In the Janus v. AFCSME (2018) decision, the U.S. Supreme Court mandated that all public sector workers, including teachers, operate in a Right to Work (RTW) framework. In the years since, teachers’ unions have not experienced the mass exodus that some predicted, but should we expect them to? Using an original, historical data set spanning 1942–2017, I examine the effect of prior RTW policies on teachers’ union membership and school expenditures. I find that RTW policies decrease teachers’ union membership by roughly 43% and reduce educational expenditures by nearly $800 per pupil. Importantly, effects take roughly 10 years to clearly materialize. Additional analyses provide support for the notion that effects on school resources are driven, in part, by effects on union membership.
AndersonK. P.CowenJ. M.StrunkK. O. (2022). The impact of teacher labor market reforms on student achievement: Evidence from Michigan. Education Finance and Policy, 17(4), 666–692.
2.
AnziaS. F.MoeT. M. (2015). Public sector unions and the costs of government. The Journal of Politics, 77(1), 114–127. doi: 10.1086/678311
3.
BaronE. J. (2018). The effect of teachers’ unions on student achievement in the short run: Evidence from Wisconsin’s Act 10. Economics of Education Review, 67, 40–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.09.003
4.
BrunnerE.HymanJ.JuA. (2020). School finance reforms, teachers’ unions, and the allocation of school resources. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(3), 473–489.
CaugheyD.WarshawC. (2018). Policy preferences and policy change: Dynamic responsiveness in the American states, 1936–2014. The American Political Science Review, 112(2), 249–266. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000533
7.
CowenJ. M.StrunkK. O. (2015). The impact of teachers’ unions on educational outcomes: What we know and what we need to learn. Economics of Education Review, 48, 208–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.02.006
8.
de ChaisemartinC.D’HaultfoeuilleX. (2020). Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. American Economic Review, 110(9), 2964–2996. doi: http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/
9.
ErenO.OzbeklikS. (2016). What do Right-To-Work laws do? Evidence from a synthetic control method analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(1), 173–194. doi: doi: 10.1002/pam.21861
10.
FarberH. S. (2006). Union membership in the united states: The diverence between the public and private sectors. In HannawayJ.RotherhamA. (Eds.), Collective bargaining in education (pp. 27–52). Harvard Education Press.
11.
FeigenbaumJ.Hertel-FernandezA.WilliamsonV. (2018). From the bargaining table to the ballot box: Political effects of Right to Work laws. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 24259. doi: 10.3386/w24259
12.
FingerL. K.HartneyM. T. (2021). Financial solidarity: The future of unions in the post-Janus era. Perspectives on Politics, 19(1), 19–35.
13.
FlavinP.HartneyM. T. (2015). When government subsidizes its own: Collective bargaining laws as agents of political mobilization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(4), 896–911.
14.
HanE. S.MaloneyT. N. (2021). Teacher unionization and student academic performance: Looking beyond collective bargaining. Labor Studies Journal, 46(1), 43–74.
15.
HartneyM. T. (2022). How policies make interest groups: Governments, unions, and American education: University of Chicago Press.
16.
HenigJ. R.JacobsenR.ReckhowS. (2019). Outside money in school board elections: The nationalization of education politics. Harvard Education Press.
17.
Hertel-FernandezA. (2018). Policy feedback as political weapon: Conservative advocacy and the demobilization of the public sector labor movement. Perspectives on Politics, 16(2), 364–379. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717004236
18.
KoganV. (2017). Do anti-union policies increase inequality? Evidence from state adoption of Right-to-Work laws. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 17(2), 180–200. doi: 10.1177/1532440016677217
LovenheimM. F.WillénA. (2019). The long-run effects of teacher collective bargaining. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(3), 292–324. doi: 10.1257/pol.20170570
21.
LyonM. A. (2021). Heroes, villains, or something in between? How “Right to Work” policies affect teachers, students, and education policymaking. Economics of Education Review, 82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102105
22.
LyonM. A. (2022). Current perspectives on teacher unionization, and what they’re missing. Educational Policy, 08959048221103798. doi: 10.1177/08959048221103798
23.
MariannoB. D. (2015). Teachers’ unions on the defensive? How recent collective bargaining laws reformed the rights of teachers. Journal of School Choice, 9(4), 551–577. doi: 10.1080/155821 59.2015.1079470
24.
MariannoB. D. (2020). Compared to what? Changes in interest group resources and the proposal and adoption of state teacher policy. Policy Studies Journal, 48(4), 982–1022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12345
25.
MariannoB. D.BrunoP.StrunkK. O. (2021). The effect of teachers’ union contracts on school district efficiency: Longitudinal evidence from California. SAGE Open, 11(1), 2158244020988684. doi: 10.1177/2158244020988684
26.
MariannoB. D.StrunkK. (2018). After Janus: A new era of teachers union activism. EdNext, 18(4), 18–25.
SanesM.SchmittJ. (2014). Regulation of public sector collective bargaining in the states. Center for Economic and Policy Research.
31.
StrunkK. O. (2011). Are teachers’ unions really to blame? Collective bargaining agreements and their relationships with district resource allocation and student performance in California. Education Finance and Policy, 6(3), 354–398.
32.
StrunkK. O.CowenJ.GoldhaberD.MariannoB. D.TheobaldR.KilbrideT. (2022). Public school teacher contracts and state-level reforms: Assessing changes to collective bargaining restrictiveness across three states. American Educational Research Journal, 59(3), 538–573. doi: 10.3102/00028312211048950
33.
StrunkK. O.GrissomJ. A. (2010). Do strong unions shape district policies? Collective bargaining, teacher contract restrictiveness, and the political power of teachers’ unions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(3), 389–406. doi: 10.3102/0162373710376665
34.
SunL.AbrahamS. (2020). Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006
35.
U.S. Department of Labor, Labor Management Services Administration. (1972, 1979, 1981). State profiles: Current status of public sector labor relations. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED064481.pdf
36.
VallettaR.FreemanR. B. (1988). Appendix B: The NBER public sector collective bargaining law data set. In IchniowskiC.FreemanR. B. (Eds.) When public sector workers unionize (pp. 399–420): University of Chicago Press.
37.
VanHeuvelenT. (2020). The right to work, power resources, and economic inequality. American Journal of Sociology, 125(5), 1255–1302. doi: 10.1086/708067
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
