The increased use of smartphones and tablets sets the stage for new mobile-based educational programs that seek to increase student learning and engagement in school and at home. This study examines the effectiveness of Escribo Play, a game-enhanced educational program, on preschool students’ phonological awareness, word reading, and writing skills. The randomized controlled trial was conducted with 749 students from 62 classrooms from 17 schools located in five cities. Quantitative pretesting and posttesting procedures using standardized instruments were employed. The results indicate that the experimental classrooms that used the 20 games for 3 months gained 68% in their reading scores compared to control classrooms (d = .40). They also gained 48% more in writing scores (d = .20). Multilevel analysis indicated that these findings were statistically significant.
BallE. W.BlachmanB. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?Reading Research Quarterly, 26(1), 49–66.
2.
BusA. G.van IJzendoornM. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.403
3.
CattsH. W.FeyM. E.ZhangX.TomblinJ. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461
4.
ChambersB.CheungA. C.SlavinR. E. (2016). Literacy and language outcomes of comprehensive and developmental-constructivist approaches to early childhood education: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 18(1), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.03.003
5.
ChauhanS. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005
6.
CheungA. C.SlavinR. E. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.50
7.
Common Sense Media. (2017). The common sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight 2017. http://tiny.cc/nptz4y
8.
DiasN. M. (2006). Alfabetização fônica computadorizada: Usando o computador para desenvolver habilidades fônicas e metafonológicas. Psicologia Escolar E Educacional, 10(1), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-85572006000100017
9.
DiasN. M.DuarteC. P.MacedoE. C.SeabraA. G. (2013). Evidências de validade e fidedignidade da prova de consciência fonológica por produção oral. In SeabraA. G.DiasN. M. (Eds.), Avaliação neuropsicológica cognitiva: Linguagem oral (Vol. 2). Memnon.
10.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
11.
EhriL. C.NunesS. R.WillowsD. M.SchusterB. V.Yaghoub-ZadehZ.ShanahanT. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 250–287. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2
12.
FelixV. G.MenaL. J.OstosR.MaestreG. E. (2017). A pilot study of the use of emerging computer technologies to improve the effectiveness of reading and writing therapies in children with Down syndrome. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12426
13.
GagnéR. M. (1965). Conditions of learning. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14.
GorpK.SegersE.VerhoevenL. (2017). Enhancing decoding efficiency in poor readers via a word identification game. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.156
15.
GrahamM.MilanowskiA.MillerJ. (2012). Measuring and promoting inter-rater agreement of teacher and principal performance ratings. Center for Educator Compensation and Reform. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532068.pdf
16.
HøienT.LundbergI.StanovichK. E.BjaalidI. (1995). Components of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 7(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027184
Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. (2016). Censo da educação básica. Ministério da Educação. http://goo.gl/iQSlhp
19.
Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. (2017). Avaliação nacional da alfabetização. Ministério da Educação. http://ana.inep.gov.br/ANA/
20.
KaradagR. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions on game based learning scenarios in primary reading and writing instruction courses. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(1), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2634
21.
KjeldsenA.KärnäA.NiemiP.OlofssonÅ.WittingK. (2014). Gains from training in phonological awareness in kindergarten predict reading comprehension in grade 9. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(6), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.940080
22.
KurdekL. A.SinclairR. J. (2001). Predicting reading and mathematics achievement in fourth-grade children from kindergarten readiness scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.451
23.
LeónC. B. R.AlmeidaÁ.LiraS.ZauzaG.PazetoT. C. B.SeabraA. G.DiasN. M. (2019). Consciência fonológica e habilidades iniciais de leitura e escrita na educação infantil: Dados normativos preliminares. Revista CEFAC, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20192127418
24.
MesmerH. A. E.WilliamsT. O. (2015). Examining the role of syllable awareness in a model of concept of word: Findings from preschoolers. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(4), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.111
MoraisA. G. d. (2012). Sistema de escrita alfabética. Melhoramentos.
27.
MoraisA. G. d. (2015). O desenvolvimento da consciência fonológica e a apropriação da escrita alfabética entre crianças brasileiras. Revista Brasileira De Alfabetização, 1(1). https://goo.gl/EWsgdX
PaulaG. R.MotaH. B.Keske-SoaresM. (2005). A terapia em consciência fonológica no processo de alfabetização. Pró-Fono Revista De Atualização Científica, 17(2), 175–184. http://tinyurl.com/zs4effd
PazetoT. C. B.LeonC. B. R.SeabraA. G. (2017). Avaliação de habilidades preliminares de leitura e escrita no início da alfabetização. Revista Psicopedagogia, 34(104). https://tinyurl.com/ycowatkc
32.
PazetoT. C. B.SeabraA. G.DiasN. M. (2014). Executive functions, oral language and writing in preschool children: Development and correlations. Paidéia, 24, 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272458201409
33.
PerlmanM.FletcherB.FalenchukO.BrunsekA.McMullenE.ShahP. S. (2017). Child-staff ratios in early childhood education and care settings and child outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170256
PierreR. G. S. (2004). Using randomized experiments. In NewcomerK. E.HatryH. P.WholeyJ. S. (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 150–175). John Wiley & Sons.
36.
PiquetteN. A.SavageR. S.AbramiP. C. (2014). A cluster randomized control field trial of the ABRACADABRA web-based reading technology: Replication and extension of basic findings. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01413
37.
PokorniJ. L.WorthingtonC. K.JamisonP. J. (2004). Phonological awareness intervention: Comparison of fast ForWord, earobics, and LiPS. Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 147–158. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27548023
38.
SantosM. J. d.MalufM. R. (2010). Consciência fonológica e linguagem escrita: Efeitos de um programa de intervenção. Educar Em Revista, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40602010000300005
39.
SchatschneiderC.FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. J.CarlsonC. D.FoormanB. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.265
SegersE.VerhoevenL. (2004). Computer-supported phonological awareness intervention for kindergarten children with specific language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(3), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/022)
42.
SegersE.VerhoevenL. (2005). Long-term effects of computer training of phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00107.x
43.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
44.
TakacsZ. K.SwartE. K.BusA. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 698–739. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314566989
45.
TorgersonC. J.TorgersonD. J.TaylorC. A. (2015). Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized designs. In NewcomerK. E.HatryH. P.WholeyJ. S. (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 144–162). John Wiley & Sons.
46.
WearsR. L. (2002). Advanced statistics: Statistical methods for analyzing cluster and cluster-randomized data. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9, 330–341. https://doi.org/10.1197/aemj.9.4.330
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
