We identify systematic differences in ninth-grade teachers’ effects on students’ course grades in their class (ninth-grade grade value-add), their persistent effects on students’ grades in the same subject of the next grade (tenth-grade grade value-add, representing effectiveness at academic preparation), and mismatch between the grades they give and students’ subsequent performance (representing inaccurate measurement). Persistent effects and mismatch contribute to observed variation in grades. Teacher effects are stable across years, and their effects are predictive of students’ long-term outcomes, including eleventh-grade ACT scores, graduating GPA, and high school graduation. Persistent effects show consistent long-term benefits, while the relationship of grading mismatch with academic outcomes is nuanced.
AtkinsonR. C.GeiserS. (2009). Reflections on a century of college admissions tests. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 665–676. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x09351981
2.
AppletonJ. J.ChristensonS. L.FurlongM. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
4.
BastedoM. N.UmbrichtM.BauschE.ByunB.-K.BaiY. (2023). Contextualized high school performance: Evidence to inform equitable holistic, test-optional, and test-free admissions policies. AERA Open, 9, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231197413
5.
BettsJ. R.GroggerJ. (2003). The impact of grading standards on student achievement, educational attainment, and entry-level earnings. Economics of Education Review, 22(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7757(02)00059-6
6.
BowenW. G.McPhersonM.ChingosM. M. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America's public universities.
7.
BowersA. J.SprottR.TaffS. A. (2013). Do we know who will drop out? A review of the predictors of dropping out of high school: Precision, sensitivity, and specificity. The High School Journal, 96(2), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2013.0000
8.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA.CockingR. (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience, and school. National Research Council. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853
BrookhartS. M.GuskeyT. R.BowersA. J.McMillanJ. H.SmithJ. K.SmithL. F.SmithL. F.StevensM. T.WelshM. E. (2016). A century of grading research: Meaning and value in the most common educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 803–848. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069
11.
CamaraW.KimmelE.ScheunemanJ.SawtellE.A. (2004). Whose grades are inflated? (Research Report No. 2003-4). New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
12.
CarawayK.TuckerC. M.ReinkeW. M.HallC. (2003). Self-efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 40(4), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10092
13.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ. N.RockoffJ. E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. The American Economic Review, 104(9), 56. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2593
College Board. (2017). Critical evidence 2.1.1.a: SAT suite technical manual appendixes. The College Board.
16.
CunhaF.HeckmanJ. J. (2008). Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Journal of Human Resources, 43(4), 738–782. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2008.0019
17.
FarringtonC. A.RoderickM.AllensworthE.NagaokaJ.KeyesT. S.JohnsonD. W.BeechumN. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance—a critical literature review. Consortium on Chicago School Research.
18.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
19.
GeiserS.SantelicesM. V. (2007). Validity of high-school grades in predicting student success beyond the freshman year: High-school record vs. standardized tests as indicators of four-year college outcomes (Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE. 6.07). Center for Studies in Higher Education.
20.
GilraineM.PopeN. G. (2021). Making teaching last: Long-run value-added (Working Paper No. w29555). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w29555
21.
GershensonS. (2018). Grade inflation in high schools (2005–2016). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
22.
GodfreyK. E. (2011). Investigating grade inflation and non-equivalence (Research Report 2011-2). College Board.
23.
GoldhaberD. D.GoldschmidtP.TsengF. (2013). Teacher value-added at the high-school level: Different models, different answers?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712466938
24.
GwynneJ. A.MooreP. T. (2017). Chicago’s charter high schools: Organizational features, enrollment, school transfers, and student performance (Research Report). University of Chicago Consortium on School Research.
25.
HurwitzM.LeeJ. (2018). Grade inflation and the role of standardized testing. In BuckleyJ.LetukasL.WildavskyB. (Eds.) Measuring success: Testing, grades, and the future of college admissions. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
JacksonC. K. (2018). What do test scores miss? The importance of teacher effects on non–test score outcomes. Journal of Political Economy, 126(5), 2072–2107. https://doi.org/10.1086/699018
27.
JacksonC. K.KiguelS.PorterS. C.EastonJ. Q. (2024). Who benefits from attending effective high schools?Journal of Labor Economics, 42(3), 717–751. https://doi.org/10.1086/724568
28.
JenningsJ. L.BearakJ. M. (2014). “Teaching to the test” in the NCLB era: How test predictability affects our understanding of student performance. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14554449
29.
KaneT. J.McCaffreyD. F.MillerT.StaigerD. O. (2013). Have we identified effective teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment (MET Project Research Paper). Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
30.
KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation (Working Paper No. w14607). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14607
LeeV. E.SmithJ. B.PerryT. E.SmylieM. A. (1999). Social support, academic press, and student achievement: A view from the middle grades in Chicago. Consortium on Chicago School Research.
36.
MahatmyaD.LohmanB. J.MatjaskoJ. L.FarbA. F. (2012). Engagement across developmental periods. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 45–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_3
37.
MitchellR. M.KenslerL. A.Tschannen-MoranM. (2015). Examining the effects of instructional leadership on school academic press and student achievement. Journal of School Leadership, 25(2), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500202
38.
MozenterZ. (2019). Essays on the effects of teacher grading standards and other teaching practices [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill]. https://doi.org/10.17615/ejqp-rn19
39.
PattisonE.GrodskyE.MullerC. (2013). Is the sky falling? Grade inflation and the signaling power of grades. Educational Researcher, 42(5), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x13481382
40.
ProtikA.WalshE.ReschA.IsenbergE.KopaE. (2013). Does tracking of students bias value-added estimates for teachers? (No. bc26562de576484b9c40626f2c5d6da8). Mathematica Policy Research.
