The “achievement gap” has long dominated mainstream conversations about race and education. Some scholars warn that the discourse around racial gaps perpetuates stereotypes and promotes the adoption of deficit-based explanations that fail to appreciate the role of structural inequities. I investigate through three randomized experiments. Results indicate that a TV news story about racial achievement gaps (vs. a control or counterstereotypical video) led viewers to express more exaggerated stereotypes of Black Americans as lacking education (Study 1 effect size = .30 SD; Study 2 effect size = .38 SD) and may have increased viewers’ implicit stereotyping of Black students as less competent than White students (Study 1 effect size = .22 SD; Study 2 effect size = .12 SD, ns). The video did not affect viewers’ explicit competence-related racial stereotyping, the explanations they gave for achievement inequalities, or their prioritization of ending achievement inequalities. After 2 weeks, the effect on stereotype exaggeration faded. Future research should probe how we can most productively frame educational inequality by race.
BerinskyA. J.HuberG. A.LenzG. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.
2.
BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (2006). A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 34, 39–89.
3.
BoasT. C.ChristensonD. P.GlickD. M. (2020). Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(2), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.2
4.
BordaloP.CoffmanK.GennaioliN.ShleiferA. (2016). Stereotypes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 1753–1794.
CareyR. L. (2014). A cultural analysis of the achievement gap Discourse: Challenging the language and labels used in the work of school reform. Urban Education, 49, 440–468.
8.
CarpenterT.PogacarR.PulligC.KourilM.AguilarS. J.LaBouffJ.IsenbergN.ChakroffA. (2018, April3). Conducting IAT research within online surveys: A procedure, validation, and open source tool. https://psyarxiv.com/hgy3z/
9.
ChongD.DruckmanJ.N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.
10.
CrossB. E. (2007). Urban school achievement gap as a metaphor to conceal U.S. apartheid education. Theory Into Practice, 46(3), 247–255.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.
13.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.
14.
GreenwaldA. G.PoehlmanT. A.UhlmannE. L.BanajiM. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.
15.
GuryanJ.CharlesK. K. (2013). Taste-based or statistical discrimination: The economics of discrimination returns to its roots. The Economic Journal, 123, F417–F431.
16.
GutiérrezR. (2008). A “gap-gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 357–364.
HarperS. R. (2015). Success in these schools? Visual counternarratives of young men of color and urban high schools they attend. Urban Education, 50(2), 139–169.
19.
HessF. M.PetrilliM. J. (2005). The politics of No Child Left Behind: Will the coalition hold?Journal of Education, 185(3), 13–25.
20.
JencksC.PhillipsM. (1998). The Black-White test score gap: An introduction. In JencksC.PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 1–51). The Brookings Institution.
21.
JostJ. T. (2019). The IAT is dead, long live the IAT: Context-sensitive measures of implicit attitudes are indispensable to social and political psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 10–19.
22.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
KurdiB.BanajiM. R. (2017). Repeated evaluative pairings and evaluative statements: How effectively do they shift implicit attitudes?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(2), 194–213.
25.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U. S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35, 3–12.
26.
LaiC. K.MariniM.LehrS. A.CerrutiC.ShinJ. L.Joy-GabaJ. A.HoA. K.TeachmanB. A.WojcikS. P.KolevaS. P.FrazierR. S.HeiphetzL.ChenE.TurnerR. N.HaidtJ.KesebirS.HawkinsC. B.SchaeferH. S.RubichiS.. . . NosekB. A. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1765–1785.
Le PelleyM. E.ReimersS. J.CalviniG.SpearsR.BeesleyT.MurphyR. A. (2010). Stereotype formation: Biased by association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(1), 138–161.
29.
LoveB. J. (2004). Brown plus 50 counter-storytelling: A critical race theory analysis of the “majoritarian achievement gap” story. Equity & Excellence in Education, 37, 227–246.
30.
MilnerH. R. (2012). Beyond a test score: Explaining opportunity gaps in educational practice. Journal of Black Studies, 43(6), 693–718.
31.
MurnaneR. J. (2013). U.S. high school graduation rates: Patterns and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 370–422.
NealD. A.JohnsonW. R. (1996). The role of premarket factors in black-white wage differentials. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 869–895.
34.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00376
35.
PayneB. K.BisharaA. J. (2009). An integrative review of process dissociation and related models in social cognition. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 272–312.
36.
PayneB. K.VuletichH. A.LundbergK. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 233–248.
37.
PeraltaC. B.WojcieszakM.LelkesY.VreesC. (2017). Selective exposure to balanced content and evidence type: The case of issue and non-issue publics about climate change and health care. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 833–861.
38.
PerryT. (2003). Young, gifted, and Black: Promoting high achievement among African-American students. Beacon Press.
39.
QuinnD. M. (2015). Kindergarten black-white test score gaps: Re-examining the roles of socioeconomic status and school quality with new data. Sociology of Education, 88, 120–139.
40.
QuinnD. M.DesruisseauxT. K.Nkansah-AmankraA. (2019). Achievement gap language affects teachers’ issue prioritization. Educational Researcher, 48, 484–487.
41.
QuinnD. M.LeQ. T. (2018). Are we trending to more or less between-group achievement inequality over the school year and summer? Comparing across ECLS-K cohorts. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418819995
42.
SteeleC. M. (2011). Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. W.W. Norton & Company.
43.
ValantJ.NewarkD. A. (2016). The politics of achievement gaps: US public opinion on race-based and wealth-based differences in test scores. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 331–346.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
