Half of kindergarten teachers split children into higher and lower ability groups for reading or math. In national data, we predicted kindergarten ability group placement using linear and ordinal logistic regression with classroom fixed effects. In fall, test scores were the best predictors of group placement, but there was bias favoring girls, high-SES (socioeconomic status) children, and Asian Americans, who received higher placements than their scores alone would predict. Net of SES, there was no bias against placing black children in higher groups. By spring, one third of kindergartners moved groups, and high-SES children moved up more than their score gains alone would predict. Teacher-reported behaviors (e.g., attentiveness, approaches to learning) helped explain girls’ higher placements, but did little to explain the higher placements of Asian American and high-SES children.
AllenM. J.YenW. M. (2001). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press.
2.
AllisonP. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/271083
3.
AllisonP. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models (1st ed.). Sage.
4.
AntonacciP. (2000). Reading in the zone of proximal development: Mediating literacy development in beginner readers through guided reading. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 41(1), Article 2. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol41/iss1/2
5.
BaetschmannG.BallantyneA.StaubK. E.WinkelmannR. (2020). feologit: A new command for fitting fixed-effects ordered logit models. The Stata Journal, 20(2), 253–275.
6.
BettsJ. R.ShkolnikJ. L. (1999). Key difficulties in identifying the effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 19(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(99)00022-9
7.
BraddockJ. H.SlavinR. E. (1992). Why ability grouping must end: Achieving excellence and equity in American education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED355296
8.
ButtaroA.Jr.CatsambisS.MulkeyL. M.SteelmanL. C. (2010). An organizational perspective on the origins of instructional segregation: School composition and use of within-class ability grouping in American kindergartens. Teachers College Record, 112(5), 1300–1337. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ888478
9.
CatsambisS.MulkeyL. M.ButtaroA.Jr.SteelmanL. C.KochP. R. (2012). Examining gender differences in ability group placement at the onset of schooling: The role of skills, behaviors, and teacher evaluations. Journal of Educational Research, 105(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.514779
10.
ChorzempaB. F.GrahamS. (2006). Primary-grade teachers’ use of within-class ability grouping in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.529
11.
CirinoP. T.ChinC. E.SevcikR. A.WolfM.LovettM.MorrisR. D. (2002). Measuring socioeconomic status: Reliability and preliminary validity for different approaches. Assessment, 9(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/10791102009002005
12.
CondronD. J. (2007). Stratification and educational sorting: Explaining ascriptive inequalities in early childhood reading group placement. Social Problems, 54(1), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.139
13.
DarleyJ. M.GrossP. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.20
14.
DeMarsC. (2010). Item response theory. Oxford University Press.
DeunkM. I.Smale-JacobseA. E.de BoerH.DoolaardS.BoskerR. J. (2018). Effective differentiation Practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24(June), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002
17.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.PaganiL. S.FeinsteinL.EngelM.Brooks-GunnJ.SextonH.DuckworthK.JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
18.
DuncanG. J.MagnusonK. (2011). The nature and impact of early achievement skills, attention skills, and behavior problems. In DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances. Russell Sage Foundation.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (1990). Social skills rating system: Manual. American Guidance Service.
22.
HallerE. J. (1985). Pupil race and elementary school ability grouping: Are teachers biased against Black children?American Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312022004465
23.
HallerE. J.DavisS. A. (1980). Does socioeconomic status bias the assignment of elementary school students to reading groups?American Educational Research Journal, 17(4), 409–481. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312017004409
24.
HallinanM. T.SorensenA. B. (1983). The formation and stability of instructional groups. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 838–851. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095329
25.
HansonA.HawleyZ.MartinH.LiuB. (2016). Discrimination in mortgage lending: Evidence from a correspondence experiment. Journal of Urban Economics, 92(March), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.12.004
LockwoodJ. R.McCaffreyD. F. (2020). Recommendations about estimating errors-in-variables regression in Stata. Stata Journal, 20(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X20909692
31.
LynchR.WasielewskiH.CronkL. (2018). Sexual conflict and the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: Females prefer daughters and males prefer sons. Scientific Reports, 8(1), Article 15463. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33650-1
32.
MarshH. W.SeatonM.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.HauK. T.O’MaraA. J.CravenR. G. (2008). The Big-fish–little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6
33.
MasonB. A.GunerselA. B.NeyE. A. (2014). Cultural and ethnic bias in teacher ratings of behavior: A criterion-focused review. Psychology in the Schools, 51(10), 1017–1030. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21800
34.
McClellandM. M.CameronC. E.DuncanR.BowlesR. P.AcockA. C.MiaoA.PrattM. E. (2014). Predictors of early growth in academic achievement: The head-toes-knees-shoulders task. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00599
35.
MoatsL. C. (2020). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers (3rd ed.). Brookes.
NajarianM.TourangeauK.NordC.Wallner-AllenK.MulliganG. M. (2018). Early childhood longitudinal study, kindergarten class of 2010–11 (ECLS-K:2011): Kindergarten Psychometric Report. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018182.pdf
38.
NationK.SnowlingM. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01250.x
39.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Fall 2010 Kindergarten Teacher Questionnaire (Child Level), early childhood longitudinal study, kindergarten class of 2010-11. U.S. Department of Education.
40.
NCS Pearson. (1990). Social skills rating system.
41.
Northwest Evaluation Association. (2010). Technical manual for measures of academic progress and measures of academic progress for primary grades.
42.
OakesJ.LiptonM. (1990). Tracking and ability grouping: A structural barrier to access and achievement. In Access to knowledge: An agenda for our nation’s schools (pp. 187–204). College Entrance Examination Board.
43.
OkonofuaJ. A.EberhardtJ. L. (2015). Two strikes: Race and the disciplining of young students. Psychological Science, 26(5), 617–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615570365
44.
PallasA. M.EntwisleD. R.AlexanderK. L.StlukaM. F. (1994). Ability-group effects: Instructional, social, or institutional?Sociology of Education, 67(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112748
45.
PhelpsE. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62(4), 659–661.
46.
PutnamS. P.RothbartM. K. (2006). Development of short and very short forms of the Children’s Behavior Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_09
47.
QuinnD. M. (2020). Experimental evidence on teachers’ racial bias in student evaluation: The role of grading scales. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720932188
48.
ReadyD. D.WrightD. L. (2011). Accuracy and inaccuracy in teachers’ perceptions of young children’s cognitive abilities: The role of child background and classroom context. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210374874
49.
ReynoldsC. R.SuzukiL. A. (2012). Bias in psychological assessment. In Handbook of psychology (2nd ed., pp. 82–113). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop210004
50.
RistR. C. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in Ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 40(3), 411–451. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.40.3.h0m026p670k618q3
51.
RothbartM. K.AhadiS. A.HersheyK. L.FisherP. (2001). Investigations of temperament at three to seven years: The Children’s Behavior Questionnaire. Child Development, 72(5), 1394–1408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00355
52.
RudmanL. A.GoodwinS. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494
53.
SplettJ. W.Smith-MillmanM.RabornA.BrannK. L.FlaspohlerP. D.MarasM. A. (2018). Student, teacher, and classroom predictors of between-teacher variance of students’ teacher-rated behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000241
54.
StataCorp. (2019). Stata base reference manual, Release 16. Stata Press.
55.
Steenbergen-HuS.MakelM. C.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417
56.
TachL. M.FarkasG. (2006). Learning-related behaviors, cognitive skills, and ability grouping when schooling begins. Social Science Research, 35(4), 1048–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.08.001
TourangeauK.NordC.LêT.Wallner-AllenK.Vaden-KiernanN.BlakerL.NajarianM. (2018). User’s manual for the ECLS-K:2011 kindergarten–Third grade data file and electronic codebook, public version (NCES 2018034). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018034
59.
UrsacheA.BlairC.RaverC. C. (2012). The promotion of self-regulation as a means of enhancing school readiness and early achievement in children at risk for school failure. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00209.x
60.
UseemE. L. (1992). Middle schools and math groups: parents’ involvement in children’s placement. Sociology of Education, 65(4), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112770
61.
von HippelP. T.HamrockC. (2019). Do test score gaps grow before, during, or between the school years? Measurement artifacts and what we can know in spite of them. Sociological Science, 6, 43–80. https://doi.org/10.15195/v6.a3
62.
von HippelP. T.WorkmanJ.DowneyD. B. (2018). Inequality in reading and math skills forms mainly before kindergarten: A replication, and partial correction, of “are schools the great equalizer?”Sociology of Education, 91(4), 323–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718801760
WooldridgeJ. M. (2001). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (1st ed.). The MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
