Racial disproportionality in school discipline is an enduring systemic problem. This study is based on a collaboration with 14 school stakeholders: American Indian students, parents, community members, and educators at a high school in a community-driven problem-solving process called Indigenous Learning Lab (ILL). ILL members addressed the root causes of the racialized school discipline and created a new school discipline system. Using critical geography and decolonizing methodology as the theoretical and analytical framework, this study aimed to unpack the emergence of Thirdspace—a space of resistance, possibilities, and hopes—in ILL to address enduring racial disproportionality. Members challenged race-neutrality of data sense-making, mapped out dystopia, revitalized American Indian epistemology, and mapped out a real utopian vision of schooling.
AgnewJ. (2011). Space and place. In AgnewJ.LivingstoneD. (Eds.), Handbook of geographical knowledge (pp. 316–331). Sage.
2.
AnyonY.GregoryA.StoneS.FarrarJ.JensonJ. M.McQueenJ.DowningB.GreerE.SimmonsJ. (2016). Restorative interventions and school discipline sanctions in a large urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1663–1697. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216675719
3.
ArtilesA. J. (2019). Fourteenth annual Brown lecture in education research: Reenvisioning equity research: Disability identification disparities as a case in point. Educational Researcher, 48(6), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19871949
4.
BalA. (2011). Culturally responsive school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports framework. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
5.
BalA. (2016). From intervention to innovation: A cultural-historical approach to the racialization of school discipline. Interchange, 47, 409–427.
BalA. (2018). Culturally responsive positive behavioral interventions and supports: A process–oriented framework for systemic transformation. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 40(2), 144–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2017.1417579
8.
BalA.AfacanK.CakirH. I. (2018). Culturally responsive school discipline: Implementing learning lab at a high school for systemic transformation. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 1007–1050. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218768796
9.
BalA.BearA. B.KoD.OrieL. (2021). Indigenous learning lab: Inclusive knowledge-production and systemic design toward indigenous prolepsis. In CavendishW.SamsonJ. F. (Eds.), Intersectionality in education: Toward more equitable policy, research and practice (pp. 122–150). Teachers College Press.
10.
BalA.Betters-BubonJ.FishR. E. (2019). A multilevel analysis of statewide disproportionality in exclusionary discipline and the identification of emotional disturbance. Education and Urban Society, 51(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517716260
11.
BalA.KozleskiE. B.SchraderE. M.RodriguezE. M.PeltonS. (2014). Systemic transformation from the ground–up: Using learning lab to design culturally responsive schoolwide positive behavioral supports. Remedial and Special Education, 35(6), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514536995
12.
BangM.FaberL.GurneauJ.MarinA.SotoC. (2016). Community-based design research: Learning across generations and strategic transformations of institutional relations toward axiological innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1087572
13.
BangM.VossoughiS. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1181879
14.
BhabhaH. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
BourdieuP.AccardoA.BalazsG.BeaudS.BonvinF.BourdieuE. (1999). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Stanford University Press.
BruyneelK. (2007). The third space of sovereignty: The postcolinal politics of U.S.-indigenoue relations. University of Minessota Press.
20.
BurlaL.KnierimB.BarthJ.LiewaldK.DuetzM.AbelT. (2008). From text to codings: Intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nursing Research, 57(2), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNR.0000313482.33917.7d
21.
CamangianP.CariagaS. (2022). Social and emotional learning is hegemonic miseducation: Students deserve humanization instead. Race Ethnicity and Education, 25(7), 901–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2020.1798374
22.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
23.
EngeströmY. (2016). Studies in expansive learning: Learning what is not yet there. Cambridge University Press.
GrandeS. (2015). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
GregoryA.SkibaR. J.NogueraP. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin?Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357621
27.
GregoryA.Ward-SeidelA. R.CarterK. V. (2022). Twelve indicators of restorative practices implementation: A framework for educational leaders. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 31(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1824788
28.
GutiérrezK. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
29.
GutiérrezK.Baquedano-LopezP.TejedaC. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind Culture and Activity, 6(4), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733
30.
GutiérrezK. D.CortesK.CortezA.DiGiacomoD.HiggsJ.JohnsonP.LizárragaJ. R.MendozaE.TienJ.VakilS. (2017). Replacing representation with imagination: Finding ingenuity in everyday practices. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 30–60. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16687323
31.
GutiérrezK. D.EngeströmY.SanninoA. (2016). Expanding educational research and interventionist methodologies. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1183347
32.
GutiérrezK. D.JurowS. A.VakilS. (2020). Social design-based experiments: A utopian methodology for understanding new possibilities for learning. In NasirN. S.LeeC.PeaR.McKinney de RoystonM. (Eds.), The handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 330–347). Routledge.
HarveyD. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. Verso.
35.
hooksB. (1989). Choosing the margin as a space of radical openness. Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media, 36, 15–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44111660
36.
IrbyD. J. (2021). Stuck improving: Racial equity and school leadership. Harvard Education Press.
37.
IshimaruA. M.Barajas-LópezF.SunM.ScarlettK.AndersonE. (2022). Transforming the role of RPPs in remaking educational systems. Educational Researcher, 51(7), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X221098077
38.
JonesC.CizekS.HornerR.VincentC. (2006). Culturally responsive schoolwide positive behavior support: A case study in one school with a high proportion of Native American students. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 9(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.56829/muvo.9.1.0311x7477113q741
39.
KhalifaM. A.BriscoeF. (2015). A counternarrative autoethnography exploring school districts’ role in reproducing racism: Willful blindness to racial inequities. Teachers College Record, 117(8), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700801
KoD.BalA.Bird BearA.OrieL.MaweneD. (2023). Learning lab as a utopian methodology for future making: Decolonizing knowledge production toward racial justice in school discipline. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 30(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2023.2205391
42.
KoD.BalA.Bird BearA.SanninoA.EngeströmY. (2022). Transformative agency for justice: Addressing racial disparity of school discipline with the indigenous learning lab. Race Ethnicity and Education, 25(7), 997–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2021.1969903
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
45.
Leung-GagnéM.McCombsJ.ScottC.LosenD. J. (2022). Pushed out: Trends and disparities in out-of school suspension. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/235.277
46.
LewisD.CastledenH.ApostleR.FrancisS.Francis-StricklandK. (2021). Linking land displacement and environmental dispossession to Mi’kmaw health and well-being: Culturally relevant place-based interpretive frameworks matter. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 65(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12656
47.
LomawaimaK. T.McCartyT. L. (2006). “To remain an Indian”: Lessons in democracy from a century of Native American education. Teachers College Press.
48.
LosenD. J.MartinezP. (2020). Lost opportunities: How disparate school discipline continues to drive differences in the opportunity to learn. Learning Policy Institute. Center for Civil Rights Remedies at the Civil Rights Project, UCLA.
49.
MaweneD.BalA. (2020). Spatial othering: Examining residential areas, school attendance zones, and school discipline in an urbanizing school district. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28, 91–91. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.4676
50.
McGintyM.BangM. (2016). Narratives of dynamic lands: Science education, Indigenous knowledge and possible futures. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9685-5
51.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.
52.
NesperL. (2002). The walleye war: The struggle for Ojibwe spearfishing and treaty rights. Univerisity of Nebraska Press.
53.
OmiM.WinantM. (2015). The racial formation in the United States (3rd ed.). Routledge.
54.
PenuelW. R.RiedyR.BarberM. S.PeurachD. J.LeBouefW. A.ClarkT. (2020). Principles of collaborative education research with stakeholders: Toward requirements for a new research and development infrastructure. Review of Educational Research, 90(5), 627–674. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320938126
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
57.
SabzalianL. (2019). Indigenous children’s survivance in public schools. Routledge.
58.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
59.
SanninoA. (2015). The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation: Activity- based studies in the Vygotskian tradition. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.001
SkibaR. J.ChungC.-G.TrachokM.BakerT. L.SheyaA.HughesR. L. (2014). Parsing disciplinary disproportionality: Contributions of infraction, student, and school characteristics to out-of-school suspension and expulsion. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 640–670. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214541670
62.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
63.
SojaE. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell Publishers Inc.
64.
SojaE. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press.
65.
TateW. F. (2008). “Geography of opportunity”: Poverty, place, and educational outcomes. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08326409
66.
TeferaA. A.ArtilesA. J.Kramarczuk VoulgaridesC.AylwardA.AlvaradoS. (2023). The aftermath of disproportionality citations: Situating disability-race intersections in historical, spatial, and sociocultural contexts. American Educational Research Journal, 60(2), 367–404. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221147007
67.
TeferaA. A.FischmanG. E. (2020). How and why context matters in the study of racial disproportionality in special education: Toward a critical disability education policy approach. Equity & Excellence in Education, 53(4), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1791284
68.
TuckE. (2009). Re-visioning action: Participatory action research and indigenous theories of change. Urban Review, 41(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-008-0094-x
69.
TuckE.McKenzieM. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. Routledge.
VelezV.SolórzanoD. G. (2017). Critical race spatial analysis: Conceptualizing GIS as a tool for critical race research in education. In MorrisonD.AnnammaS. A.JacksonD. D. (Eds.), Critical race spatial analysis: Mapping to understand and address educational inequity (pp. 8–31). Stylus Streling.
72.
VizenorG. (2008). Survivance: Narratives of native presence. University of Nebraska Press.
73.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University.
74.
VygotskyL. S. (1993). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Plenum.
WelshR. O. (2023). Navigating tensions in school discipline: Examining school leaders, teachers, and the conversion of referrals into suspensions. American Journal of Education, 129(2), 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/723064
77.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (2019). Wisconsin’s Information System for Education Data Dashboard. Author.
WrightB. (1988). For the children of infidels? American Indian education in the colonial colleges. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 12(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17953/aicr.12.3.ht5837m3502m57w1
81.
WrightE. O. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. Verso.
