Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Epistemic injustice is a condition where knowers and knowledge claims are unduly dismissed. Philosophers suggest that epistemic injustice manifests in three forms: testimonial, hermeneutical, and contributory. Although distinct, all forms of epistemic injustice stem from relations of power, privilege, and positionality — where some have the opportunity and authority to legitimize the knowledge contributions of others. The purpose of this study was to explore the presence of epistemic injustice in U.S. doctoral education through a systematic review of literature. We methodically searched hundreds of peer-reviewed journals for studies focused on teaching, advising, peer interaction, doctoral socialization, and other experiences concerning doctoral education across the humanities, social science, and science disciplines. We retained, reviewed, and analyzed 107 manuscripts. Our analysis revealed epistemic injustice in doctoral education as well as rules that foster the conditions for epistemic injustice. Implications for doctoral education and future research are offered.

Keywords

student knowledge social context learning environments higher education diversity qualitative research doctoral education doctoral students epistemic injustice knowledge production legitimacy academic disciplinary cultures

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acker

Haque

(2015). The struggle to make sense of doctoral study. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.956699

Adler

P. A.

Adler

(2005). The identity career of the graduate student: Professional socialization to academic sociology. The American Sociologist, 36(2), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-005-1002-4

Aguilar-Smith

(2021). Doubt: The uninvited educator. In Templeton

Love

B. H.

Johnson

(Eds.), Elevating marginalized voices in academe: Lessons for a new generation of scholars (pp. 11–15). Routledge.

Alexander

P. A.

(2020). Methodological guidance paper: The art and science of quality systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352

Austin

A. E.

(2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1558449

Anderson

Cidro

(2019). Decades of doing: Indigenous women academics reflect on the practices of community-based health research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619835707

Barnes

B. J.

Williams

E. A.

Stassen

M. L.

(2012). Dissecting doctoral advising: A comparison of students’ experiences across disciplines. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.614933

Bathurst

(2012). Constructing anthropologists: Culture learning and culture making in U.S. doctoral education. Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 32–68. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2012.050103

Baynes

Leal

Gonzales

L. D.

Pasque

(2019). Epistemic in/justice in graduate education—A systematic review of literature. Presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Tampa, MA.

10.

Becher

Trowler

(2001). Academic tribes and territories. McGraw-Hill Education.

11.

Bhatt

(2018). The butterfly effect of women’s studies. Feminist Studies, 44(2), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2018.0038

12.

Bhattacharya

(2016). The vulnerable academic: Personal narratives and strategic de/colonizing of academic structures. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415615619

13.

Blockett

R. A.

Felder

P. P.

Parrish

III Collier

(2016). Pathways to the professoriate: Exploring Black doctoral student socialization and the pipeline to the academic profession. Western Journal of Black Studies, 40(2), 95–110.

14.

Boden

Borrego

Newswander

L. K.

(2011). Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education. Higher Education, 62(6), 741–755. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41477900

15.

Brunsma

D. L.

Embrick

D. G.

Shin

J. H.

(2017). Graduate students of color: Race, racism, and mentoring in the white waters of academia. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 3(1), 1–13.

16.

Burt

B. A.

McKen

Burkhart

Hormell

Knight

(2019). Black men in engineering graduate education: Experiencing racial microaggressions within the advisor-advisee relationship. The Journal of Negro Education, 88(4), 493–508. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/802583

17.

Carter

J. A.

(2002). A dialogue with divas: Issues affecting a scholarly agenda in special education, from Africana feminist perspectives. The Journal of Negro Education, 71(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211182

18.

Castleden

Sylvestre

Martin

McNally

(2015). “I don’t think that any peer review committee . . . would ever ‘get’ what I currently do”: How institutional metrics for success and merit risk perpetuating the (re)production of colonial relationships in community-based participatory research involving Indigenous Peoples in Canada. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2015.6.4.2

19.

Chalmers

A. F.

(1976). What is this thing called science? (1st ed.). University of Queensland Press.

20.

Collins

P. H.

(1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), s14–s32. https://doi.org/10.2307/800672

21.

Delgado-Bernal

Villalpando

(2002). An apartheid of knowledge in academia: The struggle over the “legitimate” knowledge of faculty of color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/713845282

22.

Dotson

(2011a). Concrete flowers: Contemplating the profession of philosophy. Hypatia, 26(2), 403–409.

23.

Dotson

(2011b). Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia, 26(2), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x

24.

Dotson

(2012a). A cautionary tale: On limiting epistemic oppression. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 33(1), 24–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5250/fronjwomestud.33.1.0024

25.

Dotson

(2012b). Black feminist me: Answering the question ‘Who do I think I am.’ Diogenes, 59(3–4), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192113504377

26.

Dotson

(2014). Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology, 28(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.782585

27.

Erickson

S. K.

(2012). Women Ph.D. students in engineering and a nuanced terrain: Avoiding and revealing gender. The Review of Higher Education, 35(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0019

28.

Espino

M. M.

(2014). Exploring the role of community cultural wealth in graduate school access and persistence for Mexican American PhDs. American Journal of Education, 120(4), 545–574. https://doi.org/10.1086/676911

29.

Feldon

D. F.

Maher

M. A.

Roksa

Peugh

(2016). Cumulative advantage in the skill development of STEM graduate students: A mixed-methods study. American Educational Research Journal, 53(1), 132–161. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215619942

30.

Fleetwood

(2021). Re-visiting rules and norms. Review of Social Economy, 79(4), 607–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2019.1623909

31.

Foot

Crowe

A. R.

Tollafield

K. A.

Allan

C. E.

(2014). Exploring doctoral student identity development using a self-study approach. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 2(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.2.1.103

32.

Foste

Tevis

T. L.

(2022). On the enormity of whiteness in higher education. In Foste

Tevis

T. L.

(Eds.). Critical whiteness praxis in higher education: Considerations for the pursuit of racial justice on campus (pp. 1–18). Stylus Publishing, LLC.

33.

Fox

M. J. T.

(2013). American Indian/Alaska Native women: The path to the doctorate. Journal of American Indian Education, 52(1), 26–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43608645

34.

Frank

(2013). Mitigating against epistemic injustice in educational research. Educational Researcher, 42(7), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12457812

35.

Fricker

(2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.

36.

Fricker

(2017). Evolving concepts of epistemic injustice. In Kidd

I. J.

Medina

Pohlhaus

(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice (1st ed., pp. 53–60). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043

37.

Gardner

S. K.

(2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?”: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101

38.

Gardner

S. K.

(2009a). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0075.

39.

Gardner

S. K.

(2009b). Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States. Higher Education, 58(1), 97–112. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40269170

40.

Gardner

S. K.

Jansujwicz

J. S.

Hutchins

Cline

Levesque

(2014). Socialization to interdisciplinarity: faculty and student perspectives. Higher Education, 67(3), 255–271. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43648652

41.

Gieryn

T. F.

(1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. University of Chicago Press.

42.

Gildersleeve

R. E.

Croom

N. N.

Vasquez

P. L.

(2011). “Am I going crazy?!”: A critical race analysis of doctoral education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.539472

43.

Ginther

D. K.

Basner

Jensen

Schnell

Kington

Schaffer

W. T.

(2018). Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research awards. PLoS One, 13(11), e0205929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205929

44.

(2020). Race, empire, and epistemic exclusion: Or the structures of sociological thought. Sociological Theory, 38(2), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120926213

45.

Godbee

Novotny

J. C.

(2013). Asserting the right to belong: Feminist co-mentoring among graduate student women. Feminist Teacher, 23(3), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.5406/femteacher.23.3.0177

46.

Golde

C. M.

(2000). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. The Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2000.0004.

47.

Golde

C. M.

(2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2005.11772304

48.

Gonzales

L. D.

(2015). An acción approach to affirmative action: Hispanic-serving institutions as spaces for fostering epistemic justice. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 9(1), 28–41.

49.

Gonzales

L. D.

(2018). Subverting and minding boundaries: The intellectual work of women. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 677–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1434278

50.

Gonzales

L. D.

(2023). Authoring a different story about advocacy and public intellectualism. New Directions for Higher Education, 2022(200), 25–35.

51.

Gonzales

L. D.

Núñez

A.-M.

(2014). Ranking regimes and the production of knowledge in academia: (Re) shaping faculty work?. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n31.2014

52.

Gonzales

L. D.

Rincones

(2012). Interdisciplinary scholars: Negotiating legitimacy at the core and from the margins. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(4), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.643772

53.

Gonzales

L. D.

Terosky

A. L.

(2016). From the faculty perspective: Defining, earning, and maintaining legitimacy across academia. Teachers College Record, 118(7), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800704

54.

Gopaul

(2011). Distinction in doctoral education: Using Bourdieu’s tools to assess the socialization of doctoral students. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.539468

55.

Gopaul

(2019). “Nothing succeeds like success”: Doctoral education and cumulative advantage. The Review of Higher Education, 42(4), 1431–1457. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0071

56.

Gough

Oliver

Thomas

(2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). SAGE.

57.

Grant

(2021). No, I’m not crazy: A Black feminist perspective of gaslighting within doctoral socialization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 34(10), 939–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1930258

58.

Griebling

Zayas

V. R.

Borders

Moore

Sokol

Brydon-Miller

Gerlach

Norman

(2009). Exploring the relationship between faculty, students, and the social and behavioral ethics review committee through action research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(2), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.2.27

59.

Gumport

P. J.

(2011). Doctoral education and research: Interdependence and strain. In Altbach

P. G.

Gumport

P. J.

Berdahl

R. O.

(Eds), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (3rd ed., pp. 365–408.) Johns Hopkins University Press.

60.

Hart

(2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination (2nd ed.). SAGE.

61.

Hermanowicz

J. C.

(2016). Faculty perceptions of their graduate education. Higher Education, 72, 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9955-x

62.

Herzig

A. H.

(2002). Where have all the students gone? Participation of doctoral students in authentic mathematical activity as a necessary condition for persistence toward the Ph.D. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 177–212. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021126424414

63.

Hilmer

C. E.

Hilmer

M. J.

(2007). On the relationship between the student-advisor match and early career research productivity for Agricultural and Resource Economics Ph.D.s. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(1), 162–175. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4123570

64.

Hofstra

Kulkarni

V. V.

Munoz-Najar Galvez

Jurafsky

McFarland

D. A.

(2020). The diversity-innovation paradox in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(17), 9284–9291. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915378117

65.

Holley

(2009). The challenge of an interdisciplinary curriculum: A cultural analysis of a doctoral-degree program in neuroscience. Higher Education, 58, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9193-6

66.

hooks

(1994). Outlaw culture: Resisting representations. Routledge.

67.

Hoppe

T. A.

Litovitz

Willis

K. A.

Meseroll

R. A.

Perkins

M. J.

Hutchins

B. I.

Davis

A. F.

Lauer

M. S.

Valantine

H. A.

Anderson

J. M.

Santangelo

G. M.

(2019). Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. Science Advances, 5(10), 7238. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw7238

68.

Jacobs

J. A.

Frickel

(2009). Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115954

69.

Jacobs

J. A.

(2013). In defense of disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research university. The University of Chicago Press.

70.

Jesson

J. K.

Matheson

Lacey

F. M.

(2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE.

71.

Johnstone

(2018). Discourse analysis (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

72.

Jones

Clifton

(2018). Rendering sexism invisible in workplace narratives. A narrative analysis of female entrepreneurs’ stories of not being talked to by men. Gender, Work & Organization, 25(5), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12216

73.

Kerr

(2014). Western epistemic dominance and colonial structures: Considerations for thought and practice in programs of teacher education. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(2), 83–104. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/21148

74.

Kincheloe

J. L.

(2005). On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405275056

75.

Killion

A. K.

Sterle

Bondank

E. N.

Drabik

J. R.

Bera

Alian

Goodrich

K. A.

Hale

Myer

R. A.

Phung

Shew

A. M.

Thayer

A. W.

(2018). Preparing the next generation of sustainability scientists. Ecology and Society, 23(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26796895

76.

Knorr Cetina

. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.

77.

H.-Y.

Lahman

M. K. E.

Yeh

H.-T.

Cheng

Y.-C.

(2008). Into the Academy: Preparing and mentoring international doctoral students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(3), 365–77. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25619929

78.

Lechuga

V. M.

(2011). Faculty-graduate student mentoring relationships: mentors’ perceived roles and responsibilities. Higher Education, 62(6), 757–771. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41477901

79.

MacDonald

G. L.

(2014). Through a lens of critical race theory: Inclusive advising narrative experiences of graduate multiracial students in higher education. Race, Gender & Class, 21(1/2), 246–270. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43496973

80.

Mars

M. M.

Bresonis

Szelényi

(2014). Science and engineering doctoral student socialization, logics, and the national economic agenda: Alignment or disconnect? Minerva, 52(3), 351–379. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43548624

81.

Masta

(2021). Classroom counterspaces: Centering Brown and Black students in doctoral education. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(3), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1894119

82.

Metz

M. H.

(2001). Intellectual border crossing in graduate education: A report from the field. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030005012

83.

Metzger

W. P.

(1955). The German contribution to the American theory of academic freedom. Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors (1915–1955), 41(2), 214–230. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40221079

84.

Newswander

L. K.

Borrego

(2009). Engagement in two interdisciplinary graduate programs. Higher Education, 58(4), 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9215-z

85.

Nicol

D. J.

Yee

J. A.

(2017). “Reclaiming our time”: Women of Color faculty and radical self-care in the academy. Feminist Teacher, 27(2–3), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.5406/femteacher.27.2-3.0133

86.

Nixon-Cobb

E. J.

(2005). Humanizing the dissertation defense: One Woman of Color’s experience. Feminist Teacher, 16(1), 61–74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40545954

87.

Noy

Ray

(2012). Graduate students’ perceptions of their advisors: Is there systematic disadvantage in mentorship? The Journal of Higher Education, 83(6), 876–914. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23324239

88.

Olivas

M. R.

(2009). Negotiating identity while scaling the walls of the ivory tower: Too Brown to be white and too white to be Brown. International Review of Qualitative Research, 2(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2009.2.3.385

89.

O’Meara

Griffin

K. A.

Kuvaeva

Nyunt

Robinson

T. N.

(2017). Sense of belonging and its contributing factors in graduate education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 251–279. https://doi.org/10.28945/3903

90.

Ozias

M. L.

Pasque

P. A.

(2022). Toward definitions of whiteness and critical whiteness studies: Disruption & response-ability. In Foste

Tevis

T. L.

(Eds.), Critical whiteness praxis in higher education: Considerations for the pursuit of racial justice on campus (1st ed.). Stylus Publishing, LLC.

91.

Pasque

P. A.

(2014). American higher education, leadership, and policy: Critical issues and the public good. Palgrave Macmillan. (Original work published 2010.)

92.

Pasque

P. A.

Carducci

(2015). Critical advocacy perspectives on organization in higher education. In Paulsen

M. B.

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 275–333). Springer.

93.

Pasque

P. A.

Carducci

Kuntz

A. M.

Gildersleeve

R. E.

(2012). Qualitative inquiry for equity in higher education: Methodological innovations, implications, and interventions. ASHE Higher Education Report, 37(6).

94.

Patel

(2016). Decolonizing educational research: From ownership to answerability (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315658551

95.

Paul

J. L.

Marfo

(2001). Preparation of educational researchers in philosophical foundations of inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071004525

96.

Peckham

(2011). The elephants evaluate: Some notes on the problem of grades in graduate creative writing programs. Composition Studies, 39(2), 79–99. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/compstud.39.2.0079

97.

Phruksachart

(2017). On mentoring future faculty of color. Feminist Teacher, 27(2–3), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.5406/femteacher.27.2-3.0117

98.

Posselt

J. R.

(2015). Disciplinary logics in doctoral admissions: Understanding patterns of faculty evaluation. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(6), 807–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2015.11777385

99.

Ramirez

(2011). “No one taught me the steps”: Latinos’ experiences applying to graduate school. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10(3), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2011.581105

100.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.

101.

Sallee

M. W.

(2011). Performing masculinity: Considering gender in doctoral student socialization. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2011.11779091

102.

Schwandt

T. A.

(2015). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry (4th ed.). SAGE.

103.

Settles

I. H.

Jones

M. K.

Buchanan

N. T.

Dotson

(2021). Epistemic exclusion: Scholar(ly) devaluation that marginalizes faculty of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(4), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000174

104.

Shahjahan

R. A.

Estera

A. L.

Surla

K. L.

Edwards

K. T.

(2022). “Decolonizing” curriculum and pedagogy: A comparative review across disciplines and global higher education contexts. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 73–113. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042423

105.

Shavers

M. C.

Moore

J. L.

III (2014). The double-edged sword: Coping and resiliency strategies of African American women enrolled in doctoral programs at predominantly white institutions. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 35(3), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.35.3.0015

106.

Shotton

H. J.

Tachine

A. R.

Nelson

C. A.

Minthorn

R. Z.

Waterman

S. J.

(2018). Living our research through Indigenous scholar sisterhood practices. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 636–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417744578

107.

Slay

K. E.

Reyes

K. A.

Posselt

J. R.

(2019). Bait and switch: Representation, climate, and tensions of diversity work in graduate education. The Review of Higher Education, 42(5), 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0052.

108.

Smith

A. E.

Hatmaker

D. M.

(2014). Knowing, doing, and becoming: Professional identity construction among Public Affairs doctoral students. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(4), 545–564. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24369837

109.

Smith

D. E.

(1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Northeastern University Press.

110.

Stanley

C. A.

(2007). When counter narratives meet master narratives in the journal editorial-review process. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X06298008

111.

Stephan

(2012). How economics shapes science. Harvard University Press.

112.

Stewart

D. L.

Nicolazzo

(2018). High impact of [whiteness] on trans* students in postsecondary education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2018.1496046

113.

Sugimoto

C. R.

(2012). Are you my mentor? Identifying mentors and their roles in LIS doctoral education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 53(1), 2–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23249093

114.

Taylor

Antony

J. S.

(2000). Stereotype threat reduction and wise schooling: Towards the successful socialization of African American doctoral students in education. The Journal of Negro Education, 69(3), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696231

115.

Trautmann

N. M.

Krasny

M. E.

(2006). Integrating teaching and research: A new model for graduate education? BioScience, 56(2), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0159:itaran]2.0.co;2

116.

Tuana

(2006). The speculum of ignorance: The women’s health movement and epistemologies of ignorance. Hypatia, 21(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01110.x

117.

Turner

C. S. V.

(2002). Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 74–93.

118.

Veysey

L. R.

(1965). The emergence of the American university. University of Chicago Press.

119.

Weidman

J. C.

Twale

D. J.

Stein

E. L.

(2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report). Jossey-Bass. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED457710

120.

Wilson

(2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.

121.

Windchief

(2018). Stealing horses: Indigenous student metaphors for success in graduate education. In Minthorn

R. S.

Shotton

H. J.

(Eds.), Reclaiming indigenous research in higher education (pp. 76–87). Rutgers University Press.

122.

Yin

R. K.

(2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

123.

Zhou

(2022). Graduate enrollment and degrees: 2011 to 2021. Council of Graduate Schools.

124.

Zhou

(2015). International students’ motivation to pursue and complete a Ph.D. in the U.S. Higher Education, 69(5), 719–733. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43648822

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

Epistemic Injustice and Legitimacy in U.S. Doctoral Education: A Systematic Review of Literature

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material