This article offers a framework for analyzing social movement participation in public education through a focus on universities in Brazil. It builds on the literature on social movement–state relations, participatory governance, and community organizing in schools, drawing on the case of the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement and the National Program for Education in Areas of Agrarian Reform (PRONERA) to illustrate the need to recenter the idea of conflict as a central and ongoing process of social movement participation in public schools and universities. The article also introduces the concept of prefiguration and highlights how students can prefigure in the formal public school system the types of social and economic practices they hope to build in the future. Contentious cogovernance and prefiguration are tools not only for improving educational equity but also for increasing the strength and internal capacity of social movements, paralleling the role Paulo Freire envisioned for nonformal popular education within grassroots organizations.
AltenbaughR. J. (1990). Education for struggle: The American labor colleges of the 1920s and 1930s. Temple University Press.
2.
AlvarezS. (1990). Engendering democracy in Brazil: Women’s movements in transition politics. Princeton University Press.
3.
AnyonJ. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education and a new social movement. Taylor & Francis Group.
4.
BaiocchiG. (2005). Militants and citizens: The politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford University Press.
5.
BaiocchiG.HellerP.SilvaM. K. (2011). Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804777797
6.
BoggsC. (1977). Marxism, prefigurative communism, and the problem of workers’ control. Radical America, 11–12(6–1), 99–122.
7.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage.
8.
BowlesS.GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
9.
BranfordS.RochaJ. (2002). Cutting the wire: The story of the Landless Movement in Brazil. Latin America Bureau.
10.
BreinesW. (1989). Community and organization in the New Left, 1962–1968: The great refusal. Rutgers University Press.
11.
DinersteinA. C. (2015). The politics of autonomy in Latin America: The art of organizing hope. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316011
12.
DutschkeR. (1969). On anti-authoritarianism. In OglesbyC. (Ed.), The New Left reader (pp. 243–253). Grove Press.
13.
EvansP. (1996). Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development, 24(6), 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00021-6
14.
FabricantM.FineM. (2015). Changing politics of education: Privatization and the dispossessed lives left behind. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315635606
15.
FernandesB. M. (2005). Movimentos socioterritoriais e movimentos socioespaciais: Contribuição teórica para uma leitura geográfica dos movimentos sociais [Socio-territorial and socio-spacial movements: Theoretical contributions for a geographical reading of social movements]. Revista NERA, 8(6), 14–36.
FungA. (2001). Accountable autonomy: Toward empowered deliberation in Chicago schools and policing. Politics & Society, 29(1), 73–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029001004
18.
FungA.WrightE. O. (Eds.). (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso.
19.
GadottiM. (1994). Reading Paulo Freire: His life and work. SUNY Press.
20.
GandinL. A.AppleM. W. (2002). Challenging neo-liberalism, building democracy: Creating the citizen school in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Journal of Education Policy, 17(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930110116570
21.
GlenJ. M. (1996). Highlander: No ordinary school (2nd ed.). University of Tennessee Press.
22.
GoldfrankB. (2011). Deepening local democracy in Latin America: Participation, decentralization, and the Left. Pennsylvania State University Press.
23.
GraeberD. (2002). The new anarchists. New Left Review, 13(6), 61–73.
24.
HellerP. (2000). The labor of development: Workers and the transformation of capitalism in Kerala, India. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501720734
25.
HollowayJ. (2010). Crack capitalism. Pluto Press.
26.
IllichI. (2001). Deschooling society. Marion Boyars.
KaneL. (2001). Popular education and social change in Latin America. Latin America Bureau.
29.
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. Broadway Books.
30.
LopezE. M. (2003). Transforming schools through community organizing: A research review (Harvard Family Research Project.). Family Involvement Network of Educators.
31.
McAdamD. (1999). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970. University of Chicago Press.
32.
MedirattaK.ShahS.McAlisterS. (2009). Community organizing for stronger schools: Strategies and successes. Harvard Education Press.
33.
MichelsR. (1915). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Dover.
34.
OakesJ.RogersJ.BlasiG.LiptonM. (2006, April27–28). Grassroots organizing, social movements, and the right to high-quality education[Paper presentation]. Rethinking Rodriguez Symposium, Berkeley, CA, United States. https://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/oakes-rogers-blasi_paper.pdf
35.
OndettiG. (2008). Land, protest, and politics: The Landless Movement and the struggle for agrarian reform in Brazil. Pennsylvania State University Press.
PerlsteinD. (1990). Teaching freedom: SNCC and the creation of the Mississippi Freedom Schools. History of Education Quarterly, 30(3), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.2307/368691
39.
PivenF. F.ClowardR. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. Vintage.
40.
RojasF. (2007). From Black Power to Black studies: How a radical social movement became an academic discipline. Johns Hopkins University Press.
41.
SchutzA. (2006). Home is a prison in the global city: The tragic failure of school-based community engagement strategies. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 691–743. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076004691
42.
ShieldA.ParisD.ParisR.San PedroT. (Eds.). (2020). Education in movement spaces: Standing Rock to Chicago Freedom Square. Routledge.
43.
ShirleyD. (1997). Community organizing for urban school reform. University of Texas Press.
44.
SmuckerJ. M. (2017). Hegemony how-to: A roadmap for radicals. AK Press.
45.
SobrinhoR. S. M.de SouzaA. S. D.BettiolC. A. (2017). A educação escolar indígena no Brasil: Uma análise crítica a partir da conjuntrua dos 20 anos de LDB [Indigenous schooling in Brazil: A critical analysis of 20 years of the Basic Education Law (LDB)]. Poiésis: Revista Do Programa de Pós-Graduação Em Educação—Mestrado, Da Universidade Do Sul de Santa Catarina—UNISUL, 11(19), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.19177/prppge.v11e19201758-75
46.
TarlauR. (2015a). Education of the countryside at a crossroads: Rural social movements and national policy reform in Brazil. Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(6), 1157–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.990444
Vergara-CamusL. (2014). Land and freedom: The MST, the Zapatistas and peasant alternatives to neoliberalism. Zed Books. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350220980
WarrenM. R.MappK. L., & Community Organizing and School Reform Project. (2011). A match on dry grass: Community organizing as a catalyst for school reform. Oxford University Press.
52.
Williamson-LottJ. A. (2008). Radicalizing the ebony tower: Black colleges and the Black freedom struggle in Mississippi. Teachers College Press.
53.
WrightA.WolfordW. (2003). To inherit the earth: The Landless Movement and the struggle for a new Brazil. Food First Books.
