Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Using panel data from three successive collective bargaining (CBA) negotiation cycles from 277 California school districts in a difference-in-differences framework, I investigate the relationship between changes in CBA restrictiveness and racial and economic achievement gaps over time. I find that achievement gaps in California are smaller where contracts increase in restrictiveness in class size and larger where contracts increase in restrictiveness in teacher evaluation and leave policies over time, though this is not the case for all student subgroups. These effects are primarily concentrated in math, are small in magnitude, and are sometimes delayed in their timing. Altogether, this study provides some evidence that contract changes are associated with the educational opportunities of school districts’ diverse and economically disadvantaged students.

Keywords

achievement gap econometric analysis educational policy governance longitudinal studies regression analyses

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anzia

S. F.

Moe

T. M.

(2014). Collective bargaining, transfer rights, and disadvantaged schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713500524

Argys

L. M.

Rees

D. I.

(1995). Unionization and school productivity: A reexamination. Research in Labor Economics, 14, 49–68.

Ballou

(2000). Contractual constraints on school management: Principals’ perspectives on teacher contracts. In Ravitch

Viteritti

J. P.

(Eds.), City schools: Lessons from New York (pp. 89–116). John Hopkins University Press.

Baron

E. J.

(2018). The effect of teachers’ unions on student achievement in the short run: Evidence from Wisconsin’s Act 10. Economics of Education Review, 67(December), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.09.003

Braun

H. I.

Wang

Jenkins

Weinbaum

(2006). The Black-White achievement gap: Do state policies matter? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14, 8. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v14n8.2006

Brunner

Hyman

(2020). School finance reforms, teachers’ unions, and the allocation of school resources. Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00828

Clotfelter

Glennie

Ladd

Vigdor

(2008). Would higher salaries keep teachers in high-poverty schools? Evidence from a policy intervention in North Carolina. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1352–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.07.003

Coleman

J. S.

(1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.

Duncan

G. J.

Sojourner

A. J.

(2013). Can intensive early childhood intervention programs eliminate income-based cognitive and achievement gaps? Journal of Human Resources, 48(4), 945–968. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2013.0025

10.

Eberts

R. W.

(1984). Union effects on teacher productivity. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37(3), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001979398403700302

11.

Eberts

R. W.

Stone

J. A.

(1984). Unions and public schools: The effect of collective bargaining on American education. Lexington Books.

12.

Goldhaber

Lavery

Theobald

D’Entremont

Fang

(2013). Teacher collective bargaining: Assessing the internal validity of partial independence item response measures of contract restrictiveness. SAGE Open, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013489694

13.

Gregory

Skiba

R. J.

Noguera

P. A.

(2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357621

14.

Grissom

J. A.

Kalogrides

Loeb

(2015). The micropolitics of educational inequality: The case of teacher–student assignments. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(5), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1087768

15.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/3559017

16.

Hart

C. M. D.

Sojourner

A. J.

(2015). Unionization and productivity: Evidence from charter schools. Industrial Relations, 54(3), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12097

17.

Hess

F. M.

Kelly

A. P.

(2006). Scapegoat, albatross, or what? The status quo in teacher collective bargaining. In Hannaway

Rotherham

A. J.

(Eds.), Collective bargaining in education: Negotiating change in today’s schools (pp. 53–87). Harvard Education Press.

18.

Hess

F. M.

Loup

(2008). The leadership limbo: Teacher labor agreements in America’s fifty largest school districts. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

19.

Hess

F. M.

West

(2006). A better bargain: Overhauling teacher collective bargaining for the 21st century. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED498038

20.

Hill

P. T.

(2006). The cost of collective bargaining agreements and related district policies. In Hannaway

Rotherham

A. J.

(Eds.), Collective bargaining in education: Negotiating change in today’s schools (pp. 89–110). Harvard Education Press.

21.

Reardon

S. F.

(2012). Estimating achievement gaps from test scores reported in ordinal “proficiency” categories. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37(4), 489–517. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998611411918

22.

Hoxby

C. M.

(1996). How teachers’ unions affect education production. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3), 671–718. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946669

23.

Jackson

C. K.

Johnson

R. C.

Persico

(2015). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv036

24.

Kahn-Lang

Lang

(2020). The promise and pitfalls of differences-in-differences: Reflections on 16 and pregnant and other applications. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 38(3), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2018.1546591

25.

Kelchen

Rosinger

K. O.

Ortagus

J. C.

(2019). How to create and use state-level policy data sets in education research. AERA Open, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419873619

26.

Koski

W. S.

Horng

E. L.

(2007). Facilitating the teacher quality gap? Collective bargaining agreements, teacher hiring and transfer rules, and teacher assignment among schools in California. Education Finance and Policy, 2(3), 262–300. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2007.2.3.262

27.

Lafortune

Rothstein

Schanzenbach

D. W.

(2018). School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160567

28.

Lott

Kenny

L. W.

(2013). State teacher union strength and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 35(August), 93–103. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.03.006

29.

Lovenheim

(2009). The effect of teachers’ unions on education production: Evidence from union election certifications in three Midwestern states. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(4), 525–587. https://doi.org/10.1086/605653

30.

Marianno

B. D.

Strunk

K. O.

(2018). The bad end of the bargain? Revisiting the relationship between collective bargaining agreements and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 65(August), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.04.006

31.

Matsudaira

J. D.

Patterson

R. W.

(2017). Teachers’ unions and school performance: Evidence from California charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 61(May), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.09.005

32.

Milkman

(1997). Teachers’ unions, productivity, and minority student achievement. Journal of Labor Research, 18(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-997-1010-y

33.

Moe

T. M.

(2009). Collective bargaining and the performance of public schools. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00363.x

34.

Reardon

S. F.

A. D.

(2015). Practical issues in estimating achievement gaps from coarsened data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 40(2), 158–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998615570944

35.

Reardon

S. F.

A. D.

Shear

B. R.

Fahle

E. M.

Kalogrides

Jang

Chavez

Buontempo

DiSalvo

(2019). Stanford Education Data Archive (Version 3.0). http://purl.stanford.edu/db586ns4974

36.

Reardon

S. F.

Kalogrides

A. D.

(2019). Validation methods for aggregate-level test scale linking: A case study mapping school district test score distributions to a common scale. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 46(2), 138–167. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998619874089

37.

Reardon

S. F.

Kalogrides

Shores

(2019). The geography of racial/ethnic test score gaps. American Journal of Sociology, 124(4), 1164–1221. https://doi.org/10.1086/700678

38.

Reardon

S. F.

Shear

B. R.

Castellano

K. E.

A. D.

(2017). Using heteroskedastic ordered probit models to recover moments of continuous test score distributions from coarsened data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 42(1), 3–45. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998616666279

39.

Roth

(2017). Union reform and teacher turnover: Evidence from Wisconsin’s Act 10 (PEPG Working Paper 17-02). Program on Education Policy and Governance. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED592102.pdf

40.

Scafidi

Sjoquist

D. L.

Stinebrickner

T. R.

(2007). Race, poverty, and teacher mobility. Economics of Education Review, 26(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.08.006

41.

Shafer

(2017, September 18). States turn to task forces to address education achievement gap. Council of State Governments. http://knowledgecenter.csg.org/kc/content/states-turn-task-forces-address-education-achievement-gap

42.

Strunk

K. O.

(2011). Are teachers’ unions really to blame? Collective bargaining agreements and their relationships with district resource allocation and student performance in California. Education Finance and Policy, 6(3), 354–398. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00039

43.

Strunk

K. O.

(2012). Policy poison or promise: Exploring the dual nature of California School District collective bargaining agreements. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 506–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11432923

44.

Strunk

K. O.

McEachin

(2011). Accountability under constraint: The relationship between collective bargaining agreements and California schools’ and districts’ performance under No Child Left Behind. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 871–903. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211401006

45.

Strunk

K. O.

Reardon

S. F.

(2010). Measuring the strength of teachers’ unions: An empirical application of the partial independence item response approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(6), 629–670. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998609359790

46.

Valant

Newark

D. A.

(2016). The politics of achievement gaps: U.S. public opinion on race-based and wealth-based differences in test scores. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16658447

47.

Wing

Simon

Bello-Gomez

R. A.

(2018). Designing difference in difference studies: Best practices for public health policy research. Annual Review of Public Health, 39(1), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.39 MB

A Negotiated Disadvantage? California Collective Bargaining Agreements and Achievement Gaps

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material