Research on language-minority student outcomes has revealed sizeable and persistent achievement gaps. The reasons for these gaps are often closely linked with other factors related to underperformance, including generational status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Using sociocultural second-language acquisition theories and community linguistic capital as a theoretical frame, this study builds upon the extant literature to examine the relationship between community linguistic isolation and language-minority 10th-grade student achievement outcomes. I find that language minority achievement gaps are three to five tenths of a standard deviation in reading and math but that the effect is attenuated by increased levels of linguistic isolation. These results appear robust to a number of specifications. Possible reasons for the attenuation are also discussed.
AbediJ.LordC. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219–234.
3.
AndermanE. M. (2002). School effects on psychological outcomes during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 795–809.
4.
AriasM. B.Morillo-CampbellM. (2008). Promoting ELL parental involvement: Challenges in contested times. East Lansing, MI: Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice. Retrieved from http://epsl.asu.edu/epru/documents/EPSL-0801–250-EPRU.pdf
5.
BaliV. A.AlvarezR. M. (2004). The race gap in student achievement scores: Longitudinal evidence from a racially diverse school district. Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), 393–415.
6.
BattistichV.SolomonD.KimD.WatsonM.SchapsE. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motives, and performance: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 627–658.
7.
BennerA. D.CrosnoeR. (2011). The racial/ethnic composition of elementary schools and young children’s academic and socioemotional functioning. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 621–646.
8.
CallahanR.WilkinsonL.MullerC. (2010). Academic achievement and course taking among language minority youth in US schools: Effects of ESL placement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 84–117.
9.
CamarotaS. A. (2011). A record-setting decade of immigration, 2000 to 2010. Washington, DC: Center for Immigration Studies.
10.
CollC. G. E.MarksA. K. E. (2012). The immigrant paradox in children and adolescents: Is becoming American a developmental risk?Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Delgado-GaitanC. (2001). The power of community: mobilizing for family and schooling. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.
13.
DonatoR. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In LantolfJ. P.AppelG. (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Westport, CT: Ablex.
14.
EfronB. (1981). Nonparametric estimates of standard error: the jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods. Biometrika, 68(3), 589–599.
FloresS. M.ParkT. J. (2013). Race, Ethnicity, and college success examining the continued significance of the minority-serving institution. Educational Researcher, 42(3), 115–128.
17.
FongA. B.BaeS.HuangM. (2010). Patterns of student mobility among English language learner students in Arizona public schools (Issues and Answers Report, REL 2010-No. 093). Washington, DC: U.S Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West.
18.
FryR. (2007). How far behind in math and reading are English language learners?Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
19.
FryR., & Pew Hispanic Center. (2005). The higher drop-out rate of foreign-born teens: The role of schooling abroad. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
20.
GándaraP. (1982). Passing through the eye of the needle: High-achieving Chicanas. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 4(2), 167–179.
21.
GándaraP. (1994). Choosing higher education: Educationally ambitious Chicanos and the path to social mobility. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2(8), 1–43.
22.
GándaraP.OrfieldG. (2012). Segregating Arizona’s English learners: A return to the “Mexican room”?Teachers College Record, 114(9).
23.
GassS. M.MackeyA.PicaT. (1998). The Role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 299–307.
24.
GiffordB. R.ValdésG. (2006). The linguistic isolation of Hispanic students in California’s public schools: The challenge of reintegration. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 105(2), 125–154.
25.
GlickJ. E.WalkerL.LuzL. (2013). Linguistic isolation in the home and community: Protection or risk for young children?Social Science Research, 42, 140–154.
26.
GoldsmithP. R. (2009). Schools or neighborhoods or both? Race and ethnic segregation and educational attainment. Social Forces, 87(4), 1913–1941.
27.
GoldsmithP. R. (2011). Coleman revisited: School segregation, peers, and frog ponds. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 508–535.
28.
GonzalezR.PadillaA. M. (1997). The academic resilience of Mexican American high school students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19(3), 301–317.
29.
HagyA. P.StaniecJ. (2002). Immigrant status, race, and institutional choice in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 21(4), 381–392.
30.
HanushekE. A. (1995). Education production functions. In International encyclopedia of economics of education (pp. 277–281). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
31.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2002). New evidence about Brown v. Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition on achievement (No. w8741). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
32.
IngelsS. J.PrattD. J.RogersJ. E.SiegelP. H.StuttsE. S. (2004). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: Base year data file user’s manual (NCES 2004-405). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2004405
33.
JencksC.MayerS. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In LynnL. E.McGearyM. G. (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34.
JohnsonM. (2003). A philosophy of second language acquisition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
LaddH. F. (2012). Education and poverty: Confronting the evidence. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(2), 203–227.
36.
LillieK. E.MarkosA.EstrellaA.NguyenT.PeerK.PerezK.. . . WileyT. G. (2010). Policy in practice: The implementation of structured English immersion in Arizona. Los Angeles: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, University of California.
37.
MenkenK. (2008). English learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
38.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
39.
MoranR. F. (2005). Undone by law: The uncertain legacy of Lau v. Nichols. Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, 16, 1–10.
40.
MorrisJ. (1999). A pillar of strength: An African-American school’s communal bonds with families and community since Brown. Urban Education, 33(5), 584–605.
41.
OrellanaM. F.ReynoldsJ.DornerL.MezaM. (2003). In other words: Translating or “para-phrasing” as a family literacy practice in immigrant households. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 12–34.
42.
PavlenkoA.LantolfJ. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re) construction of selves. In LantolfJ. P. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155–177). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
PoehnerM. E.LantolfJ. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233–265.
44.
PortesA. (2000). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. In LesserE. L. (Ed.), Knowledge and social capital (pp. 43–67). Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
45.
PortesA.MacLeodD. (1999). Educating the second generation: Determinants of academic achievement among children of immigrants in the United States. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 25(3), 373–396.
46.
RaleighE.KaoG. (2010). Do immigrant minority parents have more consistent college aspirations for their children?Social Science Quarterly, 91(4), 1083–1102.
47.
RampeyB. D.DionG. S.DonahueP. L. (2009). NAEP 2008: Trends in academic progress (NCES 2009–479). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
48.
ReardonS. F.GalindoC. (2009). The Hispanic-White achievement gap in math and reading in the elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 853–891.
49.
RolstadK.MahoneyK.GlassG. V. (2005). The big picture: A meta-analysis of program effectiveness research on English language learners. Educational Policy, 19(4), 572–594.
50.
RumbautR. G. (2008). The coming of the second generation: Immigration and ethnic mobility in Southern California. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 620(1), 196–236.
51.
SchaferJ. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(1), 3–15.
52.
SfardA. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
ShoenL. T. (2011). Conceptual and methodological issues in sociocultural research and theory development in education. In MacInerneyD. M.WalkerR. A.LiemG. A. D. (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: Looking back, looking forward (pp. 11–42). New York, NY: Information Age.
55.
Suárez-OrozcoC.Suárez-OrozcoM. M. (2009). Educating Latino immigrant students in the twenty-first century: Principles for the Obama administration. Harvard Educational Review, 79(2), 327–340.
56.
ThomasW.CollierV. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Washington, DC: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.
57.
ToddP. E.WolpinK. I. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement*. Economic Journal, 113(485), F3–F33.
VegaW. A.AngA.RodriguezM. A.FinchB. K. (2011). Neighborhood protective effects on depression in Latinos. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(1), 114–126.
60.
VillenasS.DeyhleD. (1999) Critical race theory and ethnographies challenging the stereotypes: Latino families, schooling, resilience and resistance. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(4), 413–445.
61.
WangJ.GoldschmidtP. (1999). Opportunity to learn, language proficiency, and immigrant status effects on mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 93(2), 101–111.
62.
WilsonW. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
64.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
65.
ZhouM. (1992). New York’s Chinatown: The socioeconomic potential of an urban enclave. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
