Theories of writing development posit several component skills as necessary to the writing process. This meta-analysis synthesizes the literature on the correlation between these proposed component skills and writing outcomes. Specifically, in this study, we examine the bivariate relationships between handwriting fluency, spelling, reading, and oral language and students’ quality of writing and writing production. Additionally, the extent to which such relationships are moderated by student grade level and type of learner is also investigated. The findings document that each of the component skills demonstrates a weak to moderate positive relationship to outcomes assessing writing quality (rs = .33−.49) and the amount students write (rs = .20−.48). Moderator analyses were generally not significant with the exception that the relationship between reading and writing production was significantly higher for students in the primary grades. The implications of these findings to current theories and future research are discussed.
*AbbottR. D.BerningerV. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary- and intermediate-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 478–508. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.478
2.
*AbbottR. D.BerningerV. W.FayolM. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 281–298. doi:10.1037/a0019318
3.
*AdamsA.-M.SimmonsF. R.WillisC. S.PorterS. (2013). The impact of the development of verbal recording on children’s early writing skills. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 76–97. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02056.x
4.
AhmedY. (2011). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, sentence, and text level: A latent change score analysis (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1508379)
5.
AhmedY.WagnerR. K.LopezD. (2014). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, sentence, and text levels: A latent change score analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 419–434. doi:10.1037/a0035692
6.
AltemeierL. E. (2006). The contribution of executive functions to reading and writing outcomes in typically developing readers and writers and in children and adults with dyslexia (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3241875)
7.
*BalioussisC.JohnsonJ.Pascual-LeoneJ. (2012). Fluency and complexity in children’s writing: The role of mental attention and executive function. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 33–46.
8.
BereiterC.ScardamaliaM. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D. (2010). Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 635–651. doi:10.1037/a0019319
10.
BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D.AbbottS. P.GrahamS.RichardsT. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 39–56. doi:10.1177/002221940203500104
11.
*BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D.JonesJ.WolfB. J.GouldL.Anderson-YoungstromM.. . . ApelK. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; three letter-writing modes; and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 61–92. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2901_5
12.
*BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D.ThomsonJ. B.RaskindW. H. (2001). Language phenotype for reading and writing disability: A family approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 59–106. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0501_3
13.
BerningerV. W.CartwrightA. C.YatesC. M.SwansonH. L.AbbottR. D. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades: Shared and unique functional systems. Reading and Writing, 6, 161–196. doi:10.1007/BF01026911
14.
BerningerV. W.GarciaN. P.AbbottR. D. (2009). Multiple processes that matter in writing instruction and assessment. In TroiaG. A. (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers (pp. 15–50). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
BerningerV. W.HartT.AbbottR.KarovskyP. (1992). Defining reading and writing disabilities with and without IQ: A flexible, developmental perspective. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 103–118. doi:10.2307/1511012
16.
BerningerV. W.WinnW. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
BerningerV. W.YatesC.CartwrightA.RutbergJ.RemyE.AbbottR. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing, 4, 257–280.
18.
*BishopD. V.ClarksonB. (2003). Written language as a window into residual language deficits: A study of children with persistent and residual speech and language impairments. Cortex, 39, 215–237. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70106-0
19.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, England: Wiley.
20.
BourdinB.FayolM. (2000). Is graphic activity cognitively costly? A developmental approach. Reading and Writing, 13, 183–196. doi:10.1023/A:1026458102685
21.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
22.
*ConnellyV.GeeD.WalshE. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 479–492. doi:10.1348/000709906X116768
23.
CooperH. (2009). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
*CraggL.NationK. (2006). Exploring written narrative in children with poor comprehension. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 26, 55–72. doi:10.1080/01443410500340991
25.
CutlerL.GrahamS. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907–919. doi:10.1037/a0012656
*DeBonoT.HosseiniA.CairoC.GhelaniK.TannockR.ToplakM. E. (2012). Written expression performance in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Reading and Writing, 25, 1403–1426. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9325-8
28.
DickersinK.MinY-I. (1993). Publication bias: The problem that won’t go away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703, 135–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x
29.
*DockrellJ. E.LindsayG.ConnellyV. (2009). The impact of specific language impairment on adolescents’ written text. Exceptional Children, 75, 427–446.
30.
*DrayA. J.SelmanR. L.SchultzL. H. (2009). Communicating with intent: A study of social awareness and children’s writing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 116–128. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.11.003
31.
FitzgeraldJ.ShanahanT. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 39–50. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5
32.
FlowerL. S.HayesJ. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21–32. doi:10.2307/356630
33.
*FreedJ.AdamsC.LocktonE. (2011). Literacy skills in primary school-aged children with pragmatic language impairment: A comparison with children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46, 334–347. doi:10.3109/13682822.2010.500316
34.
GarcíaJ. R.CainK. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84, 74–111. doi:10.3102/0034654313499616
35.
GoughP. B.TunmerW. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
36.
*GrahamS.BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D.AbbottS. P.WhitakerD. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170–182. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.170
37.
GrahamS.BollingerA.Booth OlsonC.D’AoustC.MacArthurC.McCutchenD.OlinghouseN. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide (NCEE No. 2012-4058). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications_reviews.aspx#pubsearch
38.
GrahamS.GillespieA.McKeownD. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 26, 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
39.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3–12. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3501_2
40.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.Fink-ChorzempaB.MacArthurC. (2003). Primary grade teachers’ instructional adaptations for struggling writers: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 279–292. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.279
41.
GrahamS.HebertM. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 710–744.
42.
GrahamS.HebertM.HarrisK. (2011). Throw ’em out or make ’em better? State and district high-stakes writing assessments. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44, 1–12.
43.
GrahamS.McKeownD.KiuharaS.HarrisK. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879–896. doi:10.1037/a0029185
44.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
45.
GrahamS.SandmelK. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 396–407. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.488703
46.
HayesJ. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In LevyC. M.RansdellS. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
HayesJ. R.FlowerL. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In GreggL.SteinbergE. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
HebertM.GillespieA.GrahamS. (2013). Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 26, 111–138. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9386-3
49.
*HooperS. R.CostaL.McBeeM.AndersonK. L.YerbyD. C.KnuthS. B.ChildressA. (2011). Concurrent and longitudinal neuropsychological contributors to written language expression in first and second grade students. Reading and Writing, 24, 221–252. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9263-x
50.
HooperS. R.SwartzC. W.MontgomeryJ. W.ReedM. S. (1993). Prevalence of writing problems across three middle school samples. School Psychology Review, 22, 610–622.
51.
*JenkinsJ. R.JohnsonE.HilemanJ. (2004). When is reading also writing: Sources of individual differences on the new reading performance assessments. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 125–151. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0802_2
52.
*JewellJ.MaleckiC. K. (2005). The utility of CMB written language indices: An investigation of production-dependent, production-independent, and accurate-production scores. School Psychology Review, 34, 27–44.
53.
*JohnsonE. S.JenkinsJ. R.JewellM. (2005). Analyzing components of reading on performance assessments: An expanded simple view. Reading Psychology, 26, 267–283. doi:10.1080/02702710590962587
54.
*JonesD.ChristensenC. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44
55.
*JuelC. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437
56.
JuelC.GriffithP. L.GoughP. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243
57.
KatusicS. K.ColliganR. C.WeaverA. L.BarbaresiW. J. (2009). The forgotten learning disability: Epidemiology of written-language disorder in a population-based birth cohort (1976–1982), Rochester, Minnesota. Pediatrics, 123, 1306–1313. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2098
58.
KentS.WanzekJ.PetscherY.Al OtaibaS.KimY. (2014). Writing fluency and quality in kindergarten and first grade: The role of attention, reading, transcription, and oral language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1163–1188. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9480-1
59.
*KimY.Al OtaibaS. A.PuranikC.FolsomJ. S.GreulichL.WagnerR. K. (2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 517–525. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.004
60.
*KimY.Al OtaibaS. A.PuranikC.SidlerJ. F.GreulichL. (2013). Language, literacy, attentional behaviors, and instructional quality predictors of written composition for first graders. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 461–469. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.01.001
61.
KiuharaS. A.GrahamS.HawkenL. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 136–160. doi:10.1037/a0013097
62.
LangerJ. A. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 837–880. doi:10.3102/00028312038004837
63.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
*MackieC.DockrellJ. E. (2004). The nature of written language deficits in children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1469–1483.
65.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2007). Challenging the assumptions about the frequency and coexistence of learning disability types. School Psychology International, 28, 437–448. doi:10.1177/014303430784134
66.
McCutchenD. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299–325. doi:10.1007/BF01464076
67.
McCutchenD. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35, 13–23. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3
68.
McCutchenD.FrancisM.KerrS. (1997). Revising for meaning: Effects of knowledge and strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 667–676. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.667
69.
*MedwellJ.StrandS.WrayD. (2009). The links between handwriting and composing for Y6 children. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 329–344. doi:10.1080/03057640903103728
70.
*MehtaP. D.FoormanB. R.Branum-MartinL.TaylorP. W. (2005). Literacy as a unidimensional multilevel construct: Validation, sources of influence, and implications in a longitudinal study in grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 85–116. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_1
71.
MillerB.McCardleP. (2011). Reflections on the need for continued research on writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24, 121–132. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9267-6
72.
MoatsL. (2004). Relevance of neuroscience to effective education for students with reading and other learning disabilities. Journal of Child Neurology, 19, 840–845.
73.
MulliganM. S. (2002). The Connecticut Mastery Tests: An analytic approach to holistic measures of reading and writing (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3062091)
74.
*NagyW.BerningerV.AbbottR.VaughanK.VermeulenK. (2003). Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourth-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 730–742. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.730
75.
NathanA. M. (2009). The impact of executive functions skills in writing: A comparison of fifth-grade students with learning disabilities and students with typical development (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3387963)
76.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012-470). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
79.
NelsonD. (2003). Relationships among the reading, writing, and comprehension skills of intermediate elementary school students (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3112447)
*OlinghouseN. G. (2008). Student- and instruction-level predictors of narrative writing in third-grade students. Reading and Writing, 21, 3–26. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9062-1
82.
*OlinghouseN. G.GrahamS. (2009). The relationship between the discourse knowledge and the writing performance of elementary-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 37–50. doi:10.1037/a0013462
83.
*OlsonR. K.HulslanderJ.ChristopherM.KeenanJ. M.WadsworthS. J.WillcuttE. G.. . . DeFriesJ. C. (2013). Genetic and environmental influences on writing and their relations to language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 25–43. doi:10.1007/s11881-011-0055-z
84.
PerskyH. R.DaaneM. C.JinY. (2003). The nation’s report card: Writing 2002 (NCES 2003-529). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
85.
PughK. R.FrostS. J.SandakR.GillisM.MooreD.JennerA. R.MenclW. E. (2006). What does reading have to tell us about writing? Preliminary question and methodological challenges in examining the neurobiological foundations of writing and writing disabilities. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 433–448). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
86.
PuranikC. S.Al OtaibaS. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 25, 1523–1546. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9331-x
87.
*RitcheyK. D.CokerD. L.McCrawS. B. (2010). A comparison of metrics for scoring beginning spelling. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 78–88. doi:10.1177/1534508409336087
88.
RothsteinH. R.SuttonA. J.BorensteinM. (Eds.). (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustments. West Sussex, England: Wiley.
89.
ScammaccaN.RobertsG.VaughnS.EdmondsM.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC. K.TorgesenJ. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
90.
ScammaccaN. K.RobertsG.VaughnS.StuebingK. (2013). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 369–390. doi:10.1177/0022219413504995
91.
ShanahanT. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing development. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 83–95). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
92.
ShanahanT.LomaxR. G. (1986). An analysis and comparison of theoretical models of the reading-writing relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 116–123. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.116
93.
*ShermisM. D.LongS. K. (2009). Multitrait-multimethod analysis of FCAT reading and writing: Or is it writing and reading?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 296–311. doi:10.1177/0734282908328639
94.
SmithC. (2011). Narrative writing in native English and ESL learners: Developmental trajectories and predictors (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 916424661)
95.
StuebingK. K.BarthA. E.TrahanL. H.ReddyR. R.MiciakJ.FletcherJ. M. (2014). Are child characteristics strong predictors of responses to intervention? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.3102/0034654314555996
96.
*SwansonH. L.BerningerV. W. (1996). Individual differences in children’s writing: A function of working memory or reading or both processes?Reading and Writing, 8, 357–383. doi:10.1007/BF00395114
97.
*ThomsonJ. B.ChenaultB.AbbottR. D.RaskindW. H.RichardsT.AylwardE.BerningerV. W. (2005). Converging evidence for attentional influences on the orthographic word form in child dyslexics. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 93–126. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.11.005
98.
TierneyR. J.ShanahanT. (1991). Research on the reading–writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
99.
TroiaG. A.LinS. C.MonroeB. W.CohenS. (2009). The effects of writing workshop instruction on the performance and motivation of good and poor writers. In TroiaG. A. (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers (pp. 77–112). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
100.
*WagnerR. K.PuranikC. S.FoormanB.FosterE.WilsonL. G.TschinkelE.KantorP. T. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading and Writing, 24, 203–220. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
101.
WakelyM. B.HooperS. R.de Kruif, ReneeE. L.SwartzC. (2006). Subtypes of written expression in elementary school children: A linguistic-based model. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 125–159. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2901_7
102.
WanzekJ.KentS. C.VaughnS.SwansonE. A.RobertsG.HaynesM. (2015). Implementing team-based learning in middle school social studies classes. Journal of Educational Research, 108, 331–344. doi:10.1080/00220671.2014.893224
103.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.ScammaccaN. K.MetzK.MurrayC. S.RobertsG.DanielsonL. (2013). Extensive reading intervention for older struggling readers: Implications from research. Review of Educational Research, 83, 163–195. doi:10.3102/003465431377212
104.
*WhiteK. M. (2013). Associations between teacher-child relationships and children’s writing in kindergarten and first grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 166–176. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.05.004
105.
WhitakerD.BerningerV. W.JohnstonJ.SwansonH. L. (1994). Intraindividual differences in levels of language in intermediate grade writers: Implications for the translating process. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 107–130. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(94)90016-7
106.
*WilliamsG. J.LarkinR. F. (2012). Narrative writing, reading and cognitive processes in middle childhood: What are the links?Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 142–150. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.08.003
107.
*WilliamsG. J.LarkinR. F.BlagganS. (2013). Written language skills in children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 160–171. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12010
108.
*YoreL. D. (1988). Exploration of the predictive and concurrent validity of a global measure of cognitive development for Grade 1 reading, mathematics, and writing achievement. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21, 62–69.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
