Boundary lines have long served as a mechanism to divide people, determining the quality of available resources, and ultimately, educational opportunity. In recent years, new school district boundaries have proliferated as local communities attempt to secede from larger school districts. In this study of Memphis-Shelby County, Tennessee, we extend prior research on school district fragmentation and consolidation by examining the largest American school district merger—and swift, subsequent suburban secessions—in recent decades. In Memphis, policy and political actors fostered decentralization and competition through the expansion of choices among new school districts defined by highly salient racial boundaries. These actions exacerbated segregation between districts with students’ racial and economic school-level exposure differing substantially across the new district lines. State and local actions that fostered the fragmentation of the consolidated district reduced possibilities for further integration and equity, with significant implications for students, families, and the larger community.
AndersonM. W. (2012). Making a regional district: Memphis City Schools dissolves into its suburbs. Columbia Law Review, 112, 47–61.
5.
BischoffK. (2008). School district fragmentation and racial residential segregation: How do boundaries matter?Urban Affairs Review, 44(2), 182–217.
6.
Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1991).
7.
BraddockJ. (2009). Looking back: The effects of court-ordered desegregation. In SmrekarC.GoldringE. (Eds.), From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape of school desegregation (pp. 3–18). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
ClotfelterC. T. (2004). After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
ColemanJ. S.CampbellE. Q.HobsonC. J.McPartlandJ.MoodA. M.WeinfeldF. D.YorkR. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
12.
DiemS.Siegel-HawleyG.FrankenbergE.ClearyC. (2015). Consolidation vs. fragmentation: The relationship between school district boundaries and segregation in three southern metropolitan areas. Pennsylvania State Law Review, 119(3), 687–745.
DreierP.MollenkopfJ.SwanstromT. (2004). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty first century (2nd ed., Rev.). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
FielJ. (2013). Decomposing school resegregation: Social closure, racial imbalance, and racial isolation. American Sociological Review, 78(5), 828–848.
18.
FielJ. (2015). Closing ranks: Closure, status competition, and school segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 121(1), 126–170.
19.
FrankenbergE. (2009). Splintering school districts: Understanding the link between segregation and fragmentation. Law & Social Inquiry, 34(4), 869–909.
GamoranA.AnB. P. (2016). Effects of school segregation and school resources in a changing policy context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(1), 43–64.
23.
GlazermanS.DotterD. (2016). Market signals: Evidence on the determinants and consequences of school choice from a citywide lottery (Working Paper No. 45). Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
HolmeJ. J.FinniganK. S. (2013). School diversity, school district fragmentation and metropolitan policy. Teachers College Record, 115(11), 1–29.
26.
JargowskyP.El KomiM. (2011). Before or after the bell? School context and neighborhood effects on student achievement. In NewburgerH.BirchE.WachterS. (Eds.), Neighborhood and life chances: How place matters in modern America (pp. 50–72). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
27.
JohnsonR. C. (2015). Long-run impacts of school desegregation and school quality on adult attainments (NBER Working Paper No. 16664). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
KielD. (2008). Exploded dream: Desegregation in the Memphis City Schools. Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 26(2), 261–303.
30.
KielD. (2011). Memphis dilemma: A half-century of public education reform in Memphis and Shelby County from desegregation to consolidation. The University of Memphis Law Review, 41, 787–845.
31.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Race, class and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
LinnR.WelnerK.(Eds.). (2007). Race-conscious policies for assigning students to schools: Social science research and the Supreme Court cases. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
33.
MassellD.GlazerJ. L. (2016). “This is the big leagues”: Charter-led turnaround in a non-charter world. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation & Development, Vanderbilt Peabody College.
34.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1988). The dimensions of racial segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315.
35.
Memphis City Schools. (2012). Merger timeline. Memphis, TN: Author.
36.
MickelsonR. (2011). Exploring the school-housing nexus: A synthesis of social science evidence. In TegelerP. (Ed.), Finding common ground: Coordinating housing and education policy to promote integration (pp. 5–8). Washington, DC: Poverty and Race Research Action Council.
37.
Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974).
38.
Missouri v. Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70 (1995).
39.
Northcross v. Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, 397 U.S. 232 (1970).
40.
OrfieldG. (1978). Must we bus?: Segregated schools and national policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
41.
OrfieldG. (2001). Metropolitan school desegregation. In powellj. a.KearneyG.KayV. (Eds.), In pursuit of a dream deferred (pp. 121–157). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
42.
OrfieldG.FrankenbergE.Siegel-HawleyG. (2016). Brown at 62: School segregation by race, poverty and state. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
43.
OrfieldG.KusceraJ.Siegel-HawleyG. (2012). E pluribus . . . separation: Deepening double segregation for more students. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
44.
OrfieldG.Siegel-HawleyG.KucseraJ. (2014). Sorting out deepening confusion on segregation measures. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
45.
OwensA. (2016). Inequality in children’s contexts: Income segregation of households with and without children. American Sociological Review, 81, 549–574. doi:10.1177/0003122416642430.
46.
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 05-908 (2007).
47.
PearceD. (1980). Breaking down the barriers: New evidence on the impact of metropolitan school desegregation on housing patterns. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
48.
PettigrewT.TroppL. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.
ReardonS. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–113). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
51.
ReardonS. (2016). School segregation and racial academic achievement gaps. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(5), 34–57.
ReardonS. F.YunJ. T. (2005). Integrating neighborhoods, segregating schools: The retreat from school desegregation in the South, 1990–2000. In BogerJ. C.EdleyC.OrfieldG. (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 51–69). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
54.
ReddingS.MenifieldC.SantoC. A. (2008). Impact of a special school district on Memphis and Shelby County. Memphis, TN: Regional Economic Development Center, The University of Memphis.
55.
RichardsM.StroubK.HolmeJ. J. (2012). Can NCLB choice work? Modeling the effects of interdistrict choice on student access to higher-performing schools. In KahlenbergR. (Ed.), The future of school integration: Socioeconomic diversity as an education reform strategy (pp. 223–256). New York, NY: Century Foundation Press.
56.
Robinson v. Shelby County Board of Education, 566 F.3d 642 (6th Cir. 2009).
57.
RothwellJ. (2012). Housing costs, zoning, and access to high-scoring schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
58.
RumbergerR. W.PalardyG. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107(9), 1999–2045.
59.
RushingW. (2017). School segregation and its discontents: Chaos and community in post-civil rights Memphis. Urban Education, 52(1), 3–31.
60.
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973).
61.
SaporitoS.SohoniD. (2006). Coloring outside the lines: Racial segregation in public schools and their attendance boundaries. Sociology of Education, 79(2), 81–105.
62.
Shelby County Schools. (2013). Facts first: What you need to know about the 2013–2014 school year. Retrieved from http://www.scsfactsfirst.com/
63.
Siegel-HawleyG. (2013). City lines, county lines, color lines: The relationship between school and housing segregation in four southern metro areas. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–45.
64.
Siegel-HawleyG. (2016). When the fences come down: Twenty-first century lessons from metropolitan school desegregation. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
65.
Siegel-HawleyG.DiemS.FrankenbergE. (2015). Examining the (de)merger of the Memphis city and Shelby County school systems. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
66.
Siegel-HawleyG.FrankenbergE. (2011). Redefining diversity: Political responses to the post-PICS environment. Peabody Journal of Education, 86(5), 529–552.
TrouttD. D. (2013). The price of paradise: The costs of inequality and a vision for a more equitable America. New York, NY: NYU Press.
69.
TrujilloT. (2016). Restoring the federal commitment to equal educational opportunity: New directions for ESSA’s school improvement initiatives. Education Law & Policy Review, 3(1), 141–165.
70.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2016). K–12 education: Better use of information could help agencies identify disparities and address racial discrimination (GAO-16-345). Washington, DC: Author.
71.
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp, 429 U.S. 252 (1977).
72.
Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1 (1974).
73.
Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490 (1975).
74.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Eds. RothG.WittichC.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
75.
WeiherG. (1992). The fractured metropolis: Political fragmentation and metropolitan segregation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
76.
WellsA. S.CrainR. L. (1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 531–555.
77.
WilsonE. K. (2016). The new school segregation. Cornell Law Review, 102, 139–210.
78.
ZimmerR.KhoA.HenryG.VianoS. (2015). Evaluation of the effect of Tennessee’s Achievement School District on student test scores. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation, and Development, Vanderbilt Peabody College.
