State policy makers are constantly looking for ways to improve teacher quality. An oft tried method is to increase the rigor of licensure exams. This study utilizes state administrative data from Arkansas to determine whether raising the cut-scores on licensure exams would improve the quality of the teacher workforce. In addition, the study explores the trade-offs of such a policy decision. It is concluded that raising the required passing score on the Praxis II would increase the quality of the teacher workforce, as measured by value-added student achievement. This change, however, would be accompanied with an important trade-off as it would reduce the number of minority teachers and potentially lead to negative outcomes in disadvantaged schools.
AaronsonD.BarrowL.SanderW. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 95-135.
2.
BallouD.SandersW.WrightP. (2004). Controlling for student background in value-added assessments of teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 37-65.
3.
BennettC. I.McWhorterL. M.KuykendallJ. A. (2006). Will I ever teach? Latino and African American students’ perspectives on PRAXIS I. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 531-575.
4.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RockoffJ.WychoffJ. (2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high poverty schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 793-818.
5.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ. N.RockoffJ. E. (2011, December). The long-term impacts of teachers: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood (Working Paper No. 17699). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Human Resources, 41, 778-820.
7.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45, 655-681.
8.
DeeT. S. (2005). A teacher like me: Does race, ethnicity, or gender matter?The American Economic Review, 95, 158-165.
9.
EgaliteA. J.KisidaB.WintersM. A. (2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teachers on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 45, 44-52.
10.
FergusonR. F.LaddH. F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In LaddH. F. (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 256-298.
FryerR. G.Jr.LevittS. D. (2004). Understanding the Black-White test score gap in the first two years of school. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 447-464.
13.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
14.
GershensonS.HoltS. B.PapageorgeN. W. (2016). Who believes in me? The effect of student–teacher demographic match on teacher expectations. Economics of Education Review, 52, 209-224.
15.
GitomerD. H.BrownT. L.BonettJ. (2011). Useful signal or unnecessary obstacle? The role of basic skills tests in teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 431-445.
16.
GoldhaberD. (2007). Everyone’s doing it, but what does teacher testing tell us about teacher effectiveness?Journal of Human Resources, 42, 765-794.
17.
GoldhaberD.HansenM. (2010). Race, gender, and teacher testing: How informative a tool is teacher licensure testing?American Educational Research Journal, 47, 218-251.
18.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.O’BrienD. M.RivkinS. G. (2005, February). The market for teacher quality (Working Paper No. 11154). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w11154
19.
HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2006). Teacher quality. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 2, 1051-1078.
20.
KleinerM. M. (2000). Occupational licensing. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 189-202.
21.
LathamA. S.GitomerD.ZiomekR. (1999). What the tests tell us about new teachers. Educational Leadership, 56(8), 23-26.
22.
MarantoR.ShulsJ. V. (2012). How do we get them on the farm? Efforts to improve rural teacher recruitment and retention in Arkansas. Rural Educator, 34(1), n1.
23.
McGeeJ.CostrellR. (2010, January5). Who leaves and who stays: An analysis of teachers’ behavioral response to retirement incentives. Paper presented at the American Economic Association Conference, Atlanta, GA.
24.
MemoryD. M.ColemanC. L.WatkinsS. D. (2003). Possible tradeoffs in raising basic skills cutoff scores for teacher licensure: A study with implications for participation of African Americans in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 217-227.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013b). National Assessment of Educational Progress. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
27.
NguyenH. H. D.RyanA. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1314-1334.
28.
PetchauerE. (2012). Teacher licensure exams and Black teacher candidates: Toward new theory and promising practice. The Journal of Negro Education, 81, 252-267.
ShulsJ. V.TrivittJ. (2015a). Teacher effectiveness: An analysis of licensure screens. Educational Policy, 29, 645-675.
31.
ShulsJ. V.TrivittJ. (2015b). Teacher qualifications and productivity in secondary schools. Journal of School Choice: International Research and Reform, 9, 49-70.
32.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(5), 797.
33.
TellezK. (2003). Three themes on standards in teacher education: Legislative expediency, the role of external review, and test bias in the assessment of pedagogical knowledge. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30, 9-18.
34.
VillegasA. M.LucasT. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
35.
VillegasA. M.StromK.LucasT. (2012). Closing the racial/ethnic gap between students of color and their teachers: An elusive goal. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45, 283-301.
