Among the many challenges facing public schools are high levels of principal turnover. Given the important role that principals play and are expected to play in the improvement process, concerns about principal turnover have resulted in a growing body of research on its causes and consequences. The purpose of this review is to take stock of what we have learned about the sources and consequences of principal turnover and to identify what gaps remain. The final review included 36 empirical studies. It discusses and categorizes findings relating to the determinants and consequences of principal turnover. The review concludes with a discussion about the implications of those findings and the areas and kinds of research still needed.
AkibaM.ReichardtR. (2004). What predicts the mobility of elementary school leaders? An analysis of longitudinal data in Colorado. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(18). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/173
2.
American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33–40.
3.
BakerB. D.CooperB. S. (2005). Do principals with stronger academic backgrounds hire better teachers? Policy implications for improving high-poverty schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 449–479.
4.
BakerB. D.PunswickE.BeltC. (2010). School leadership stability, principal moves, and departures: Evidence from Missouri. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 523–557.
5.
BattleD.GruberK. (2010). Principal attrition and mobility: Results from the 2008-2009 Principal Follow-Up Survey: First look (No. NCES 2010-337). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
6.
BéteilleT.KalogridesD.LoebS. (2012). Stepping stones: Principal career paths and school outcomes. Social Science Research, 41, 904–919.
7.
BoyceJ.BowersA. J. (2016). Principal turnover: Are there different types of principals who move from or leave their schools? A latent class analysis of the 2007–2008 Schools and Staffing Survey and the 2008–2009 Principal Follow-Up Survey. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15, 237–272.
8.
BranchG. F.HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2009, January). Principal turnover and effectiveness. Paper presented at the American Economics Association, San Francisco, CA.
9.
BrewerD. J. (1993). Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S. high schools. Economics of Education Review, 12, 281–292.
10.
BurkhauserS.GatesS. M.HamiltonL. S.IkemotoG. S. (2012). First-year principals in urban school districts: How actions and working conditions relate to outcomes (Technical Report). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
11.
ClotfelterC.LaddH. F.VigdorJ.WheelerJ. (2006). High-poverty schools and the distribution of teachers and principals. North Carolina Law Review, 85, 1345–1378.
12.
CullenJ. B.MazzeoM. J. (2007). Implicit performance awards: An empirical analysis of the labor market for public school administrators. San Diego: University of California, San Diego.
13.
DayC.GuQ.SammonsP. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 221–258.
14.
DeAngelisK. J.WhiteB. R. (2011). Principal turnover in Illinois public schools, 2001-2008 (Policy Research No. IERC 2011-1). Edwardsville: Illinois Education Research Council.
15.
DhueyE.SmithJ. (2014). How school principals influence student learning (Discussion Paper No. 7949). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.
16.
EbertsR. W.StoneJ. A. (1988). Student achievement in public schools: Do principals make a difference?Economics of Education Review, 7, 291–299.
17.
Farley-RippleE. N.RaffelJ. A.WelchJ. C. (2012). Administrator career paths and decision processes. Journal of Educational Administration, 50, 788–816.
18.
Farley-RippleE. N.SolanoP. L.McDuffieM. J. (2012). Conceptual and methodological issues in research on school administrator career behavior. Educational Researcher, 41, 220–229.
19.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
FullerE.YoungM. D. (2009). Tenure and retention of newly hired principals in Texas. Austin, TX: University Council for Educational Administration.
21.
FullerE.YoungM. D.OrrM. T. (2007, April). Career pathways of principals in Texas. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
22.
GatesS. M.RingelJ. S.SantibanezL.GuarinoC.Ghosh-DastidarB.BrownA. (2006). Mobility and turnover among school principals. Economics of Education Review, 25, 289–302.
23.
GatesS. M.RingelJ. S.SantibañezL.RossK. E.ChungC. H. (2003). Who is leading our schools? An overview of school administrators and their careers. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Education.
24.
GoldringR.TaieS.OwensC. (2014). Principal attrition and mobility: Results from the 2012-2013 Principal Follow-Up Survey: First look (NCES No. 2014-064). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
25.
GrissomJ. A.KalogridesD.LoebS. (2014). Using student test scores to measure principal performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1), 3–28.
26.
GrissomJ. A.LoebS. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1091–1123.
27.
GuarinoC. M.SantibañezL.DaleyG. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 173–208.
28.
HallingerP. (2014). Reviewing reviews of research in educational leadership: An empirical assessment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 539–576. doi:10.1177/0013161X13506594
29.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5–44.
30.
HanselmanP.GriggJ. K.BruchS.GamoranA. (2016). The consequences of principal and teacher turnover for school social resources. In KaoG.ParkH. (Eds.), Family environments, school resources, and educational outcomes (pp. 49–89). Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
31.
HittD. H.TuckerP. D. (2015). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86, 531–569.
32.
HolmeJ. J.JabbarH.GermainE.DinningH. (2017). Rethinking teacher turnover: Longitudinal measures of instability in schools. Educational Researcher. Advance online publication. doi: 10.3102/0013189X17735813.
33.
JacobR.GoddardR.KimM.MillerR.GoddardY. (2015). Exploring the causal impact of the McREL balanced leadership program on leadership, principal efficacy, instructional climate, educator turnover, and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 314–332.
34.
KearneyW. S.ValdezA.GarciaL. (2012). Leadership for the long-haul: The impact of leadership longevity on student achievement. School Leadership Review, 7(2), 24–33.
LoebS.KalogridesD.HorngE. L. (2010). Principal preferences and the uneven distribution of principals across schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 205–229.
38.
MakelM. C.PluckerJ. A. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43, 304–316.
39.
MascallB.LeithwoodK. (2010). Investing in leadership: The district’s role in managing principal turnover. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 367–383.
40.
MillerA. (2013). Principal turnover and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 36, 60–72.
41.
MitaniH. (2017, March). Principals’ working conditions, job stress, and turnover behaviors under NCLB accountability pressure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education Finance and Policy, Portland, OR.
42.
NiY.SunM.RorrerA. (2015). Principal turnover: Upheaval and uncertainty in charter schools?Educational Administration Quarterly, 51, 409–437.
43.
NoonanW.GoldmanP. (1995). Principal succession and elementary school climate: One year’s experience in an urban school division (ERIC No. ED396426). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED396426.pdf
44.
ObermanG. L. (1996). A report on principal turnover in the Chicago public schools (ERIC No. ED410655). Chicago, IL: Chicago Public Schools Department of Research, Evaluation, and Planning.
45.
PapaF. C. (2007). Why do principals change schools? A multivariate analysis of principal retention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6, 267–290.
46.
PapaF. C.LankfordH.WyckoffJ. (2002). The attributes and career paths of principals: Implications for improving policy. Stanford, CA: Teacher Policy Research Center, Stanford University.
47.
PartlowM. C. (2007). Contextual factors relating to elementary principal turnover. Planning and Changing, 38(1&2), 60–76.
48.
PodgurskyM.EhlertM.LindsayJ.WanY. (2016). An examination of the movement of educators across and within three Midwest region states. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED570453.pdf
49.
PrintyS. M. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 187–226.
50.
ReamesE. H.KochanF. K.ZhuL. (2014). Factors influencing principals’ retirement decisions: A southern US perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(1), 40–60.
51.
RobinsonV. M. J.LloydC. A.RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674.
52.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.
53.
School Leaders Network. (2014). CHURN: The high cost of principal turnover. Hinsdale, MA: School Leaders Network.
54.
ShawJ. D.DeleryE. J.JenkinsG. J.GuptaN. (1998). An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 511–525.
55.
SolanoP. L.McDuffieM. J.Farley-RippleE. N.BrutonJ. (2010). Principal retention in the state of Delaware. Newark, DE: University of Delaware, Center for Community Research and Service.
56.
SunM.NiY. (2016). Work environments and labor markets: Explaining principal turnover gap between charter schools and traditional public schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 144–183.
57.
TekleselassieA. A.VillarrealP.III. (2010). Career mobility and departure intentions among school principals in the United States: Incentives and disincentives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10, 251–293.
58.
TranH. (2017). The impact of pay satisfaction and school achievement on high school principals’ turnover intentions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(4), 621–638.
59.
TranH.BuckmanD. G. (2017). The impact of principal movement and school achievement on principal salaries. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16, 106–129.
60.
WeinsteinM.SchwartzA. E.JacobowitzR.ElyT.LandonK. (2009). New schools, new leaders: A study of principal turnover and academic achievement at new high schools in New York City (New York University Wagner Research Paper No. 2011-09). New York, NY: Institute for Education and Social Policy.
61.
WilsonA. P.HeimJ. M. (1984). Principal turnover by Kansas rural school administrators from 1978–1984. Manhattan, KS: Center for Rural Education and Small Schools, Kansan State University.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
