This article reviews critical discourse analysis scholarship in education research from 2004 to 2012. Our methodology was carried out in three stages. First, we searched educational databases. Second, we completed an analytic review template for each article and encoded these data into a digital spreadsheet to assess macro-trends in the field. Third, we developed schemata to interpret the complexity of research design. Our examination of 257 articles reveals trends in research questions, the theories researchers find useful, and the kinds of interactions that capture their attention. We explore areas in the field especially ripe for debate and critique: reflexivity, deconstructive–reconstructive stance toward inquiry, and social action. We compare the findings with an earlier review published in 2005, reflecting on three decades of critical discourse analysis in education research.
AgiroC. (2012). Comparative critical discourse analysis of student and teacher editions of secondary Christian American literature textbooks. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 21, 211–234.
2.
AllardA. C.SantoroN. (2008). Experienced teachers’ perspectives on cultural and social class diversity: Which differences matter?Equity & Excellence in Education, 41, 200–214. doi:10.1080/10665680801957253
3.
ArnottM.OzgaJ. (2010). Education and nationalism: The discourse of education policy in Scotland. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31, 335–350. doi:10.1080/01596301003786951
4.
AskehaveI. (2007). The impact of marketization on higher education genres: The international student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies, 9, 723–742. doi:10.1177/1461445607082576
5.
AtesB.EslamiZ. (2012). An analysis of non-native English-speaking graduate teaching assistants’ online journal entries. Language and Education, 62, 537–552. doi:10.1080/09500782.2012.669766
6.
AyersD. (2005). Neoliberal ideology in community college mission statements: A critical discourse analysis. Review of Higher Education, 28, 527–549.
7.
BarrettT. (2010). Problem-based learning process as finding and being in flow. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47, 165–174.
8.
BartlettT. (2012). Hybrid voices and collaborative change: Contextualizing positive discourse analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
BartonA.SakwaL. (2012). The representation of gender in English textbooks in Uganda. Pedagogy, Culture, & Society, 20, 173–190.
10.
BeneschS. (2008). “Generation 1.5” and its discourses of partiality: A critical analysis. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 7, 294–311. doi:10.1080/15348450802237954
11.
BerkowitzD. E. (2012). Framing the future of fanfiction: How The New York Times’ portrayal of a youth media subculture influences beliefs about media literacy education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 4, 198–212.
12.
BlaiseM. (2005). A feminist poststructuralist study of children “doing” gender in an urban kindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 85–108. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2005.01.002
13.
BlommaertJ. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511610295
14.
BlumA.JohnsonE. J. (2012). Reading repression: Textualizing the linguistic marginalization of nonnative English-speaking teachers in Arizona. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 11, 167–184. doi:10.1080/15348458.2012.686379
15.
BriscoeF. M.De OliverM. (2012). School leaders’ discursive constructions of low-income and minority families identities: A marketplace racism/classism. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 9, 247–280. doi:10.1080/15427587.2012.627028
16.
BrooksC. (2009). Teaching in full view: GLA as a mechanism of power. Policy Futures in Education, 7, 313–320.
17.
BrownS.Souto-ManningM.LamanT. T. (2010). Seeing the strange in the familiar: Unpacking racialized practices in early childhood settings. Race Ethnicity and Education, 13, 513–532. doi:10.1080/13613324.2010.519957
18.
CahnmannM.RymesB.Souto-ManningM. (2005). Using critical discourse analysis to understand and facilitate identification processes of bilingual adults becoming teachers. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 2, 195–213. doi:10.1207/s15427595cils0204_1
19.
CarloneH. B.WebbS. M. (2006). On (not) overcoming our history of hierarchy: Complexities of university/school collaboration. Science Education, 90, 544–568. doi:10.1002/sce.20123
20.
CaryL. J. (2004). The professional development school model: Unpacking knowledge. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7, 319–337. doi:10.1080/13603120410001694522
21.
ChenC. (2006). The development of email literacy: From writing to peers to writing to authority figures. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 35–55.
22.
ChiperS. (2006). The discourse of Romanian universities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 713–724. doi:10.1108/09534810610708369
23.
ClarkeL. W. (2007). Discussing Shiloh: A conversation beyond the book. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51, 112–122. doi:10.1598/JAAL.51.2.3
24.
ClarkeM. (2009). The discursive construction of interpersonal relations in an online community of practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2333–2344. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.001
25.
CohenJ. L. (2010). Teachers in the news: A critical analysis of one US newspaper’s discourse on education, 2006–2007. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31, 105–119. doi:10.1080/01596300903465450
26.
CollinsJ. (1986). Differential treatment in reading instruction. In Cook-GumperzJ. (Ed.), The social construction of literacy (pp. 117–137). London, England: Cambridge University Press.
27.
ComberB.CormackP. (2011). Education policy mediation: Principals’ work with mandated literacy assessment. English in Australia, 46, 77–86.
28.
ComberB.NixonH. (2009). Teachers’ work and pedagogy in an era of accountability. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30, 333–345. doi:10.1080/01596300903037069
29.
CotsJ. M. (2006). Teaching “with an attitude”: Critical discourse analysis in EFL teaching. ELT Journal, 60, 336–345. doi:10.1093/elt/ccl024
30.
CranstonJ. (2010). What do you mean your staff is like family?McGill Journal of Education, 45, 579–595. doi:10.7202/1003578ar
31.
CrumplerT. P.HandsfieldL. J.DeanT. R. (2011). Constructing difference differently in language and literacy professional development. Research in the Teaching of English, 46, 55–86.
32.
DavisonC. (2006). Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right?International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9, 454–475. doi:10.2167/beb339.0
33.
de los HerosS. (2009). Linguistic pluralism or prescriptivism? A CDA of language ideologies in Talento, Peru’s official textbook for the first-year of high school. Linguistics and Education, 20, 172–199. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.007
34.
DomineV. (2012). Blogging the field: An emergent continuum for urban teacher development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20, 387–414.
35.
du PreezP.SimmondsS. (2011). Understanding how we understand girls’ voices on cultural and religious practices: Toward a curriculum for justice. South African Journal of Education, 31, 322–332.
36.
DutroE. (2010). What “hard times” means: Mandated curricula, class-privileged assumptions, and the lives of poor children. Research in the Teaching of English, 44, 255–291.
37.
DutroE.SellandM. (2012). “I like to read, but I know I’m not good at it”: Children’s perspectives on high-stakes testing in a high-poverty school. Curriculum Inquiry, 42, 340–367. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00597.x
38.
DworinJ. E.BomerR. (2008). What we all (supposedly) know about the poor: A critical discourse analysis of Ruby Payne’s “framework.”English Education, 40, 101–121.
39.
Egan-RobertsonA. (1998). Learning about culture, language, and power: Understanding relationships among personhood, literacy practices, and intertextuality. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 449–487.
40.
FaircloughN. (1989). Language and power. London, England: Longman.
41.
FaircloughN. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4, 138–168.
42.
FernstenL. A. (2008). Writer identity and ESL learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 44–52. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.1.5
43.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon.
44.
FowlerR.HodgeB.KressG.TrewT. (1979). Language and control. London, England: Routledge.
45.
GebhardM. (2002). Fast capitalism, school reform, and second language literacy practices. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 15–52. doi:10.3138/cmlr.59.1.15
46.
GebhardM.DemersJ.Castillo-RosenthalZ. (2008). Teachers as critical text analysts: L2 literacies and teachers’ work in the context of high-stakes school reform. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 274–291.
47.
GeeJ. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London, England: Falmer Press.
48.
GoulahA. (2011). Ecospirituality in public foreign language education: A critical discourse analysis of a transformative world language learning approach. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 8, 27–52. doi:10.1080/15427587.2011.545766
49.
GraffJ. M. (2010). Countering narratives: Teachers’ discourses about immigrants and their experiences within the realm of children’s and young adult literature. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 9, 106–131.
50.
GreenM. G.TuckerJ. L. (2011) Tumultuous times of education reform: A critical reflection on caring in policy and practice. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14, 1–19. doi:10.1080/13603124.2010.488701
51.
HaddixM. (2010). No longer on the margins: Researching the hybrid literate identities of Black and Latina preservice teachers. Research in the Teaching of English, 45, 97–123.
52.
HamiltonM.PittK. (2011). Challenging representations: Constructing the adult literacy learner over 30 years of policy and practice in the United Kingdom. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 350–373.
53.
HanrahanM. (2004). Power-sharing in science classrooms: Utilising CDA for research in science education. Melbourne Studies in Education, 46, 107–127.
54.
HanrahanM. U. (2006). Highlighting hybridity: A critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms. Science Education, 90, 8–43. doi:10.1002/sce.20087
55.
HaasE.FischmanG. (2010). Nostalgia, entrepreneurship, and redemption: Understanding prototypes in higher education. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 532–562. doi:10.3102/0002831209359419
56.
HashimotoK. (2011). Compulsory “foreign language activities” in Japanese primary schools. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12, 167–184. doi:10.1080/14664208.2011.585958
57.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
58.
HodgeR.KressG. (1979). Language as ideology. London, England: Routledge.
59.
IrvingC.EnglishL. (2008). Partnering for research: A critical discourse analysis. Studies in Continuing Education, 30, 107–118. doi:10.1080/01580370802097702
60.
JanksH. (2009). Literacy and power. New York, NY: Routledge.
61.
JohnsonD. C. (2010). Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 61–79. doi:10.1080/13670050902780706
62.
KettleM. (2005). Agency as discursive practice: From “nobody” to “somebody” as an international student in Australia. Asian Pacific Journal of Education, 25, 45–60. doi:10.1080/02188790500032525
63.
KettleM.RyanM.AlfordJ. (2015, April). Applying critical discourse analysis (CDA) in education research: Theory, rigorous method and possibilities for application. Professional development workshop presented at the meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.
64.
KressG. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
KuntzA. M.GildersleeveR. E.PasqueP. A. (2011). Obama’s American graduation initiative: Race, conservative modernization, and a logic of abstraction. Peabody Journal of Education, 86, 488–505. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2011.616130
67.
LiM. (2011). Shaping socialist ideology through language education policy for primary schools in the PRC. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12, 185–204. doi:10.1080/14664208.2011.592132
68.
LiasidouA. (2008). Critical discourse analysis and inclusive educational policies: The power to exclude. Journal of Education Policy, 23, 483–500. doi:10.1080/02680930802148933
69.
LlewellynA. (2009). “Gender games”: A post-structural exploration of the prospective teacher, mathematics and identity. Math Teacher Education, 12, 411–426. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9109-0
70.
LukeA. (1995). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21, 3–48. doi:10.2307/1167278
71.
LukeA. (2004). Notes on the future of critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 1, 810–825.
72.
ManteawB. O. (2008). When businesses go to school: Neoliberalism and education for sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 2, 119–126. doi:10.1177/097340820800200209
73.
MarshallE.TooheyK. (2010). Representing family: Community fund, knowledge, bilingualism, and multimodality. Harvard Educational Review, 80, 221–241.
74.
MartinJ. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 49, 179–200.
75.
MaybinJ. (2013). Working towards a more complete sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17, 547–555. doi:10.1111/josl.12047
76.
MazherW. (2011). A Foucaultian critique of learning disability discourses: Personal narratives and science. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25, 767–800. doi:10.1080/09518398.2011.569767
77.
McNeillT. (2012). “Don’t affect the share price”: Social media policy in higher education as reputation management. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 152–162. doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19194
78.
MitchellC. (2004). In search of civility: Higher education and the discourse of disdain. Taboo, 8, 5–27.
79.
Moita-LopesL. P. (2006). Queering literacy teaching: Analyzing gay-themed discourses in a fifth-grade class in Brazil. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 5, 31–50. doi:10.1207/s15327701jlie0501_3
80.
MoreauM.OsgoodJ.HalsallA. (2007). Making sense of the glass ceiling in schools: An exploration of women teachers’ discourses. Gender and Education, 19, 237–253. doi:10.1080/09540250601166092
81.
MorganB. (2009). Revitalising the essay in an English for academic purposes course: Critical engagement, multiliteracies and the Internet. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12, 309–324. doi:10.1080/13670050802153350
82.
MorganB.RamanathanV. (2009). Outsourcing, globalizing economics, and shifting language policies: Issues in managing Indian call centers. Language Policy, 8, 69–80. doi:10.1007/s10993-008-9111-x
83.
MosleyM. (2010). “That really hit me hard”: Moving beyond passive anti-racism to engage with critical race literacy pedagogy. Race Ethnicity and Education, 13, 449–471. doi:10.1080/13613324.2010.488902
84.
MossmanT. (2012). “They’re different from who I am”: Making relevant identities in the middle through talk-in-interaction. TESL Canada Journal, 29, 103–123.
85.
New London Group. (1996). The pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
86.
NgoB.Leet-OtleyJ. (2011). Discourses about gender among Hmong American policymakers: Conflicting views about gender, culture, and Hmong youth. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 10, 99–118. doi:10.1080/15348458.2011.563646
87.
NordinA. (2011). Making the Lisbon strategy happen: A new phase of lifelong learning discourse in European policy?European Educational Research Journal, 10, 11–20. doi:10.2304/eerj.2011.10.1.11
88.
NudzorH. (2012). Unmasking complexities involved in operationalizing UPE policy initiatives: Using the “fCUBE” policy implementation in Ghana as an exemplar. Journal of Educational Change, 13, 347–371. doi:10.1007/s10833-012-9181-6
89.
OikonomidoyE. (2008). Preservice teachers’ views on the global dimensions of education. Teacher Education & Practice, 21, 363–381.
90.
OsgoodJ. (2009). Childcare workforce reform in England and “the early years professional”: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 24, 733–751. doi:10.1080/02680930903244557
91.
OughtonH. (2007). Constructing the “ideal learner”: A critical discourse analysis of the adult numeracy core curriculum. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 12, 259–275. doi:10.1080/13596740701387536
92.
ParkerW. C. (2011). “International education” in US public schools. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9, 487–501. doi:10.1080/14767724.2011.605330
93.
PaughP.RobinsonE. (2011). Keeping a “vigilant critique”: Unpacking critical praxis as teacher educators. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24, 363–378. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.538747
94.
PaughP. C.Dudley-MarlingC. (2011). “Speaking” deficit into (or out of) existence: How language constrains classroom teachers’ knowledge about instructing diverse learners. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 819–833. doi:10.1080/13603110903437144
95.
PayneR. (2005). A framework for understanding poverty. Austin, TX: Aha Press.
96.
PeacockD. (2012). Neoliberal social inclusion? The agenda of the Australian Universities Community Engagement Alliance. Critical Studies in Education, 53, 311–325. doi:10.1080/17508487.2012.703138
97.
Peled-ElhananN. (2010). Legitimation of massacres in Israeli school history books. Discourse & Society, 21, 377–404.
98.
PimentelC. (2010). Critical race talk in teacher education through movie analysis. Multicultural Education, 17, 51–56.
99.
PimentelO.VelaquezP. (2009). Shrek 2: An appraisal of mainstream animation’s influence on identity. Journal of Latinos and Education, 8(1), 5–21.
100.
PittK. (2002). Being a new capitalist mother. Discourse & Society, 13, 251–267.
PrinsE.TosoB. (2008). Defining and measuring parenting for educational success: A critical discourse analysis of the parent education profile. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 555–596. doi:10.3102/0002831208316205
103.
RambeP. (2012). Critical discourse analysis of collaborative engagement in “Facebook” postings. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 295–314.
104.
RaptisH. (2012). Ending the reign of the Fraser Institute’s school rankings. Canadian Journal of Education, 35, 187–201.
105.
ReidI. C. (2009). Auditors of the managerial university: Neo-liberal business advisers or paternal controllers?Globalisation, Societies and Education, 7, 337–355. doi:10.1080/14767720903166137
106.
RichardsonE. (2007). “She was workin like foreal”: Critical literacy and discourse practices of African American females in the age of hip hop. Discourse & Society, 18, 789–809. doi:10.1177/0957926507082197
107.
Rocha-SchmidE. (2010). Participatory pedagogy for empowerment: A critical discourse analysis of teacher–parents’ interactions in a family literacy course in London. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29, 343–358. doi:10.1080/02601371003700659
108.
RogersR. (2002). “That’s what you’re here for, you’re supposed to know”: Teaching and learning critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45, 772–787.
109.
RogersR. (2011a). Becoming discourse analysts: Constructing meanings and identities. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 8, 72–104. doi:10.1080/15427587.2011.545768
110.
RogersR. (Ed.). (2011b). Introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
111.
RogersR.ChristianJ. (2007). “What could I say?” A critical discourse analysis of the construction of race in children’s literature. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10, 21–46. doi:10.1080/13613320601100351
112.
RogersR.Malancharuvil-BerkesE.MosleyM.HuiD.O’GarroG. (2005). A critical review of critical discourse analysis. Review of Educational Research, 75, 365–416. doi:10.3102/00346543075003365
113.
RogersR.Mosley WetzelM. (2013). Studying agency in teacher education: A layered approach to positive discourse analysis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10, 62–92. doi:10.1080/15427587.2013.753845
114.
RogersR.Mosley WetzelM. (2014). Designing critical literacy education through critical discourse analysis: Pedagogical and research tools for teacher researchers. New York, NY: Routledge.
115.
RogersR.SchaenenI. (2014). Critical discourse analysis in language and literacy research. Reading Research Quarterly, 49, 121–143.
116.
RossiT.TinningR.McCuaigL.SirnaK.HunterL. (2009). With the best of intentions: A critical discourse analysis of physical education curriculum materials. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 28, 75–89.
117.
RyanM. (2011). Productions of space: Civic participation of young people at university. British Educational Research Journal, 37, 1015–1031. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.517827
118.
RyanM.JohnsonG. (2009). Negotiating multiple identities between school and the outside world: A critical discourse analysis. Critical Studies in Education, 50, 247–260. doi:10.1080/17508480903009574
119.
RymesB.Cahnmann-TaylorM.Souto-ManningM. (2008). Bilingual teachers’ performances of power and conflict. Teaching Education, 19, 93–107. doi:10.1080/10476210802040757
120.
SabriD. (2011). What’s wrong with “the student experience”?Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32, 657–667. doi:10.1080/01596306.2011.620750
121.
SchaenenI. (2010a). “All white Americans in the country” and other loaded subjects: Race, community, and morality in a second grade classroom. Journal of Research in Character Education, 8, 87–105.
122.
SchaenenI. (2010b). “Genre means . . .”: A critical discourse analysis of fourth grade talk about genre. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 7, 28–53. doi:10.1080/15427580903523581
123.
SchiebleM. (2012). A critical discourse analysis of teachers’ views on LGBT literature. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33, 207–222. doi:10.1080/01596306.2011.620758
124.
ScollonR. (2010). Analyzing public discourse: Discourse analysis in the making of public policy. London, England: Routledge.
125.
SmithK. (2008). “Who do you think you’re talking to?” The discourse of learning and teaching strategies. Higher Education, 56, 395–406. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9100-6
126.
Souto-ManningM. (2006). A critical look at bilingualism discourse in public schools: Autoethnographic reflections of a vulnerable observer. Bilingual Research Journal, 30, 559–577. doi:10.1080/15235882.2006.10162890
127.
StackM. (2006). Testing, testing, read all about it: Canadian press coverage of the PISA results. Canadian Journal of Education, 29, 49–69. doi:10.2307/20054146
128.
StamouA. G.PadeliaduS. (2009). Discourses of disability by teacher candidates: A critical discourse analysis of written responses to a disability simulation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 509–540. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00449.x
129.
StreetB. (1985). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
130.
SungY. K.KangM. O. (2012). The cultural politics of national testing and test result release policy in South Korea: A critical discourse analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32, 53–73. doi:10.1080/02188791.2011.62169
131.
Sutherland-SmithW. (2010). Retribution, deterrence and reform: The dilemmas of plagiarism management in universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31, 5–16. doi:10.1080/13600800903440519
132.
TakayamaK. (2009). Is Japanese education the “exception”? Examining the situated articulation of neoliberalism through the analysis of policy keywords. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29, 125–142. doi:10.1080/02188790902857149
133.
TalbotB. C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis for transformative music teaching and learning: Method, critique, and globalization. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 186, 81–93.
134.
TamateaL.HardyJ.NinnesP. (2008). Paradoxical inscriptions of global subjects: Critical discourse analysis of international schools’ websites in the Asia-Pacific region. Critical Studies in Education, 49, 157–170. doi:10.1080/17508480802040241
135.
TaylorN. (2008). Critical analysis of the adult literacy curriculum: Instructional or regulative?Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 13, 307–314. doi:10.1080/13596740802346514
136.
ThomasS. (2011). Teachers and public engagement: An argument for rethinking teacher professionalism to challenge deficit discourses in the public sphere. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32, 317–382. doi:10.1080/01596306.2011.573253
137.
TutenJ. (2007). There’s two sides to every story. Language Arts, 84, 314–324.
138.
van DijkT. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4, 249–283.
139.
van LeeuwenT. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
140.
van RensburgW. (2007). CSL, multiliteracies, and multimodalities. Education as Change, 11, 183–189.
141.
WadeS. E.FauskeJ. R.ThompsonA. (2008). Prospective teachers’ problem solving in online peer-led dialogues. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 398–442. doi:10.3102/0002831207308224
142.
WeirK. (2005). Critical discourse analysis and Internet research. Melbourne Studies in Education, 46, 67–86. doi:10.1080/17508480509556425
143.
WiddowsonH. G. (1998). The theory and practice of critical discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 19, 136–151. doi:10.1093/applin/19.1.136
WohlwendK. E. (2012). “Are you guys girls?” Boys, identity texts, and Disney princess play. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 12, 3–23. doi:10.2304/ciec.2007.8.1.73
146.
YoonI. H. (2012). The paradoxical nature of whiteness-at-work in the daily life of schools and teacher communities. Race Ethnicity and Education, 15, 587–613. doi:10.1080/13613324.2011.624506
147.
YoungJ. P. (2000). Boy talk: Critical literacy and masculinities. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 312–337.
148.
YoungP. A. (2009). The Brownies’ book (1920–1921): Exploring the past to elucidate the future of instructional design. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 8(1), 1–20.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
