Design-based research (DBR) evolved near the beginning of the 21st century and was heralded as a practical research methodology that could effectively bridge the chasm between research and practice in formal education. In this article, the authors review the characteristics of DBR and analyze the five most cited DBR articles from each year of this past decade. They illustrate the context, publications, and most popular interventions utilized. They conclude that interest in DBR is increasing and that results provide limited evidence for guarded optimism that the methodology is meeting its promised benefits.
AngeliC.ValanidesN. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education, 52(1), 154-168.
BarabS.ThomasM.DodgeT.CarteauxR.TuzunH. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86-107.
7.
BarabS.ZuikerS.WarrenS.HickeyD.Ingram-GobleA.KwonE.-J.KouperI.HerringS. C. (2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts. Science Education, 91(5), 750-782.
8.
BodzinA. M. (2011). The implementation of a geospatial information technology (GIT)–supported land use change curriculum with urban middle school learners to promote spatial thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 281-300.
9.
BoydstonJ. (1971). John Dewey: The early works. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
10.
BrownA. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
11.
ChristensenC.HornM.JohnsonC. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.
CollinsA.JosephD.BielaczycK. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
15.
ConceicaoS.SherryL.GibsonD. (2004). Using developmental research to design, develop and evaluate an urban education portal. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15(3), 271–286.
16.
HarzingA. W. (2010). Publish or perish. Melbourne, Australia: Tarma Software Research.
17.
HarzingA. W.van der WalR. (2008). Google Scholar: The democratization of citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 61–73.
18.
HerringtonJ.McKenneyS.ReevesT. C.OliverR. (2007). Design-based research and doctoral students: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal. Retrieved from www.editlib.org/d/25967/proceeding_25967.pdf
19.
JahnkeI. (2010). Dynamics of social roles in a knowledge management community. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 533-546.
20.
KetelhutD. (2007). The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in River City, a multi-user virtual environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1):99–111. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-9038-y10.1007/s10956-006-9038-y
21.
KetelhutD. J.NelsonB. C.ClarkeJ.DedeC. (2010). A multi-user virtual environment for building higher order inquiry skills in science. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 56-68.
22.
KlopferE.SquireK. (2008). Environmental detectives—The development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203-228.
23.
KoehlerM. J.MishraP.YahyaK. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers and Education, 49(3), 740-762.
24.
KuhnG.QuigleyA. (1997). Understanding and using action research in practice settings. In QuigleyA.KuhneG. (Eds.), Creating practical knowledge through action research (pp. 23–40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
LooiC.-K.ChenW.NgF. K. (2010). Collaborative activities enabled by GroupScribbles (GS): An exploratory study of learning effectiveness. Computers and Education, 54(1), 14-26.
26.
MaxcyS. J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 51–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
27.
MingfongJ.Yam SanC.Ek MingT. (2010). Unpacking the design process in design-based research. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
OhaE.ReevesT. (2010). The implications of the differences between design research and instructional systems design for educational technology researchers and practitioners. Educational Media International, 4(47), 263–275.
30.
OnwuegbuzieA.LeechN. (2007). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron?Quality and Quantity, 41(2), 233–249. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3
31.
ReevesT. (2000, April). Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through “design experiments” and other developmental strategies. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. Retrieved from http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/~treeves/AERA2000Reeves.pdf
32.
ReevesT. C.HerringtonJ.OliverR. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 96-115.
StappersP. J. (2007). Doing design as a part of doing research. In MichelR. (Ed.), Design research now (pp. 81-91). Basel, UK: Birkhauser. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8472-2_6
TiberghienA.VinceJ.GaidiozP. (2009). Design-based research: Case of a teaching sequence on mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2275–2314. Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/09500690902874894
37.
TimulakL. (2009). Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: A tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4/5), 591–600.
38.
ZhangJ.ScardamaliaM.ReeveR.MessinaR. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7-44.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
