Dual certification programs are proliferating as the principal means of preparing teachers for inclusive practice. Drawing on the 1,408 university-based teacher education programs on the 2019 Title II database, we examined the institutional website discourse for every program offering prospective teachers the opportunity to earn a general and special education license. One-quarter of these websites reflected discourse conveying inclusion as a reform, transformational, and equity strategy for teaching; three-quarters limited discourse to the practical benefit of earning two licenses, absent any elaboration regarding inclusive teaching. This raises questions regarding whether these programs serve a robust reform function in orienting prospective teachers to inclusive practice or instead a transactional function that maintains the traditional binary relationship between general and special education.
AnnammaS. A.FerriB. A.ConnorD. J. (2018). Disability critical race theory: Exploring the intersectional lineage, emergence, and potential futures of DisCrit in education. Review of Research in Education, 42, 46–71. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759041
2.
ArtilesA. J. (2013). Untangling the racialization of disabilities: An intersectionality critique across disability models. Du Bois Review, 10(2), 329–347. https://doi.org/10/1017/S1742058X13000271
3.
ArtilesA. J. (2022). Interdisciplinary notes on the dual nature of disability: Disrupting ideology–ontology circuits in racial disparities research. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 71, 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377221120106
4.
ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE. B. (2016). Inclusive education’s promises and trajectories: Critical notes about future research on a venerable idea. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.1919
5.
AshbyC. (2012). Disability studies and inclusive teacher preparation: A socially just path for teacher education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691203700204
6.
BaglieriS.ValleJ. W.ConnorD. J.GallagherD. J. (2011). Disability studies in education: The need for a plurality of perspectives on disability. Remedial and Special Education, 32(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510362200
7.
BlantonL. P.PugachM. C. (2011). Using a classification system to probe the meaning of dual licensure in general and special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406411404569
8.
BlantonL. P.PugachM. C. (2017). A dynamic model for the next generation of research on inclusive teacher education. InFlorianL.PanticN. (Eds.), Teacher education for the changing demographics of schooling: Issues for research and practice (pp. 215–228). Springer.
BlantonL. P.PugachM. C.BovedaM. (2018). Interrogating the intersections between general and special education in the history of teacher education reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(4), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118778539
11.
BlumenreichM.GuptaA. (2015). The globalization of Teach for America: An analysis of institutional discourse of Teach for America and Teach for India within local contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.017
12.
CangesR. L.AltemuellerL.HalleyK. (2021). Making it work! Increasing collaboration between our special education and general education licensure programs at MSU Denver. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 9(1), Article 7. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/jeri/vol9/iss1/7
13.
ChoiJ. H.MeisenheimerJ. M.McCartA. B.SailorW. (2017). Improving learning for all students through equity-based inclusive reform practices: Effectiveness of a fully integrated schoolwide model on student reading and math achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 38(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516644054
14.
Cioè-PeñaM. (2017). The intersectional gap: How bilingual students in the United States are excluded from inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(9), 906–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1296032
15.
Cochran-SmithM.Dudley-MarlingC. (2012). Diversity in teacher education and special education: The issues that divide. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112446512
16.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, Article 8. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
17.
Darling-HammondL.OakesJ. (2019). Preparing teachers for deeper learning. Harvard Education Press.
18.
FaircloughN.WodakR. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In van DijkT. (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 258–284). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446289068.n17
19.
FlorianL. (2021). The universal value of teacher education for inclusive education. In KöpferA.PowellJ. J. W.ZahndR. (Eds.), Handbuch Inklusion international: Globale, nationale und lokale Perspektiven auf Inklusive Bildung (pp. 89–105). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1f70kvj.8
GabelS. L.ReidD.PearsonH.RuizL.Hume-DawsonR. (2016). Disability and diversity on CSU Websites: A critical discourse study. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039256
22.
HeinrichS.CollinsB.C.KnightV.SpriggsA.D. (2016). Embedded simultaneous prompting procedure to teach STEM content to high school students with moderate disabilities in an inclusive setting. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(1), 41–54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26420363
23.
HollandD.DetgenA.GutekunstL. (2008). Preparing elementary school teachers in the southeast region to work with students with disabilities. Report of the Southeast Regional Educational Laboratory at SERVE Center, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=REL2008065
Mason-WilliamsL.BettiniE.PeytonD.HarveyA.RosenbergM.SindelarP.T. (2020). Rethinking shortages in special education: Making good on the promise of an equal opportunity for students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419880352
MilesB. (2010). Discourse analysis. In SalkindN. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (Vol. 1-0, pp. 368–370). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288
28.
NaraianS. (2021). Making inclusion matter: Critical disability studies and teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1882579
29.
NaraianS.SchlessingerS. (2017). When theory meets the “reality of reality”: Reviewing the sufficiency of the social model of disability as a foundation for teacher preparation for inclusive education.Teacher Education Quarterly, 44(1), 81–100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90003619
National Council for Learning Disabilities. (2020). Significant disproportionality in special education: Current trends and actions for impact. https://www.ncld.org/sigdispro/
32.
O’KeefeA. (2012). Media and discourse analysis. In GeeJ. P.HandfordM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 441–454). Taylor & Francis Group.
33.
OperttiR.WalkerZ.ZhangY. (2014). Inclusive education: From targeting groups and schools to achieving equality as the core of EFA. In FlorianL. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. 149–169). SAGE.
34.
PugachM. C.BlantonL.P. (2009). A framework for conducting research on collaborative teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.007
35.
PugachM. C.BlantonL. P.BovedaM. (2014). Preparing general education and special education teachers for inclusion and collaboration: Transcending the structural divide, rethinking the grand narrative. In SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.BrownellM. T.Lignugaris-KraftB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 143–160). Routledge.
36.
PugachM. C.BlantonL. P.CorreaV. (2011). An historical perspective on the role of collaboration in teacher education reform: Making good on the promise of teaching all students. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406411406141
37.
PugachM. C.BlantonL.MickelsonA.BovedaM. (2020). Curriculum theory: The missing perspective in teacher education for inclusion. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419883665
38.
PugachM. C.BlantonL. P.MickelsonA.Kleinhammer-TramillJ. (2013, May). A comparative policy analysis of federal support for inclusive teacher education: Slouching toward transformation? [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, United States.
39.
PugachM. C.MatewosA. M.Gomez-NajarroJ. (2021). Disability and the meaning of social justice in teacher education research: A precarious guest at the table?Journal of Teacher Education, 72(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120929623
40.
RupparA. L.AllcockH.Gonsier-GerdinJ. (2017). Ecological factors affecting access to general education content and contexts for students with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516646856
41.
SiutyM. B. (2019). Teacher preparation as interruption or disruption? Understanding identity (re)constitution for critical inclusion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.02.008
42.
StolzS. (2021). Time for critical reimagining and breaking of silos in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 48(4), 97–100.
43.
StremmelBurns, J.NgangaC.BertoliniK. (2015). Countering the essentialized discourse of teacher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 36(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2015.1030522
44.
SyedM.NelsonS. C. (2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerging Adulthood, 3(6), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815587648
VaaraE. (2010). Critical discourse analysis as methodology in strategy as practice research. In GolsorkhiD.RouleauL.SiedlD.VaaraE. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 217–229). Taylor & Francis. Group. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139681032.029
47.
Van DijkT. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In TannenD.HamiltonH. E.SchifrinD. (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 466–485). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
48.
VillegasA. M.LucasT. (2020). Educating culturally responsive teachers. State University of New York Press.
49.
VoltzD. L. (2003). Collaborative infusion: An emerging approach to teacher preparation for inclusive education. Action in Teacher Education, 25(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2003.10463287
50.
WaitollerF. R.ArtilesA. J. (2013). A decade of professional development research for inclusive education: A critical review and notes for a research program. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 319–356. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483905
51.
WaitollerF. R.WoodardR.RaoA.KangV. (2023). Untangling ideologies of disablement: the perils of the (in)visibility of dis/ability in urban teacher education programs. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 36(2), 152–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1956630
52.
WeidmanJ. C. (2006). Socialization of students in higher education: Organizational perspectives. In ConradC.SerlinR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 253–262). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976039.n14
