Principals are understood to be critical actors in improving teaching and learning conditions in schools; however, relatively little is known about the leadership strategies to which principals should dedicate their time and effort to improve outcomes. We review the empirical literature from 51 studies of principal behaviors and student, teacher, and school outcomes and conduct a meta-analysis of these relationships. Our analysis has three central findings: (1) we find direct evidence of the relationship between principal behaviors and student achievement (0.08–0.16 SD), teacher well-being (0.34–0.38 SD), teacher instructional practices (0.35 SD), and school organizational health (0.72–0.81 SD); (2) we highlight the importance of principal behaviors beyond instructional management as potential tools to improve student achievement outcomes; and (3) the preceding findings are based almost entirely on observational studies because the causal evidence base on school leadership behaviors is nonexistent. We argue our findings suggest value in investing in school leadership capacities. We conclude by discussing opportunities to improve the quality of future research examining the relationship between principal behaviors and student, teacher, and school outcomes.
*AllenN.GrigsbyB.PetersM. L. (2015). Does leadership matter? Examining the relationship among transformational leadership, school climate, and student achievement. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 10(2), 1–22.
AloeA. M.ThompsonC. G. (2013). The synthesis of partial effect sizes. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4, 390–405. doi:10.5243/jsswr.2013.24
5.
AustinW.ChenB.GoldhaberD.HanushekE.HoldenK.KoedelC.. . . TuraevaM. (2019). Path to the principalship and value-added: A cross-state comparison of elementary and middle-school principals (CALDER Working Paper Series No. 213-0119-1). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from https://caldercenter.org/sites/default/files/CALDERWP213-0119-1.pdf
6.
AvolioB.BassB. (1997). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.
7.
Bambrick-SantoyoP.PeiserB. M. (2012). Leverage leadership: A practical guide to building exceptional schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
*BarnettK.McCormickJ. (2004). Leadership and individual principal-teacher relationships in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 406–434. doi:10.1177/0013161X03261742
9.
*BednarJ. (2018). Effective school leaders and student achievement: An examination of 265 schools in Northern Illinois (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10747419)
10.
BéteilleT.KalogridesD.LoebS. (2012). Stepping stones: Principal career paths and school outcomes. Social Science Research, 41, 904–919. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.003
11.
BlaseJ.BlaseJ. (2004). Handbook of instructional leadership: How successful principals promote teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
12.
BloomH. S.HillC. J.BlackA. R.LipseyM. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 289–328. doi:10.1080/19345740802400072
13.
BorensteinM. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis (1st ed.). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
14.
BorensteinM.HigginsJ. P. T.HedgesL. V.RothsteinH. R. (2017). Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(1), 5–18. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1230
15.
BranchG.HanushekE.RivkinS. (2012). Estimating the effect of leaders on public sector productivity: The case of school principals (NBER Working Paper No. 17803). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w17803
16.
*BraunD.GableR.KiteS. (2008). Relationship among essential leadership preparation practices and leader, school, and student outcomes in K-8 schools. K-12 Education, 8. Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/k12_ed/8
17.
BurkhauserS. (2017). How much do school principals matter when it comes to teacher working conditions?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39, 126–145. doi:10.3102/0162373716668028
*CancioE. J.AlbrechtS. F.JohnsB. H. (2013). Defining administrative support and its relationship to the attrition of teachers of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(4), 71–94. doi:10.1353/etc.2013.0035
20.
ChiangH.LipscombS.GillB. (2016). Is school value added indicative of principal quality?Education Finance and Policy, 11, 283–309. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00184
21.
ClarkD.MartorellP.RockoffJ. (2009). School principals and school performance (CALDER Working Paper No. 38, National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509693
22.
CoelliM.GreenD. A. (2012). Leadership effects: School principals and student outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 31, 92–109. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.09.001
23.
CorcoranS. P.SchwartzA. E.WeinsteinM. (2012). Training your own: The impact of New York City’s Aspiring Principals Program on student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 232–253. doi:10.3102/0162373712437206
24.
*CrosthwaiteG. (2015). The correlation between elementary school leadership behaviors and student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3689171)
25.
*DayC.SammonsP.HopkinsD.HarrisA.LeithwoodK.GuQ.. . . KingtonA. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Nottingham, England: University of Nottingham.
26.
*DevriesR. (2017). The instructional leadership practices of elementary principals of average needs/resource capacity school districts in New York State. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10640434)
27.
DhueyE.SmithJ. (2014). How important are school principals in the production of student achievement?Canadian Journal of Economics, 47, 634–663. doi:10.1111/caje.12086
28.
*DumayX.BoonenT.Van DammeJ. (2013). Principal leadership long-term indirect effects on learning growth in mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 114, 225–251. doi:10.1086/673198
29.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
30.
*EbmeierH. (2003). How supervision influences teacher efficacy and commitment: An investigation of a path model. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18, 110–141. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ660834
31.
*EgleyR.JonesB. (2005). Principals’ inviting leadership behaviors in a time of test-based accountability. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 3(1), 13–24. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ796133.pdf
32.
*FanceraS.BlissJ. (2011). Instructional leadership influence on collective teacher efficacy to improve school achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10, 349–370. doi:10.1080/15700763.2011.585537
33.
FullanM. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Routledge.
GatesS. M.BairdM.MasterB.Chavez-HerreriasE. (2019). Principal pipelines: A feasible, affordable, and effective way for districts to improve schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. doi:10.7249/RR2666
36.
*GatesS. M.HamiltonL. S.BurkhauserS.HeatonP.PiersonA.BairdM. D., . . . Rand Education. (2014). Preparing principals to raise student achievement: Implementation and effects of the New Leaders program in ten districts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED561152
37.
*GeijselF. P.SleegersP. J. C.StoelR. D.KrügerM. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. Elementary School Journal, 109, 406–427. doi:10.1086/593940
*GraczewskiC.KnudsonJ.HoltzmanD. J. (2009). Instructional leadership in practice: What does it look like, and what influence does it have?Journal for Students Placed at Risk, 14(1), 72–96. doi:10.1080/10824660802715460
40.
*GrebW. (2011). Principal leadership and student achievement: What is the effect of transformational leadership in conjunction with instructional leadership on student achievement? (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3468985)
41.
GrissomJ. A.BartanenB.MitaniH. (2018). Principal sorting and the distribution of principal quality (Vanderbilt University Working Paper). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
42.
GrissomJ. A.KalogridesD.LoebS. (2015). Using student test scores to measure principal performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1), 3–28. doi:10.3102/0162373714523831
43.
*GrissomJ. A.LoebS. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1091–1123. doi:10.3102/0002831211402663
44.
GrissomJ. A.LoebS. (2017). Assessing principals’ assessments: Subjective evaluations of teacher effectiveness in low- and high-stakes environments. Education Finance and Policy, 12, 369–395. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00210
45.
*GrissomJ. A.LoebS.MasterB. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders. Educational Researcher, 42, 433–444. doi:10.3102/0013189X13510020
46.
GrissomJ. A.MitaniH.WooD. S. (2019). Principal preparation programs and principal outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55, 73–115. doi:10.1177/0013161X18785865
47.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5–44. doi:10.1177/0013161X96032001002
48.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (2010). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement?Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38, 654–678. doi:10.1177/1741143210379060
49.
HallingerP.LeithwoodK.MurphyJ. (1993). Cognitive perspectives on educational administration: An introduction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29, 296–301.
50.
HargreavesA.GoodsonI. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 3–41. doi:10.1177/0013161X05277975
51.
HeckR. H.HallingerP. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 659–689. doi:10.3102/0002831209340042
52.
HeckR. H.HallingerP. (2010). Collaborative leadership effects on school improvement: Integrating unidirectional- and reciprocal-effects models. Elementary School Journal, 111, 226–252. doi:10.1086/656299
53.
HedgesL. V.TiptonE.JohnsonM. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. doi:10.1002/jrsm.5
54.
HigginsJ. P.RamsayC.ReevesB. C.DeeksJ. J.SheaB.ValentineJ. C.. . . WellsG. (2013). Issues relating to study design and risk of bias when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions. Research Synthesis Methods, 4(1), 12–25. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1056
55.
HittD. H.TuckerP. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 86, 531–569. doi:10.3102/0034654315614911
56.
*HorngE. L.KlasikD.LoebS. (2010). Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116, 491–523. doi:10.1086/653625
57.
*HulpiaH.DevosG.Van KeerH. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers’ organizational commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 728–771. doi:10.1177/0013161X11402065
58.
HusainA.MatsaD. A.MillerA. R. (2018). Do male workers prefer male leaders? An analysis of principals’ effects on teacher retention (NBER Working Paper No. w25263). doi:10.2139/ssrn.3259638
59.
*JonesC.GilmanL. (2019, March). How are district differences in the implementation of teacher evaluations associated with teacher perceptions of school leadership and teacher job satisfaction?Paper presented at American Education and Finance Policy Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
60.
*KlinginsmithE. N. (2007). The relative impact of principal managerial, instructional, and transformational leadership on student achievement in Missouri middle level schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri–Columbia). doi:10.32469/10355/4772
KraftM. A.BlazarD.HoganD. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88, 547–588. doi:10.3102/0034654318759268
63.
KraftM. A.GilmourA. F. (2016). Can principals promote teacher development as evaluators? A case study of principals’ views and experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 711–753. doi:10.1177/0013161X16653445
64.
*KrügerM. L.WitziersB.SleegersP. (2007). The impact of school leadership on school level factors: Validation of a causal model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(1), 1–20. doi:10.1080/09243450600797638
65.
*LeanaC. R.PilF. K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organization Science, 17, 353–366. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0191
66.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 112–129. doi:10.1108/09578230010320064
67.
LeithwoodK.JantziD. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 177–199. doi:10.1080/15700760500244769
68.
LeithwoodK.SunJ. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 387–423. doi:10.1177/0013161X11436268
69.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.12.1181
70.
*LouisK. S.DretzkeB.WahlstromK. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national U.S. survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 315–336. doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.486586
71.
MarzanoR.WatersT.McNultyB. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
72.
*MayH.HuffJ.GoldringE. (2012). A longitudinal study of principals’ activities and student performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 417–439. doi:10.1080/09243453.2012.678866
73.
*MayH.SupovitzJ. A. (2011). The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 332–352. doi:10.1177/0013161X10383411
74.
*McInnisT. M. (2009). Relationship between high school leadership team practices and student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3383219)
75.
*MeesG. W. (2008). The relationships among principal leadership, school culture, and student achievement in Missouri middle schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri–Columbia). doi:10.32469/10355/5540
76.
*MincklerC. H. (2014). School leadership that builds teacher social capital. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42, 657–679. doi:10.1177/1741143213510502
77.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G., & The Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
78.
*MulfordB.SilinsH. (2011). Revised models and conceptualisation of successful school principalship for improved student outcomes. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(1), 61–82. doi:10.1108/09513541111100125
79.
*NdoyeA.ImigS. R.ParkerM. A. (2010). Empowerment, leadership, and teachers’ intentions to stay in or leave the profession or their schools in North Carolina charter schools. Journal of School Choice, 4, 174–190. doi:10.1080/15582159.2010.483920
80.
*NelsonJ. L.HegtvedtK. A.HaardörferR.HaywardJ. L. (2019). Trust and respect at work: Justice antecedents and the role of coworker dynamics. Work and Occupations, 46, 307–338. doi:10.1177/0730888419835261
81.
*OdegaardL. (2008). The relationship between teacher-identified principal leadership behavior and effectiveness and student achievement in South Dakota secondary schools (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3318826)
82.
*O’DonnellR. J.WhiteG. P. (2005). Within the accountability era: Principals’ instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 89, 56–71. doi:10.1177/019263650508964505
83.
OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264190658-en
84.
*OrrM. T.OrphanosS. (2011). How graduate-level preparation influences the effectiveness of school leaders: A comparison of the outcomes of exemplary and conventional leadership preparation programs for principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 18–70. doi:10.1177/0011000010378610
85.
Osborne-LampkinL.Folsom SidlerJ.HerringtonC. D. (2015). A systematic review of the relationships between principal characteristics and student achievement (REL 2016-091). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
86.
*PraterM. (2004). The relative impact of principal managerial, instructional and transformational leadership on student achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia.
87.
*QuinnD. M. (2002). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice and student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 40, 447–467. doi:10.1108/09578230210440294
88.
*QuintJ. C.AkeyT. M.RappaportS.WillnerC. J. (2007). Instructional leadership, teaching quality and student achievement: Suggestive evidence from three urban school districts. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED499788
89.
*ReardonR. M. (2011). Elementary school principals’ learning-centered leadership and educational outcomes: Implications for principals’ professional development. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(1), 63–83. doi:10.1080/15700760903511798
90.
ReardonS. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In DuncanG.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–116). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
91.
RobinsonV. M. J.LloydC. A.RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
92.
*SebastianJ.AllensworthE.HuangH. (2016). The role of teacher leadership in how principals influence classroom instruction and student learning. American Journal of Education, 123, 69–108. doi:10.1086/688169
93.
SebastianJ.AllensworthE.WiedermannW.HochbeinC.CunninghamM. (2018). Principal leadership and school performance: An examination of instructional leadership and organizational management. Leadership and Policy in Schools. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/15700763.2018.1513151
94.
SebastianJ.HuangH.AllensworthE. (2017). Examining integrated leadership systems in high schools: Connecting principal and teacher leadership to organizational processes and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28, 463–488. doi:10.1080/09243453.2017.1319392
95.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
96.
*ShatzerR. H.CaldarellaP.HallamP. R.BrownB. L. (2014). Comparing the effects of instructional and transformational leadership on student achievement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42, 445–459. doi:10.1177/1741143213502192
97.
*ShenJ.LeslieJ. M.SpybrookJ. K.MaX. (2012). Are principal background and school processes related to teacher job satisfaction? A multilevel study using schools and staffing survey 2003–04. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 200–230. doi:10.3102/0002831211419949
98.
*SilvaJ. P.WhiteG. P.YoshidaR. K. (2011). The direct effects of principal–student discussions on eighth grade students’ gains in reading achievement: An experimental study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 772–793. doi:10.1177/0013161X11404219
99.
SpillaneJ. P.HuntB. R. (2010). Days of their lives: A mixed-methods, descriptive analysis of the men and women at work in the principal’s office. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42, 293–331. doi:10.1080/00220270903527623
100.
SpillaneJ. P.LeeL. C. (2014). Novice school principals’ sense of ultimate responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 431–465. doi:10.1177/0013161X13505290
101.
SteinM. K.NelsonB. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 423–448. doi:10.3102/01623737025004423
102.
SteinM. K.SpillaneJ. (2005). What can researchers on educational leadership learn from research on teaching? Building a bridge. In FirestoneW. A.RiehlC. (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 28–45). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
103.
StroupD. F.BerlinJ. A.MortonS. C.OlkinI.WilliamsonG. D.RennieD., . . . MOOSE Group. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 2008–2012. doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
104.
SunJ.LeithwoodK. (2012). Transformational school leadership effects on student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11, 418–451. doi:10.1080/15700763.2012.681001
105.
SunJ.LeithwoodK. (2015). Direction-setting school leadership practices: A meta-analytic review of evidence about their influence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26, 499–523. doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1005106
106.
SupovitzJ.SirinidesP.MayH. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 31–56. doi:10.1177/1094670509353043
107.
Tanner-SmithE. E.TiptonE. (2014). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 13–30. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1091
108.
*ThoonenE. E. J.SleegersP. J. C.OortF. J.PeetsmaT. T. D.GeijselF. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 496–536. doi:10.1177/0013161X11400185
109.
TiptonE. (2015). Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression. Psychological Methods, 20, 375–393. doi:10.1037/met0000011
110.
*TuytensM.DevosG. (2011). Stimulating professional learning through teacher evaluation: An impossible task for the school leader?Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 891–899. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.02.004
111.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS), Public School Principal Data File, 2015-16 and Principal Follow-Up Survey. Washington, DC: Author.
112.
ValentineJ.PraterM. (2011). Instructional, transformational, and managerial leadership and student achievement: High school principals make a difference. NASSP Bulletin, 95(1), 5–30. doi:10.1177/0192636511404062
113.
ValentineJ. C.ThompsonS. G. (2013). Issues relating to confounding and meta-analysis when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions. Research Synthesis Methods, 4(1), 26–35. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1064
114.
*WareH. W.KitsantasA. (2011). Predicting teacher commitment using principal and teacher efficacy variables: An HLM approach. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 183–193. doi:10.1080/00220671003638543
115.
*WilliamsE. (2009). Evaluation of a school systems plan to utilize teachers’ perceptions of principal leadership to improve student achievement. Challenge, 15(1), 13–30.
116.
WitziersB.BoskerR. J.KrügerM. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 398–425. doi:10.1177/0013161X03253411
117.
ZepedaS. J. (2013). The principal as instructional leader: A practical handbook (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
