Federalism,Race,and the Politics of Turnaround: U.S. Public Opinion on Improving Low-Performing Schools and Districts

Abstract

Public support for school improvement policies can increase the success and durability of those reforms. However, little is known about public views on turnaround. We capitalize on a nationally representative 2017 survey (N = 4,214) to uncover opinions regarding which level of government should lead on turnaround and state takeover of troubled districts. We find controversy surrounding state intervention into low-performing schools is not driven by a generalized allegiance to local control over education. We observe high levels of support for state-level leadership in identifying and fixing failing schools, and even for state takeover of struggling districts. Instead, opposition appears to arise from the loss of local political and economic power, often experienced by majority-Black communities, that typically accompanies state takeover.

Keywords

district improvement educational policy equity experimental design politics public opinion school turnaround state takeover survey research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anzia

(2014). Timing and turnout: How off-cycle elections favor organized groups. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226086958.001.0001

Barnum

(2018, June 12). When states take over school districts, they say it’s about academics: This political scientist says it’s about race and power. Chalkbeat. https://www.chalkbeat.org/2018/6/12/21105215/when-states-take-over-school-districts-they-say-it-s-about-academics-this-political-scientist-says-i

Barone

(2017). What ESSA says: Continuities and departures. In Hess

Eden

(Eds.), The Every Student Succeeds Act: What it means for schools, systems, and states (pp. 59–74). Harvard Education Press.

Barrows

Henderson

Peterson

West

(2016). Relative performance information and perceptions of public service quality: Evidence from American school districts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw028

Berry

Howell

(2005). Democratic accountability in public education. In Howell

(Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 150–172). Brookings Institution Press. https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/voices.uchicago.edu/dist/5/539/files/2017/05/DemocraticAccountability-2iilpcc.pdf

Buras

(2015). Charter schools, race, and urban space: Where the market meets grassroots resistance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203067000

Chingos

Henderson

West

(2012). Citizen perceptions of government service quality: Evidence from public schools. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7(4), 411–445. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00011071

Dahl

R. A.

(1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.

Dee

(2012). School turnarounds: Evidence from the 2009 stimulus (NBER Working Paper 17990). https://doi.org/10.3386/w17990

10.

Dragoset

Thomas

Herrmann

Deke

James-Burdumy

Graczewski

Boyle

Upton

Tanenbaum

Giffin

(2017). School Improvement Grants: Implementation and Effectiveness (NCEE 2017-4013). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

11.

Duke

(2016). The children left behind: American’ struggle to improve its lowest performing schools. Rowman & Littlefield.

12.

Ewing

(2018). Ghosts in the schoolyard: Racism and school closings on Chicago’s South Side. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226526331.001.0001

13.

Gershenson

Hart

Hyman

Lindsay

Papageorge

N. W.

(2018). The long-run impacts of same-race teachers (No. w25254). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25254

14.

Gilens

(2012). Affluence and influence: Economic inequality and political power in America. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7s1jn

15.

Glazer

Egan

(2018). The ties that bind: Building civic capacity for the Tennessee Achievement School District. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 928–964. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218763088

16.

Harris

Larsen

(2016). The effects of the New Orleans Post-Katrina school reforms on student academic outcomes. Tulane University, Education Research Alliance for New Orleans. https://educationresearchalliancenola.org/files/publications/The-Effects-of-the-New-Orleans-Post-Katrina-School-Reforms-on-Student-Academic-Outcomes.pdf

17.

Harris

Larsen

(2018). The effects of the New Orleans post-Katrina market-based school reforms on student achievement, high school graduation, and college outcomes. Tulane University, Education Research Alliance. https://educationresearchalliancenola.org/files/publications/071518-Harris-Larsen-What-Effect-Did-the-New-Orleans-School-Reforms-Have-on-Student-Achievement-High-School-Graduation-and-College-Outcomes.pdf

18.

Henig

(2013). The end of exceptionalism is American education: The changing politics of school reform. Harvard Education Press.

19.

Henig

Hula

Orr

Pedescleaux

(1999). The color of school reform: Race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823291

20.

Honig

Coburn

(2008). Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices: Toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy, 22(4), 578–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807307067

21.

Houston

(2019). Schoolhouse democracy: Public opinion and education spending in the states. Educational Researcher, 48(7), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19867948

22.

Jabar

(2015). “Drenched in the past”: The evolution of market-oriented reforms in New Orleans. Journal of Education Policy, 30(6), 751–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1047409

23.

Jackson

C. K.

Johnson

R. C.

Persico

(2016). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv036

24.

Jacobsen

Saultz

(2012). The poll-trends: Who should control education? Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs017

25.

Jochim

(2013). A reform at risk? The political realities. In Hess

McShane

(Eds.), Common core meets education reform (pp. 185–205). Teachers College Press.

26.

Jochim

(2016). Measures of last resort: Assessing strategies for state-initiated turnarounds. Center for Reinventing Public Education.

27.

Johnson

S. M.

Marietta

Higgins

Mapp

Grossman

(2015). Achieving coherence in district improvement. Harvard Education Press.

28.

Key

V. O.

Jr. (1961). Public opinion and American democracy. Alfred A. Knopf.

29.

Kirst

(2004). Turning points: A history of American school governance. In Epstein

(Ed.), Who’s in charge here? The tangled web of school governance and policy (pp. 14–41). Brookings Institution Press.

30.

Layton

(2016, February 1). GOP-led states increasingly taking control from local school boards. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/gop-led-states-increasingly-taking-control-from-local-school-boards/2016/02/01/c01a8e4e-bad3-11e5-b682-4bb4dd403c7d_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.240ea6bbadfc

31.

Lipsky

(2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.

32.

Mann

(2016, October 31). School turnaround under ESSA: Progress, but not a silver bullet. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2016/10/31/school-turnaround-under-essa-progress-but-not-a-silver-bullet/

33.

Moe

(2005). Teachers unions and school board elections. In Howell

(Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 254–287). Brookings Institution Press.

34.

Moe

(2011). Special interest: Teachers unions and America’s public schools. Brookings Institution Press.

35.

Morel

(2016). The effects of centralized government authority on Black and Latino political empowerment. Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639136

36.

Morel

(2018). Takeover: Race, education, and American democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190678975.001.0001

37.

Morel

Nuamah

(2019). Who governs? How shifts in political power shape perceptions of local government services. Urban Affairs Review, 56(5), 1503–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419855675

38.

Murphy

Bleiberg

(2019). School turnaround politics and practices in the US: Learning from failed school reform. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01434-6

39.

Nuamah

(2017). The paradox of educational attitudes: Racial differences in public opinion on school closure. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(4), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1360734

40.

Oluwole

Green

P. C.

III . (2009). State takeovers of school districts: Race and the equal protection clause. Indiana Law Review, 42(343), 343–409. https://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/ilr/pdf/vol42p343.pdf

41.

Patashnik

(2014). Reforms at risk: What happens after major policy changes are enacted. Princeton University Press.

42.

Peterson

(2016). The end of the Bush-Obama regulatory approach to school reform. Education Next, 16(3), 22–32.

43.

Peterson

Henderson

West

(2014). Teachers versus the public: What Americans think about schools and how to fix them. Brookings Institution Press.

44.

Pressman

Wildavsky

(1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.

45.

Reardon

Shear

Fahle

Kalogrides

DiSalvo

(2017). Stanford Education Data Archive (Version 2.0). http://purl.stanford.edu/db586ns4974

46.

Russakoff

(2015). The prize: Who’s in charge of America’s schools? Houghton Mifflin.

47.

Schueler

(2018). A third way: The politics of school district takeover and turnaround in Lawrence, Massachusetts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(1), 116–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18785873

48.

Schueler

Asher

Larned

Mehrotra

Pollard

(2020). Improving low-performing schools: A meta-analysis of impact evaluation studies (EdWorkingPaper 20-274). https://doi.org/10.26300/qxjk-yq91

49.

Schueler

Bleiberg

(2021). Evaluating education governance: Does state takeover of school districts affect student achievement? (EdWorkingPaper No. 21-411). https://www.edworkingpapers.com/sites/default/files/ai21-411.pdf

50.

Schueler

Goodman

Deming

(2017). Can states take over and turn around school districts? Evidence from Lawrence, Massachusetts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716685824

51.

Schueler

West

(2015). Sticker shock: How information affects citizen support for public school funding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv047

52.

Scott

Holme

(2016). The political economy of market-based educational policies: Race and reform in urban school districts, 1915 to 2016. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 250–297. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16681001

53.

Stone

Henig

Jones

Pierannunzi

(2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. University Press of Kansas.

54.

Welsh

Williams

Little

Graham

(2017). Right cause, wrong method? Examining the politics of state takeover in Georgia. Urban Affairs Review, 55(3), 703–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417714061

55.

West

Henderson

Peterson

Barrows

(2018). The 2017 EdNext Poll on School Reform. Education Next, 18(1), 32–52. https://www.educationnext.org/2017-ednext-poll-school-reform-public-opinion-school-choice-common-core-higher-ed/

56.

Wong

Shen

(2002). Politics of state-led reform in education: Market competition and electoral dynamics. Educational Policy, 16(1), 161–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904802016001009

57.

Wong

Shen

(2003). Measuring the effectiveness of city and state takeover as a school reform strategy. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(4), 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930PJE7804_06

58.

Zimmer

Kho

Henry

Viano

(2015). Evaluation of the effects of Tennessee’s Achievement School District on student test scores. Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation and Development. https://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net/p/wpln/files/201512/ASD_Impact_Policy_Brief_Final_12.8.15.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.12 MB