Conference session]. 120th ASEE National Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA (paper ID 6219). American Society for Engineering Education.
16.
BloomB. S.EnglehartM. D.FurstE. J.HillW. H.KrathwohlD. R. (1956). The taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. David McKay Co.
17.
BloomH. S.HillC. J.BlackA. R.LipseyM. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(4), 172–177.
18.
BondM. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K–12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
19.
BorensteinM. (2019). Common mistakes in meta-analysis and how to avoid them. Biostat, Inc.
20.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
21.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (2004). How people learn brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
22.
BredowC. A.RoehlingP. V.KnorpA. J.SweetA. M. (2021). To flip or not to flip? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of flipped learning in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 91(6), 878–918. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019122
23.
*CarlisleC. S. (2018). How the flipped classroom impacts students’ math achievement [Doctoral dissertation]. Trevecca Nazarene University, Nashville.
24.
ChenL. L. (2016). Impacts of flipped classroom in high school health education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(4), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239515626371
25.
ChengL.RitzhauptA. D.AntonenkoP. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
26.
CheungA. C.SlavinR. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16656615
27.
CheungM. W. L. (2014). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968
28.
CheungM. W. L. (2019). A guide to conducting a meta-analysis with non-independent effect sizes. Neuropsychology Review, 29(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09415-6
29.
ChiM. T. H.WylieR. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
30.
ClarkK. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online12(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2015.1.5
CookD.LevinsonA.GarsideS. (2011). Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: A systematic review. Medical Education, 45(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03890.x
33.
DabbaghN.KitsantasK. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5), 513–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1278-3
34.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
35.
De BoerH.DonkerA. S.van der WerfM. P. C. (2014). Effects of the attributes of educational interventions on students’ academic performance: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 509–545. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314540006
36.
DeLozierS. J.RhodesM. G. (2016). Flipped classrooms: A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9
37.
DemirelM.DağyarM. (2016). Effects of problem-based learning on attitude: A meta-analysis study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2115–2137. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1293a
38.
*DeSantisJ.Van CurenR.PutschJ.MetzgerJ. (2015). Do students learn more from a flip? An exploration of the efficacy of flipped and traditional lessons. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(1), 39–63. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/130133/
39.
DoğanY.BatdıV.YaşarM. D. (2021). Effectiveness of flipped classroom practices in teaching of science: A mixed research synthesis. Research in Science and Technological Education, 41(1), 393–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1909553
40.
DoyleI. C.KrupickaM. I.VoT. (2013). Student perceptions during the implementation of the flipped classroom model in a modified block curriculum [Paper presentation]. The 114th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL.
41.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
42.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
43.
Fernández-CastillaB.AloeA. M.DeclercqL.JamshidiL.BeretvasS. N.OnghenaP.Van den NoortgateW. (2021). Estimating outcome-specific effects in meta-analyses of multiple outcomes: A simulation study. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 702–717. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01459-4
44.
Fernández-CastillaB.DeclercqL.JamshidiL.BeretvasN.OnghenaP.Van den NoortgateW. (2019). Detecting selection bias in meta-analyses with multiple outcomes: A simulation study. Journal of Experimental Education, 89(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1582470
45.
Fernández-CastillaB.DeclercqL.JamshidiL.BeretvasN.OnghenaP.Van den NoortgateW. (2020). Visual representations of meta-analyses of multiple outcomes: Extensions to forest plots, funnel plots, and caterpillar plots. Methodology, 16(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.4013
46.
FuR.GartlehnerG.GrantM.ShamliyanT.SedrakyanA.WiltT. J.GriffithmL.OremusM.RainaP.IsmailaA.SantaguidaP.LauJ.TrikalinosT. A. (2011). Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health care program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(11), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.010
47.
*GaoX.HewK. F. (2022). Toward a 5E-based flipped classroom model for teaching computational thinking in elementary school: Effects on student computational thinking and problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(2), 512–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211037757
48.
GijbelsD.DochyF.Van den BosscheP.SegersM. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001027
GopalanM.RosingerK.AhnJ. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302
51.
GoughE.DeJongD.GrundmeyerT.BaronM. (2017). K–12 teacher perceptions regarding the flipped classroom model for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516658444
52.
GreenhouseJ. B.IyengarS. (2009). Sensitivity analysis and diagnostics. In CooperH. M.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 417–433). Russell Sage Foundation.
53.
GülerM.KokoçM.Önder BütünerS. (2022). Does a flipped classroom model work in mathematics education? A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11143-z
54.
HarrerM.CuijpersP.FurukawaT. A.EbertD. D. (2021). Doing meta-analysis with R: A hands-on guide. CRC press.
55.
HattieJ. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel—A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Taylor & Francis.
56.
HedgesL. V. (2017). Challenges in building usable knowledge in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2017.1375583
57.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
58.
HewK. F.LoC. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
59.
HigginsJ. P. T.ThomasJ.ChandlerJ.CumpstonM.LiT.PageM. J.WelchV. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 6.3 (updated 2022). Cochrane Training. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
60.
HillH. C.EricksonA. (2019). Using implementation fidelity to aid in interpreting program impacts: A brief review. Educational Researcher, 48(9), 590–598. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19891436
61.
HoweK. R.BervJ. (2000). Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical. In PhillipsD. C. (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 19–40). University of Chicago Press.
62.
*HuangY. N.HongZ. R. (2016). The effects of a flipped English classroom intervention on students’ information and communication technology and English reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9412-7
63.
HwangG. J.LaiC. L. (2017). Facilitating and bridging out-of-class and in-class learning: An interactive E-book-based flipped learning approach for math courses. Educational Technology and Society, 20(1), 184–197. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.20.1.184
JensenL.KonradsenF. (2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23(11), 1515–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0
66.
Karagölİ.EsenE. (2019). The effect of flipped learning approach on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, 34(3), 708–727. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018046755
67.
KongS. C. (2015). An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with pedagogical and technological support. Computers and Education, 89, 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.017
KrathwohlD. R.BloomB. S.MasiaB. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, handbook II: Affective domain. David McKay Co., Inc.
70.
LågT.SæleR. G. (2019). Does the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419870489
71.
LaiC. L.HwangG. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
72.
*LeeG. G.JeonY. E.HongH. G. (2021). The effects of cooperative flipped learning on science achievement and motivation in high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1381–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1917788
73.
LeeM. K. (2018). Flipped classroom as an alternative future class model? Implications of South Korea’s social experiment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 837–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9587-9
74.
LiS.WangW. (2022). Effect of blended learning on student performance in K–12 settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1254–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12696
75.
LinC. J.MubarokH. (2021). Learning analytics for investigating the mind map-guided ai chatbot approach in an EFL flipped speaking classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 16–35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48629242
76.
*LinY. W.TsengC. L.ChiangP. J. (2017). The effect of blended learning in mathematics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a
77.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
78.
LoC. K.CheungK. L.ChanH. R.ChauC. L. E. (2021). Developing flipped learning resources to support secondary school mathematics teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(8), 4787–4805. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1981397
79.
LoC. K.HewK. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K–12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
80.
LoC. K.HewK. F. (2019). The impact of flipped classrooms on student achievement in engineering education: A meta-analysis of 10 years of research. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(4), 523–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20293
81.
*LoC. K.HewK. F. (2021). Developing a flipped learning approach to support student engagement: A design-based research of secondary school mathematics teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12474
82.
*LoC. K.LieC. W.HewK. F. (2018). Applying “First Principles of Instruction” as a design theory of the flipped classroom: Findings from a collective study of four secondary school subjects. Computers and Education, 118, 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.003
83.
MacaskillP.WalterS. D.IrwigL. (2001). A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 20(4), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.698
84.
MakelM. C.PluckerJ. A. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14545513
85.
*MakindeS.YusufM. O. (2017). The flipped classroom: Its effects on students’ performance and retention in secondary school mathematics classroom. International Journal of Innovative Technology Integration in Education, 1(1), 117–126. https://ijitie.aitie.org.ng/index.php/ijitie/article/view/43
86.
MankiwN. G. (2004). Principles of economics (3rd ed.). South-Western College Press.
87.
MattisK. V. (2015). Flipped classroom versus traditional textbook instruction: Assessing accuracy and mental effort at different levels of mathematical complexity. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9238-0
88.
MayerR. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
89.
MayerR. E. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(89), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.47
90.
McDanielM. A.AndersonJ. L.DerbishM. H.MorrisetteN. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5), 494–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326154
91.
McHughM. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://hrcak.srce.hr/89395
MerrillM. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
94.
MethleyA. M.CampbellS.Chew-GrahamC.McNallyR.Cheraghi-SohiS. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
95.
*MohantyA.ParidaD. (2016). Exploring the efficacy suitability of flipped classroom instruction at school level in India: A pilot study. Creative Education, 7(5), 768–776. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.75079
96.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
97.
MorseT. E.HabibA.HornbyG.EvansW. (2022). The efficacy of flipped classrooms: An investigation of the views of an international cohort of teacher educators. International Journal of Educational Reform, 31(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879221076080
98.
*MoundyK.ChafiqN.TalbiM. (2022). Digital textbook and flipped classroom: Experimentation of the self-learning method based on the development of soft skills and disciplinary knowledge. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(7), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i07.28933
99.
MuirT. (2021). Self-determination theory and the flipped classroom: A case study of a senior secondary mathematics class. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(3), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00320-3
100.
MyersJ. A.WitzelB. S.PowellS. R.LiH.PigottT. D.XinY. P.HughesE. M. (2022). A meta-analysis of mathematics word-problem solving interventions for elementary students who evidence mathematics difficulties. Review of Educational Research, 92(5), 695–742. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211070049
101.
NgD. T. K.NgE. H. L.ChuS. K. W. (2022). Engaging students in creative music making with musical instrument application in an online flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10568-2
102.
NiemiecC. P.RyanR. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1477878509104318
103.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2018). Teaching for the future: Effective classroom practices to transform education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264293243-en
104.
OrhanA. (2019). The effect of flipped learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 48(1), 368–396. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.400919
105.
*ØsterlieO.MehusI. (2020). The impact of flipped learning on cognitive knowledge learning and intrinsic motivation in Norwegian secondary physical education. Education Sciences, 10(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040110
106.
PigottT. D.PolaninJ. R. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
107.
PolaninJ. R.Tanner-SmithE. E.HennessyE. (2016). Estimating the difference between published and unpublished effect sizes: A meta-review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 207–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582067
108.
PustejovskyJ. E.TiptonE. (2022). Meta-analysis with robust variance estimation: Expanding the range of working models. Prevention Science, 23(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01246-3
109.
R Core Team. (2021). R: The R project for statistical computing. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.r-project.org
110.
ReedD. A.CookD. A.BeckmanT. J.LevineR. B.KernD. E.WrightS. M. (2007). Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(9), 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.9.1002
111.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
112.
*SalhoobiJ. (2021). Investigating whether the flipped classroom instructional approach in conjunction with gender, satisfy students’ basic psychological needs and influence their chemistry achievements in high school [Doctoral dissertation]. St. John’s University, New York.
113.
*SergisS.SampsonD. G.PelliccioneL. (2018). Investigating the impact of flipped classroom on students’ learning experiences: A self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.011
114.
*SharkiaH.KohenZ. (2021). Flipped classroom among minorities in the context of mathematics learning: The Israeli case. Mathematics, 9(13), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9131500
115.
SimonsohnU.NelsonL. D.SimmonsJ. P. (2014). P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 143(2), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033242
116.
SilvermanS.SolmonM. (1998). The unit of analysis in field research: Issues and approaches to design and data analysis. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(3), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.17.3.270
*StrattonE.ChitiyoG.MathendeA. M.DavisK. M. (2020). Evaluating flipped versus face-to-face classrooms in middle school on science achievement and student perceptions. Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.646888
119.
StrelanP.OsbornA.PalmerE. (2020a). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
120.
StrelanP.OsbornA.PalmerE. (2020b). Student satisfaction with courses and instructors in a flipped classroom: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12421
121.
StuartE. A.RubinD. B. (2008). Best practices in quasi-experimental designs. In OsborneJ. W. (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 155–176). Sage.
122.
SwellerJ. (2019). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
123.
TanC.YueW. G.FuY. (2017). Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in nursing education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Chinese Nursing Research, 4(4), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnre.2017.10.006
124.
Tanner-SmithE. E.TiptonE.PolaninJ. R. (2016). Handling complex meta-analytic data structures using robust variance estimates: A tutorial in R. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 2, 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-016-0026-5
125.
TiptonE.PustejovskyJ. E.AhmadiH. (2019). Current practices in meta-regression in psychology, education, and medicine. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1339
126.
*TsaiM. N.LiaoY. F.ChangY. L.ChenH. C. (2020). A brainstorming flipped classroom approach for improving students’ learning performance, motivation, teacher-student interaction and creativity in a civics education class. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(1), 100747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100747
127.
*TseW. S.ChoiL. Y. A.TangW. S. (2019). Effects of video-based flipped class instruction on subject reading motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12569
128.
TsengM. F.LinC. H.ChenH. (2018). An immersive flipped classroom for learning Mandarin Chinese: Design, implementation, and outcomes. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 714–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1440603
129.
TurraH.CarrascoV.GonzálezC.SandovalV.YáñezS. (2019). Flipped classroom experiences and their impact on engineering students’ attitudes towards university-level mathematics. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1644963
130.
TutalÖ.YazarT. (2021). Flipped classroom improves academic achievement, learning retention and attitude towards course: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09706-9
131.
Van AltenD. C. D.PhielixC.JanssenJ.KesterL. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003
132.
Van den NoortgateW.López-LópezJ. A.Marín-MartínezF.Sánchez-MecaJ. (2013). Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 576–594. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0261-6
133.
Van GogT.EricssonK. A.RikersR. M. J. P.PaasF. (2005). Instructional design for advanced learners: Establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and deliberate practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504799
134.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
135.
ViechtbauerW. (2020). Model checking in meta-analysis. In SchmidC. H.StijnenT.WhiteI. (Eds.), Handbook of meta-analysis (pp. 219–254). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
136.
ViechtbauerW.CheungM. W. L. (2010). Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.11
137.
WagnerM.GegenfurtnerA.UrhahneD. (2021). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom on student achievement in secondary education: A meta-analysis. Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie, 35(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000274
138.
*WangJ.JouM.LvY.HuangC. C. (2018). An investigation on teaching performances of model-based flipping classroom for physics supported by modern teaching technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.018
139.
WangT. (2017). Overcoming barriers to “flip”: Building teacher’s capacity for the adoption of flipped classroom in Hong Kong secondary schools. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0047-7
140.
WangY. H. (2021). Exploring the effectiveness of adopting anchor-based game learning materials to support flipped classroom activities for senior high school students. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1579238
141.
*WeiX.ChengI. L.ChenN. S.YangX.LiuY.DongY.ZhaiX.Kinshuk. (2020). Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1461–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09752-x
WigfieldA.KlaudaS. L.CambriaJ. (2011). Influences on the development of academic self-regulatory processes. In BarryD. H. S.ZimmermanJ. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 33–48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch3
144.
WolfR.MorrisonJ.InnsA.SlavinR.RismanK. (2020). Average effect sizes in developer-commissioned and independent evaluations. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 428–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1726537
145.
WuR.YangW.RifenbarkG.WuQ. (2023). School and teacher information, communication and technology (ICT) readiness across 57 countries: The alignment optimization method. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1273–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11233-y
146.
*YangC. C. R.ChenY. (2020). Implementing the flipped classroom approach in primary English classrooms in China. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1217–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10012-6
147.
*YeS. H.HsiaoT. Y.SunC. T. (2018). Using commercial video games in flipped classrooms to support physical concept construction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12267
148.
*YousefzadehM.SalimiA. (2015). The effect of flipped learning (revised learning) on Iranian students’ learning outcomes. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(5), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.5p.209
149.
ZhengL.BhagatK. K.ZhenY.ZhangX. (2020). The effectiveness of the flipped classroom on students’ learning achievement and learning motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology and Society, 23(1), 1–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915403
150.
ZhuG. (2021). Is flipping effective? A meta-analysis of the effect of flipped instruction on K–12 students’ academic achievement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 733–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09983-6
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
