Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

States and districts are increasingly incorporating measures of achievement growth into their school accountability systems, but there is little research on how these changes affect the public’s perceptions of school quality. We conduct a nationally representative online survey experiment to identify the effects of providing participants with information about their local public schools’ average achievement status and/or average achievement growth. Prior to receiving any information, participants already possess a modest understanding of how their local schools perform in terms of status, but they are largely unaware of how these schools perform in terms of growth. Participants who live in higher status districts tend to grade their local schools more favorably. The provision of status information does not fundamentally change this relationship. The provision of growth information, however, alters Americans’ views about local educational performance. Once informed, participants’ evaluations of their local schools better reflect the variation in district growth.

Keywords

accountability achievement educational policy policy politics experimental design experimental research survey research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulkadiroglu

Pathak

P. A.

Schellenberg

Walters

C. R.

(2020). Do parents value school effectiveness? American Economic Review, 110(5), 1502–1539.

Achieve, Inc. (2019). Accountability in state ESSA plans [Tracking tool]. https://www.achieve.org/accountability-in-essa

Ainsworth

Dehejia

Pop-Eleches

Urqiola

(2020). Information, preferences, and household demand for school value added (NBER Working Paper 28267). https://www.nber.org/papers/w28267

Alabama Department of Education. (2021). Education report card. https://reportcard.alsde.edu/alsde/selectschool

Baekgaard

Serritzlew

(2015). Interpreting performance information: Motivated reasoning or unbiased comprehension. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 73–82.

Bali

(2016). Evolving trends in public opinion on the quality of local schools. Educational Policy, 30(5), 688–720.

Barnum

(2020, September 24). GreatSchools overhauls ratings in bid to reduce link with race and poverty. Chalkbeat. https://www.chalkbeat.org/2020/9/24/21453357/greatschools-overhauls-ratings-reduce-link-race-poverty

Barone

(2017). What ESSA says: Continuities and departures. In Hess

F. M.

Eden

(Eds.), The Every Student Succeeds Act: What it means for schools, systems, and states (pp. 59–73). Harvard Education Press.

Barrows

Henderson

Peterson

P. E.

West

M. R.

(2016). Relative performance information and perceptions of public service quality: Evidence from American school districts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 571–583.

10.

Bayer

Ferreira

McMillan

(2007). A unified framework for measuring preferences for schools and neighborhoods. Journal of Political Economy, 115(4), 588–638.

11.

Berry

C. R.

Howell

W. G.

(2007). Accountability and local elections: Rethinking retrospective voting. Journal of Politics, 69(3), 844–858.

12.

Betebenner

Van Iwaarden

(2020). Issues and considerations that the COVID-19 pandemic presents for measuring student growth. Center for Assessment. https://www.nciea.org/blog/sgp/issues-and-considerations-covid-19-pandemic-presents-measuring-student-growth

13.

Beuermann

Jackson

C. K.

Navarro-Sola

Pardo

(2020). What is a good school, and can parents tell? Evidence on the multidimensionality of school output (NBER Working Paper 25342). https://www.nber.org/papers/w25342

14.

Black

S. E.

(1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 577–599.

15.

Castellano

K. E.

A. D.

(2013). A practitioner’s guide to growth models. Council of Chief State School Officers.

16.

Chingos

M. M.

Henderson

West

M. R.

(2012). Citizen perceptions of government service quality: Evidence from public schools. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7(4), 411–445.

17.

Chingos

M. M.

West

M. R.

(2015, January 20). Why annual statewide testing is critical to judging school quality. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/why-annual-statewide-testing-is-critical-to-judging-school-quality/

18.

Clinton

J. D.

Grissom

J. A.

(2015). Public information, public learning, and public opinion: Democratic accountability in education policy. Journal of Public Policy, 35(3), 355–385.

19.

Corcoran

Jennings

Cohodes

Sattin-Bajaj

(2018). Leveling the playing field for high school choice: Results from a field experiment of informational interventions (NBER Working Paper 24471). https://www.nber.org/papers/w24471

20.

Data Quality Campaign. (2019). Growth data: It matters, and it’s complicated. https://dataqualitycampaign.org/resource/growth-data-it-matters-and-its-complicated/

21.

Data Quality Campaign. (2020). Show me the data: There is no finish line for report cards. https://dataqualitycampaign.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-DQC-Show-Me-the-Data.pdf

22.

Fahle

E. M.

Shear

B. R.

Kalogrides

Reardon

S. R.

DiSalvo

A. D.

(2018). Stanford Education Data Archive: Technical documentation (Version 2.1). Stanford University Center for Education Policy Analysis.

23.

Fazlul

Koedel

Parsons

Qian

(2021). Bridging the COVID divide: How states can measure student achievement growth in the absence of 2020 test scores. Thomas B. Fordham Institute. https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/research/bridging-covid-divide-how-states-can-measure-student-achievement-growth-absence

24.

Figlio

D. N.

Lucas

M. E.

(2004). What’s in a grade? School report cards and the housing market. American Economic Review, 94(3), 591–604.

25.

Fiva

J. H.

Kirkebøen

L. J.

(2011). Information shocks and the dynamics of the housing market. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113(3), 525–552.

26.

Gewertz

(2020, April 2). It’s official: All states have been excused from statewide testing this year. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/its-official-all-states-have-been-excused-from-statewide-testing-this-year/2020/04

27.

Glazerman

Dotter

(2017). Market signals: Evidence on the determinants and consequences of school choice from a citywide lottery. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 593–619.

28.

Glazerman

Nichols-Barrer

Valant

Chandler

Burnett

(2020). The choice architecture of school choice websites. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 322–350.

29.

Harris

D. N.

Larsen

M. F.

(2015). What do families want (and why)? New Orleans families and their school choices before and after Katrina. Education Research Alliance for New Orleans.

30.

Hastings

J. S.

Weinstein

J. M.

(2008). Information, school choice, and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1373–1414.

31.

Holbein

(2016). Left behind? Citizen responsiveness to government performance information. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 353–368.

32.

Houston

D. M.

Henig

J. R.

(2021). The effects of student growth data on school district choice: Evidence from a survey experiment. American Journal of Education. Advance online publication.

33.

Imberman

S. A.

Lovenheim

M. F.

(2016). Does the market value value-added? Evidence from housing prices after the public release of school and teacher value-added. Journal of Urban Economics, 91(1), 104–121.

34.

Iowa Department of Education. (2021). Iowa school performance profiles. https://www.iaschoolperformance.gov/ECP/Home/Index

35.

Jacobsen

(2009). The voice of the people in education. In Sykes

Schneider

Plank

D. N.

(Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 307–318). Routledge.

36.

Jacobsen

Saultz

Snyder

J. W.

(2013). When accountability strategies collide: Do policy changes that raise accountability standards also erode public satisfaction? Educational Policy, 27(2), 360–389.

37.

Jacobsen

Snyder

J. W.

Saultz

(2014). Informing or shaping public opinion? The influence of school accountability data format on public perceptions of school quality. American Journal of Education, 121(1), 1–27.

38.

Jacobsen

Snyder

J. W.

Saultz

(2015). Understanding satisfaction with schools: The role of expectations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 831–848.

39.

James

(2011). Performance measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 399–418.

40.

James

Moseley

(2014). Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfactions, and voice behavior? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information. Public Administration, 92(2), 493–511.

41.

James

Van Ryzin

G. G.

(2017). Incredibly good performance: An experimental study of source and level effects on the credibility of government. American Review of Public Administration, 47(1), 23–35.

42.

Kane

T. J.

Cellini

S. R.

Staiger

D. O.

(2006). School quality, neighborhoods and housing prices. American Law and Economics Review, 8(2), 183–212.

43.

Klugman

E. M.

A. D.

(2020). How can released state test items support interim assessment purposes in an educational crisis? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 39(3), 65–69.

44.

Kogan

Lavertu

Peskowitz

(2016). Performance federalism and local democracy: Theory and evidence from school tax referenda. American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), 418–435.

45.

Ladd

Loeb

(2013). The challenges of measuring school quality: Implications for educational equity. In Reich

Allen

(Eds.), Education, justice, and democracy (pp. 22–55). Chicago University Press.

46.

Loveless

(1997). The structure of public confidence in education. American Journal of Education, 105(2), 127–159.

47.

Marvel

J. D.

(2016). Unconscious bias in citizens’ evaluations of public sector performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 143–158.

48.

Payson

J. A.

(2016). When are local incumbents held accountable for government performance? Evidence from US school districts. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 421–448.

49.

Reardon

S. F.

(2019). Educational opportunity in early and middle childhood: Using full population administrative data to study variation by place and age. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(2), 40–68.

50.

Reardon

S. F.

Papay

J. P.

Kilbride

Strunk

K. O.

Cowen

Donohue

(2019). Can repeated aggregate cross-sectional data be used to measure average student learning rates? A validation study of learning rate measures in the Stanford Education Data Archive (Working Paper No. 19-08). Center for Education Policy Analysis, Stanford University.

51.

Rothstein

Jacobsen

Wilder

(2008). Grading education: Getting accountability right. Teachers College Press.

52.

Schneider

Jacobsen

White

R. S.

Gehlbach

(2018). The (mis)measure of schools: How data affect stakeholder knowledge and perceptions of quality. Teachers College Record, 120(6), 1–40.

53.

Schueler

West

M. R.

(2016). Sticker shock: How information affects citizen support for public school funding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(1), 90–113.

54.

Sherman

S. J.

Mackie

D. M.

Driscoll

D. M.

(1990). Priming and the differential use of dimensions in evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(3), 405–418.

55.

Stiefel

Schwartz

A. E.

Rotenberg

(2011). What do AEFA Members say? Summary of results of an education finance and policy survey. Education Finance and Policy, 6(2), 267–292.

56.

Strauss

(2020, December 31). Calls are growing for Biden to do what DeVos did: Let states skip annual standardized tests this spring. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/12/30/calls-are-growing-biden-do-what-devos-did-let-states-skip-annual-standardized-tests-this-spring/

57.

Valant

Weixler

L. B.

(2020). Informing school-closing families about their options: A field experiment from New Orleans. Education Research Alliance for New Orleans.

58.

Walker

S. E.

Archbold

C. A.

(2014). The new world of police accountability (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

Status,Growth,and Perceptions of School Quality

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material