Low-socioeconomic status (SES) students are underrepresented at selective colleges, but the role that admissions offices play is poorly understood. Because admissions offices often have inconsistent information on high school contexts, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine whether providing detailed information on high school contexts increases the likelihood that admissions officers (n = 311) would recommend admitting low-SES applicants. Admissions officers in the detailed-information condition were 13 to 14 percentage points (i.e., 26%–28%) more likely to recommend admitting a low-SES applicant from an underserved high school than those in the limited-information condition, although the limited-information condition provided significant details about family SES and high school context. These findings were consistent regardless of the selectivity of the college, admissions office practices, and participant demographics.
AttewellP. (2001). The winner-take-all high school: Organizational adaptations to educational stratification. Sociology of Education, 74, 267–295.
2.
AttewellP.DominaT. (2008). Raising the bar: Curricular intensity and academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 51–71.
3.
Barron’s. (2013). Profiles of American colleges 2013 (30th ed.). Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s Educational Series.
4.
BastedoM. N. (2014, April). Cognitive repairs in the admissions office: New strategies for improving equity and excellence at selective colleges. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
5.
BastedoM. N. (2016). Enrollment management and the low-income student: How holistic admissions and market competition can impede equity. In KellyA. P.HowellJ. S.Sattin-BajajC. (Eds.), Matching students to opportunity: Expanding college choice, access, and quality (pp. 121–134). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
6.
BastedoM. N.FlasterA. (2014). Conceptual and methodological problems in research on college undermatch. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 93–99.
7.
BastedoM. N.HowardJ. E.FlasterA. (2016). Holistic admissions after affirmative action: Does “maximizing” the high school curriculum matter?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 389–409.
8.
BastedoM. N.JaquetteO. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 318–339.
9.
BowenW. G.ChingosM. M.McPhersonM. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BowenW. G.KurzweilM. A.TobinE. M. (2006). Equity and excellence in American higher education. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
11.
BuchmannC.CondronD. J.RoscignoV. J. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT, and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 435–461.
12.
ChenX. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES 2009–161). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
13.
ClinedinstM. (2015). State of college admission 2014. Washington, DC: National Association for College Admission Counseling.
14.
EspenshadeT. J.RadfordA. W. (2009). No longer separate, not yet equal: Race and class in elite college admission and campus life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
EspinosaL. L.GaertnerM. N.OrfieldG. (2015). Race, class, and college access: Achieving diversity in a shifting legal landscape. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
16.
FreemanJ.SimonsenB. (2015). Examining the impact of policy and practice interventions on high school dropout and school completion rates: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 205–248.
17.
GaertnerM. N.HartM. (2013). Considering class: College access and diversity. Harvard Law and Policy Review, 7, 367–87.
18.
GilbertD. T.MaloneP. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21–38.
19.
GrodskyE. (2007). Compensatory sponsorship in higher education. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1662–1712.
20.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
21.
HenryP. J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 49–71.
22.
HillC. B.WinstonG. C. (2010). Low-income students and highly selective private colleges: Geography, searching, and recruiting. Economics of Education Review, 29(4), 495–503.
23.
HollandM. M. (2014). Navigating the road to college: Race and class variation in the college application process. Sociology Compass, 8(10), 1191–1205.
24.
HoxbyC. M.AveryC. (2012). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low-income students (NBER Working Paper 18586). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
25.
HoxbyC.TurnerS. (2013). Expanding college opportunities for high-achieving, low-income students (SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 12-014). Palo Alto, CA: SIEPR.
26.
HseeC. K.LoewensteinG. F.BlountS.BazermanM. H. (1999). Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 576–590.
27.
JaccardJ.TurrisiR. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
29.
KarenD. (1990). Toward a political-organizational model of gatekeeping: The case of elite colleges. Sociology of Education, 63, 227–240.
30.
KlopfensteinK. (2004). Advanced Placement: Do minorities have equal opportunity?Economics of Education Review, 23, 115–131.
31.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
LucidoJ. A. (2015). How admission decisions get made. In HosslerD.BontragerB. (Eds.), Handbook of strategic enrollment management (pp. 147–173). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
MamletR.VanDeVeldeC. (2011). College admission: From application to acceptance, step by step. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
34.
MooreD. A.SwiftS. A.SharekZ. S.GinoF. (2010). Correspondence bias in performance evaluation: Why grade inflation works. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 843–852.
35.
MuseusS. D.PalmerR. T.DavisR. J.MarambaD. C. (2011). Racial and ethnic minority students’ success in STEM education (ASHE Higher Education Report, Vol. 36, No. 6). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
O’ConnellA. A. (2006). Logistic regression models for ordinal response variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
PernaL. W. (2004). The key to college access: Rigorous academic preparation. In TierneyW. G.CorwinZ. B.ColyarJ. E. (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 113–134). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
39.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
40.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
ReardonS. F.BischoffK. (2011). Income inequality and income segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 116(4), 1092–1153.
42.
RossL. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173–220.
43.
RossL. D.AmabileT. M.SteinmetzJ. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(7), 485–494.
44.
RossL.NisbettR. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
45.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
StevensM. L. (2009). Creating a class: College admissions and the education of elites. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
SwiftS. A.MooreD. A.SharekZ. S.GinoF. (2013). Inflated applicants: Attribution errors in performance evaluation by professionals. PLoS One, 8(7), e69258.
48.
ThalerR.SunsteinC. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness (Updated ed.). New York, NY: Penguin.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
