Public support for school improvement policies can increase the success and durability of those reforms. However, little is known about public views on turnaround. We capitalize on a nationally representative 2017 survey (N = 4,214) to uncover opinions regarding which level of government should lead on turnaround and state takeover of troubled districts. We find controversy surrounding state intervention into low-performing schools is not driven by a generalized allegiance to local control over education. We observe high levels of support for state-level leadership in identifying and fixing failing schools, and even for state takeover of struggling districts. Instead, opposition appears to arise from the loss of local political and economic power, often experienced by majority-Black communities, that typically accompanies state takeover.
BaroneC. (2017). What ESSA says: Continuities and departures. In HessF.EdenM. (Eds.), The Every Student Succeeds Act: What it means for schools, systems, and states (pp. 59–74). Harvard Education Press.
4.
BarrowsS.HendersonM.PetersonP.WestM. (2016). Relative performance information and perceptions of public service quality: Evidence from American school districts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw028
BurasK. (2015). Charter schools, race, and urban space: Where the market meets grassroots resistance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203067000
7.
ChingosM.HendersonM.WestM. (2012). Citizen perceptions of government service quality: Evidence from public schools. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7(4), 411–445. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00011071
8.
DahlR. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
9.
DeeT. (2012). School turnarounds: Evidence from the 2009 stimulus (NBER Working Paper 17990). https://doi.org/10.3386/w17990
10.
DragosetL.ThomasJ.HerrmannM.DekeJ.James-BurdumyS.GraczewskiC.BoyleA.UptonR.TanenbaumC.GiffinJ. (2017). School Improvement Grants: Implementation and Effectiveness (NCEE 2017-4013). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
11.
DukeD. (2016). The children left behind: American’ struggle to improve its lowest performing schools. Rowman & Littlefield.
GershensonS.HartC.HymanJ.LindsayC.PapageorgeN. W. (2018). The long-run impacts of same-race teachers (No. w25254). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25254
14.
GilensM. (2012). Affluence and influence: Economic inequality and political power in America. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7s1jn
15.
GlazerJ.EganC. (2018). The ties that bind: Building civic capacity for the Tennessee Achievement School District. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 928–964. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218763088
HenigJ. (2013). The end of exceptionalism is American education: The changing politics of school reform. Harvard Education Press.
19.
HenigJ.HulaR.OrrM.PedescleauxD. (1999). The color of school reform: Race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823291
20.
HonigM.CoburnC. (2008). Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices: Toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy, 22(4), 578–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807307067
21.
HoustonD. (2019). Schoolhouse democracy: Public opinion and education spending in the states. Educational Researcher, 48(7), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19867948
22.
JabarH. (2015). “Drenched in the past”: The evolution of market-oriented reforms in New Orleans. Journal of Education Policy, 30(6), 751–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1047409
23.
JacksonC. K.JohnsonR. C.PersicoC. (2016). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv036
24.
JacobsenR.SaultzA. (2012). The poll-trends: Who should control education?Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs017
25.
JochimA. (2013). A reform at risk? The political realities. In HessF.McShaneM. (Eds.), Common core meets education reform (pp. 185–205). Teachers College Press.
26.
JochimA. (2016). Measures of last resort: Assessing strategies for state-initiated turnarounds. Center for Reinventing Public Education.
27.
JohnsonS. M.MariettaG.HigginsM.MappK.GrossmanA. (2015). Achieving coherence in district improvement. Harvard Education Press.
28.
KeyV. O.Jr. (1961). Public opinion and American democracy. Alfred A. Knopf.
29.
KirstM. (2004). Turning points: A history of American school governance. In EpsteinN. (Ed.), Who’s in charge here? The tangled web of school governance and policy (pp. 14–41). Brookings Institution Press.
MoeT. (2005). Teachers unions and school board elections. In HowellW. (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 254–287). Brookings Institution Press.
34.
MoeT. (2011). Special interest: Teachers unions and America’s public schools. Brookings Institution Press.
35.
MorelD. (2016). The effects of centralized government authority on Black and Latino political empowerment. Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639136
MorelD.NuamahS. (2019). Who governs? How shifts in political power shape perceptions of local government services. Urban Affairs Review, 56(5), 1503–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419855675
38.
MurphyJ.BleibergJ. (2019). School turnaround politics and practices in the US: Learning from failed school reform. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01434-6
39.
NuamahS. (2017). The paradox of educational attitudes: Racial differences in public opinion on school closure. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(4), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1360734
40.
OluwoleJ.GreenP. C.III. (2009). State takeovers of school districts: Race and the equal protection clause. Indiana Law Review, 42(343), 343–409. https://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/ilr/pdf/vol42p343.pdf
41.
PatashnikE. (2014). Reforms at risk: What happens after major policy changes are enacted. Princeton University Press.
42.
PetersonP. (2016). The end of the Bush-Obama regulatory approach to school reform. Education Next, 16(3), 22–32.
43.
PetersonP.HendersonM.WestM. (2014). Teachers versus the public: What Americans think about schools and how to fix them. Brookings Institution Press.
44.
PressmanJ.WildavskyA. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.
RussakoffD. (2015). The prize: Who’s in charge of America’s schools?Houghton Mifflin.
47.
SchuelerB. (2018). A third way: The politics of school district takeover and turnaround in Lawrence, Massachusetts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(1), 116–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18785873
48.
SchuelerB.AsherC.LarnedK.MehrotraS.PollardC. (2020). Improving low-performing schools: A meta-analysis of impact evaluation studies (EdWorkingPaper 20-274). https://doi.org/10.26300/qxjk-yq91
SchuelerB.GoodmanJ.DemingD. (2017). Can states take over and turn around school districts? Evidence from Lawrence, Massachusetts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716685824
51.
SchuelerB.WestM. (2015). Sticker shock: How information affects citizen support for public school funding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv047
52.
ScottJ.HolmeJ. (2016). The political economy of market-based educational policies: Race and reform in urban school districts, 1915 to 2016. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 250–297. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16681001
53.
StoneC.HenigJ.JonesB.PierannunziC. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. University Press of Kansas.
54.
WelshR.WilliamsS.LittleS.GrahamJ. (2017). Right cause, wrong method? Examining the politics of state takeover in Georgia. Urban Affairs Review, 55(3), 703–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417714061
WongK.ShenF. (2002). Politics of state-led reform in education: Market competition and electoral dynamics. Educational Policy, 16(1), 161–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904802016001009
57.
WongK.ShenF. (2003). Measuring the effectiveness of city and state takeover as a school reform strategy. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(4), 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930PJE7804_06
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
