To document wiki usage in U.S. K–12 settings, this study examined a representative sample drawn from a population of nearly 180,000 wikis. The authors measured the opportunities wikis provide for students to develop 21st-century skills such as expert thinking, complex communication, and new media literacy. The authors found four types of wiki usage: (a) trial wikis and teacher resource-sharing sites (40%), (b) teacher content-delivery sites (34%), (c) individual student assignments and portfolios (25%), and (d) collaborative student presentations and workspaces (1%). Wikis created in schools serving low-income students have fewer opportunities for 21st-century skill development and shorter lifetimes than wikis from schools serving affluent students. This study illustrates the exciting potential that Web 2.0 data warehouses offer for educational research.
AttewellP. (2001). Comment: The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 252–259.
3.
AttewellP. (2003). Beyond the digital divide. In AttewellP.SeelN. (Eds.), Disadvantaged teens and computer technologies (pp. 15–34). Munster, Germany: Waxmann.
4.
AttewellP.BattleJ. (1999). Home computers and school performance. Information Society, 15(1), 1–10.
5.
boydd. (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked contexts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
6.
ChiuM. M. (2008). Flowing toward correct contributions during group problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 415–463.
7.
Clarke-MiduraJ.DedeC. (2010). Assessment, technology, and change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 309–328.
8.
CortezC.NussbaumM.WoywoodG.AravenaR. (2009). Learning to collaborate by collaborating: A face-to-face collaborative activity for measuring and learning basics about teamwork. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 1261–142. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00298.x10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00298.x
9.
CubanL. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
DedeC. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In BellancaJ. A.BrandtR. S. (Eds.), 21st century skills : Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51–76). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
11.
FriedmanT. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
12.
GrantL. (2009). “I DON’T CARE DO UR OWN PAGE!” A case study of using wikis for collaborative work in a UK secondary school. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 105–117.
13.
GrayL.ThomasN. T.LewisL. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009 (NCES No. 2010040). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
14.
GreenhowC.RobeliaB.HughesJ. E. (2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we takenow? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246–259.
15.
JenkinsH. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture : Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
JeongA. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25–43.
17.
LarussonJ.AltermanR. (2009). Wikis to support the “collaborative” part of collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 371–402.
18.
Learning about teaching—Initial findings from the measures of effective teaching project. (2010). Seattle, WA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
19.
LevyF.MurnaneR. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
LiC.BernoffJ. (2008). Groundswell: Winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
21.
MoskaliukJ.KimmerleJ.CressU. (2009). Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: Effects of incongruity between knowledge and information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 549–561. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00331.x10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00331.x
22.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2007–2008). Public elementary/secondary school universe survey data [Data file]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/
23.
NystrandM.GamoranA.CarbonaroW. (1998). Towards and ecology of learning: The case of classroom discourse and its effects on writing in high school English and social studies (No. 11001). Albany, NY: National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement.
24.
NystrandM.WuL. L.GamoranA.ZeiserS.LongD. A. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35(2), 135–198.
OriogunP.RavenscroftA.CookJ. (2005). Validating an approach to examining cognitive engagement within online groups. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 197–214.
27.
PapertS. (1980). Mindstorms : Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
28.
ReichJ. (2008). Reworking the Web, reworking the world: How Web 2.0 is changing our society (Beyond Current Horizons Review paper, Challenge No. 2). Bristol, UK: Futurelab.
29.
ReichJ.MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2010). The Wiki Quality Instrument: A tool to evaluate the degree to which teachers use wiki learning environments to promote deeper learning. Unpublished manuscript.
30.
ReichJ.DaccordT. (2008). Best ideas for teaching with technology: A practical guide for teachers, by teachers. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
31.
RichardsonW. (2008). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful Web tools for classrooms (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
32.
ScardamaliaM.BereiterC. (1993). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.
33.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
TrentinG. (2009). Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 43–55. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00276.x10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00276.x
36.
TurkleS. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
37.
WarschauerM.MatuchniakT. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. doi:10.3102/0091732X0934979110.3102/0091732X09349791
38.
WenglinskyH. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between education technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
39.
WiskeM. S.FranzK. R.BreitL. (2005). Teaching for understanding with technology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
ZuckermanE. (2010). International reporting in the age of participatory media. Daedalus, 139(2), 66–75. doi:10.1162/daed.2010.139.2.6610.1162/daed.2010.139.2.66
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
