The theoretical framework of intersectionality shows much promise in exploring how multiple social identities and their relationships with interlocking systems of power influence educational equity, particularly for historically underserved groups in education. Yet, social scientists have critiqued this framework for not adequately specifying how these dimensions shape life opportunities. This essay draws on the work of sociologist Floya Anthias to advance a conceptual model of intersectionality for educational research. This model addresses how different levels of analysis, types of practices, and relationships between social categories separately or together affect educational opportunities. To illustrate the model’s utility in research, policy, and practice, I apply this model to understand contextual influences on Latino im/migrant students’ college access.
AbesE. S.JonesS. R.McEwenM. K. (2007). Reconceptualizing the model of multiple dimensions of identity: The role of meaning-making capacity in the construction of multiple identities. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 1–22.
2.
AlderJ. (2013). A supreme challenge: Achieving the educational and societal benefits of diversity after the Supreme Court’s Fisher decision. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 6, 147–154.
3.
AnthiasF. (2013). Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality, and levels of analysis. Ethnicities, 13, 3–19.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2013). The last shall be the first: Best books in the race field since 2000. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 42, 31–40.
6.
BrownS. K.HirschmanC. (2006). The end of affirmative action in Washington State and its impact on the transition from high school to college. Sociology of Education, 79, 106–130.
7.
CalavitaK. (2010). Inside the state: The Bracero Program, immigration, and the INS. New Orleans, LA: Quid Pro.
8.
ChoS.CrenshawK. W.McCallL. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38, 785–810.
9.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
10.
CollinsP. H. (2007). Pushing the boundaries or business as usual? Race, class, and gender studies in sociological inquiry. In CalhounC. (Ed.), Sociology in America: A history (pp. 572–604). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
CollinsP. H. (2009). Foreword. In DillB. T.ZambranaR. E. (Eds.), Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice (pp. vii-xiii). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
12.
ContrerasF. (2011). Achieving equity for Latino students: Expanding the pathway to higher education through public policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
13.
CovarrubiasA. (2011). Quantitative intersectionality: A critical race analysis of the Chicana/o educational pipeline. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10, 86–105.
14.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
15.
DavisK. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9, 67–85.
16.
Delgado BernalD.VillalpandoO. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in academia: The struggle over the “legitimate” knowledge of faculty of color. Equity and Excellence in Education, 35, 169–180.
17.
DillB. T.McLaughlinA.NievesA. D. (2007). Future directions of feminist research: Intersectionality. In Hesse-BiberS. (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research, theory, and praxis (pp. 629–638). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
DillB. T.ZambranaR. E. (2009). Critical thinking about inequality: An emerging lens. In DillB. T.ZambranaR. E. (Eds.), Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice (pp. 1–21). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
19.
GándaraP.LosenD.AugustD.UriarteM.GómezM. C.HopkinsM. (2010). Forbidden language: A brief history of U.S. language policy. In GándaraP.HopkinsM. (Eds.), Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies (pp. 20–33). New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
GándaraP.OrfieldG. (2012). Segregating Arizona’s English Learners: A return to the “Mexican Room”?Teachers College Record, 114(9), 1–27.
21.
GibsonM. A.HidalgoN. D. (2009). Bridges to success in high school for migrant youth. Teachers College Record, 111, 683–711.
22.
GildersleeveR. (2010). Fracturing Opportunity. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
23.
GriffinK.ReddickR. (2011). Surveillance and Sacrifice: Gender differences in the mentoring patterns of Black professors at predominantly White research universities. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1032–1057.
24.
GutiérrezK. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148–164.
25.
HuberL. P. (2009). Challenging racist nativist framing: Acknowledging the community cultural wealth of undocumented Chicana college students to reframe the immigration debate. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 704–729.
KaoG.TiendaM. (1995). Optimism and achievement: The educational performance of im/migrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 76, 1–18.
29.
MarambaD.MuseusS. (2011). The utility of using mixed-methods and intersectionality approaches in conducting research on Filipino American students’ experiences with the campus climate and on sense of belonging. In GriffinK. A.MuseusS. D. (Eds.), Using mixed methods to study intersectionality in higher education (pp. 93–101). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Martínez AlemánA. M. (2006). Latino demographics, democratic individuality, and educational accountability: A pragmatist’s view. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 25–31.
31.
MasseyD. S.PrenK. A. (2012). Origins of the new Latino underclass. Race and Social Problems, 4, 5–17.
32.
MaxwellL. A. (2013, May15). Arizona ELL dispute continues, despite federal ruling. Education Week, 32(31), 17, 18.
33.
MenjivarC.AbregoL. (2012). Legal violence in the lives of immigrants: How immigration enforcement affects families, schools, and workplaces. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
34.
MitchellD. (2012). They saved the crops: Labor, landscape, and the struggle over industrial farming in Bracero-Era California. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
35.
MoraC. (2014). Making Hispanics: How activists, bureaucrats, and media constructed a new American. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
MurilloE.Jr. (2002). How does it feel to be a problem? In WorthamS.MurrilloE.Jr.HammanE. (Eds.), Education in the New Latino Diaspora (pp. 215–240). Westport, CT: Ablex.
NúñezA.-M. (2009). Creating pathways to college for migrant students: Assessing a migrant outreach program. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 14, 226–237.
40.
NuñezA.-M. (2014). Advancing an intersectionality framework in higher education: Power and Latino postsecondary opportunity. Handbook of Theory and Research in Higher Education, 29, 33–92.
41.
NúñezA.-M.GildersleeveR. (2014). Sociocritical matters: Migrant and Immigrant students’ college access. Manuscript in review.
42.
OakesJ.RogersJ.SilverD.ValladaresS.TerriquezV.McDonoughP.. . . LiptonM. (2006). Removing the roadblocks: Fair college opportunities for all California students. Los Angeles: UC All Campus Consortium for Research on Diversity and UCLA Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access.
43.
ObolerL. (1995). Ethnic labels, Latino lives: Identity and the politics of representation in the United States. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
44.
OrtizV.TellesE. (2012). Racial identity and racial treatment of Mexican Americans. Race and Social Problems, 4, 41–56.
45.
PachecoM. (2012). Learning in/through everyday resistance: A cultural-historical perspective on community resources and curriculum. Educational Researcher, 41, 121–132.
46.
PachecoM.NaoK. (2009). Rewriting identities: Using historicized writing to promote migrant students’ writing. Pedagogies, 4, 24–43.
47.
Pew Hispanic Center. (2010a). Hispanics and Arizona’s new immigration law. Washington, DC: Author.
PortesA.RumbautR. G. (2001). Legacies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
50.
PusserB.MarginsonS. (2012). Power, politics, and global rankings. In BastedoM. N. (Ed.), The organization of higher education (pp. 86–117). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
51.
RamírezE. (2013). Examining Latinos/as’ graduate school choice process: An intersectionality perspective. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 12, 23–36.
52.
Rios-AguilarC.GandaraP. (2012). Horne v. Flores and the future of language policy. Teachers College Record, 114(9), 1–13.
53.
RodríguezC. (2000). Changing race: Latinos, the Census, and the history of ethnicity. New York: New York University Press.
54.
RodríguezC. F. (2008). Latinos and im/migrants. Harvard Law Review, 11, 247–262.
55.
RoscignoV. J. (2011). Power, revisited. Social Forces, 90, 349–374.
SolórzanoD.VillalpandoO.OsegueraL. (2005). Educational inequities and Latina/o undergraduate students in the United States: A critical race analysis of their educational progress. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4, 272–294.
58.
SteeleC. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi. New York, NY: Norton.
59.
Suárez-OrozcoC.Suárez-OrozcoM.TodorovaI. (2008). Learning a New Land: Im/migrant Students in American Society. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
60.
TellesE. (2012). Race and social problems. Race and Social Problems, 4, 1-4.
61.
TiendaM. (2010, May25). Application behavior and campus diversity. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org (ID No. 15995.)
62.
VillalpandoO. (2004). Practical considerations of critical race theory and Latino critical race theory for Latino college students. New Directions for Student Services, 105, 41–50.
63.
VillenasS. (2002). Reinventing educación in new Latino communities. In WorthamS.MurrilloE.Jr.HammanE. (Eds.), Education in the New Latino Diaspora (pp. 215–240). Westport, CT: Ablex.
64.
WorthamS.Clonan-RoyK.LinkH.MartínezC. (2013, March). Scattered challenges, singular solutions: The new Latino diaspora. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(6), 14–19.
65.
WorthamS.MurilloE.Jr.HamannE. (2002). Education in the new Latino diaspora. Westport, CT: Ablex.
66.
ZambranaR. E.DillB. T. (2009).Conclusion: Future directions in knowledge building and institutional change. In DillB. T.ZambranaR. E. (Eds.), Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice (pp. 274–290). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
67.
ZuberiT. (2001). Thicker than blood: How racial statistics lie. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
