Increasing the vocabulary knowledge of young adolescent and adolescent students has been a focal point of educational research and many teacher professional development initiatives. Yet many teachers continue to use traditional, but generally ineffective, methods of classroom-based vocabulary instruction. Synthesizing the literature around the general topics of vocabulary instruction, classroom discourse, and teacher talk, this review provides a comprehensive and critical examination of instruction that supports vocabulary learning in older students with a particular focus on practices that promote productive discussions of content.
AdlerM.RougleE.KaiserE.CaughlanS. (2003/2004). Closing the gap between concept and practice: Toward more dialogic discussion in the language arts classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 47, 312–322.
2.
AlvermannD. E. (2001). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents (Executive summary and paper commissioned by the National Reading Conference). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
3.
AndersonR. C.FreebodyP. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In GuthrieJ. T. (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4.
BaumannJ. F.EdwardsE. C.BolandE.OlejnikS.Kame’enuiE. W. (2003). Vocabulary tricks: Effects of instruction in morphology and context on fifth-grade students’ ability to derive and infer word meanings. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 447–494. doi:10.3102/00028312040002447
5.
BaumannJ. F.EdwardsE. C.FontG.TereshinskiC. A. (2002). Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 150–176. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/748155
6.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 789–814). New York, NY: Longman.
7.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G.KucanL. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G.KucanL. (2008). Creating robust vocabulary: Frequently asked questions and extended examples. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
BeckI. L.PerfettiC. A.McKeownM. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506–521. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.506
10.
BeersK. (1998). Choosing not to read: Understanding why some middle schoolers just say no. In BeersK.SamuelsB. G. (Eds.), Into focus: Understanding and creating middle school readers (pp. 37–64). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
11.
BensoussanM.LauferB. (1984). Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 7, 15–32. doi:10.1111/j.14679817.1984.tb00252.x
12.
BiancarosaG.SnowC. E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/ReadingNext.pdf
13.
BiemillerA. (2003). Vocabulary: Needed if more children are to read well. Reading Psychology, 24, 323–335. doi:10.1080/02702710390227297
14.
BiemillerA.SlonimN. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 498–520. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.3.498
15.
BlachowiczC. L. Z.FisherP. (2000). Vocabulary instruction. In KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 503–523). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
BlachowiczC. L. Z.FisherP. J.OgleD.Watts-TaffeS. (2006). Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 524–539. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.4.5
17.
CainK.OakhillJ.LemmonK. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671–681. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671
18.
CarloM. S.AugustD.McLaughlinB.SnowC. E.DresslerC.LippmanD. N.. . . WhiteC. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 186–215. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.2.3
19.
Celce-MurciaM.RosensweigF. (1979). Teaching vocabulary in the ESL classroom. In Celce-MurciaM.McIntoshL. (Eds.), Teaching English as a second language (pp. 241–257). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
20.
CoxheadA. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238. doi:10.2307/3587951
21.
CrossleyS.SalsburyT.McNamaraD. (2010). The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers. Language Learning, 60, 573–605. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00568.x
22.
CunninghamA. E.StanovichK. E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 264–274. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.264
23.
CunninghamA. E.StanovichK. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934
24.
CunninghamA. E.StanovichK. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22, 8–15.
25.
DaleE. (1965). Vocabulary measurement: Techniques and major findings. Elementary English, 42, 82–88.
26.
DanemanM. (1988). Word knowledge and reading skill. In DanemanM.MacKinnonG.WallerT. G. (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 6, pp. 145–175). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27.
DavisF. B. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 499–545. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/747153
28.
Dixon-KraussL. (2002). Literature as a context for teaching vocabulary. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45, 310–318.
29.
DoleJ.SloanC.TrathenW. (1995). Teaching vocabulary within the context of literature. Journal of Reading, 38, 452–460. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40017892
30.
FukkinkR. G.DeGlopperK. (1998). Effects of instruction in deriving word meaning from context: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 68, 450–469. doi:10.3102/00346543068004450
31.
GoerssB. L.BeckI. L.McKeownM. G. (1999). Increasing remedial students’ ability to derive word meaning from context. Journal of Reading Psychology, 20, 151–175. doi:10.1080/027027199278457
32.
GravesM. F. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
33.
HarmonJ. M. (1998). Constructing word meanings: Strategies and perceptions of four middle school learners. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 561–599. doi:10.1080/10862969809548014
34.
HarmonJ. M. (2000). Creating contexts for supporting word-meaning constructions: Dialogues with struggling middle-school readers. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 49, 331–343.
35.
HarrisM. L.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (2011). The effects of strategic morphological analysis instruction on the vocabulary performance of secondary students with and without disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 17–33.
36.
HartB.RisleyT. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
37.
HedrickW. B.HarmonJ. M.LinerodeP. M. (2004). Teachers’ beliefs and practices of vocabulary instruction with social studies textbooks in grades 4–8. Reading Horizons, 45, 103–125.
38.
HiebertE. H. (2005). In pursuit of an effective, efficient vocabulary program. In HiebertE. H.KamilM. (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 243–263). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39.
JimenezR. T.GarciaG. E.PearsonP. D. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latino students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 90–112. doi:10.1598/RRQ.31.1.5
40.
KnappM. S. (1995). Teaching for meaning in high-poverty classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
41.
KucanL. (2007). Insights from teachers who analyzed transcripts of their own classroom discussions. The Reading Teacher, 61, 228–236. doi:10.1598/RT.61.3.3
42.
LangerJ. A. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 837–880. doi:10.3102/00028312038004837
43.
LesauxN. K.KiefferM. J.FallerS. E.KelleyJ. G. (2010). The effectiveness and ease of implementation of an academic vocabulary intervention for linguistically diverse students in urban middle schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 196–228. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.2.3
44.
LublinerS.SmetanaL. (2005). The effects of comprehensive vocabulary instruction on Title I students’ metacognitive word-learning skills and reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 163–200. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3702_3
45.
McKennaM. C.KearD. J.EllsworthR. A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934–955. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/748205
46.
McKeownM. G.BeckI. L.OmansonR. C.PerfettiC. A. (1983). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Literacy Research, 15, 3–18. doi:10.1080/10862968309547474
47.
McKeownM.BeckI.OmansonR.PopleM. (1985). Some effects of the nature and frequency of vocabulary instruction on the knowledge and use of words. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 522–535. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/747940
48.
MillerG.GildeaP. M. (1985). How to misread a dictionary. AILA Bulletin, 13–26.
49.
MurphyP. K.WilkinsonI. A.SoterA. O.HennesseyM. N.AlexanderJ. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 740–764. doi:10.1037/a0015576
50.
NagyW. E. (2005). Why vocabulary instruction needs to be long-term and comprehensive. In HiebertE. H.KamilM. L. (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 27–44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
NagyW. E.AndersonR. C.SchommerM.ScottJ.StallmanA. C. (1989). Morphological families in the internal lexicon. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262–282. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/747770
52.
NagyW. E.BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D. (2006). Contribution of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134
53.
NagyW. E.HermanP. A.AndersonR. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/747758
54.
NagyW. E.ScottJ. A. (2000). Vocabulary processing. In KamilM.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55.
NagyW. E.TownsendD. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 91–108. doi:10.1002/RRQ.011
56.
NationI. S. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York, NY: Newbury House.
57.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2013). 2013 Reading Assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/
58.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects, Appendix A. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_A.pdf
59.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
60.
NelsonJ. R.StageS. A. (2007). Fostering the development of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension through contextually-based multiple meaning vocabulary instruction. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 1–22. doi:10.1353/etc.2007.0003
61.
NippoldM. A. (2002). Lexical learning in school-age children, adolescents, and adults: A process where language and literacy converge. Journal of Child Language, 29, 474–478. doi:10.1017/s0305000902275340
62.
NippoldM. A.SunL. (2008). Knowledge of morphologically complex words: A developmental study of older children and young adolescents. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 365–373. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2008/034)
63.
NystrandM.WuL. L.GamoranA.ZeiserS.LongD. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35, 135–198. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3
64.
ParibakhtT.WescheM. (1996). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 155–178. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524643.013
PearsonP. D.HiebertE. H.KamilM. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 282–296. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.2.4
67.
PerieM.MoranR.LutkusA. (2005). NAEP 2004 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance in reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
68.
ProctorC. P.CarloM.AugustD.SnowC. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 246–256. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.246
69.
QianD. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 26, 282–307. doi:10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282
70.
RamG.MarinellieS. A.BenignoJ.McCarthyJ. (2013). Morphological analysis in context versus isolation: Use of a dynamic assessment task with school-age children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 32–47. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0023)
71.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
72.
ResnickL. B.LevineJ. M.TeasleyS. D. (Eds.). (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
73.
ScottJ. A. (2005). Creating opportunities to acquire new word meanings from text. In HiebertE. H.KamilM. L. (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 69–91). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
74.
ScottJ. A.Jamieson-NoelD.AsselinM. (2003). Vocabulary instruction throughout the day in twenty-three Canadian upper-elementary classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 103, 269–312. doi:10.1086/499726
75.
ScottJ. A.NagyW. E. (1997). Understanding the definitions of unfamiliar words. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 184–200. doi:10.1598/RRQ.32.2.4
76.
ShanahanT. (2000). Research synthesis: Making sense of the accumulation of knowledge in reading. In KamilM.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 209–226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
77.
SharpeT. (2008). How can teacher talk support learning?Linguistics and Education, 19, 132–148. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2008.05.001
78.
SilvermanR. D.ProctorC. P.HarringJ. R.DoyleB.MitchellM. A.MeyerA. G. (2013). Teachers’ instruction and students’ vocabulary and comprehension: An exploratory study with English monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual students in grades 3–5. Reading Research Quarterly, 49, 31–60. doi:10.1002/rrq.63
79.
SnowC. E.LawrenceJ.WhiteC. (2009). Generating knowledge of academic language among urban middle school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 325–344. doi:10.1080/19345740903167042
80.
SoterA. O.WilkinsonI. A. G.MurphyP. K.RudgeLReningerK.EdwardsM. (2008). What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 372–391. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001
81.
StahlS. A.ClarkC. H. (1987). The effects of participatory expectations in classroom discussion on the learning of science vocabulary. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 541–556. doi:10.3102/00028312024004541
82.
StahlS. A.FairbanksM. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56, 72–110. doi:10.3102/00346543056001072
83.
StahlS. A.NagyW. E. (2006). Teaching word meanings. New York, NY: Routledge.
84.
StahlS. A.VancilS. (1986). Discussion is what makes semantic maps work in vocabulary instruction. The Reading Teacher, 40, 62–69. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20199306
85.
StanovichK. E.CunninghamA. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 211–229. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.211
86.
SternbergR. J.PowellJ. S. (1983). Comprehending verbal comprehension. American Psychologist, 38, 878–893. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.38.8.878
87.
SwanbornM. S. L.deGlopperK. (1999). Incidental word learning while reading: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 261–285. doi:10.3102/00346543069003261
88.
TempletonS. (1992). Theory, nature, and pedagogy of higher-order orthographic development in older students. In TempletonS.BearD. R. (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 253–277). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89.
TownsendD.CollinsP. (2009). Academic vocabulary and middle school English learners: An intervention study. Reading and Writing, 22, 993–1019. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9141-y
90.
VerhallenM.SchoonenR. (1993). Lexical knowledge of monolingual and bilingual children. Applied Linguistics, 14, 344–363. doi:10.1093/applin/14.4.344
91.
VermeerA. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–234. doi:10.1017/s0142716401002041
92.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
93.
WattsS. M. (1995). Vocabulary instruction during reading lessons in six classrooms. Journal of Literacy Research, 27, 399–424. doi:10.1080/10862969509547889
94.
WolfM. K.CrossonA. C.ResnickL. B. (2005). Classroom talk for rigorous reading comprehension instruction. Reading Psychology, 26, 27–53. doi:10.1080/02702710490897518
95.
WoodD. (1992). Teaching talk: How modes of teacher talk affect pupil participation. In NormanK. (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project (pp. 201–214). London, England: Hodder Arnold.
96.
WysockiK.JenkinsJ. R. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 66–81. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/747721
