The President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities report heartily supported arts integration. However, the President’s Committee called for a better understanding of the dimensions of quality and best practices. One promising arts integration method is drama-based pedagogy (DBP). A comprehensive search of the literature revealed 47 quasi-experimental DBP intervention studies conducted since 1985. The literature showed that designs were generally weak for making causal inferences and that outcomes other than achievement were infrequently studied. A meta-analysis of this research suggested that DBP has a positive, significant impact on achievement outcomes in educational settings. Effects were strongest when the intervention (a) was led by a classroom teacher or researcher rather than a teaching artist, (b) included more than five lessons, and (c) was integrated into English language arts or science curriculum compared to other domains. Positive effects across psychological and social outcomes were found. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
AldredgeP. A. (2010). The intersection of religion and homosexuality in the social work classroom: A drama-based approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Houston, TX.
2.
*ArieliB. (2007). The integration of creative drama into science teaching (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kansas State University, Manhattan.
3.
*BallouK. J. (2000). The effects of a drama intervention on communication skills and learning attitudes of at-risk sixth grade students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9992523)
4.
BarnettV.LewisT. (1994). Outliers in statistical data (3rd. ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
5.
BarnettW. S.JungK.YaroszD. J.ThomasJ.HarnbeckA.SteckhukR.BurnsS. (2008). Educational effects of the tools of the mind curriculum: A randomized trial. Early Children Research Quarterly, 23, 299–313.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
7.
BoalA. (1974). Theatre of the oppressed (Maria-OdiliaC. A.McBrideL., Trans.). New York, NY: Theatre Communications.
8.
BoltonG.DavisD.LawrenceC. (1987). Gavin Bolton: Selected writings on drama in education. London, England: Longman.
*Bournot-TritesM.BelliveauG.SpiliotopoulosV.SerorJ. (2007). The role of drama on cultural sensitivity, motivation and literacy in a second language context. Journal for Learning Through the Arts, 3, 1–35.
11.
*BramwellR. (1990). The effect of drama education on children’s attitudes to the elderly and to aging (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
12.
BraundM. R. (1999). Using drama to improve student teachers’ understanding in the physical sciences (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leeds, Leeds, England.
13.
*BuegeC. (1994). The effect of mainstreaming on attitude and self-concept using creative drama and social skills training. Youth Theatre Journal, 7(3), 19–22.
14.
BurmanD. D.BitanT.BoothJ. R. (2008). Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1349–1362. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.021
15.
BurtonB. (2010). Dramatising the hidden hurt: Acting against covert bullying by adolescent girls. Research in Drama Education, 15, 255–270. doi:10.1080/13569781003700151
16.
*ByerlyS. (1994). Generating greater learning gains through dramatization in the classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/?id=ED372426
17.
CawthonS.DawsonK. (2009). Drama for schools: Impact of a drama-based professional development program on teacher self-efficacy and authentic instruction. Youth Theatre Journal, 23, 144–161. doi:10.1080/08929090903281451
18.
ChiM. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
19.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
ConradF. (1992). The arts in education and a meta-analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
21.
ConradF.AsherJ. W. (2000). Self-concept and self-esteem through drama: A meta-analysis. Youth Theatre Journal, 14, 78–84. doi:10.1080/08929092.2000.10012519
22.
*CooneyM. P. (1999). A comparison study of process drama and actor training (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
23.
CooperH. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
25.
*CormackR. (2003). Creative drama in the writing process: The impact on elementary students’ short stories (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
26.
*DannerS. (2003). Prevention through performance: A creative drama enrichment program for arts school students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.
27.
DawsonK.LeeB. K. (2014). Drama for schools: A handbook for using drama as an educational tool. Manuscript in preparation.
28.
DeasyJ. R. (2002). Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
29.
DeCharmsR. (1968). Personal causation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
30.
DeciE.RyanR. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
31.
DeciE.RyanR. (2008a). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14–23. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
32.
DeciE.RyanR. (2008b). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185. doi:10.1037/a0012801
33.
DorionK. R. (2009). Science through drama: A multiple case exploration of the characteristics of drama activities used in secondary science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 2247–2270. doi:10.1080/09500690802712699
34.
*DupontS. (1992). The effectiveness of creative drama as an instructional strategy to enhance the reading comprehension skills of fifth-grade remedial readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 31(3), 41–52. doi:10.1080/19388079209558087
35.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000a). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98.
36.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000b). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 276–284. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
37.
EdmistonB. (2013). Transforming teaching and learning with active and dramatic approaches. New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
EisnerE. W. (1998). Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement?Journal of Art & Design Education, 17, 51–60. doi:10.1111/1468-5949.00105
39.
*EncisoP.LeeB. K. (2014). The effects of Stand up for Shakespeare on students attitudes toward Shakespeare, reading, and school. Manuscript in preparation.
40.
ErdmanH. (1991). Conflicts of interest: Bringing drama into the elementary foreign language classroom. Youth Theatre Journal, 5(3), 12–14.
41.
EriksonE. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
42.
*FernslerH. M. (2003). A comparison between the test scores of third grade children who receive drama in place of traditional social studies instruction and third grade children who receive traditional social studies instruction (Unpublished master’s thesis). Johnson Bible College, Knoxville, TN.
43.
*FischerC. W. (1989). Effects of a development drama-inquiry process on creative and critical thinking skills in early adolescent students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9010183)
44.
*FizanoW. J.Jr. (1999). The impact of story drama on the reading comprehension, oral language complexity, and the attitudes of third graders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9949891)
45.
*FlemingM.MerrellC.TymmsP. (2004). The impact of drama on pupils’ language, mathematics, and attitudes in two primary schools. Research in Drama Education, 9, 177–199. doi:10.1080/1356978042000255067
46.
*FrancisM. (2007). The impact of drama on pupils’ learning in science. School Science Review, 89, 91–102.
47.
*FreemanG.SullivanK.FultonC. R. (2003). Effects of creative drama on self-concept, social skills, and problem behavior. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 131–138. doi:10.1080/00220670309598801
48.
*GoldsteinL. M. (1985). The Dorothy Heathcote approach to creative drama: Effectiveness and impact on moral education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.
49.
GourgeyA. F.BosseauJ.DelgadoJ. (1984). The impact of an improvisational dramatics program on school attitude and achievement. Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
50.
GrubbsF. E. (1950). Sample criteria for testing outlying observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 21, 27–58.
51.
HanleyM. S.GayG. (2002). Teaching moral education and social action through drama. Talking Points, 14(1), 22–26.
52.
HarrisL. F.RosenbergH. S. (1983). Creative drama and affective response to literature. Children’s Theatre Review, 32(2), 21–25.
53.
HarterS. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97. doi:10.2307/1129640
54.
HeathcoteD.BoltonG. (1995). Drama for learning: Dorothy Heathcote’s mantle of the expert approach to education. Portsmouth, NJ: Heinemann.
HedgesL. V.VeveaJ. L. (1998). Fixed and random effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486–504.
57.
HendricksonR. H.GallegosF. S. (1972). Using creative dramatics to improve the English language skills of Mexican-American students. Final report. Sonoma: California State College.
58.
*HendrixR. (2011). Using creative dramatics to foster conceptual learning in a science enrichment program (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
59.
HeinigR. B. (1992). Improvisation with favorite tales: Integrating drama into the reading/writing classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
60.
HuntsmanK. H. (1982). Improvisational dramatic activities: Key to self-actualization?Children’s Theatre Review, 31(2), 3–9.
61.
IngersollR. L.KaseJ. B. (1970). Effects of creative dramatics on learning and retention of classroom material. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Research and Development.
62.
*JacksonJ. (2000). The effect of involvement in creative dramatics on the self-esteem of seventh grade students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Central Missouri State University, Warrensburg.
63.
JacksonT. (Ed.). (1993). Learning through theatre: New perspectives on theatre in education. London, England: Routledge.
64.
*KarakelleS. (2009). Enhancing fluent and flexible thinking through the creative drama process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 124–129. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.05.002
65.
KardashC. A. M.WrightL. (1986). Does creative drama benefit elementary school students: A meta-analysis. Youth Theatre Journal, 1, 11–18.
66.
*KariukiP.HumphreyS. G. (2006, March). The effects of drama on the performance of at-risk elementary math students. Paper presented at the meeting of Mid-South Educational Research Association, Birmingham, AL.
67.
Kase-PolisiniJ.SpectorB. (1994). Improvised drama: A tool for teaching science. Youth Theatre Journal, 7(1), 15–19.
68.
KayhanH. C. (2009). Creative drama in terms of retaining information. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 737–740. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.129
69.
KowalJ.FortierM. S. (1999). Motivational determinants of flow: Contributions from self-determination theory. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 355–368. doi:10.1080/00224549909598391
70.
*LaurinS. (2010). The effect of story drama on children’s writing skills (Unpublished master’s thesis). Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
71.
LawtonB.BrandonP. R. (2005). Descriptive statistics on student achievement data collected for the ARTS FIRST Windward research project. Manoa, HI: Curriculum Research & Development Group.
72.
LeeB. K. (2013). The effect of drama-based instruction on PreK-16 outcomes: A meta-analysis of the research from 1985-2012 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin.
MagesW. (2006). Drama and imagination: A cognitive theory of drama’s effect on narrative comprehension and narrative production. Research in Drama Education, 11, 329–340.
75.
*McCambridgeM. D. (1998). An exploration of the growth of moral judgment in eighth grade students through process drama (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 9914689)
76.
McCaslinN. (1996). Creative drama in the classroom and beyond (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
77.
*McDonaldM. K. (1992). Dramatization of children’s original, dictated stories: The effects upon oral fluency and story complexity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 303965648)
78.
*McFaddenP. J. (2010). Using theatre arts to enhance literacy skills at the second grade level (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Irvine, and University of California, Los Angeles.
79.
*McGregorG. D. (2001). Creative thinking instruction for a college study skills program: A case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Baylor University, Waco, TX.
80.
*McNameeG. D.McLaneJ. B.CooperP. M.KerwinS. M. (1985). Cognition and affect in early literacy development. Early Child Development and Care, 20, 245–261. doi:10.1080/0300443850200402
81.
*MerrellR. (2005). The impact of a drama intervention program on the response of the bystander to bullying situations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Rochester, NY.
82.
*MillerH.RyndersJ. E. (1993). Drama: A medium to enhance social interaction between students with and without mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 31, 228–231.
83.
MinnaertA.BoekaertsM.BrabanderC. (2007). Autonomy, competence, and social relatedness in task interest within project-based education. Psychological Reports, 101, 574–586.
*MooreB. H.CaldwellH. (1990). The art of planning: Drama as rehearsal for writing in the primary grades. Youth Theatre Journal, 4(3), 13–20.
86.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
87.
NiedermeyerF.OliverL. (1973). The development of young children’s dramatic and public speaking skills. Elementary School Journal, 73, 95–100. doi:10.1086/460739
88.
ParkS.HollowayS.ArendtszA.BempechatJ.LiJ. (2012). What makes students engaged in learning? A time-use study of within- and between-individual predictors of emotional engagement in low-performing high schools. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 41, 390–401. doi:10.1007/s10964–011–9738–3
89.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). Framework for 21st century skills. Washington, DC: Author.
90.
PiagetJ. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International University Press. doi:10.1037/11494-000
91.
PodloznyA. (2000). Strengthening verbal skills through the use of classroom drama: A clear link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34, 239–275. doi:10.2307/3333644
92.
President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities. (2011). Reinvesting in arts education: Winning America’s future through creative schools. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation.
93.
*RangerL. (1995). Improving reading comprehension through a multi-faceted approach utilizing drama (unpublished master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED380758.pdf
94.
*RapaportK. S. (1989). The effects of creative dramatics on reading comprehension and language/thought of second grade children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence.
95.
*RisembergR.ZimmermanB. (1992). Using mime to improve children’s writing of autobiographical narratives. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25, 232–239.
96.
*RoseD. S.ParksM.AndroesK.McMahonS. D. (2000). Imagery-based learning: Improving elementary students’ reading comprehension with drama techniques. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 55–63. doi:10.1080/00220670009598742
97.
RosenbergH. S.PinciottiP.SmithJ. K. (1983). On quantifying dramatic behavior. Children’s Theatre Review, 32(2), 3–8.
98.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
99.
*SaabJ. F. (1987). The effects of creative drama methods on mathematics achievement, attitudes and creativity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). West Virginia University, Morgantown.
100.
ShackerD. L.JulieböM. F.ParkerD. (1993). Using drama in the French immersion program. Youth Theatre Journal, 8(1), 3–10.
101.
SlomanK.ThompsonR. (2010). An example of large-group drama and cross-year peer assessment for teaching science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1877–1893. doi:10.1080/09500690903229312
102.
*SmithH. (2010). The effects of a drama-based language intervention on the development of theory of mind and executive functioning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta.
103.
SpolinV. (1986). Theater games for the classroom: A teacher’s handbook. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
104.
StewigJ. W.VailN. J. (1985). The relation between creative drama and oral language growth. Clearing House, 58, 261–264.
105.
TerwelJ.OersB.DijkI.EedenP. (2009). Are representations to be provided or generated in primary mathematics education? Effects on transfer. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 25–44. doi:10.1080/13803610802481265
106.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychology processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107.
*WagnerB. J. (1986). The effects of role playing on written persuasion: An age and channel comparison of fourth and eighth graders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
108.
WagnerB. J. (1990). Dramatic improvisation in the classroom. In RubinD.HyndsS. (Eds.), Perspective on talk and learning (pp. 195–211). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
109.
WagnerB. J. (1998). Educational drama and language arts: What research shows. Portsmouth, NJ: Heinemann Drama.
*WalkerE. M.TaboneC.WeltsekG. (2011). When achievement data meet drama and arts integration. Language Arts, 88, 365–372.
112.
*Walsh-BowersR.BassoR. (1999). Improving early adolescents’ peer relations through classroom creative drama: An integrated approach. Social Work in Education, 21(1), 23–32.
113.
WardW. (Ed.). (1986). Stories to dramatize (6th ed.). New Orleans, LA: Anchorage Press.
114.
*WarnerC. D.AndersenC. (2004). “Snails are science”: Creating context for science inquiry and writing through process drama. Youth Theatre Journal, 18, 68–83. doi:10.1080/08929092.2004.10012565
115.
WebbN.MastergeorgeA. (2003). Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 73–97. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00074-0
116.
*WeidnerD. F. (1993). The effects of creative dramatics activities on the story retellings of kindergartners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Texas, Denton.
117.
WillhelmJ. (2002). Action strategies for deepening comprehension: Role plays, text structure tableaux, talking statues, and other enrichment techniques that engage students with text. New York, NY: Scholastic.
118.
WinnerW.CooperM. (2000). Mute those claims: No evidence (yet) for a causal link between arts study and academic achievement. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 11–75.
119.
WrightP. R. (2006). Drama education and development of self: Myth or reality?Social Psychology of Education, 9, 43–65.
120.
YagerR. E.AkcayH. (2008). Comparison of learning outcomes in middle school science with an STS approach and a typical textbook dominated approach. Research in Middle Level Education, 31(7), 1–16.
121.
YehY.LiM. (2008). Age, emotion regulation nstrategies, temperament, creative drama, and preschoolers’ creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 131–148.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
