Using a nationally representative sample of U.S. public school districts, we explored the current landscape of social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) approaches and their impact on behavioral outcomes. Data suggest SEB screening is the exception rather than the rule, with most districts reporting that students are referred to an internal support team when SEB concerns arise. Districts more likely to report SEB problems were identified and supported internally when they had elementary SEB programs, were located in urban areas, and had higher socioeconomic status levels. District administrators who reported that SEB problems were identified and addressed internally, including use of universal screening procedures, reported the highest levels of knowledge about their SEB approach as well as willingness to change their practices.
AaronsG. A.HurlburtM.HorwitzS. M. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(January), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7
2.
BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M.CintronD.McCoachD. B. (2019). Factorial invariance of the usage rating profile for supporting students’ behavioral needs (URP-NEEDS). School Psychology, 35(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000309
3.
BruhnA. L.Woods-GrovesS.HuddleS. (2014). A preliminary investigation of emotional and behavioral screening practices in K-12 schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(4), 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2014.0039
4.
ChafouleasS. M.BrieschA. M.McCoachD. B.DineenJ. N. (2018). Usage Rating Profile–NEEDS. University of Connecticut.
5.
ChafouleasS. M.VolpeR. J.GreshamF. M.CookC. (2010). School-based behavioral assessment within problem-solving models: Current status and future directions. School Psychology Review, 34(3), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087756
6.
CholewaB.HullM. F.BabcockC. R.SmithA. D. (2018). Predictors and academic outcomes associated with in-school suspension. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(2), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000213
7.
ChuE. M.ReadyD. D. (2018). Exclusion and urban public high schools: Short- and long-term consequences of school suspensions. American Journal of Education, 124(4), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1086/698454
8.
EklundK.KilgusS.von der EmbseN.BeardmoreM.TannerN. (2017). Use of universal screening scores to predict distal academic and behavioral outcomes: A multilevel approach. Psychological Assessment, 29(5), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000355
9.
EklundK.KilpatrickK. D.KilgusS.HaiderA. (2019). A systematic review of state-level social-emotional learning standards: Implications for practice and research. School Psychology Review, 47(3), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017.0116.V47-3
GloverT. A.AlbersC. A. (2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. Journal of School Psychology, 45(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.005
13.
GuoS.FraserM. W. (2009). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Sage.
14.
HoagwoodK. E.AtkinsM.HorwitzS.KutashK.OlinS. S.BurnsB.Peth-PierceR.KuppingerA.BurtonG.ShorterP.KelleherK. J. (2017). A response to proposed budget cuts affecting children's mental health: Protecting policies and programs that promote collective efficacy. Psychiatric Services, 69(3), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700126
15.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.OakesW. P.KalbergJ. R. (2020). Developing a schoolwide framework to prevent and manage learning and behavior problems. Guilford Press.
16.
LaneK. L.OakesW.MenziesH. (2010). Systematic screenings to prevent the development of learning and behavior problems: Considerations for practitioners, researchers, and policy makers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(3), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207310379123
17.
MarcyH. M.DineenJ. N.McCoachD. B.ChafouleasS. M.BrieschA. M. (2018). The NEEDs2 Project: Project methodology. University of Connecticut. https://needs2.education.uconn.edu
18.
MenziesH. M.LaneK. L. (2012). Validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale: Evidence of predictive validity in a diverse, suburban elementary setting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426610389613
19.
MerikangasK. R.HeJ.BursteinM.SwendsenJ.AvenevoliS.CaseB.GeorgiadesK.HeatonL.SwansonS.OlfsonM. (2011). Service utilization for lifetime mental disorders in US adolescents: Results of the national comorbidity Survey-Adolescent supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.10.006
20.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Fostering healthy mental, emotional, and behavioral development in children and youth: A national agenda. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25201
21.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Common Core of Data (CCD): Local Education Agency (school district) universe survey data. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubagency.asp
OlfsonM.DrussB. G.MarcusS. C. (2015). Trends in mental health care among children and adolescents. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 2029–2038. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1413512
24.
PanW.BaiH. (2015). Propensity score analysis: Fundamentals and development. Guilford Press.
25.
PerouR.BitskoR. H.BlumbergS. J.PastorP.GhandourR. M.GfroererJ. C.HeddenS. L.CrosbyA. E.VisserS. N.SchieveL. A.ParksS. E.HallJ. E.BrodyD.SimileC. M.ThompsonW. M.BaioJ.AvenevoliS.KoganM. D.HuangL. N. (2013). Mental health surveillance among children: United States, 2005–2011. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 62(Suppl. 2), 1–35. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6202a1.htm
RobinsJ. M.HernanM. A.BrumbackB. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 5(11), 550–560.0
28.
RomerD.McIntoshM. (2005). The roles and perspectives of school mental health professionals in promoting adolescent mental health. In EvansD.FoaE.GurR.HendinH.O’BrienC.SeligmanM.WalshB. (Eds.), Treating and preventing adolescent mental health disorders: What we know and what we don't know (pp. 598–615). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780195173642.003.0032
SplettJ. W.ChafouleasS. M.GeorgeM. W. R. (2018). Accessing behavioral health services: Introduction to a special issue of research, policy, and practice. School Mental Health, 10(June), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-018-9262-7
31.
StataCorp. (2017). Stata User's Guide Release 15.
32.
StifflerM. C.DeverB. V. (2015). Contemporary issues in psychological assessment. Mental health screening at school: Instrumentation, implementation, and critical issues. Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19171-3
33.
TruscottS. D.CohenC. E.SamsD. P.SanbornK. J.FrankA. J. (2005). The current state(s) of prereferral intervention teams: A report from two national surveys. Remedial and Special Education, 26(3), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260030101
34.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families.
35.
WelshM. E.MillerF. G.KookenJ.ChafouleasS. M.McCoachD. B. (2016). The kindergarten transition: Behavioral trajectories in the first formal year of school, Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 30(4), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2016.1214935
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
