Contributing to a growing body of research on acknowledging U.S. imperialism within teacher education, this article explores how knowledge production on Iran—and U.S.-Iran relations more broadly—in secondary education represents a site of what Britzman has called difficult knowledge. Here, the difficulty of classroom engagements with the theme of U.S. imperialism is highlighted in several epistemic stumbling blocks, notably notions of White epistemic authority, neoliberal multiculturalism, and imperial feeling. Drawing upon data collected during a 9-month ethnographic study, the analysis presents classroom scenes from a high school world literature unit on Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis, selected by the teacher to explore themes of colonialism, imperialism, and revolution. Despite these intentions, classroom engagements with the text often reproduced Orientalist understandings. These findings inform the concluding argument that mobilizes contrapuntal reading as a generative technique for teacher education research and practice to identify and confront the epistemic bases that normalize systems of oppression.
AbrahamianE. (1999). Tortured confessions: Prisons and public recantations in modern Iran. University of California Press.
2.
AbrahamianE. (2018). A history of modern Iran (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
3.
BritzmanD. (2000). If the story cannot end. In EppertC.SimonR.RosenbergS. (Eds.), Between hope and despair: Pedagogy and the remembrance of historical trauma (pp. 27–57). Rowman & Littlefield.
Chávez-MorenoL. (2021). U.S. empire and an immigrant’s counternarrative: Conceptualizing imperial privilege. Journal of Teacher Education, 72, 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120919928
6.
ChowdhryG. (2007). Edward Said and contrapuntal reading: Implications for critical interventions in international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 36(1), 101–116.
7.
ColomaR. (2013). Empire: An analytical category for educational research. Educational Theory, 63(6), 639–658.
8.
De LeónJ. (2015). The land of open graves. University of California Press.
9.
FayyazS.ShiraziR. (2013). Good Iranian, bad Iranian: Representations of Iran and Iranians in Time and Newsweek (1998-2009). Iranian Studies, 46(1), 53–72.
10.
FredericksC.HeibelJ. (2018). Standing rock, the Sioux treaties, and the limits of the supremacy clause. University of Colorado Law Review, 477, 517–530.
11.
GrandinG. (2006). Empire’s workshop: Latin America, the United States, and the rise of the new imperialism. Metropolitan Books.
12.
HantzopoulosM.BajajM. (2021). Educating for peace and human rights: An introduction. Bloomsbury.
13.
hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
14.
LensmireT. (2017). White folks. Routledge.
15.
LoveB. (2017). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
16.
LynnM.ParkerL. (2006). Critical race studies in education: Examining a decade of research on U.S. schools. Urban Review, 38, 257–290.
17.
MairaS. (2009). Missing: Youth, citizenship, and empire after 9/11. Duke University Press.
18.
MalekA. (2006). Memoir as Iranian exile cultural production: A case study of Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis series. Iranian Studies, 39(3), 353–380.
19.
MelamedJ. (2006). The spirit of neoliberalism: From racial liberation to neoliberal multiculturalism. Social Text, 24(4), 1–24.
20.
MelamedJ. (2011). Represent and destroy: Rationalizing violence in the new racial capitalism. University of Minnesota Press.
21.
MillsC. W. (1997). The racial contract. Cornell University Press.
22.
PicowerB. (2009). The unexamined Whiteness of teaching: How White teachers maintain and enact dominant racial ideologies. Race Ethnicity and Education, 12(1), 197–215.
23.
RoshanravanS. (2014). Motivating coalition: Women of color and epistemic disobedience. Hypatia, 29(1), 41–58.
24.
SaidE. (1979). Oreintalism. Vintage Books.
25.
SaidE. (1993). Culture and imperialism. Vintage Books.
26.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
27.
SatrapiM. (2007). The complete Persepolis. Patheon Books.
28.
SohrabiN. (2018). The “problem space” of the historiography of the 1979 Iranian Revolution. History Compass, 16, 1–10.
29.
SonuD. (2016). Forgotten memories of a social justice education: Difficult knowledge and the impossibilities of school and research. Curriculum Inquiry, 46(5), 473–490.
30.
StolerA. (2008). Imperial debris: Reflections of ruins and ruination. Cultural Anthropology, 23(2), 191–219.
31.
StraussA. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.
32.
SuttonK.UlucI. (2019). Donald Trump’s border wall and treaty infringement. Mexican Law Review, 12(1), 3–31.
33.
TarcA. M. (2011). Reparative curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(3), 350–372.
34.
VineD. (2021). The United States of war: A global history of America’s endless conflicts, from Columbus to the Islamic State. University of California Press.
35.
WilliamsH. M.BermeoM. (2020). A decolonial imperative: Pluriversal rights education. International Journal of Human Rights Education, 4(1), 1–33.
36.
WillisP. (1977). Learning to labor: How working-class kids get working-class jobs. Columbia University Press.
37.
WolfeP. (2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), 387–409.
38.
ZembylasM. (2014). Theorizing “difficult knowledge” in the aftermath of the “affective turn”: Implications for curriculum and pedagogy in handling traumatic representations. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(3), 390–412.
