Principal Beliefs Predict Responses to Individual Students’ Misbehavior

Abstract

National policies have targeted widespread exclusionary discipline in schools which is associated with negative academic outcomes. Principals play an important role in making disciplinary decisions, yet little is understood about how their mindsets might impact these decisions. We hypothesized that principals’ mindsets regarding the purpose of discipline (exclusion vs. prevention) would predict their responses to misbehavior. In a random, nationwide sample (N = 234), principals responded to misbehavior by a hypothetical Black or White student. Exclusion beliefs predicted more severe discipline, whereas prevention beliefs predicted greater endorsement of referring the student to a school counselor. Principal mindsets also predicted exclusionary discipline in real-world contexts.

Keywords

administration attitude classroom research correlational analysis experimental design principals psychology regression analyses school psychology survey research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Ritter

(2017). Do school discipline policies treat students fairly? A second look at school discipline rate disparities. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2700707

Curran

F. C.

(2017). Influence over school discipline policy: Variation across levels of governance, school contexts, and time. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, Article 119. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.3141

Grissom

J. A.

Loeb

Master

(2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x13510020

Jarvis

S. N.

Ferguson

Z. E.

Okonofua

(2021, March 4). A test of racial disparities in principals’ disciplinary decisions in a national sample. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/j2kd8

Jarvis

S. N.

Okonofua

J. A.

(2020). School deferred: When bias affects school leaders. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 492–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875150

Yan

Pounder

(2018). Collective leadership: Principals’ decision influence and the supportive or inhibiting decision influence of other stakeholders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(2), 216–248.

Okonofua

J. A.

Goyer

J. P.

Lindsay

C. A.

Haugabrook

Walton

G. M.

(2022a). A scalable empathic-mindset intervention reduces group disparities in school suspensions. Science Advances, 8(12), Article eabj0691. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj0691

Okonofua

J. A.

Harris

L. T.

Walton

G. M.

(2022b). Sidelining bias: A situationist approach to reduce the consequences of bias in real-world contexts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(5), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221102422

Okonofua

J. A.

Paunesku

Walton

G. M.

(2016). Brief intervention to encourage empathic discipline cuts suspension rates in half among adolescents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(19), 5221–5226. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523698113

10.

Okonofua

J. A.

Perez

A. D.

Darling-Hammond

(2020). When policy and psychology meet: Mitigating the consequences of bias in schools. Science Advances, 6(42), Article eaba9479. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba9479

11.

Skiba

R. J.

Chung

C. G.

Trachok

Baker

T. L.

Sheya

Hughes

R. L.

(2014). Parsing disciplinary disproportionality: Contributions of infraction, student, and school characteristics to out-of-school suspension and expulsion. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 640–670. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214541670

12.

Skiba

Edl

Rausch

(2007, April). How do principals feel about discipline? The Disciplinary Practices Survey. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Supplementary Materials.

13.

Sorensen

L. C.

Bushway

S. D.

Gifford

E. J.

(2021). Getting tough? The effects of discretionary principal discipline on student outcomes (EdWorkingPaper: 20-216). https://doi.org/10.26300/vz9t-hd28

14.

U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights. (2018). 2015-16 civil rights data collection: School climate and safety.

15.

Walton

G. M.

Okonofua

J. A.

Remington Cunningham

Hurst

Pinedo

Weitz

Ospina

J. P.

Tate

Eberhardt

J. L.

(2021). Lifting the bar: A relationship-orienting intervention reduces recidivism among children reentering school from juvenile detention. Psychological Science, 32(11), 1747–1767. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211013801

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.33 MB