Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-8
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders and Classroom-Based Interventions: Evidence-Based Status,Effectiveness,and Moderators of Effects in Single-Case Design Research
Students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience symptoms of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity that often manifest as academic impairment. As such, teachers must select interventions to increase the probability of success for students with ADHD in their classes. Prior meta-analyses have evaluated school-based intervention effects; however, no systematic review meta-analysis has evaluated the effectiveness of interventions implemented in classrooms with students with ADHD. Additionally, classroom-based studies are frequently conducted through single-case design methodology, and recent advances in meta-analytic techniques provide the opportunity to explore intervention effectiveness as evaluated through quality research. Therefore, to inform selection of evidence-based interventions to be implemented in classroom settings, the current systematic review with meta-analysis of single-case design studies was conducted to evaluate intervention effectiveness, evidence-based status, and moderators of effects for four intervention types (behavioral, instructional, self-management, and environmental) when implemented with students with ADHD in classroom settings. The analysis included 27 articles published from 1971 to 2018. Overall and specific to each intervention type, the results indicate that classroom-based interventions for students with ADHD were moderately effective. Instructional and self-management interventions were deemed evidence based by What Works Clearinghouse standards and potentially evidence based by Council for Exceptional Children standards. Behavioral interventions were found to be potentially evidence based by Council for Exceptional Children criteria and were most effective when selected through functional behavior analysis and implemented by researchers in secondary settings. Instructional interventions were more effective when implemented in special education settings targeting academic outcomes. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
AaseH.SagvoldenT. (2005). Moment-to-moment dynamics of ADHD behaviour. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 1(1), 12. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-1-12
2.
AbramsonJ. H. (2011). WINPEPI updated: Computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential. Epidemiological Perspective & Innovations, 8, 1–9. doi:10.1186/1742-5573-8-1.
3.
AhmedA. (2015). The effectiveness of using computer-assisted instruction for reading intervention on reading comprehension and on-task behavior of students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorders in a second language classroom (Electronic dissertation). Retrieved from OhioLINK (Document No. ohiou1427805350)
4.
*BandaD. R.SokoloskyS. (2012). Effectiveness of noncontingent attention to decrease attention-maintained disruptive behaviors in the general education classroom. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 34, 130–140. doi:10.1080/07317107.2012.684646
5.
BarkleyR. A.CopelandA. P.SivageC. (1980). A self-control classroom for hyperactive children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10(1), 75–89. doi.10.1007/BF02408435
6.
BarlowD. H.NockM.HersenM. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior for change (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
7.
BorgmeierC.HornerR. H.KoegelR. L. (2006). An evaluation of the predictive validity of confidence ratings in identifying functional behavioral assessment hypothesis statements. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 100–105. doi:10.1177/10983007060080020101
8.
Bowman-PerrottL.BurkeM.ZhangN.ZainiS. (2014). Direct and collateral benefits of peer tutoring on social and behavioral outcomes: A meta-analysis of single-case studies. School Psychology Review, 43, 260–285.
9.
*BraschT. L.WilliamsR. L.McLaughlinT. F. (2008). The effects of a direct instruction flashcard system on multiplication fact mastery by two high school students with ADHD and ODD. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 30(1), 51–59. doi:10.1300/j019v30n01_04
10.
BrieschA. M.BrieschJ. M. (2016). Meta-analysis of behavioral self-management interventions in single-case research. School Psychology Review, 45(1), 3–18. doi:10.17105/spr45-1.3-18
11.
BrossartD. F.ParkerR. I.OlsonE. A.MahadevanL. (2006). The relationship between visual analysis and five statistical analyses in a simple AB single-case research design. Behavior Modification, 30, 531–563. doi:10.1177/0145445503261167
12.
BuskP. L.SerlinR. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
ByiersB. J.ReichleJ.SymonsF. J. (2012). Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 397–414. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0036
14.
CarrE. G.HornerR. H.TurnbullA. P.MarquisJ. G.McLaughlinD. M.McAteeM. L.. . . BraddockD. (1999). Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
*CookA.JohnsonC.Bradley-JohnsonS. (2015). White noise to decrease problem behaviors in the classroom for a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 37(1), 38–50. doi:10.1002/jaba.79
17.
CooperH. M.HedgesL. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
*CramerA. M.MasonL. H. (2014). The effects of strategy instruction for writing and revising persuasive quick writes for middle school students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 37–51. doi:10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.37
20.
CroneD. A.HawkenL. S.BergstromM. K. (2007). A demonstration of training, implementing, and using functional behavioral assessment in 10 elementary and middle school settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(1), 15–29. doi:10.1177/10983007070090010301
21.
*DaviesS.WitteR. (2000). Self-management and peer-monitoring within a group contingency to decrease uncontrolled verbalizations of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 135–147. doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6807
22.
de BruinC.DeppelerJ.MooreD.DiamondN. (2013). Public school-based interventions for adolescents and young adults with an autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 83, 521–550. doi:10.3102/0034654313498621
23.
DrasgowE.YellM. L.BradleyR.ShrinerJ. G. (1999). The IDEA amendments of 1997: A school-wide model for conducting functional behavioral assessments and developing behavior intervention plans. Education & Treatment of Children, 22, 244–266.
DunlapG.Kern-DunlapL.ClarkeS.RobbinsF. R. (1991). Functional assessment, curricular revision, and severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 387–397. doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-387
26.
DuPaulG. J.EckertT. L. (1997). The effects of school-based interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 26(1), 5–27.
27.
DuPaulG. J.EckertT. L.VilardoB. (2012). The effects of school-based interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis 1996–2010. School Psychology Review, 41, 387–412.
28.
*DuPaulG. J.GuevremontD. C.BarkleyR. A. (1992). Behavioral treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in the classroom: The use of the attention training system. Behavior Modification, 16, 204–225. doi:10.1177/01454455920162004
29.
DuPaulG. J.WeyandtL. L. (2006). School-based intervention for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects on academic, social, and behavioural functioning. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 53, 161–176. doi:10.1080/10349120600716141
30.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
ErlandsonD. A.HarrisE. L.SkipperB. L.AllenS. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
EvansS. W.OwensJ. S.MautoneJ. A.DuPaulG. J.PowerT. J. (2014). Toward a comprehensive life-course model of care for youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In WeistM. D.LeverN. A.BradshawC. P.Sarno OwensJ. (Eds.), Issues in clinical child psychology. Handbook of school mental health: Research, training, practice, and policy (pp. 413–426). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
34.
EvansS. W.SerpellZ. N.SchultzB. K.PastorD. A. (2007). Cumulative benefits of secondary school-based treatment of students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Review, 36, 256–273. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-10860-005
35.
FabianoG.SchatzN.AloeA.ChackoA.Chronis-TuscanoA. (2015). A systematic review of meta-analyses of psychosocial treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 18(1), 77–97. doi:10.1007/s10567-015-0178-6
36.
FischerM.BarkleyR. A.FletcherK. E.SmallishL. (1993). The adolescent outcome of hyperactive children: Predictors of psychiatric, academic, social, and emotional adjustment. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 324–332. doi:10.1097/00004583-199303000-00013
37.
FormanS. G.OlinS. S.HoagwoodK. E.CroweM.SakaN. (2009). Evidence-based interventions in schools: Developers’ views of implementation barriers and facilitators. School Mental Health, 1(1), 26–36. doi:10.1007/s12310-008-9002-5
38.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2001). One blueprint for bridging the gap: Project PROMISE (practitioners and researchers orchestrating model innovations to strengthen education). Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 304–314. doi:10.1177/088840640102400405
39.
GableR.HendricksonJ. M.SassoG. M. (1995). Toward a more functional analysis of aggression. Education & Treatment of Children, 18, 226–242.
*Graham-DayK. J.GardnerR.IIIHsinY. W. (2010). Increasing on-task behaviors of high school students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Is it enough?Education & Treatment of Children, 33, 205–221. doi:10.1353/etc.0.0096
42.
GuernseyT. F. (1989). The Education for All Handicapped Children Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973: Statutory interaction following the Handicapped Children’s Protection Act of 1986, 68 Neb. L. Rev. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol68/iss2/5
43.
*Gureasko-MooreS.DuPaulG. J.WhiteG. P. (2006). The effects of self-management in general education classrooms on the organizational skills of adolescents with ADHD. Behavior Modification, 30, 159–183. doi:10.1177/0145445503259387
44.
*Gureasko-MooreS.DuPaulG. J.WhiteG. P. (2007). Self-management of classroom preparedness and homework: Effects on school functioning of adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Review, 36, 647–664.
45.
*HarrisK. R.FriedlanderB. D.SaddlerB.FrizzelleR.GrahamS. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance: Effects among students with ADHD in the general education classroom. Journal of Special Education, 39, 145–157. doi:10.1177/00224669050390030201
46.
HarrisonJ.ThompsonB.VannestK. J. (2009). Interpreting the evidence for effective interventions to increase the academic performance of students with ADHD: Relevance of the statistical significance controversy. Review of Educational Research, 79, 740–775. doi:10.3102/0034654309331516
47.
HarrisonJ. R.BunfordN.EvansS. W.OwensJ. S. (2013). Educational accommodations for students with behavioral challenges: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 83, 551–597. doi:10.3102/0034654313497517
48.
HartE. L.LaheyB. B.LoeberR.ApplegateB.FrickP. J. (1995). Developmental change in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in boys: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 729–749. doi:10.1007/BF01447474
49.
HartK. C.MassettiG. M.FabianoG. A.PariseauM. E.PelhamW. E.Jr. (2011). Impact of group size on classroom on-task behavior and work productivity in children with ADHD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19(1), 55–64. doi:10.1177/1063426609353762
50.
HartmannD. P.BarriosB. A.WoodD. D. (2004). Principles of behavioral observation. In HaynesS. N.HeibyE. M. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: Vol. 3. Behavioral assessment (pp. 108–127). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
51.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558. doi:10.1002/sim.1186
52.
*HoffK. E.ErvinR. A. (2013). Extending self-management strategies: The use of a classwide approach. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 151–164. doi:10.1002/pits.21666
53.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. doi:10.1177/001440290507100203
54.
HouseA. E.HouseB. J.CampbellM. B. (1981). Measures of interobserver agreement: Calculation formulas and distribution effects. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 3, 37–57. doi:10.1007/BF01321350
*JacobsonL. T.ReidR. (2010). Improving the persuasive essay writing of high school students with ADHD. Exceptional Children, 76, 157–174. doi:10.1177/001440291007600202
57.
JamshidiL.HeyvaertM.DeclercqL.Fernández-CastillaB.FerronJ. M.MoeyaertM.. . .Van den NoortgateW. (2018). Methodological quality of meta-analyses of single-case experimental studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79, 97–115. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.016
58.
JensenP. S.ArnoldL. E.SwansonJ. M.VitielloB.AbikoffH. B.GreenhillL. L.. . . ConnersC. K. (2007). 3-Year follow-up of the NIMH MTA study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 989–1002. doi:10.1097/CHI.0b013e3180686d48
59.
JensenP. S.HinshawS. P.KraemerH. C.LenoraN.NewcornJ. H.AbikoffH. B.. . . ElliottG. R. (2001). ADHD comorbidity findings from the MTA study: Comparing comorbid subgroups. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 147–158.
60.
*JohnsonJ. W.ReidR.MasonL. H. (2012). Improving the reading recall of high school students with ADHD. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 258–268. doi:10.1177/001440291007600202
61.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
62.
KercoodS.BandaD. R. (2012). The effects of added physical activity on performance during a listening comprehension task for students with and without attention problems. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 13(1), 19–32.
63.
KercoodS.GrskovicJ. A. (2010). Reducing the effects of auditory and visual distraction on the math performances of students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 15(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/19404150903524515
64.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. MShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Document/229
65.
KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (2010). Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychological Methods, 15, 124–144. doi:10.1037/a0017736
66.
LaneJ. D.GastD. L. (2014). Visual analysis in single-case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24, 445–463. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.815636
67.
LeeP.NiewW.YangH.ChenV. C.LinK. (2012). A meta-analysis of behavioral parent training for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 2040–2049. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.05.011
68.
LeFeverG. B.VillersM. S.MorrowA. L.VaughnE. S.III. (2002). Parental perceptions of adverse educational outcomes among children diagnosed and treated for ADHD: A call for improved school/provider collaboration. Psychology in the Schools, 39(1), 63–71. doi:10.1002/pits.20099
69.
*LienemannT. O.ReidR. (2008). Using self-regulated strategy development to improve expository writing with students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Exceptional Children, 74, 471–486. doi:10.1177/001440290807400404
70.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
71.
LoeI. M.FeldmanH. M. (2007). Academic and educational outcomes of children with ADHD. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(6), 643–654. doi:10.1016/j.ambp.2006.05.005
72.
MagginD. M.BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2013). An application of the What Works Clearinghouse standards for evaluating single-subject research: Self-management interventions. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 44–58. doi:10.1177/0741932511435176
73.
MagginD. M.BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M.FergusonT. D.ClarkC. (2014). A comparison of rubrics for identifying empirically supported practices with single-case research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 287–311. doi:10.1007/s10864-013-9187-z
74.
MagginD. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2013). Introduction to the special series: Issues and advances of synthesizing single-case research. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 3–8. doi:10.1177/0741932512466269
75.
MagginD. M.PustejovskyJ. E.JohnsonA. H. (2017). A meta-analysis of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior: An update. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 353–370. doi:10.1177/0741932517716900
76.
*MajeikaC. E.WalderJ. P.HubbardJ. P.SteebK. M.FerrisG. J.OakesW. P.LaneK. L. (2011). Improving on-task behavior using a functional assessment-based intervention in an inclusive high school setting. Beyond Behavior, 20(3), 55–67.
77.
MartellaR.NelsonJ. R.Marchand-MartellaN. (1999). Research methods: Learning to become a critical research consumer. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
78.
MartinE. W.MartinR.TermanD. L. (1996). The legislative and litigation history of special education. The Future of Children, 6(1), 25–39. doi:10.2307/1602492
79.
*MathesM. Y.BenderW. N. (1997). The effects of self-monitoring on children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder who are receiving pharmacological interventions. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 121–128. doi:10.1177/074193259701800206
80.
*MautoneJ. A.DuPaulG. J.JitendraA. K. (2005). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance and classroom behavior of children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9, 301–312. doi:10.1177/1087054705278832
81.
MillerF. G.LeeD. L. (2013). Do functional behavioral assessments improve intervention effectiveness for students diagnosed with ADHD? A single-subject meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 253–282. doi:10.1007/s10864-013-9174-4
82.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264–269. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
83.
*MorrisonC.McDougallD.BlackR. S.King-SearsM. E. (2014). Impact of tactile-cued self-monitoring on independent biology work for secondary students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (Online), 11(4), 181. doi:10.19030/tlc.v11i4.8856
84.
*MoserL. A.FishleyK. M.KonradM.HesslerT. (2012). Effects of the copy–cover–compare strategy on acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of spelling sight words for elementary students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 34, 93–110. doi:10.1080/07317107.2012.684644
85.
NelsonJ. R.RobertsM. L.MathurS. R.RutherfordR. B.Jr. (1999). Has public policy exceeded our knowledge base? A review of the functional behavioral assessment literature. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 169–179. doi:10.1177/019874299902400207
86.
*NolanJ. D.FilterK. J. (2012). A function-based classroom behavior intervention using non-contingent reinforcement plus response cost. Education & Treatment of Children, 35, 419–430. doi:10.1353/etc.2012.0017
87.
*OtaK. R.DuPaulG. J. (2002). Task engagement and mathematics performance in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects of supplemental computer instruction. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 242–257. doi:10.1521/scpq.17.3.242.20881
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.BrownL. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single-case research. Exceptional Children, 75, 135–150. doi:10.1177/001440290907500201
90.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 303–322. doi:10.1177/0145445511399147
91.
PowerT. J.WatkinsM. W.AnastopoulosA. D.ReidR.LambertM. C.DuPaulG. J. (2017). Multi-informant assessment of ADHD symptom-related impairments among children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 46, 661–674. doi:10.1080/15374416.2015.1079781
92.
PurdieN.HattieJ.CarrollA. (2002). A review of the research on interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: What works best?Review of Educational Research, 72, 61–99. doi:10.3102/00346543072001061
93.
PyleK.FabianoG. A. (2017). A meta-analysis of single-subject design studies utilizing the Daily Report Card intervention for students with ADHD. Exceptional Children, 83, 378–395. doi:10.1177/0014402917706370
94.
ReidR. (1999). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effective methods for the classroom. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(4), 1–20.
95.
ReidR.HagamanJ. L.GrahamS. (2014). Using self-regulated strategy development for written expression with students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 12(1), 21–42.
96.
ReidR.TroutA.SchartzM. (2005). Self-regulation interventions for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity. Exceptional Children, 71, 361–377.
97.
RosenthalR.DiMatteoM. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59–82. doi:0.1002/0471214426.pas0410
98.
SchillingD. L.WashingtonK.BillingsleyF. F.DeitzJ. (2003). Classroom seating for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Therapy balls versus chairs. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 534–541. doi:10.5014/ajot.57.5.534
99.
ScottT. M.BucalosM.LiaupsinC.NelsonC. M.JolivetteK.DeSheaL. (2004). Using functional behavior assessment in general education settings: Making a case for effectiveness and efficiency. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 189–201. doi:10.1177/019874290402900207
100.
ShadishW. R.BrasilI. C.IllingworthD. A.WhiteK. D.GalindoR.NaglerE. D.RindskopfD. M. (2009). Using UnGraph to extract data from image files: Verification of reliability and validity. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 177–183. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.1.177
101.
ShadishW. R.HedgesL. V.HornerR. H.OdomS. L. (2015). The role of between-case effect size in conducting, interpreting, and summarizing single-case research (NCER 2015-002). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562991.pdf
102.
ShadishW. R.HedgesL. V.PustejovskyJ. E. (2014). Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: A primer and applications. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 123–147. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.005
103.
*ShimabukuroS. M.PraterM. A.JenkinsA.Edelen-SmithP. (1999). The effects of self-monitoring of academic performance on students with learning disabilities and ADD/ADHD. Education & Treatment of Children, 22, 397–414.
104.
SoaresD. A.HarrisonJ. R.VannestK. J.McClellandS. S. (2016). Effect size for token economy use in contemporary classroom settings: A meta-analysis of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 45, 379–399. doi:10.17105/spr45-4.379-399
105.
SugaiG.Lewis-PalmerT.Hagan-BurkeS. (2000). Overview of the functional behavioral assessment process. Exceptionality, 8(3), 149–160. doi:10.1207/S15327035EX0803_2
106.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2008). Teaching children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Instructional strategies and practices. Washington, DC: Author.
107.
VannestK. J.HarrisonJ. R.Temple-HarveyK.RamseyL.ParkerR. I. (2011). Improvement rate differences of academic interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 521–534. doi:10.1177/0741932510362509
108.
VannestK. J.NinciJ. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 403–411. doi:10.1002/jcad.12038
109.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single case research: Web-based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0). College Station: Texas A&M University.
110.
VarniJ. W.HenkerB. (1979). A self-regulation approach to the treatment of three hyperactive boys. Child Behavior Therapy, 1, 171–192. doi:10.1300/J473v01n02_04
111.
*VilardoB. A.DuPaulG. J.KernL.HojnoskiR. L. (2013). Cross-age peer coaching: Enhancing the peer interactions of children exhibiting symptoms of ADHD. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 35(1), 63–81. doi:10.1080/07317107.2013.761043
112.
VoightM. L.HoogenboomB. J. (2012). Publishing your work in a journal: Understanding the peer review process. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 7, 452—460. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474310/
113.
*WhitfordD. K.LiaupsinC. J.UmbreitJ.FerroJ. B. (2013). Implementation of a single comprehensive function-based intervention across multiple classrooms for a high school student. Education & Treatment of Children, 36, 147–167. doi:10.1353/etc.2013.0036
114.
*WillsH. P.MasonB. A. (2014). Implementation of a self-monitoring application to improve on-task behavior: A high-school pilot study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 421–434. doi:10.1007/s10864-014-9204-x
115.
*WoltersdorfM. A. (1992). Videotape self-modeling in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 14(2), 53–73. doi:10.1300/j019v14n02_04
116.
ZigmondN. (2003). Where should students with disabilities receive special education services? Is one place better than another?Journal of Special Education, 37, 193–199. doi:10.1177/00224669030370030901
117.
ZwiM.JonesH.ThorgaardC.YorkA.DennisJ. (2011). Parent training interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years. Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group, (12), CD003018. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003018.pub3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
