Teachers’ preference to remain close to where they grew up is recognized as a defining feature of the teacher labor market. Using a unique data set from a large school district in the southeastern United States, I apply a series of within–school and within–student comparisons to assess the effectiveness of homegrown teachers who returned to teach in their home district. Discrete time survival analysis is then used to examine differences in when early career teachers exit the district. Study results show that homegrown teachers make small but statistically meaningful improvements in student achievement in English language arts. They are also more likely to identify as Black compared with other beginning teachers and less likely to exit the district.
AchinsteinB.OgawaR. T.SextonD.FreitasC. (2010). Retaining teachers of color: A pressing problem and a potential strategy for “hard-to-staff” schools. Review of Educational Research, 80(1), 71–107. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309355994
AtteberryA.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2015). Do first impressions matter? Predicting early career teacher effectiveness. AERA Open, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415607834
5.
BiancoM.LeechN.Viesca-MitchellK. (2011). Pathways to teaching: African American male teens explore teaching as a career. Journal of Negro Education, 80(3), 368–383. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41341140
6.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20072
7.
BristolT. J. (2018). To be alone or in a group: An exploration into how the school–based experiences differ for Black male teachers across one urban school district. Urban Education, 53(3), 334-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917697200
8.
CableD. M.JudgeT. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0081
9.
Carter-AndrewsD. J.CastroE.ChoC. L.PetchauerE.RichmondG.FlodenR. (2019). Changing the narrative on diversifying the teaching workforce: A look at historical and contemporary factors that inform recruitment and retention of teachers of color. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118812418
10.
ChatmanJ. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person–organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/258171
11.
DalyA. J.MoolenaarN. M.BolivarJ. M.BurkeP. (2010). Relationships in reform: The role of teachers’ social networks. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(3), 359–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231011041062
12.
Dizon-RossE.LoebS.PennerE.RochmesJ. (2019). Stress in boom times: Understanding teachers’ economic anxiety in a high–cost urban district. AERA Open, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419879439
13.
Easton-BrooksD. (2019). Ethnic matching: Academic success of students of color. Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
EdwardsJ. R.CableD. M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 654–677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014891
15.
ElfenbeinH. A.O’ReillyC. A. (2007). “Fitting in”: The effects of relational demography and person–organization fit on group process and performance. Group & Organization Management, 32(1), 109–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106286882
16.
EngelM.CannataM. (2015) Localism and teacher labor markets: How geography and decision making may contribute to inequality. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.988533
FeldmanD. C.NgT. W.VogelR. M. (2012). Off-the-job embeddedness: A reconceptualization and agenda for future research. In MartocchioJ. J.JoshiA.LiaoH. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 31, pp. 209–251), Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-7301(2012)0000031008
19.
FrayL.GoreJ. (2018). Why people choose teaching: A scoping review of empirical studies, 2007–2016. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75(October), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.009
20.
GistC. D. (2018). Black educators fight back: Facing and navigating vulnerability and stress in teacher development. Urban Review, 50(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-018-0446-0
21.
GistC. D. (2022). Shifting dominant narratives of teacher development: New directions for expanding access to educator workforce through Grow Your Own programs. Educational Researcher, 51(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211049762
22.
GistC. D.BiancoM.LynnM. (2019). Examining Grow Your Own programs across the teacher development continuum: Mining research on teachers of color and nontraditional educator pipelines. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118787504
23.
GoingsR.BiancoM. (2016). Hard to be who you don't see: An exploration of Black male high school students’ perspectives on becoming teachers. Urban Review, 48(4), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0371-z
24.
GoldhaberD.KriegJ.NaitoN.TheobaldR. (2019). Student teaching and the geography of teacher shortages. Educational Researcher, 50(3), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20962099
25.
GoldhaberD.KriegJ. M.TheobaldR. (2017). Does the match matter? Exploring whether student teaching experiences affect teacher effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 325–359. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217690516
26.
GuarinoC. M.SatibañezL.DaleyG. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173–208. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076002173
27.
HarrisD. N.SassT. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
28.
HerreraS. G.MoralesA. R.HolmesM. A.TerryD. H. (2011). From remediation to acceleration: Recruiting, retaining, and graduating future culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) educators. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.13.2.e
29.
HoffmanB. J.WoehrD. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.003
30.
HoltomB. C.MitchellT. R.LeeT. W.EberlyM. (2008). Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 231–274. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211552
31.
HomP. W.LeeT. W.ShawJ. D.HausknechtJ. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000103
32.
HomP. W.MitchellT. R.LeeT. W.GriffethR. W. (2012). Reviewing employee turnover: Focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 831–858. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027983
33.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Education Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038003499
34.
IrizarryJ. G. (2007). “Home-growing” teachers of color: Lessons learned from a town–gown partnership. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(4), 87–102. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ795190.pdf
35.
IrvineJ. J. (1989). Beyond role models: An examination of cultural influences on the pedagogical perspectives of Black teachers. Peabody Journal of Education, 66(4), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619568909538662
36.
JabbarH.CannataM.GermainE.CastroA. (2020). It’s who you know: The role of social networks in a changing labor market. American Educational Research Journal, 57(4), 1485–1524. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219879092
37.
JacobB. A. (2007). The challenges of staffing urban schools with effective teachers. Future of Children, 17(1), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2007.0005
38.
JiangK.LiuD.McKayP. F.LeeT. W.MitchellT. R. (2012). When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta–analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028610
39.
KalogridesD.LoebS. (2013). Different teachers, different peers: The magnitude of student sorting within schools. Educational Researcher, 42(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13495087
40.
KardosS. M.JohnsonS. M. (2007). On their own and presumed expert: New teachers’ experience with their colleagues. Teachers College Record, 109(9), 2083–2106.
41.
KaufmanJ. H.MasterB. K.HuguetA.TooP. Y.Faxon-MillsS.SchulkerD.GrimmG. E. (2020). Growing teachers from within: Implementation, impact, and cost of an alternative teacher preparation program in three urban school districts. Rand Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA256-1
42.
KiazadK.HoltomB. C.HomP. W.NewmanA. (2015). Job embeddedness: A multifoci theoretical extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038919
KraftM. A.MarinellW. H.YeeD. (2016). School organizational contexts, teacher turnover, and student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1411–1499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216667478
45.
KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476–500. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713519496
46.
KriegJ. M.TheobaldR.GoldhaberD. (2016). A foot in the door: Exploring the role of student teaching assignments in teachers’ initial job placements. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 364–388. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716630739
47.
KristofA. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
48.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta–analysis of person–job, person-organization, person–group, and person- supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
49.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
50.
LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024001037
51.
LeeT. W.BurchT. C.MitchellT. R. (2014). The story of why we stay: A review of job embeddedness. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091244
52.
LeeT. W.MitchellT. R.SablynskiC. J.BurtonJ. P.HoltomB. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 711–722. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159613
53.
MaertzC. P.GriffethR. W. (2004). Eight motivational forces and voluntary turnover: A theoretical synthesis with implications for research. Journal of Management, 30(5), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.04.001
54.
McKinney de RoystonM.MadkinsT. C.GivensJ. R.NasirN. i. S. (2020). “I’m a Teacher, I'm Gonna Always Protect You”: Understanding Black Educators’ Protection of Black Children. American Educational Research Journal, 58(1), 58–106. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220921119
55.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1991). A three–component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
56.
MillerJ. M.YoungsP. (2021). Person-organization fit and first–year teacher retention in the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97(January), 103226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103226
57.
MillerJ. M.YoungsP.PerroneF.GroganE. (2020). Using measures of fit to predict beginning teacher retention. Elementary School Journal, 120(3), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1086/707094
MitchellT. R.LeeT. W. (2001). The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 189–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23006-8
NgE. S. W.BurkeR. J. (2005). The person–organization fit and the war for talent: Does diversity management make a difference?International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(7), 1195–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500144038
62.
NgT. W. H.FeldmanD. C. (2009). Occupational embeddedness and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 863–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.580
63.
NguyenT. D.PhamL. D.CrouchM.SpringerM. G. (2020). The correlates of teacher turnover: An updated and expanded Meta-analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 31(November), 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100355
NyeB.KonstantopoulousS.HedgesL. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737026003237
66.
PapayJ. P.Bacher-HicksA.PageL. C.MarinellW. H. (2017). The challenge of teacher retention in urban schools: Evidence of variation from a cross–site analysis. Educational Researcher, 46(8), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17735812
67.
PearmanF. A. (2019). Gentrification and academic achievement: A review of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 125–165. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318805924
68.
PlayerD.YoungsP.PerroneF.GroganE. (2017). How principal leadership and person–job fit are associated with teacher mobility and attrition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67(October), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.017
69.
ReddingC. (2019). A teacher like me: A review of the effect of student–teacher racial/ethnic matching on teacher perceptions of students and student academic and behavioral outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319853545
70.
ReddingC.HenryG. T. (2018). New evidence on the frequency of teacher turnover: Accounting for within–year turnover. Educational Researcher, 47(9), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18814450
71.
ReddingC.NguyenT. (2020). Recent trends in the characteristics of new teachers, the schools in which they teach, and their turnover rates. Teachers College Record, 122(7), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200711
72.
ReiningerM. (2012). Hometown disadvantage? It depends on where you're from: Teachers’ location preferences and the implications for staffing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711420864
73.
RonfeldtM. (2015). Field placement schools and instructional effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(4), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115592463
74.
RonfeldtM.FarmerS. O.McQueenK.GrissomJ. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215585562
SimonN. S.JohnsonS. M. (2015). Teacher turnover in high–poverty schools: What I know and can do. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700305
77.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press.
78.
SpillaneJ. P.HopkinsM.SweetT. M. (2017). School district educational infrastructure and change at scale: Teacher peer interactions and their beliefs about mathematics instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 532–571. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217743928
79.
SunM. (2018). Black teachers’ retention and transfer patterns in North Carolina: How do patterns vary by teacher effectiveness, subject, and school conditions?AERA Open, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418784914
80.
SunM.LoebS.GrissomJ. A. (2017). Building teacher teams: Positive spillover from more effective colleagues. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 104–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716665698
81.
SunM.PenuelW. R.FrankK. A.GallagherA.YoungsP. (2013). Shaping professional development to promote the diffusion of instructional expertise among teachers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(3), 344–369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713482763
82.
SutcherL.Darling-HammondL.Carver-ThomasD. (2016). A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/247.242
83.
VillagómezA. A.Easton-BrooksD.GomezK.LubbesT.JohnsonK. (2016). Oregon Teacher Pathway: Responding to national trends. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1121455
84.
VillegasA. M.IrvineJ. J. (2010). Diversifying the teaching force: An examination of major arguments. Urban Review, 42(3), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-010-0150-1
85.
WilliamsS. M.SwainW. A.GrahamJ. A. (2021). Race, climate, and turnover: An examination of the teacher labor market in rural Georgia. AERA Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858421995514
86.
YoungsP.PogodzinskiB.GroganE.PerroneF. (2015). Person-organization fit and research on instruction. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15569531
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
