Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study compared immigrant and nonimmigrant educational achievement (i.e., the immigrant gap) in math by reexamining the explanatory power of race and socioeconomic status (SES)—two variables, perhaps, most commonly considered in educational research. Four research questions were explored through growth curve modeling, factor analysis, and regression analysis on a sample of participants in the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study–Kindergarten Cohort of 1998 (ECLS-K) from kindergarten to eighth grade (N = 6,861). Findings indicated that immigrant students who had been in the United States since at least their preschool years had lower math achievement than nonimmigrants when they began kindergarten; 1.75-generation students caught up to their nonimmigrant peers but second-generation students did not. Nationality played a greater role in determining immigrant performance than did race. Educational selectivity had significant explanatory power over SES in accounting for gaps between immigrant and nonimmigrant achievement. Mother’s educational selectivity was positively associated with parental involvement and center-based early childhood education. This study suggests that immigrant status alone is not a particularly powerful indicator of need for additional educational services nor is immigrant’s race in the absence of information about nationality. Because educational selectivity had positive and negative associations with educational achievement, encouraging parents with low educational selectivity to adopt the parenting processes of those with high educational selectivity cannot be recommended as a policy implication of this study. However, the incorporation of educational selectivity as a measure in future research is highly warranted due to its explanatory power regarding immigrant math achievement.

Keywords

achievement gaps immigrant education immigrant paradox educational selectivity immigrant nationality and race

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alba

Nee

(2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Barnett

R. C.

Marshall

N. L.

Raudensbush

S. W.

Brennan

R. T.

(1993). Gender and the relationship between job experiences and psychological distress: A study of dual earner couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 794-806.

Borjas

G. J.

(1987). Self-selection and the earnings of immigrants. American Economic Review, 77, 531-553.

Chiswick

B. R.

DebBurman

(2004). Educational attainment: Analysis by immigrant generation. Economics of Education Review, 23, 361-379.

Crosnoe

(2007). Early child care and the school readiness of children from Mexican immigrant families. International Migration Review, 41, 152-181.

Farley

Alba

(2002). The new second generation in the United States. International Migration Review, 36, 669-701.

Feliciano

(2005a). Does selective migration matter? Explaining ethnic disparities in educational attainment among immigrant children. International Migration Review, 39, 841-871.

Feliciano

(2005b). Educational selectivity in U.S. immigration: How do immigrants compare to those left behind? Demography, 42, 131-152.

Fuligini

A. J.

(1997). The academic achievement of adolescents from immigrant families: The roles of family background, attitudes, and behavior. Child Development, 68, 351-363.

10.

Glick

J. E.

Hohmann-Marriott

(2007). Academic performance of young children in immigrant families: The significance of race, ethnicity, and national origin. International Migration Review, 41, 371-402.

11.

Glick

J. E.

White

M. J.

(2004). Post-secondary school participation of immigrant and native youth: The role of familial resources and educational expectations. Social Science Research, 33, 272-299.

12.

Hirschman

(2005). Immigration and the American century. Demography, 42, 595-620.

13.

Kao

(2004). Parental influences on the educational outcomes of immigrant youth. International Immigration Review, 38, 427-449.

14.

Kao

Tienda

(1995). Optimism and achievement: The educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 76, 1-19.

15.

Keith

P. B.

Lictman

M.V.

(1994). Does parental involvement influence the academic achievement of Mexican-American eighth graders? Results from the National Education Longitudinal Study. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 256-272.

16.

Magnuson

Lahaie

Waldfogel

(2006). Preschool and school readiness of children of immigrants. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 1241-1262.

17.

Marks

(2005). Accounting for immigrant nonimmigrant differences in reading and mathematics in twenty countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 925-946.

18.

Ogbu

J. U.

Simons

H. D.

(1998). Voluntary and involuntary minorities: A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 29, 155-188.

19.

Palacios

Guttmannova

Chase-Lansdale

P. L.

(2008). Early reading achievement of children in immigrant families: Is there an immigrant paradox? Developmental Psychology, 44, 1381-1395.

20.

Perreira

K. M.

Harris

K. M.

Lee

(2006). Making it in America: High school completion by immigrant and native youth. Demography, 43, 511-536.

21.

Pong

Hao

Gardner

(2005). The role of parenting styles and social capital in the school performance of immigrant Asian and Hispanic adolescents. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 928-950.

22.

Portes

MacLeod

(1996). Educational progress of children of immigrants: The roles of class, ethnicity, and school context. Sociology of Education, 69, 255-275.

23.

Portes

Zhou

(1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 530, 74-96.

24.

Qin

D. B.

(2006). Our child doesn’t talk to us anymore: Alienation in immigrant Chinese families. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 37, 162-179.

25.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

26.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

Cheong

Y. F.

Congdon

Toit

(2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

27.

Rosenbaum

Rochford

J. A.

(2008). Generational patterns in academic performance: The variable effects of attitudes and social capital. Social Science Research, 37, 350-372.

28.

Rumbaut

R. G.

(1997a). Assimilation and its discontent: Between rhetoric and reality. International Migration Review, 31, 923-960.

29.

Rumbaut

R. G.

(1997b). Paradoxes (and orthodoxies) of assimilation. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 483-511.

30.

Rumbaut

R. G.

(1997c). Ties that bind: Immigration and immigrant families in the United States. In Booth

Crouter

Landale

N. S.

(Eds.), International migration and family change (pp. 3-46), New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

31.

Rumbaut

R. G.

(2005). Turning points in the transition to adulthood: Determinants of educational attainment, incarceration, and early childhood among children of immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 1041-1086.

32.

Schnepf

S. V.

(2007). Immigrants’ educational disadvantage: An examination across ten countries and three surveys. Journal of Population Economics, 20, 527-545.

33.

Schwartz

A. E.

Stiefel

(2006). Is there a nativity gap? New evidence on the academic performance of immigrant students. Education Finance and Policy, 1, 17-49.

34.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

35.

Tillman

K. H.

Guo

Harris

K. M.

(2006). Grade retention among immigrant children. Social Science Research, 35, 129-156.

36.

Tourangeau

Nord

Lê

Pollack

J. M.

Atkins-Burnett

Hausken

E. G.

(2006). Combined User’s Manual for the ECLS-K Fifth-grade Data Files and Electronic Codebooks (NCES 2006-032). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.

37.

Tourangeau

Nord

Lê

Sorongon

A. G.

Najarian

(2009). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K), Combined User’s Manual for the ECLS-K Eighth-grade and K-8 Full Sample Data Files and Electronic Codebooks (NCES 2009-004). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

38.

Trejo

S. J.

(1997). Why do Mexican Americans earn low wages? Journal of the Political Economy, 105, 1235-1268.

39.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (n.d). Table 3: Total enrolment, school life expectancy and expenditure on education. Retrieved from http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/TableViewer/document.aspx?ReportId=143&IF_Language=eng

40.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). 2009 statistical abstract: The national data book. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/population.html

41.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). Early childhood longitudinal study: Kindergarten class of 1998-99 data files and electronic code book (CD-ROM) (NCES 2009-005). Washington, DC: Author.

42.

Waldinger

Lim

Cort

(2007). Bad jobs, good jobs, no jobs? The employment experience of Mexican American second generation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33, 1-35.

43.

White

M. J.

Glick

J. E.

(2000). Generational status, social capital, and routes out of high school. Sociological Forum, 15, 671-691.

A Hierarchical Examination of the Immigrant Achievement Gap

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References