In recent years, several states have expanded a new publicly funded learning option: Transitional Kindergarten (TK). TK bridges prekindergarten and kindergarten in its eligibility, requirements, and design. Using Michigan as a case study, we examine TK’s fit in the early learning landscape. Broadly, we find TK in Michigan reduces some socioeconomic gaps in early program enrollment while exacerbating others. Specifically, districts with more White and fewer economically disadvantaged students are more likely to offer TK. Among preschool-age children, noneconomically disadvantaged children are more likely to enroll in TK; among kindergarten-age children, take-up is similar by family income. Finally, some children enroll in TK instead of other public options, but there is no evidence that public slots decline overall.
AnsariA.WinslerA. (2016). Kindergarten readiness for low-income and ethnically diverse children attending publicly funded preschool programs in Miami. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 37, 69–80.
2.
AtteberryA.BassokD.WongV. C. (2019). The effects of full-day prekindergarten: Experimental evidence of impacts on children’s school readiness. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(4), 537–562.
3.
BassokD. (2012). Competition or collaboration?: Head Start enrollment during the rapid expansion of state pre-kindergarten. Educational Policy, 26(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904811428973
4.
BassokD.ReardonS. F. (2013). “Academic redshirting” in kindergarten: Prevalence, patterns, and implications. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737015002209
5.
BerneJ.JacobB.MusaddiqT.ShapiroA.WeilandC. (2024a). The effect of early childhood programs on third-grade test scores: Evidence from Transitional Kindergarten in Michigan. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 114, 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20241081
BrownJ. (2019). Does public pre-K have unintended consequences on the child care market for infants and toddlers? (Princeton University Industrial Relations Section Working Paper 626). SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3360616
8.
CadiganM.QuickH.ManshipK. (2015). Transitional kindergarten in California: Early outreach, enrollment, and parent perspectives (Research Brief). American Institutes for Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED557629
CascioE. U. (2021). Early childhood education in the United States: What, when, where, who, how, and why. In McCallB. P. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the economics of education (pp. 30–72). Routledge.
12.
CavalluzzoL.ClintonY.HolianL.MarrL.TaylorL. (2009). West Virginia’s progress toward universal pre-K (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2009- No. 070). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia.
13.
ChaudryA.DattaR. (2017). The current landscape for public pre-kindergarten programs. In PhillipsD. A. & Pre-Kindergarten Task Force (Eds.), The current state of scientific knowledge on pre-kindergarten effects (pp. 5–18). Brookings Institution and Duke University.
14.
ChaudryA.MorrisseyT.WeilandC.YoshikawaH. (2021). Cradle to kindergarten: A new plan to combat inequality. Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
CosdenM.ZimmerJ.TussP. (1993). The impact of age, sex, and ethnicity on kindergarten entry and retention decisions. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 209–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164422
16.
DemingD.DynarskiS. (2008). The lengthening of childhood. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.3.71
17.
DouganK.PijanowskiJ. C. (2011). The effects of academic redshirting and relative age on student achievement. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ973826.pdf
18.
FellerA.GrindalT.MiratrixL.PageL. C. (2016). Compared to what? Variation in the impacts of early childhood education by alternative care type. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 10(3), 1245–1285. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43956881
FreyN. (2005). Retention, social promotion, and academic redshirting: What do we know and need to know?Remedial and Special Education, 26, 332–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932505026006040
GoodvinR.GibsonC.RashidA.MillerM.HoaglandC. (2023). Transitional kindergarten programs in Washington State: Describing 2022-23 programs, educators, and students (Document Number 23-12-2201). Washington State Institute for Public Policy
24.
GreenburgJ. E.WinslerA. (2020). Delayed kindergarten entry among low-income, ethnically diverse children: Prevalence, predictors, and selection patterns. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 53, 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.06.007
HustedtJ. T.BarnettW. S. (2011). Financing early childhood education programs: State, federal, and local issues. Educational Policy, 25(1), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904810386605
JohnsonR.C. (2024). Synergistic impacts of expansions in Pre-K access and school funding on student achievement: Evidence from California’s transitional Kindergarten rollout. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 114, 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20241079
29.
LafortuneJ.HillL.SeveranceM. (2023). Assessing transitional kindergarten’s impact on elementary school trajectories. Public Policy Institute of California.
30.
LarinK. (2019). Child care and early education: Most states offer preschool programs and rely on multiple funding sources. United States Government Accountability Office. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-19-375.pdf
31.
ManshipK.HolodA.QuickH.OgutB.de los ReyesIlianaA. J.ChernoffJ.HauserA.MartinA.KeuterS.VontsolosE.ReinE.AndersonE. (2017). The impact of transitional kindergarten on California students: Final report from the “Study of California’s Transitional Kindergarten Program.”American Institutes for Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED609085
32.
McCormickM.PralicaM.HsuehJ.WeilandC.WeissmanA. K.ShapiroA.XiaS.MacDowellC.MavesS.TaylorA.SachsJ. (2023). Going the distance: Disparities in pre-K enrollment in higher-quality schools by geographic proximity, race/ethnicity, family income, and home language. AERA Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231168867
MelnickH.GarcíaE.Leung-GagnéM. (2022). Building a well-qualified transitional kindergarten workforce in California: Needs and opportunities. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/826.674
35.
National Center for Education Statistics (2021). Table 202.20: Percentage of 3- to 5-year-old children enrolled in school, by age and selected child and family characteristics: 2010 through 2021. United States Census Bureau. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/tables/dt22_202.20.asp?current=yes
36.
PhillipsD. A.LipseyM. W.DodgeK. A.HaskinsR.BassokD.BurchinalM. R.DuncanG. J. (2017). Puzzling it out: The current state of scientific knowledge on pre-kindergarten effects - A consensus statement. Brookings Institution and Duke University.
ShapiroA.MartinE.WeilandC.UntermanR. (2019). If you offer it, will they come? Patterns of application and enrollment behavior in a universal prekindergarten context. AERA Open, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419848442
39.
WeilandC. (2016). Impacts of the Boston prekindergarten program on the school readiness of young children with special needs. Developmental Psychology, 52(11), 1763–1776.
40.
WeixlerL.ValantJ.BassokD.DoromalJ. B.GerryA. (2020). Helping parents navigate the early childhood education enrollment process: Experimental evidence from New Orleans. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(3), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720922237
41.
WinslerA.HutchisonL. A.De FeyterJ. J.ManfraL.BleikerC.HartmanS. C.LevittJ. (2012). Child, family, and childcare predictors of delayed school entry and kindergarten retention among linguistically and ethnically diverse children. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1299–1314. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026985
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
