Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to estimate the impact of Race to the Top (RTTT) on test scores, both overall and in terms of narrowing demographic achievement gaps—a central focus in the original RTTT applications. We draw on student-level NAEP data in reading and mathematics for fourth and eighth graders from 1996 to 2019. An event-study difference-in-difference research design is used to estimate the impact RTTT had on NAEP scores. We show that RTTT had a consistently positive effect on test scores with average treatment effects ranging from .06 to .11 standard deviations, depending on grade and subject. Estimates are generally larger for Black students and, to a lesser degree, economically disadvantaged students.

Keywords

Race to the Top student achievement education policy education reform

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

Larcker

D. F.

Wang

C. C. Y.

(2022). How much should we trust staggered difference in-differences estimates? Journal of Financial Economics, 144(2), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.01.004

Bakeman

(2015). As race to the top ends, controversy continues. Politico.

Barnum

(2022, October 24). Nation's report card: Massive drop in math scores, slide in reading linked to COVID disruption. Chalkbeat.

Bleiberg

(2021). Does the Common Core have a common effect? An exploration of effects on academically vulnerable students. AERA Open, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211010727

Bleiberg

Brunner

Harbatkin

Kraft

M. A.

Springer

M. G.

(2021). The effect of teacher evaluation on achievement and attainment: Evidence from statewide reforms (EdWorkingPaper No. 21-496). Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.

Carnoy

Loeb

(2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024004305

Childs

Russell

J. L.

(2017). Improving low-achieving schools: Building state capacity to support school improvement through race to the top. Urban Education, 52(2), 236–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916656899

Coburn

C. E.

Hill

H. C.

Spillane

J. P.

(2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation: The Common Core State Standards and implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16651080

Cohen

D. K.

Mehta

J. D.

(2017). Why reform sometimes succeeds: Understanding the conditions that produce reforms that last. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 644–690. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217700078

10.

Dahill-Brown

S. E.

(2019). Education, equity, and the states: How variations in state governance make or break reform. Harvard Education Press.

11.

De Chaisemartin

d’Haultfoeuille

. (2023). Two-way fixed effects and differences-in-differences with heterogeneous treatment effects: A survey. The Econometrics Journal, 26(3), C1–C30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utac017

12.

Dee

T. S.

Jacob

(2011). The impact of No Child Left Behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(3), 418–446.

13.

Dewey

D. C.

Fahle

E. M.

Kane

T. J.

Reardon

S. F.

Staiger

D. O.

(2024). Federal pandemic relief and academic recovery (No. w32897). National Bureau of Economic Research.

14.

Donaldson

M. L.

Firestone

(2021). Rethinking teacher evaluation using human, social, and material capital. Journal of Educational Change, 22(4), 501–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09405-z

15.

Dragoset

Thomas

Herrmann

Deke

James-Burdumy

Graczewski

Boyle

Tanenbaum

Giffin

Wei

T. E.

(2016). Race to the Top: Implementation and relationship to student outcomes (NCEE 2017- 4001). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

16.

Edgerton

A. K.

Desimone

L. M.

(2019). Mind the gaps: Differences in how teachers, principals, and districts experience college- and career-readiness policies. American Journal of Education, 125(4), 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1086/704099

17.

Finnan

L. A.

Domenech

D. A.

(2014). Common Core and other state standards: Superintendents feel optimism, concern and lack. The School Superintendents Association. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED553304.pdf

18.

Goldhaber

Falken

(2024). ESSER and student achievement: Assessing the impacts of the largest one-time federal investment in K12 schools (CALDER Working Paper No. 301-0624). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (CALDER).

19.

Goodman-Bacon

(2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014

20.

Grabarek

Kallemeyn

L. M.

(2020). Does teacher data use lead to improved student achievement? A review of the empirical evidence. Teachers College Record, 122(12), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681201220120

21.

Hanushek

E. A.

Raymond

M. E.

(2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20091

22.

Hanushek

E. A.

Schwerdt

Wiederhold

Woessmann

(2015). Returns to skills around the world: Evidence from PIAAC. European Economic Review, 73, 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.10.006

23.

Hershberg

Robertson-Kraft

(2009). A grand bargain for education reform: New rewards and supports for new accountability. Harvard Education Press.

24.

Hess

Finn

(2022, June). The end of school reform?American Enterprise Institute. https://www.aei.org/op-eds/the-end-of-school-reform/

25.

Howell

W. G.

Magazinnik

(2017). Presidential prescriptions for State policy: Obama’s Race to the Top initiative. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36(3), 502–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21986

26.

Howell

W. G.

Magazinnik

(2020). Financial incentives in vertical diffusion: The variable effects of Obama’s Race to the Top initiative on state policy making. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 20(2), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440019888229

27.

Kober

Rentner

D. S.

(2011). Common Core State Standards: Progress and challenges in school districts’ implementation. Center on Education Policy.

28.

Koedel

Springer

M. G.

Tan

(2019). Teacher performance ratings and professional improvement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 12(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2018.1490471

29.

Kraft

M. A.

(2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x20912798

30.

Kraft

M. A.

Gilmour

A. F.

(2017). Revisiting the widget effect: Teacher evaluation reforms and the distribution of teacher effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 234–249.

31.

Ladd

H. F.

(2017). NCLB: Response to Jacob. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36(2), 477–480.

32.

Lee

Reeves

(2012). Revisiting the impact of NCLB high-stakes school accountability, capacity, and resources: State NAEP 1990-2009 reading and math achievement gaps and trends. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2), 209–231.

33.

Liebowitz

D. D.

(2022). Teacher evaluation for growth and accountability: Under what conditions does it improve student outcomes? Harvard Educational Review, 92(4), 533–565. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.4.533

34.

Manna

Ryan

L. L.

(2011). Competitive grants and educational federalism: President Obama’s race to the top program in theory and practice. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 41(3), 522–546. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjr021

35.

Marcus

Sant’Anna

P. H.

(2021). The role of parallel trends in event study settings: An application to environmental economics. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 8(2), 235–275. https://doi.org/10.1086/711509

36.

McGuinn

(2012). Stimulating reform: Race to the Top, competitive grants and the Obama education agenda. Educational Policy, 26(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904811425911

37.

McGuinn

(2016). From no child left behind to the every student succeeds act: Federalism and the education legacy of the Obama administration. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 46(3), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjw014

38.

McLaughlin

M. W.

Elmore

R. F.

(1982). Implementation of federal education programs: Implications for future federal policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 60(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619568209538383

39.

Polikoff

(2021). Beyond standards: The fragmentation of education governance and the promise of curriculum reform. Harvard Education Press.

40.

Rambachan

Roth

(2023). A more credible approach to parallel trends. Review of Economic Studies, 90(5), 2555–2591. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad018

41.

Ravitch

(2020). Slaying Goliath: The passionate resistance to privatization and the fight to save America's public schools. Vintage.

42.

Redding

Nguyen

T. D.

(2020). The relationship between school turnaround and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(4), 493–519. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720949513

43.

Redding

Nguyen

T. D.

(2025). The effects of race to the top on teacher qualifications, work environments, and job attitudes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 47(1), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737231210291

44.

Rogers

Tarsitano

Sikali

(2014). National Assessment of Educational Profress (NAEP) 2013 mathematics and reading grades 4 and 8 assessments restricted-use data files data companion. National Center for Education Statistics.

45.

Roth

Sant'Anna

P. H.

Bilinski

Poe

(2023). What's trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 2218–2244.

46.

Russell

J. L.

Meredith

Childs

Stein

M. K.

Prine

D. W.

(2015). Designing inter-organizational networks to implement education reform an analysis of state Race to the Top applications. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 92–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737145273

47.

Schueler

B. E.

Asher

C. A.

Larned

K. E.

Mehrotra

Pollard

(2022). Improving low-performing schools: A meta-analysis of impact evaluation studies. American Educational Research Journal, 59(5), 975–1010. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312211060855

48.

Steinberg

M. P.

Sartain

(2021). What explains the race gap in teacher performance ratings? Evidence from Chicago Public Schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720970204

49.

Stosich

E. L.

(2016). Building teacher and school capacity to teach to ambitious standards in high-poverty schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.010

50.

Song

Garet

M. S.

Yang

Atchison

(2022). Did states’ adoption of more rigorous standards lead to improved student achievement? Evidence from a comparative interrupted time series study of standards-based reform. American Educational Research Journal, 59(3), 610–647. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312211058460

51.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009, November). Race to the Top Program executive summary. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED557422.pdf

52.

VanGronigen

B. A.

Meyers

C. V.

(2019). How state education agencies are administering school turnaround efforts: 15 years after No Child Left Behind. Educational Policy, 33(3), 423–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817691846

53.

Weiss

(2015). Disappointing NAEP scores and the questions they raise. Economic Policy Institute.

54.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2021). Two-way fixed effects, the two-way Mundlak regression, and difference-indifferences estimators. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3906345

55.

Zimmer

Henry

G. T.

Kho

(2017). The effects of school turnaround in Tennessee’s achievement school district and innovation zones. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 670–696. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717705729

The Effects of Race to the Top on Student Achievement: Evidence From National Data

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References