Through school-based networks, parents obtain information, practical help, and other resources. Because networks vary by size and structure, access to these resources is uneven. What accounts for differences in access to social ties and in the mobilization of those ties to provide resources? In this article, we analyze a network of mothers of eighth graders at a Philadelphia public school. With a near-complete census of network ties, we explore mothers’ access to and mobilization of information and practical help through social ties. We find that mothers’ school-based participation, rather than their race or class-based social position, is associated with resource access and mobilization. Importantly, greater levels of participation increase the likelihood that a mother will provide—but not obtain—information and practical help. Our results can help inform public policy and practice on family and community engagement in schools.
AjrouchK.BlandonA.AntonucciT. (2005). Social networks among men and women: The effects of age and socioeconomic status. Journals of Gerontology, 60(6), S311–S317.
2.
BarónJ. D.BreunigR. V.Cobb-ClarkD.GorgensT.SartbayevaA. (2009). Does the effect of incentive payments on survey response rates differ by income support history?Journal of Official Statistics, 25(4), 483–507.
3.
BonacichP. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182.
4.
BorgattiS.EverettM.FreemanL. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
5.
BorgattiS.EverettM.JohnsonJ. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
6.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
7.
BrickerJ. (2014). Survey incentives, survey effort, and survey costs. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs, Federal Reserve Board.
8.
BurtR. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.
9.
ChaseI. (1982). Dynamics of hierarchy formation: The sequential development of dominance relationships. Behavior, 80, 218–240.
10.
CochranM.GunnarssonL. (1990). The social networks of married mothers in four cultures. In CochranM.LarnerM.RileyD.GunnarssonL.HendersonC.Jr. (Eds.), Extending families: The social networks of parents and their children (pp. 86–104). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CochranM.NiegoS. (2002). Parenting and social networks. In BornsteinM. H. (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting. Vol. 4: Social conditions and applied parenting (pp. 123–148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
ColemanJ. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Suppl.), S95–S120.
13.
CooperC. W. (2007). School choice as ‘motherwork’: Valuing African-American women’s educational advocacy and resistance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(5),491–512.
14.
CornwellE.CornwellB. (2008). Access to expertise as a form of social capital: An examination of race- and class-based disparities in network ties to experts. Sociological Perspectives, 51(4), 853–876.
15.
CrockenbergS. (1988). Social support and parenting. In FitzgeraldW.LesterB.YogmanM. (Eds.), Research on support for parents and infants in the postnatal period (pp. 67–92). New York: Ablex.
16.
CrosnoeR. (2001). Academic orientation and parental involvement in education during high school. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 210–30.
17.
CucchiaraM. (2013). Marketing schools, marketing cities: Who wins and who loses when schools become urban amenities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
DalyA.FinniganK. (2011). The ebb and flow of social network ties between district leaders under high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 39–79.
19.
DiamondJ. B.GomezK. (2004). African American parents’ educational orientations: The importance of social class and parents’ perceptions of schools. Education and Urban Society, 36(4), 383–427.
20.
DominaT. (2005). Leveling the home advantage: Assessing the effectiveness of parental involvement in elementary school. Sociology of Education, 78(3), 233–249.
21.
EcclesJ.HaroldR. (1996). Family involvement in children’s and adolescents’ schooling. In BloomA.DunnJ. F. (Eds.), Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes? (pp. 3–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
FeldS. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035.
23.
FischerC. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Garcia CollC.AkibaD.PalaciosN.BaileyB.SilverR.DiMartinoL.ChinC. (2002). Parental involvement in children’s education: Lessons from three immigrant groups. Parenting: Science and Practice, 2(3), 303–324.
25.
GottzénL. (2011). Involved fatherhood? Exploring the educational work of middle-class men. Gender and Education, 23(5), 619–634.
26.
GranovetterM. S. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
HannemanR.RiddleM. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California, Riverside. Retrieved from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/
28.
HeidlerR.GamperM.HerzA.EßerF. (2014). Relationship patterns in the 19th century: The friendship network in a German boys’ school class from 1880 to 1881 revisited. Social Networks, 37, 1–13.
29.
Hoover-DempseyK.WalkerJ.SandlerH.WhetselD.GreenC.WilkinsA.ClossonK. (2005). Why do parents become involved? Research findings and implications. Elementary School Journal, 106(2), 105–130.
30.
HorvatE.WeiningerE.LareauA. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319–351.
31.
JoynerK.KaoG. (2000). School racial composition and adolescent racial homophily. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3), 810–825.
32.
KrackhardtD. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In NohriaN.EcclesR. G. (Eds.), Organizations and networks: Structure, form and action (pp. 216–239). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
33.
LambM.PleckJ.CharnovE.LevineJ. (2017). A biosocial perspective on paternal behavior and involvement. In Parenting across the life span: Biosocial dimensions (pp. 111–142). London: Routledge.
34.
LareauA. (2000). My wife can tell me who I know: Methodological and conceptual problems in studying fathers. Qualitative Sociology, 23(4), 407–433.
35.
LareauA.HorvatE. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 37–53.
36.
LareauA.MuñozV. (2012). “You’re not going to call the shots”: Structural conflicts between the principal and the PTO at a suburban public elementary school. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 201–218.
37.
LareauA.ShumarW. (1996). The problem of individualism in family-school policies. Sociology of Education, 69 (Extra Issue), 24–39.
38.
LareauA.WeiningerE.CoxA. (2018). Parental challenges to organizational authority in an elite school district: The role of cultural, social, and symbolic capital. Teachers College Record, 120(1), 1–46.
39.
LewisA.DiamondJ. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
LiA.FischerM. J. (2017). Advantaged/disadvantaged school neighborhoods, parent networks, and parent involvement at elementary school. Sociology of Education, 90(4), 355–377.
41.
LinN. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
42.
LinN. (2000). Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29(6), 785–795.
43.
LinN. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
LopezG.ScribnerJ.MahitivanichchaK. (2001). Redefining parental involvement: Lessons from high-performing migrant-impacted schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 253–288.
45.
McGrathD. E. (2006). An incentives experiment in the U.S. Consumer Expenditures Quarterly Survey. BAE Systems Information Technology/Bureau of Labor Statistics.
46.
McNealR. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces, 78(1), 117–144.
47.
McNealR. (2001). Differential effects of parental involvement on cognitive and behavioral outcomes by socioeconomic status. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(2), 171–179.
48.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353–375.
49.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
50.
MizruchiM.StearnsL. (2001). Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision-making. American Sociological Review, 66(5), 647–671.
51.
ParkeR. (2000). Father involvement: A developmental psychological perspective. Marriage & Family Review, 29(2–3), 43–58.
52.
PernaL.TitusM. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 485–518.
53.
PharesV.FieldsS.KamboukosD. (2009). Fathers’ and mothers’ involvement with their adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(1), 1–9.
54.
Posey-MaddoxL.KimelbergS.CucchiaraM. (2016). Seeking a “critical mass”: Middle-class parents’ collective engagement in city public schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(7), 905–927.
55.
SheldonS. (2002). Parents’ social networks and beliefs as predictors of parent involvement. Elementary School Journal, 102(4), 301–316.
56.
ShojiM.HaskinsA.RangelD.SorensenK. (2014). The emergence of social capital in low-income Latino elementary schools. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 600–613.
57.
SingerE.Van HoewykJ.GeblerN.RaghunathanT.McGonagleK. (1999). The effect of incentives on response rates in interviewer-mediated surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 15(2), 217–230.
58.
SmallM. (2009). Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
59.
SoutulloO.Smith-BonahueT.Sanders-SmithS.NaviaL. (2016). Discouraging partnerships? Teachers’ perspectives on immigration-related barriers to family-school collaboration. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(2), 226–240.
60.
TurneyK.KaoG. (2009). Barriers to school involvement: Are immigrant parents disadvantaged?Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 257–271.
61.
UseemE. (1992). Middle schools and math groups: Parents’ involvement in children’s placement. Sociology of Education, 65(4), 263–279.
62.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
63.
WelnerK. (2001). Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity. New York: SUNY Press.
64.
WellmanB. (1979). The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 84(5), 1201–1231.
65.
WellmanB.WortleyS. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558–588.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
