What does it mean to expand the epistemological terrain in education research to improve educational equity? This feature article attends to this question by opening a national conversation with education researchers who take up intersectionality in their study of Black women in higher education, specifically, the application of Kimberlé Crenshaw’s intersectionality dimensions—structural, political, and representational. We surveyed the authors of 23 peer-reviewed research studies that engaged intersectionality across Crenshaw’s dimensions. Findings showed that the majority of the studies were published in journals with low-impact factors. Additionally, authors indicated that they experienced pushback in the publishing process, including having to justify their work to journal editors and responding to reviewers who did not value their work. Implications are discussed.
BallA. F. (2012). To know is not enough: Knowledge, power, and the zone of generativity. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12465334
3.
BanksJ. A. (1993). The canon debate, knowledge construction, and multicultural education. Educational Researcher, 22(5), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X022005004
4.
BanksJ. A. (1998). The lives and values of researchers: Implications for educating citizens in a multicultural society. Educational Researcher, 27(7), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027007004
5.
BanksJ. A. (2016). Expanding the epistemological terrain: Increasing equity and diversity within the American Educational Research Association. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16639017
6.
BuchananN. T. (2005). Incorporating race and gender in sexual harassment research: The racialized Sexual Harassment Scale (RSHS). In N. T. Buchanan (Chair), Expanding sexual harassment research to include diverse populations and intersecting forms of harassment [Symposium]. International Coalition Against Sexual Harassment, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
7.
CarbadoD. W. (2013). Colorblind intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 811–845. https://doi.org/10.1086/669666
8.
Carter AndrewsD. J.BrownT.CastroE.Id-DeenE. (2019). The impossibility of being “perfect and White”: Black girls’ racialized and gendered schooling experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2531–2572. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219849392
9.
ChoS.CrenshawK. W.McCallL. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608
10.
CollinsP. H. (1998). Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. University of Minnesota Press.
11.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), Article 8.
15.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Identity politics, intersectionality, and violence against women. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
16.
Darling-HammondL. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy, and practice in democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25(6), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025006005
17.
EdwardsK. T.ThompsonV. J. (2016). Womanist pedagogical love as justice work on college campuses: Reflections from faithful Black women academics. New Directions For Adult & Continuing Education, 2016(152), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20211
ErcikanK.RothW. M. (2006). What good is polarizing research into qualitative and quantitative?Educational Researcher, 35(5), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035005014
20.
Evans-WintersV. E.EspositoJ. (2010). Other people’s daughters: Critical race feminism and Black girls’ education. Journal of Educational Foundations, 24(1/2), 11–24.
21.
GordonE. W.MillerF.RollockD. (1990). Coping with communicentric bias in knowledge production in the social sciences. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019003014
22.
GreenD. E.WalkeyF. H.McCormickI. A.TaylorA. J. W. (1988). Development and evaluation of a 21-item version of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist with New Zealand and United States respondents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049538808259070
HardingS. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
25.
Harris-PerryM. V. (2011). Sister citizen: Shame, stereotypes, and Black women in America. Yale University Press.
26.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. Guilford Press.
27.
HaynesC. (2017). Dismantling the White supremacy embedded in our classrooms: White faculty in pursuit of more equitable educational outcomes for racially minoritized students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 87–107.
28.
HaynesC.JosephN. M.PattonL. D.StewartS.AllenE. L. (2020). Toward an Understanding of Intersectionality Methodology: A 30-Year Literature Synthesis of Black Women’s Experiences in Higher Education. Review of Educational Research, 90(6), 751–787.
29.
HaynesC.PattonL. D. (2019). From racial resistance to racial consciousness: Engaging White STEM faculty in pedagogical transformation. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 22(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458919829845
30.
HullG.ScottP. B.SmithB. (1982). All the women are white, all the Blacks are men, but some of us are brave: Black women’s studies. Feminist Press.
31.
KingJ. E. (2017). 2015 AERA presidential address morally engaged research/ers dismantling epistemological nihilation in the age of impunity. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17719291
32.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U. S. schools. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003
33.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F.IV. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
34.
LeachC. W.van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.OuwerkerkJ. W.SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
35.
LindsayS. (2019). Five approaches to qualitative comparison groups in health research: A scoping review. Qualitative Health Research, 29(3), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318807208
36.
MacKinnonC. A. (2013). Intersectionality as method: A note. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1086/669570
37.
MacPhailC.KhozaN.AblerL.RanganathanM. (2016). Process guidelines for establishing intercoder reliability in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research, 16(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115577012
38.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
39.
MoradiB.SubichL. M. (2003). A concomitant examination of the relations of perceived racist and sexist events to psychological distress for African American women. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(4), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000003031004007
40.
MorseJ. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501
PattonL. D.CroomN. N.HaynesC. (Guest Eds.). (2017). Centering the diverse experiences of Black women undergraduates [Special Issue]. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 10(2), 141–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2017.1331627
43.
PattonL. D.HaynesC. (2018). Hidden in plain sight: The Black women’s blueprint for institutional transformation in higher education. Teachers College Record, 120(14), 1–18.
44.
PattonL. D.NjokuN. N. (2019). Theorizing Black women’s experiences with institution-sanctioned violence: A #BlackLivesMatter imperative toward black liberation on campus. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(9), 1162–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1645908
45.
PattonL. D.WardL. W. (2016). Missing Black undergraduate women and the politics of disposability: A critical race feminist perspective. Journal of Negro Education, 85(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.85.3.0330
46.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
47.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
48.
StanleyC. (2007). When counter narratives meet master narratives in the journal editorial review process. Educational Researcher, 36(1), pp. 14–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X06298008
49.
SzymanskiD. M.LewisJ. A. (2016). Gendered racism, coping, identity centrality, and African American college women’s psychological distress. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315616113
50.
ThomasE. L.DovidioJ. F.WestT. V. (2014). Lost in the categorical shuffle: Evidence for the social non-prototypicality of Black women. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035096
51.
WardK. B.GrantL. (1996). Gender and academic publishing. In SmartJ. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 172–212). Agathon.
52.
WeiM.AlvarezA. N.KuT. Y.RussellD. W.BonettD. G. (2010). Development and validation of a coping with discrimination scale: Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(3), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019969
53.
YoderJ. D.AniakudoP. (1997). “Outsider within” the firehouse: Subordination and difference in the social interactions of African American women firefighters. Gender & Society, 11(3), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124397011003004
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
